Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation

176 soru

Soru 41Soru

Environmental scientists recently deployed underwater acoustic speakers broadcasting healthy reef soundscapes along a degraded coastline to attract free-swimming fish larvae, hoping to regenerate local kelp forests. Within six months of continuous broadcast, fish larval settlement along the treated coastline tripled, and local kelp canopy density increased by 40 percent. The scientists concluded that the soundscape-induced influx of fish larvae directly accelerated the recovery of the kelp forest. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the scientists' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The predominant species of fish larvae attracted by the soundscapes feed aggressively on juvenile sea urchins, which are the primary herbivores responsible for destroying kelp holdfasts in the region.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by the statement establishing that the attracted fish larvae consume juvenile sea urchins, the primary destroyers of kelp holdfasts.
The conclusion claims that the influx of fish larvae directly caused the kelp forest's recovery. The statement about fish larvae preying on juvenile sea urchins supplies a direct biological mechanism connecting fish larvae to kelp survival: by consuming sea urchins (which destroy kelp holdfasts), the larvae reduce kelp mortality, directly explaining how their presence accelerates kelp canopy growth.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core argument structure.
Premise 1: Soundscapes increased fish larvae settlement threefold. Premise 2: Kelp canopy density increased by 40%. Conclusion: The influx of fish larvae directly accelerated the kelp forest recovery.
Identifying the leap from correlation (larvae increase coincided with kelp increase) to causation (larvae caused kelp increase) is necessary to determine what support is required.
2
Identify the logical gap or missing link.
The argument assumes a causal connection between the presence of fish larvae and the growth of kelp without explicitly stating how fish larvae benefit kelp.
To strengthen a causal argument, an option must provide a plausible biological mechanism connecting the cause to the effect or rule out alternative causes.
3
Evaluate the choices against the logical gap.
The option stating that the larvae feed on sea urchins (which destroy kelp) supplies the exact causal mechanism needed to show that fish larvae actively protect kelp.
Connecting fish larvae behavior directly to the suppression of kelp predators validates the author's causal conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Supplying a Causal Mechanism
Soru 42Soru

Read the following argument regarding environmental economic policy carefully, and match each boldfaced statement to its specific structural role within the overall argument:

Many economic analysts contend that imposing a carbon tax on domestic manufacturing will severely undermine international competitiveness. Data from pilot tax programs show that domestic manufacturers offset compliance costs by improving energy efficiency. Based on this finding, environmental advocates argue that carbon taxation yields net environmental gains without hurting economic output. However, this argument falsely assumes that energy efficiency gains can be scaled indefinitely across all manufacturing sectors. Therefore, implementing a comprehensive carbon tax under current conditions is likely to cause substantial net harm to domestic industry.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

First boldfaced statement ("Data from pilot tax programs...")
Second boldfaced statement ("However, this argument falsely assumes...")
Third boldfaced statement ("implementing a comprehensive carbon tax...")

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement matches 'Evidence cited to support a position that the author ultimately criticizes.', the second boldfaced statement matches 'A premise offered by the author to undermine the reasoning of an opposing group.', and the third boldfaced statement matches 'The main conclusion reached by the author of the argument.'
The first boldfaced statement introduces empirical evidence from pilot programs that supports the environmental advocates' view, which the author subsequently refutes. The second boldfaced statement serves as a counter-premise directly targeting an unstated assumption of those advocates. The third boldfaced statement is the final claim supported by the author's rebuttal, making it the main conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main argument flow and identify the author's stance.
The author concludes that implementing a comprehensive carbon tax under current conditions is likely to cause substantial net harm to domestic industry.
Establishing the main conclusion anchors the overall structural organization of the passage.
2
Determine the role of the first boldface statement.
It describes empirical data showing energy efficiency improvements, which environmental advocates use to support carbon taxation. The author later refutes this advocacy.
Recognizing that this evidence supports an opposing view helps classify it as evidence for a criticized position.
3
Determine the role of the second boldface statement.
It directly attacks the environmental advocates' argument by highlighting an unviable assumption regarding scaling.
This statement functions as the author's premise used to weaken the intermediate counter-position.
4
Determine the role of the third boldface statement.
Introduced by 'Therefore', it states the final judgment of the author.
This statement represents the author's main conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Boldface Statement Roles and Argument Structure
Soru 43Soru

A small local bakery introduced a new sugar-free pastry line last month, hoping to attract health-conscious customers. During that same month, the bakery's total sales increased by 20 percent. The owner concludes that introducing the sugar-free pastry line was the main cause of the increase in total sales. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the owner's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Customer surveys conducted last month showed that the majority of new customers visited the bakery specifically to purchase the new sugar-free pastries.

Cevap

Customer surveys conducted last month showed that the majority of new customers visited the bakery specifically to purchase the new sugar-free pastries.
The conclusion asserts a causal relationship between the launch of sugar-free pastries and the 20 percent sales increase. Showing that most new customers were drawn to the shop specifically by the sugar-free pastries provides direct evidence that the new line was indeed the driver of the increased sales.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.
Premises: Sugar-free pastries introduced last month; total sales rose 20% that month. Conclusion: The sugar-free line caused the sales increase.
To strengthen an argument, one must first isolate the core gap between evidence and conclusion.
2
Identify the assumption or missing link.
The argument assumes the sales growth came from buyers of the new sugar-free pastries rather than external factors or increased sales of traditional items.
A strengthening statement will confirm this link or eliminate major alternative explanations.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that directly supports the causal link.
The statement showing that most new customers came specifically for the sugar-free pastries directly confirms that the new line drove the sales increase.
Direct evidence of consumer motivation confirms the proposed cause-and-effect relationship.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 44Soru

A recent municipal study observed that residents living within walking distance of public parks report significantly lower average stress levels than residents living in urban areas without green space. Based on this observation, city planners concluded that creating more public parks directly causes a reduction in the stress levels of nearby residents. Which of the following would be most important to determine in evaluating the city planners' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether individuals with naturally lower stress levels are more likely to select housing locations near public parks.

Cevap

Determining whether individuals with lower stress levels naturally choose to live near parks evaluates the possibility of reverse causality.
The argument infers a direct causal link (proximity to parks reduces stress) from an observed correlation. To evaluate this claim, one must consider alternative explanations, such as reverse causality or self-selection. Determining whether lower-stress individuals systematically choose to live near parks tests whether pre-existing low stress determines housing choice rather than park proximity causing stress reduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the Premise and Conclusion in the argument
Premise: People near parks have lower stress than people far from parks. Conclusion: Parks directly cause lower stress.
The argument concludes causation based solely on an observed correlation between proximity to parks and lower stress.
2
Identify the key causal vulnerability
The argument assumes directionality (Park \rightarrow Lower Stress) without ruling out reverse causality (Lower Stress / Preference \rightarrow Choosing to live near a Park) or confounding variables.
A standard method for evaluating a causal claim is to test whether the presumed effect actually caused the presumed cause.
3
Evaluate the impact of self-selection
If stressed-free or health-conscious people move near parks, the correlation exists because of self-selection, invalidating the claim that parks cause the lower stress.
Determining this alternative direction directly tests the validity of the author's causal leap.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Causal Arguments and Alternative Explanations
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 45Soru

Over the past two years, an agricultural cooperative in an arid valley replaced traditional flood irrigation with an advanced drip-irrigation system across all its member farms. Although the new system reduced water usage per cultivated acre by 30 percent, total agricultural water consumption across the valley rose substantially during the same period. This increase occurred despite stable weather conditions and no changes in non-agricultural water demands.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The lower water cost per acre made farming profitable enough for member farms to expand their total cultivated land significantly by planting previously uncultivated acreage.

Cevap

The correct answer is that the lower water cost per acre made farming profitable enough for farmers to expand their total cultivated land significantly by planting previously uncultivated acreage.
The correct answer resolves the paradox by bridging the rate-versus-total-volume gap. Total agricultural water consumption depends on both the water required per acre and the total number of acres farmed. If the per-acre water savings lower operating costs enough to induce farmers to cultivate significantly more land, total water usage across all land can increase even as each individual acre uses 30 percent less water.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two contradictory empirical facts presented in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Water usage per cultivated acre decreased by 30%. Fact 2: Total agricultural water consumption in the region increased substantially.
Resolving a paradox requires finding a factor that allows both stated premises to remain true simultaneously.
2
Analyze the mathematical relationship between the rate (per acre) and the total volume.
Total Water Consumption = (Water Usage per Acre) × (Total Number of Acres). If per-acre usage drops, total volume can only increase if the total number of acres increases by a greater proportion.
Recognizing the underlying rate versus absolute total relationship highlights what missing variable is required.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify which one provides the necessary reconciling factor.
The option stating that farmers expanded their total cultivated land accounts for the increase in total water volume while preserving the fact that each acre used less water.
This supplies the missing cause for the overall volume increase without disputing either stated premise.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving Paradoxes: Rate vs. Total Volume Discrepancy
Tahmini Süre:1m 40s
Soru 46Soru

In the city of Valera, municipal authorities recently implemented a dedicated bus rapid transit (BRT) lane along the main commercial corridor, reducing automotive traffic lanes by fifty percent. Despite initial concerns from local merchants that the loss of driving lanes and street parking would reduce customer traffic, total retail sales along the corridor increased by twelve percent during the six months following implementation. City officials concluded that the BRT system was the primary driver of this increase in retail sales. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the city officials' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the same six-month period, retail sales in comparable commercial corridors in Valera that lacked BRT lanes remained virtually unchanged.

Cevap

The statement that retail sales in comparable commercial corridors without BRT lanes remained virtually unchanged during the same period provides the strongest support for the conclusion.
The conclusion asserts a causal relationship between the introduction of the BRT system and the rise in corridor retail sales. To strengthen this causal argument, evidence must show that the effect is specifically associated with the BRT system rather than a broader trend. Showing that comparable commercial corridors in the same city without BRT lanes saw no sales growth serves as a control comparison, ruling out citywide economic factors or inflation and isolating the BRT system as the likely driver.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument structure
Premise: BRT lane added; retail sales in corridor increased 12%. Conclusion: The BRT system caused the retail sales increase.
Identifying the premises and conclusion clarifies the author's causal claim.
2
Identify the central assumption and weakness
The argument assumes correlation equals causation and ignores potential external factors such as citywide economic growth, inflation, or seasonal trends.
Strengthening a causal conclusion requires ruling out alternative explanations or confirming a comparative baseline.
3
Evaluate the options against the strengthening objective
The option showing that similar corridors without BRT experienced no sales change acts as a control group, ruling out citywide economic growth as an alternative cause.
Eliminating alternative explanations directly reinforces the claim that the BRT system was responsible for the increase.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Ruling Out Alternative Explanations
Soru 47Soru

A municipal health agency recently installed advanced air-purification filtration systems in all public primary schools located in Sector 4, a district known for high levels of industrial particulate pollution. Over the six months following the installation, student absenteeism due to respiratory illnesses in Sector 4 primary schools dropped by 30 percent compared to the same period in previous years. Concluding that the filtration systems were directly responsible for this health improvement, city officials plan to expand the installation of these systems to all public secondary schools in Sector 4.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the city officials' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the six months following the installation, the total ambient concentration of industrial particulate pollution throughout Sector 4 remained at or above historical averages.

Cevap

The argument is most strongly supported by the statement indicating that ambient outdoor pollution levels remained at or above historical averages during the six-month trial period.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal link between the newly installed air-purification systems and a 30 percent reduction in respiratory illness absenteeism. A classic vulnerability in causal arguments is that an unmentioned external factor—such as a general decrease in district-wide ambient pollution—might actually account for the outcome. The statement establishing that overall ambient pollution in Sector 4 remained at or above historical levels effectively rules out lower external pollution as an alternative explanation, thereby strengthening the conclusion that the indoor filtration systems caused the health improvement.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the Argument Structure
Premise: Indoor air filters were installed in Sector 4 primary schools, and respiratory absenteeism fell by 30%. Conclusion: The filtration systems were directly responsible for the reduction in respiratory illness.
Identifying the premise and conclusion reveals the underlying causal claim: Air Filters (Cause) -> Decreased Respiratory Illness (Effect).
2
Identify the Logical Vulnerability
The argument assumes correlation equals causation and ignores potential confounding variables, such as a natural decrease in overall outdoor pollution during those six months.
To strengthen a causal argument, one must eliminate alternative causes for the observed effect.
3
Evaluate the Impact of Ruling Out an Alternative Cause
Confirming that outdoor pollution remained high confirms that the drop in respiratory illness was not simply due to cleaner outdoor air, strongly reinforcing the contribution of the indoor filters.
Ruling out a major confounding variable directly bolsters the validity of the author's causal conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Claims by Ruling Out Alternative Causes
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 48Soru

Archaeologists analyzing late-Bronze Age settlements along the upper Rhine found that around 1200 BCE, local pottery began exhibiting high concentrations of pine resin, an organic sealant used to preserve liquids. Concurrently, environmental soil core samples reveal a sharp spike in regional timber harvests, despite evidence that local population density and building construction remained stable. Scholars conclude that the settlements increased tree-felling primarily to produce pine resin for export containers. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the scholars' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Extracting and processing pine resin in quantities sufficient to line large volumes of export containers required burning substantial amounts of harvested timber to fuel pitch-kilns.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by establishing that extracting pine resin required burning large quantities of timber in pitch-kilns, directly linking increased tree-felling to resin production.
The correct answer provides the critical missing link in the argument's causal chain. The scholars conclude that tree-felling increased specifically to manufacture pine resin. Showing that resin extraction is a wood-intensive process requiring large amounts of fuel for pitch-kilns directly accounts for the timber harvest spike and strongly reinforces the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure into premises and conclusion
Premises: (1) Pottery showed high pine resin around 1200 BCE. (2) Timber harvests spiked sharply at the same time. (3) Population and building construction did not increase. Conclusion: Tree-felling increased primarily to produce pine resin for export containers.
Identifying the logic gap requires clearly distinguishing the observed evidence from the author's causal claim.
2
Identify the unstated assumption or logical gap
The argument assumes that producing pine resin consumes or requires large amounts of harvested timber, explaining why timber harvests would spike alongside resin production.
Without a clear operational link showing how resin production leads to timber consumption, the correlation between tree-felling and resin presence remains unproven.
3
Evaluate choices to find the one that confirms the operational link
The statement explaining that pitch-kilns consumed massive amounts of timber to extract pine resin supplies the missing operational link.
Connecting timber felling directly to the resin extraction process eliminates missing steps in the causal chain and strongly validates the author's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Supplying a Missing Operational Mechanism
Soru 49Soru

A coalition of environmental policy analysts recently advocated for an immediate municipal tax on industrial carbon emissions, arguing that higher operational costs would compel manufacturing firms to transition swiftly to renewable energy sources. However, this proposal relies on the unproven assumption that alternative energy infrastructure in industrial zones is already capable of supporting existing power loads. Currently, regional transmission grids suffer from severe capacity bottlenecks that prevent the integration of high-voltage renewable power. Consequently, imposing an immediate tax will force heavy manufacturers to curtail production output rather than upgrade facilities, thereby undermining regional economic growth without accelerating green transition goals.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a claim introduced by the author to challenge the feasibility of a proposed policy; the second is the author's main conclusion.

Cevap

The statement identifying the first boldface as a claim introduced to challenge the feasibility of a proposed policy and the second boldface as the author's main conclusion is correct.
The correct option accurately captures the functional structure of the argument. The author begins by presenting a policy proposed by environmental analysts and immediately uses the first boldface statement to attack an unproven assumption underlying that policy. After providing supporting evidence regarding grid bottlenecks, the author uses the second boldface statement—signaled by the keyword 'Consequently'—to state the overall main conclusion of the passage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main argument structure and identify the opposing view
The argument begins by summarizing a proposal by environmental policy analysts (imposing an immediate municipal tax on industrial carbon emissions).
Understanding the overall context allows us to determine whose voice is speaking in each part of the passage.
2
Evaluate the role of the first boldface statement
The author introduces the first boldface ('However, this proposal relies on the unproven assumption...') to directly target and criticize a flaw in the analysts' proposal.
This establishes that the first boldface is a premise used by the author to undermine the feasibility of the proposed tax policy.
3
Evaluate the role of the supporting evidence and the second boldface statement
The sentence following the first boldface provides factual evidence regarding grid bottlenecks. The second boldface ('Consequently, imposing an immediate tax will force heavy manufacturers to curtail production...') presents the author's final, overarching claim about the negative outcome of the tax.
The conclusion marker 'Consequently' introduces the author's primary judgment and main conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Boldface Statement Roles in Critical Reasoning
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 50Soru

Read the following argument regarding urban transport policy carefully, focusing on the roles played by the bolded statements:

Many urban planners contend that introducing congestion pricing in central business districts will inevitably reduce commercial activity by discouraging consumers from driving downtown. However, [1] this position overlooks the reality that severe traffic gridlock itself imposes substantial monetary costs on local merchants by delaying deliveries and curtailing customer turnover. Furthermore, empirical data from metropolitan areas with peak-hour tolls show that retail foot traffic increases once gridlock is alleviated. Therefore, [2] the claim that congestion pricing inherently harms central district businesses is unfounded, and municipal governments [3] should proceed with implementing peak-hour tolls to revitalize urban commercial centers.

Match each bolded statement from the passage to its exact structural role in the argument.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

First bolded statement: "[1] this position overlooks the reality that severe traffic gridlock itself imposes substantial monetary costs on local merchants by delaying deliveries and curtailing customer turnover."
Second bolded statement: "[2] the claim that congestion pricing inherently harms central district businesses is unfounded,"
Third bolded statement: "[3] should proceed with implementing peak-hour tolls to revitalize urban commercial centers."

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Statement 1 matches the premise supporting the author's rebuttal of the opposing position; Statement 2 matches the intermediate conclusion refuting the opponent's claim; Statement 3 matches the main conclusion containing the final policy proposal.
Statement [1] functions as a premise introduced after the transition word 'However' to challenge the urban planners' assumptions. Statement [2] draws a sub-conclusion that the planners' claim is unfounded, based on the evidence provided in statement [1] and the empirical data. Statement [3] presents the author's primary recommendation and final thesis, supported by the sub-conclusion in statement [2]. Matching statement [1] to the premise role, statement [2] to the intermediate conclusion role, and statement [3] to the main conclusion role reflects the exact structural hierarchy of the passage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main objective of the passage and distinguish the author's voice from opposing viewpoints.
The author opposes the urban planners' claim and advocates for peak-hour tolls.
Understanding the overall argumentative direction is necessary to contextualize each component.
2
Analyze the function of statement [1].
Statement [1] provides evidence that gridlock causes financial harm, countering the claim that congestion pricing alone causes harm.
It acts as a supporting premise designed to undermine the opposing planners' premise.
3
Analyze the relationship between statement [2] and statement [3].
Statement [2] derives a sub-conclusion ('the claim... is unfounded'), which is then used as justification to support statement [3] ('governments should proceed...').
Because statement [2] supports another claim rather than standing as the final endpoint, it is an intermediate conclusion, leaving statement [3] as the main conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying structural roles: premises, intermediate conclusions, counter-arguments, and main conclusions.
Soru 51Soru

A study conducted across several suburban art galleries noted that after the galleries installed soft ambient background music in their exhibition halls, average visitor dwell time increased by 35 percent compared to the previous year. Based on this observation, the gallery management concluded that playing ambient background music directly caused visitors to spend more time viewing the art. Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in order to assess the strength of the gallery management's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether the galleries concurrently hosted several major, highly anticipated special exhibitions during the period after the music was introduced

Cevap

Evaluating whether the galleries concurrently hosted several major, highly anticipated special exhibitions provides critical information about whether an alternative factor caused the increase in visitor dwell time.
The argument leaps from a sequence of events (installing music, followed by an increase in dwell time) to a direct causal claim. To evaluate this causal reasoning, one must determine whether an alternative explanation (confounder) was present during the same timeframe. If the galleries hosted major special exhibitions during this period, the exhibitions likely caused visitors to stay longer, weakening the causal link to the music. If no such exhibitions took place, the causal claim regarding the music is strengthened.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's causal claim and underlying evidence
The argument concludes that soft ambient music caused an increase in visitor dwell time based solely on a temporal correlation (music added -> dwell time increased).
Evaluating a causal claim requires testing whether the correlation could be explained by an alternative cause or confounding variable.
2
Assess candidate evaluation questions for potential confounding variables
If special exhibitions were launched at the same time, those exhibitions—rather than the music—could be the real reason visitors stayed longer.
Knowing whether special exhibitions occurred allows us to determine if an external factor produced the observed outcome.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Causal Arguments and Alternative Explanations
Tahmini Süre:1m 50s
Soru 52Soru

In an effort to lower operating costs, the municipal transit authority of Oakhaven plans to replace its entire fleet of diesel-powered buses with electric buses. Management projects that this transition will significantly decrease total annual maintenance costs for the transit system, because electric buses have fewer moving mechanical parts than diesel buses do.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the municipal transit authority's projection depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The ongoing maintenance costs for the electronic and battery components of electric buses will not exceed the savings achieved from having fewer mechanical parts.

Cevap

The ongoing maintenance costs for the electronic and battery components of electric buses will not exceed the savings achieved from having fewer mechanical parts.
The argument concludes that total annual maintenance costs will decrease because electric buses have fewer moving mechanical parts. For this to hold true, any new or existing maintenance costs associated with non-mechanical systems (such as batteries, software, and electrical wiring) must not outweigh the savings realized from reduced mechanical maintenance. If non-mechanical maintenance expenses exceed those mechanical savings, the overall maintenance budget will not decrease.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise: Electric buses have fewer moving mechanical parts than diesel buses. Conclusion: Replacing the fleet with electric buses will significantly decrease total annual maintenance costs.
Isolating the premise and conclusion reveals the scope gap between mechanical parts and total maintenance costs.
2
Identify the underlying logical gap.
The author assumes that savings gained from having fewer mechanical parts will not be offset or surpassed by new non-mechanical maintenance expenses specific to electric buses.
Total maintenance costs encompass all components of a vehicle, not just mechanical ones.
3
Apply the Negation Test to verify the assumption.
Logical Negation: Non-mechanical maintenance costs WILL exceed the savings achieved from having fewer mechanical parts. Outcome: If this negated statement is true, total maintenance costs will increase or stay the same, completely destroying the conclusion.
A valid assumption must be necessary for the conclusion to hold true.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions
Soru 53Soru

To reduce municipal carbon emissions and alleviate gridlock, City X introduced a daily congestion toll on private passenger automobiles entering its commercial core during morning peak hours. Analysts argue that this policy will successfully decrease overall motor vehicle traffic along the primary access corridors leading into the commercial core by at least 25 percent. Their reasoning is that the added financial cost will compel a significant portion of daily automobile commuters to switch to the city's underutilized suburban rail network. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the analysts' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Because the toll applies exclusively to private passenger automobiles, commercial delivery fleets and ride-hailing services plan to sharply increase peak-hour trips along those same access corridors to meet shifted consumer demand.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that commercial delivery fleets and ride-hailing services will increase peak-hour trips along the access corridors, replacing reduced private cars with other motor vehicles.
The correct answer demonstrates that while private passenger cars may decrease due to the toll, another category of motor vehicles—commercial fleets and ride-hailing cars—will significantly increase operations on the exact same access corridors. This directly invalidates the analysts' assumption that reduced private automobile commuter traffic guarantees a 25 percent drop in total motor vehicle volume.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and premises.
Conclusion: Overall motor vehicle traffic along primary access corridors leading into the commercial core will decrease by at least 25%. Premise: A daily toll on private passenger cars will cause commuters to switch to suburban rail.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the leap between private car commuter behavior and total vehicle traffic volume.
2
Identify unstated assumptions in the argument's logic.
The argument assumes that private passenger vehicles are the sole major contributor to traffic volume on those corridors, or that decrease in private vehicles will not be replaced by other types of vehicular traffic.
Weakening questions require finding new information that shatters an unstated assumption.
3
Evaluate option impacts against the core assumption.
Showing that exempt vehicle categories (delivery fleets and ride-hailing cars) will increase trip frequency along the exact same corridors directly counteracts the projected net traffic reduction.
Demonstrating an offsetting surge in non-tolled motor vehicles directly breaks the link between fewer private cars and lower overall corridor traffic volume.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Causal and Extrapolation Arguments by Identifying Offsetting Alternative Factors
Soru 54Soru

To reduce mortality rates from aggressive skin cancers, a network of dermatology clinics plans to deploy a new automated scanning device that detects subtle tissue irregularities undetectable by visual examination alone. Clinic administrators claim that because the device identified early-stage tissue irregularities in 30 percent more patients during trials than visual exams did, deploying this technology across all clinics will significantly decrease overall skin cancer mortality among their patients. Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the clinic administrators' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The vast majority of the additional tissue irregularities detected by the automated scanning device are harmless, benign growths that never progress to malignant cancer.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the vast majority of the additional tissue irregularities detected by the scanning device are benign growths that never develop into malignant cancer.
The correct answer demonstrates that the 30 percent increase in detected tissue irregularities consists almost entirely of harmless, benign growths. Because these growths would never have developed into fatal skin cancer anyway, detecting them provides no mortality reduction benefit, thereby undermining the administrators' central conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument.
Premise: The new scanning device detected 30% more early-stage tissue irregularities than visual exams. Conclusion: Deploying the device across all clinics will significantly reduce skin cancer mortality.
Understanding the structure reveals the core assumption: that detecting these additional tissue irregularities leads to early treatment of fatal cancers.
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption connecting premise to conclusion.
The author assumes that the extra anomalies detected represent dangerous, early-stage cancers that would otherwise become fatal.
To weaken the argument, we must find evidence that undermines this key assumption.
3
Select the option that shows the extra detections do not prevent fatal cancer.
If the additional detected irregularities are benign growths that never turn into cancer, identifying them does not reduce cancer mortality.
This directly undermines the claim that higher detection rates of these irregularities will decrease patient deaths.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments by Severing the Premise-Conclusion Assumption
Soru 55Soru

Urban planners in Metroville recently proposed planting deep-rooted oak trees along city avenues to expand the tree canopy and mitigate the urban heat island effect. Critics argued that the extensive root networks would crack adjacent underground water pipes, incurring massive municipal repair costs. In response, city planners pointed out that the target avenues are lined with modern flexible polymer pipes rather than traditional brittle clay pipes, concluding that the tree-planting initiative will not lead to pipe repair costs. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the city planners' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Flexible polymer pipes have been shown in municipal engineering tests to bend under pressure from expanding tree roots without fracturing or leaking.

Cevap

The statement that flexible polymer pipes bend under root pressure without fracturing or leaking most strengthens the argument.
The city planners defend their plan against critics by noting that the target avenues use flexible polymer pipes rather than brittle clay pipes. For this defense to hold, flexible polymer pipes must actually withstand root pressure better than clay pipes. Confirming that polymer pipes bend under root pressure without fracturing directly reinforces the planners' conclusion that pipe repair costs will be avoided.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Target avenues use flexible polymer pipes instead of brittle clay pipes. Conclusion: Planting oak trees will not cause pipe repair costs.
Identifying the premise-to-conclusion gap isolates the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the logical gap
The argument assumes that flexible polymer pipes will not crack or break when exposed to expanding oak tree roots.
Strengthening questions require finding evidence that validates key assumptions or rules out potential failure modes.
3
Evaluate the choices against the logical gap
The option confirming that polymer pipes withstand root expansion by bending without fracturing directly validates the planners' defense.
Providing empirical evidence of durability bridges the premise to the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Defenses by Validating Assumptions
Soru 56Soru

Biopharmaceuticals produced via cell culture require precise environmental stability inside bioreactors. Last year, several batches of a critical biologic drug at a manufacturing facility were lost to opportunistic bacterial contamination. To eliminate future batch rejections, plant engineers installed automated sensor arrays that monitor nutrient consumption rates in real time. The engineers claim that this system will prevent future bacterial contamination losses because early detection of abnormal nutrient consumption allows immediate, targeted anti-microbial treatment before bacteria proliferate. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the plant engineers' claim?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In pilot trials with identical bioreactors, bacterial strains consistently altered nutrient consumption rates several hours before reaching cell densities capable of causing batch loss.

Cevap

The argument is most strongly supported by evidence showing that in pilot trials, bacterial strains consistently altered nutrient consumption rates several hours before reaching cell densities capable of causing batch loss.
The correct answer provides critical empirical evidence establishing that the indicator (nutrient consumption changes) occurs significantly ahead of the harmful outcome (batch loss). This confirms the core assumption of the engineers' plan: that sensor detection provides a usable window of opportunity to intervene effectively before proliferation ruins the batch.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and main premise of the argument.
Conclusion: Real-time nutrient sensor arrays will eliminate future batch contamination losses. Premise: Early detection of abnormal nutrient consumption allows immediate targeted treatment before bacteria proliferate.
Understanding the precise link between early detection and intervention timing is crucial for identifying assumptions.
2
Analyze the underlying gap in the reasoning.
The argument assumes that bacterial growth changes nutrient consumption detectably *before* contamination reaches a point where the batch is already ruined or beyond treatment.
If bacterial alteration of nutrient levels occurs too late, early intervention will fail.
3
Evaluate which option validates this necessary temporal link.
The statement verifying that bacterial strains alter nutrient consumption several hours before destructive cell densities are reached proves that the detection window provides sufficient time for successful anti-microbial intervention.
Directly confirming the feasibility and timing of the proposed causal mechanism provides the strongest support.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments via Confirming Necessary Assumptions and Causal Timelines
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 57Soru

To reduce financial losses from fraudulent claims, a major art insurer instituted a rule requiring all paintings valued over $100,000 to undergo advanced spectroscopic pigment testing prior to policy issuance. The insurer reasoned that because fraudulent claims overwhelmingly involve recent forgeries crafted with modern synthetic pigments that spectroscopic testing easily identifies, this mandatory pre-issuance verification would drastically cut the firm's fraudulent payout losses. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the insurer's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Fraudulent claims involving paintings valued over $100,000 predominantly stem from staged disappearances of genuine artworks rather than the submission of forged pieces.

Cevap

The insurer's plan relies on the assumption that fraudulent claims on high-value paintings depend on insuring forged artworks. Demonstrating that high-value fraud primarily involves staged disappearances of genuine paintings undermines the effectiveness of pre-issuance authentication.
The correct answer weakens the argument by exposing a flaw in the plan's core assumption. The insurer assumes that fraudulent payouts occur because forged paintings are successfully insured. However, if fraudsters stage thefts of genuine paintings, the painting presented at policy issuance is authentic and will easily pass spectroscopic testing. Consequently, the insurer remains vulnerable to fraudulent payouts despite implementing mandatory testing.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core argument structure
Premise: Fraudulent claims overwhelmingly involve recent forgeries using synthetic pigments, which spectroscopic testing detects. Plan: Require spectroscopic testing prior to policy issuance for paintings over $100,000. Conclusion: Fraudulent payout losses will be drastically cut.
Identifying the link between the premise (detecting fake canvases at issuance) and the conclusion (reducing payout losses) reveals the key unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated logical assumption
The insurer assumes that fraudulent claims on policies above $100,000 rely on getting forged paintings authenticated and insured in the first place.
If the fraud mechanism does not depend on insuring fake canvases, authentication at issuance will not stop fraudulent claims.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that breaks this link
The statement indicating that fraud in the target price bracket mainly involves staged disappearances of genuine artworks shows that paintings will pass the initial spectroscopic test, rendering the protocol ineffective at preventing fraudulent payouts.
This introduces an alternative mechanism of fraud that completely bypasses pre-issuance pigment inspection.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Plan Feasibility and Unstated Assumptions in Causal Reasoning
Soru 58Soru

A commercial fruit exporter plans to introduce low-concentration ozone gas injection into its long-distance refrigerated shipping containers to prevent mold decay in bananas during transit. Skeptics argue that ozone exposure can accelerate fruit ripening and softening by triggering ethylene production. The exporter claims that using ozone gas will successfully extend the saleable shelf life of the fruit upon arrival at distant ports without causing premature softening. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the fruit exporter's claim?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At low concentrations, ozone gas rapidly oxidizes and neutralizes ambient ethylene in enclosed spaces before the ethylene can bind to fruit ripening receptors.

Cevap

The statement showing that ozone gas neutralizes ambient ethylene before it can bind to fruit receptors provides the strongest support for the exporter's claim.
The correct answer provides a chemical mechanism that directly defends the argument against the main objection. The critics argue that ozone causes softening by triggering ethylene. If low concentrations of ozone actually neutralize ambient ethylene before it can affect the fruit, the ozone removes the very agent responsible for premature ripening while still treating mold. This strongly supports the exporter's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core argument and main vulnerability
The exporter claims ozone will extend shelf life without premature softening. The main objection is that ozone triggers ethylene production, causing softening.
To strengthen the argument, an option must resolve the vulnerability by showing why ozone will not lead to ethylene-induced softening.
2
Evaluate the impact of the correct mechanism
If ozone oxidizes and neutralizes ethylene gas, it removes the trigger for premature ripening and softening.
This directly neutralizes the skeptics' counterargument and confirms that mold protection will occur without the negative side effect.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments
Soru 59Soru

In 2024, Apex Logistics implemented an automated fleet-scheduling system across all its regional distribution hubs, designed to reduce delivery delays by optimizing driver routes. Following the implementation, company records showed a 25 percent decrease in total traffic-related delay hours per driver compared to the previous year. Paradoxically, during the exact same period, customer complaints regarding late deliveries increased by more than 30 percent across all operating regions.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the same period, Apex Logistics narrowed its guaranteed delivery window from a flexible four-hour range to a strict fifteen-minute timeframe, leading customers to report late deliveries for minor arrival variations that were previously considered on time.

Cevap

The apparent discrepancy is resolved by the fact that Apex Logistics narrowed its guaranteed delivery window from a flexible four-hour range to a strict fifteen-minute timeframe, causing more deliveries to be classified as late by customers despite drivers experiencing fewer traffic delays.
The correct answer resolves the paradox by demonstrating that the threshold for what constitutes a 'late delivery' changed significantly. By narrowing the delivery window from four hours to fifteen minutes, minor arrival variations that were previously deemed acceptable now failed to meet the guarantee, causing customer complaints to rise sharply even though drivers encountered 25 percent fewer traffic delay hours overall.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly contradictory facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Total traffic-related delay hours per driver decreased by 25%. Fact 2: Customer complaints regarding late deliveries increased by more than 30%.
Resolving an apparent discrepancy requires recognizing both empirical statements as true and finding a missing variable that connects them logically.
2
Determine the criteria for a valid resolving statement.
The correct option must supply an external factor showing how customer complaints could increase despite actual traffic delay time per driver decreasing, without contradicting either stated premise.
A valid resolution cannot dispute either premise or introduce facts that deepen the contradiction.
3
Evaluate the options against the required criteria.
Narrowing the delivery guarantee window from four hours to fifteen minutes explains why customer expectations were breached more frequently (generating complaints) even while driver traffic delays were objectively lower.
This establishes a direct causal link between driver performance metrics and customer complaint metrics under a revised operational standard.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving Paradoxes and Apparent Discrepancies
Soru 60Soru

In City X, municipal health officials observed that residents living in neighborhoods with a high density of full-service grocery stores report significantly lower rates of cardiovascular disease than residents in neighborhoods served primarily by fast-food outlets and convenience stores. To reduce the citywide incidence of cardiovascular disease, the city council proposes offering tax incentives to attract full-service grocery stores to underserved neighborhoods. The council reasons that increasing physical access to fresh produce will prompt residents to adopt healthier diets, thereby directly lowering their risk of cardiovascular illness.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the city council's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Individuals who maintain healthy diets are no more likely to choose to live in neighborhoods with full-service grocery stores than are individuals with poor dietary habits.

Cevap

The correct response is the statement establishing that individuals with healthy diets are no more likely to move to neighborhoods with full-service grocery stores than those with poor diets.
The city council's argument relies on a causal claim: increasing physical access to fresh produce will cause residents to adopt healthier diets and lower their risk of cardiovascular disease. The evidence provided is a mere correlation between grocery store density and lower disease rates. A key vulnerability of correlation-to-causation reasoning is the possibility of self-selection bias—specifically, that health-conscious people actively choose to live in areas near full-service grocery stores. By confirming that individuals with healthy diets are no more likely to relocate to these neighborhoods than individuals with poor diets, the correct answer rules out self-selection bias, thereby substantially strengthening the likelihood that the stores themselves positively influence resident health.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure into premises, proposed action, and core conclusion.
Premise: Grocery store density correlates with lower cardiovascular disease. Action: Provide tax incentives for grocery stores in underserved areas. Conclusion: Increased physical access will cause healthier diets and directly reduce cardiovascular disease risk.
Identifying the logic gap between correlation (store location and health) and causation (store access causing health improvement) is crucial for strengthening the argument.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities and unstated assumptions in the causal leap.
The main vulnerability is reverse causality or self-selection bias: perhaps health-conscious people self-select into neighborhoods with grocery stores, rather than the stores causing residents to become healthy.
To strengthen a causal argument based on observational correlation, one must rule out alternative explanations or confounding variables.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that addresses the self-selection vulnerability.
The option stating that healthy eaters do not preferentially move to grocery-rich neighborhoods eliminates self-selection bias, ensuring the correlation is driven by the environment rather than residential preference.
Ruling out a major confounding variable directly strengthens the author's causal claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Eliminating Confounding Variables / Reverse Causality
ÖncekiSayfa 3 / 9Sonraki
Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 3 | Examkin