Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 2501Soru →

Marine robotics engineers establishing operational parameters for deep-sea exploration submersibles documented the following protocols:

• Any exploration submersible deployed in the Mariana Abyssal Zone that is equipped with an acoustic doppler profiler also carries a high-resolution photogrammetry rig.
• No exploration submersible carrying a high-resolution photogrammetry rig operates without a redundant lithium-polymer power backup.
• Every exploration submersible that operates with a redundant lithium-polymer power backup is certified for deep-trench hydrothermal survey missions.
• Some exploration submersibles deployed in the Mariana Abyssal Zone that are equipped with an acoustic doppler profiler are not certified for autonomous benthic sediment coring.

If all the statements above are true, which of the following statements must also be true? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any exploration submersible equipped with a high-resolution photogrammetry rig is certified for deep-trench hydrothermal survey missions.; At least some exploration submersibles certified for deep-trench hydrothermal survey missions are not certified for autonomous benthic sediment coring.

Cevap

The statements establishing that any submersible with a photogrammetry rig is certified for hydrothermal survey missions, and that some hydrothermal-certified submersibles are not certified for benthic sediment coring, are both logically guaranteed.
The deduction that every submersible equipped with a photogrammetry rig is certified for hydrothermal survey missions directly follows from connecting the second premise to the third premise in a two-step conditional chain. Furthermore, the deduction that at least some submersibles certified for hydrothermal survey missions are not certified for benthic coring follows from tracing the submersibles identified in the fourth premise through the conditional chain: they possess photogrammetry rigs, which guarantees power backups, which in turn guarantees hydrothermal certification, while simultaneously lacking sediment coring certification.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the conditional rules linking equipment and certifications.
Photogrammetry Rig → Lithium-Polymer Power Backup → Hydrothermal Survey Certified.
Chaining the second and third premises proves that having a photogrammetry rig guarantees hydrothermal survey certification.
2
Synthesize the existential premise with the conditional chain.
Some (Mariana & Acoustic Doppler) submersibles exist that are NOT Coring Certified. Since (Mariana & Acoustic Doppler) implies Photogrammetry Rig, Power Backup, and Hydrothermal Certification, these specific submersibles are Hydrothermal Certified but NOT Coring Certified.
An existential quantifier ('some') linked to the sufficient condition of a valid chain transfers all downstream necessary properties to those specific members.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the deduced relationships.
Two statements strictly follow from the deductive chain, while the remaining choices commit formal conditional reversal, illicit negation, or scope overextension.
In Must Be True questions, only claims that are 100% logically necessitated by the premises are correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Quantifier Synthesis
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 2502Soru →

Consider the following argument:

Marine Biologist: Commercial entities argue that deep-sea polymetallic nodule harvesting will have negligible ecological consequences because the abyssal plain lacks high organismal density. However, this assessment overlooks the extraordinarily slow metabolic rates of abyssal benthic fauna. Because metabolic turnover and reproductive cycles in these cold, high-pressure ecosystems operate over centuries rather than years, localized physical disturbances to benthic substrate remain unrecovered for millennia. Consequently, any disruption to nodule fields inflicts irreversible damage on these unique habitats. Therefore, international regulatory bodies must establish an immediate moratorium on deep-sea mining exploitation.

Arrange the key propositions of the argument in order of their logical progression, starting from the foundational empirical evidence, advancing through the intermediate conclusions, and ending with the overarching main conclusion.

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct logical order progresses from the foundational biological premise (centuries-long metabolic and reproductive cycles), to the initial sub-conclusion (physical disturbances persist for millennia), to the broader sub-conclusion (habitat damage is irreversible), to the ultimate main conclusion (regulatory bodies must impose an immediate mining moratorium).
In this argument, the author builds a multi-tiered deductive chain: the baseline biological evidence concerning multi-century organismal life cycles logically necessitates that physical disruption persists for millennia. This in turn proves that nodule extraction causes irreversible habitat damage, which ultimately justifies the author's primary conclusion that an immediate international regulatory moratorium must be enacted.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the foundational premise that receives no evidentiary support within the argument.
The statement detailing that abyssal benthic organisms have metabolic and reproductive cycles spanning centuries is supported by no other claim and functions as the foundational empirical premise.
Foundational premises provide the evidential grounding for all downstream inferences.
2
Trace the initial inference directly supported by the foundational premise.
Because metabolic cycles take centuries, localized physical disturbances take millennia to recover.
This functions as an intermediate conclusion that bridges the biological fact to the persistence of physical disruption.
3
Trace the second-tier inference derived from the persistence of seabed disruption.
Because disturbances persist for millennia, disruptions to nodule fields constitute irreversible ecological damage.
This is a subsidiary conclusion refuting the opposing view that mining impacts are negligible.
4
Isolate the ultimate prescriptive conclusion that receives support from the preceding sub-conclusions.
Because irreversible ecological damage will occur, international regulatory bodies must enact an immediate moratorium on deep-sea mining.
This is the overarching main point of the argument to which all other structural elements logically lead.

Anahtar Kavram

Argument Structure and Main Point Identification
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 2503Soru →

The arguments below each commit a distinct informal reasoning error. Which flaw description correctly characterizes each respective argument?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Museum Curator: Our institution is legally bound to act in the public interest. Because recent visitor surveys reveal widespread public interest in pop-music celebrity memorabilia, mounting an exhibition of pop-music stage costumes is our foremost institutional duty.
Acoustics Consultant: Dr. Vance contends that installing fiberglass acoustic panels in the concert hall will lead to fiber degradation within two years. However, Dr. Vance holds substantial equity in a company that produces cellular foam soundproofing. Hence, fiberglass acoustic panels will remain durable indefinitely.
Software Architect: Every separate encryption module incorporated into the new network security suite underwent rigorous stress testing without registering any latency delays. It follows that the complete security suite assembled from these modules will function without producing system latency.
Civic Planner: The city council must either entirely ban commercial freight trucks from the historic harbor district or permit completely unrestricted commercial trucking. Because a total ban would severely harm waterfront shipping businesses, the council must allow unrestricted trucking.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Match the Museum Curator argument to the flaw conflating public welfare with public curiosity; match the Acoustics Consultant argument to the flaw rejecting a claim based on source bias; match the Software Architect argument to the fallacy of composition; match the Civic Planner argument to the false dilemma flaw.
Each argument is correctly paired with the description of its underlying vulnerability: the curator shifts between distinct senses of 'public interest' (equivocation); the acoustics consultant treats a conflict of interest as proof that the opposing claim is false (source bias); the software architect attributes a component-level property to the whole system (fallacy of composition); and the civic planner unnecessarily restricts choices to two extremes (false dilemma).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion and supporting premises of each individual argument.
Identified the primary structural leap in each passage: semantic ambiguity for the curator, personal bias dismissal for the acoustics consultant, part-to-whole inference for the software architect, and restricted binary options for the civic planner.
Accurately identifying the gap between premises and conclusion is essential to pinpointing logical flaws.
2
Map each argument's specific reasoning gap to its corresponding abstract logical error description.
The curator's shift between 'public interest' definitions maps to equivocation; the acoustic consultant's focus on Dr. Vance's stock holdings maps to source bias / ad hominem; the architect's aggregation of standalone modules maps to composition; the planner's either/or framing maps to false dilemma.
Matching structural vulnerabilities to abstract definitions verifies structural comprehension without relying on superficial topic cues.
3
Confirm that all pairings are mutually exclusive and leave no unmatched or ambiguous elements.
All four arguments match precisely one unique flaw description with exact alignment.
Ensures full accuracy across the entire matching set.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying informal logical fallacies in short argumentative passages and pairing them with formal abstract descriptions.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 2504Soru →

Medical regulatory guidelines for a new category of synthetic pharmaceutical peptides stipulate the following protocols:

• Any synthetic peptide that exhibits neuroplasticity must either cross the blood-brain barrier or be administered intrathecally.
• If a synthetic peptide crosses the blood-brain barrier, it is strictly subject to Schedule II regulatory oversight unless it fully degrades within 24 hours of administration.
• No peptides classified in the newly developed 'Cyto-Alpha' class can be administered intrathecally.
• Furthermore, every peptide in the 'Cyto-Alpha' class exhibits neuroplasticity and has been granted a complete exemption from Schedule II regulatory oversight.

Based on the regulatory protocols above, which of the following statements MUST be true? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Every peptide in the 'Cyto-Alpha' class crosses the blood-brain barrier.; All peptides in the 'Cyto-Alpha' class fully degrade within 24 hours of administration.

Cevap

The correct statements are that every peptide in the 'Cyto-Alpha' class crosses the blood-brain barrier, and all peptides in the 'Cyto-Alpha' class fully degrade within 24 hours of administration.
The stimulus establishes a rigorous chain of formal logic. First, all Cyto-Alpha peptides exhibit neuroplasticity. The first rule dictates that any peptide with neuroplasticity must either cross the blood-brain barrier or be administered intrathecally. Because Cyto-Alpha peptides are forbidden from intrathecal administration, they are logically forced into the other option: they must cross the blood-brain barrier. This proves the first correct statement. Next, any peptide crossing the blood-brain barrier must be subject to Schedule II oversight OR fully degrade within 24 hours (translating the 'unless' rule). Since Cyto-Alpha peptides cross the barrier but are explicitly exempt from Schedule II oversight, they must satisfy the alternative condition: fully degrading within 24 hours. This proves the second correct statement.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the mandatory requirements for neuroplasticity.
Cyto-Alpha peptides exhibit neuroplasticity but cannot be administered intrathecally. Therefore, they must cross the blood-brain barrier.
Applies a disjunctive syllogism to the first condition to deduce the primary characteristic of Cyto-Alpha peptides.
2
Evaluate the conditional rule regarding Schedule II oversight.
The rule means: If a peptide crosses the barrier and is NOT Schedule II, it MUST degrade within 24 hours.
Accurately translates the 'unless' modifier into formal conditional logic.
3
Combine deductions specifically for Cyto-Alpha peptides.
Since Cyto-Alpha peptides definitely cross the barrier and are explicitly exempt from Schedule II oversight, they are logically forced to fully degrade within 24 hours.
Synthesizes the derived premise from Step 1 with the given exemptions to find the final necessary truth.

Anahtar Kavram

Complex Deductive Inference and Conditional Logic Chains
Soru 2505Soru →

Ecologist: Mountain pine beetles have recently expanded into northern boreal forests and begun infesting jack pines, a tree species outside their historic range. Jack pines produce substantially higher levels of monoterpenes—defensive resin chemicals toxic to many bark beetles—than do lodgepole pines, the beetle's traditional host. Nevertheless, researchers observed normal survival rates among beetle larvae developing inside infested jack pines. Therefore, the mountain pine beetle must possess physiological mechanisms that neutralize or tolerate elevated monoterpene concentrations.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the ecologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The beetle larvae developing inside the jack pines were not shielded from the elevated monoterpene concentrations by feeding exclusively on tissues with low chemical levels.

Cevap

The argument requires assuming that the beetle larvae developing in the jack pines were not shielded from the elevated monoterpene concentrations by feeding exclusively on tissues with low chemical levels.
The correct answer rules out an alternative explanation for the observed survival rate. The ecologist concludes that the beetles must have physiological mechanisms to neutralize or tolerate elevated monoterpenes because they survive in jack pines, which have high levels of those chemicals. This conclusion relies on the assumption that the larvae were in fact exposed to the elevated chemical levels. If the larvae avoided exposure entirely by feeding only on specific low-toxin tissues, their survival would provide no evidence for physiological tolerance mechanisms.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus to isolate the premises and the conclusion.
Premises: Jack pines produce higher concentrations of toxic monoterpenes than traditional hosts; beetle larvae nevertheless show normal survival rates in jack pines. Conclusion: Mountain pine beetles must possess physiological mechanisms that neutralize or tolerate elevated monoterpenes.
Clarifying the boundary between stated facts and the inferred conclusion reveals the logical leap.
2
Identify the unstated gap between larval survival in high-toxin trees and physiological tolerance.
The author presumes that the larvae were actually exposed to the high concentrations of monoterpenes while developing inside the tree.
If the larvae did not actually ingest or encounter the toxic chemicals, their survival would not require a physiological adaptation.
3
Apply the Negation Test to confirm necessity.
Negation: 'Larvae were shielded from the elevated monoterpene concentrations by feeding exclusively on tissues with low chemical levels.' If this is true, the beetle does not need physiological detoxification mechanisms to survive, which destroys the argument.
A necessary assumption must fatally undermine the conclusion when logically negated.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Archetype)

Alternatif Yöntem

Use the Negation Test: Negate each choice and see which one destroys the conclusion. The statement that larvae avoided exposure by feeding only on low-toxin tissues directly eliminates the need for the inferred physiological mechanisms.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 2506Soru →

Entomologists studying leafcutter ants (*Atta cephalotes*) observed that worker ants harvest fresh leaves to nourish their symbiotic fungal gardens (*Leucoagaricus gongylophorus*). When foragers supply leaves containing chemical compounds that inhibit fungal development, the colony completely ceases collecting foliage from that specific plant species within two days, even though the worker ants themselves suffer no toxic effects from the plant. The entomologists hypothesize that the cultivated fungus emits chemical signaling molecules that condition the ants to discontinue harvesting harmful vegetation.

Statement: The finding that worker ants persist in collecting toxic leaves when supplied with fungal gardens whose chemical secretions are chemically inhibited, even as the fungal garden suffers visible tissue necrosis, provides logical support for the entomologists' hypothesis.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True, because establishing that blocking fungal chemical secretions prevents the foraging change despite visible fungal decay confirms chemical signaling as the governing causal mechanism and eliminates the competing explanation of physical observation.
The statement is correct because the described experimental finding demonstrates that blocking chemical secretion prevents the avoidance behavior despite the presence of visible fungal damage. This confirms that chemical cues are the active mechanism and eliminates the alternative explanation that ants react directly to physical deterioration.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and the central hypothesis.
Premise: Worker ants stop gathering toxic leaves within 48 hours despite being immune to the plant toxins. Hypothesis: The fungus produces chemical signals that condition the ants to avoid the plant.
Understanding the precise causal link asserted between fungal chemical emissions and ant behavioral change is necessary to evaluate supportive evidence.
2
Analyze the reasoning gap and potential alternative explanations.
The argument assumes that chemical cues, rather than visual or physical cues of fungal damage, trigger the ants' avoidance behavior.
Strengthening a causal claim requires providing evidence that validates the specific mechanism or rules out alternative triggers.
3
Evaluate the impact of the supplementary statement.
When chemical cues are blocked, avoidance fails to occur even though visible necrosis is present, proving chemical cues are necessary and that physical necrosis alone does not trigger avoidance.
This experimental control isolates the chemical variable and eliminates the rival hypothesis of visual or structural cues, thereby strengthening the hypothesis.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal strengthening via control of alternative mechanisms
Soru 2507Soru →

Read the following two passages regarding urban planning.

Passage A
The Garden City movement, pioneered in the late nineteenth century, sought to cure the ills of the industrial metropolis by proposing a radical decentralization of urban populations. A core tenet was the creation of meticulously planned communities of limited size, surrounded by inviolable greenbelts. To ensure tranquility and social hygiene, these plans mandated strict zoning: residential areas were structurally isolated from commercial and industrial districts. By imposing geometric order and suppressing the chaotic density of the traditional city, advocates argued, urban planning could foster social harmony and reconnect citizens with the natural environment.

Passage B
The mid-twentieth century witnessed a profound critique of orthodox urban planning, which had long favored the separation of uses and the reduction of urban density. Critics noted that dividing cities into sterile, single-use zones—residential here, commercial there—destroys the vital, organic complexity that makes urban life safe and economically vibrant. A healthy city relies on high density and mixed-use neighborhoods, where sidewalks are constantly monitored by the 'eyes on the street' of local shopkeepers and residents. Planners who attempt to impose top-down order by dispersing populations into quiet, low-density enclaves fundamentally misunderstand the chaotic but functional ecology of successful cities.

Based on the perspectives outlined in the passages, match each proposition or element from Passage A with how the author of Passage B would most likely evaluate or react to it.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The mandate to structurally isolate residential areas from commercial districts.
The belief that suppressing the chaotic density of the traditional city fosters social harmony.
The foundational goal of curing the societal ills associated with the traditional industrial metropolis.
The dispersal of urban populations into decentralized, low-density enclaves.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The structural isolation of uses matches the elimination of street-level monitoring; the suppression of chaotic density matches the conflation of functional ecology with disorder; the goal of curing societal ills matches a shared objective pursued via misguided methodology; and the dispersal into low-density enclaves matches the diminution of concentrated human presence.
Each match requires accurately projecting Author B's distinct framework onto Passage A's specific claims. Author B directly ties the separation of uses to a lack of safety and monitoring, correctly matching the mandate to isolate residential areas with the elimination of street-level monitoring. Author B explicitly defends 'chaotic' density as a functional ecology, meaning Author A's desire to suppress it is a theoretical error confusing complexity with disorder. Because Author B clearly wants healthy cities, Author A's foundational goal of curing urban ills is a shared objective, albeit one pursued through misguided methods. Finally, Author B champions high density, meaning Author A's low-density dispersal diminishes the concentrated human presence necessary for city vitality.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Author B's primary critique of orthodox urban planning.
Author B argues that a healthy city requires both mixed-use zoning (for continuous monitoring) and high density (for vital, organic complexity), and that 'chaotic' city life is actually a functional ecology.
Understanding Author B's theoretical framework is necessary to project their perspective onto Author A's specific propositions.
2
Evaluate Author B's stance on Passage A's isolation of residential and commercial districts.
Author B views single-use zoning as a destructive practice that eliminates the monitoring provided by local shopkeepers and residents.
This aligns the structural isolation of uses with the loss of street-level safety and monitoring.
3
Evaluate Author B's stance on Passage A's suppression of 'chaotic density'.
Author B explicitly states that what orthodox planners see as 'chaotic' is actually the 'functional ecology of successful cities.'
This connects Passage A's desire to suppress chaos with Author B's assertion that planners mistake functional complexity for undesirable disorder.
4
Determine Author B's view on Passage A's overarching goal to cure urban ills.
While Author B vehemently disagrees with the methods (decentralization, strict zoning), the underlying goal of making cities healthy, safe, and vibrant is shared.
This matches the foundational goal with a shared but misguidedly pursued objective.
5
Evaluate Author B's stance on Passage A's dispersal of populations into low-density enclaves.
Author B argues that urban vitality relies on 'high density' and that dispersing populations creates sterile zones lacking organic complexity.
This matches decentralization and low-density planning with the diminution of concentrated human presence.

Anahtar Kavram

Cross-Author Inference
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 2508Soru →

Legal Historian: The 12th-century abandonment of trial by ordeal in favor of jury trials was not driven by a newfound commitment to rational evidence gathering. Rather, it was a deliberate political maneuver by emerging centralized monarchies to consolidate power. Trial by ordeal depended entirely on local clerics to officiate and interpret divine will, effectively placing final legal authority in the hands of the Church. By replacing ordeals with jury systems—where outcomes were decided by laymen based on secular evidence—monarchs successfully transferred the locus of judicial authority from religious institutions directly to the crown.

Which of the following are assumptions on which the legal historian's argument depends? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The laymen who decided outcomes in the new jury systems were not uniformly controlled by the religious institutions that oversaw trials by ordeal.; The local clerics who officiated trials by ordeal did not exercise their authority primarily as appointed agents of the centralized monarchies.

Cevap

The argument fundamentally relies on two assumptions: that the laymen evaluating evidence were not under the same religious control as the clerics, and that the clerics themselves were not already acting as agents of the monarchy.
For the historian's conclusion to hold true, two unstated premises must be valid. First, the new laymen could not be proxies for the Church. If we negate the statement about laymen ('The laymen WERE uniformly controlled by the religious institutions'), the shift to juries would not transfer power to the crown, destroying the conclusion. Second, the old clerics could not have been proxies for the crown. If we negate the statement about clerics ('The local clerics DID exercise their authority as appointed agents of the monarchies'), the crown already held the judicial power, meaning the transition did not serve to transfer authority from the Church. Both are strictly required for the argument to function.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premises and conclusion.
Premise: Ordeals relied on clerics (placing power with the Church); juries relied on laymen. Conclusion: Replacing ordeals with juries was a deliberate maneuver that transferred power from the Church to the crown.
Identifying the structural components is required to spot the logical gaps between the stated evidence and the final claim.
2
Identify potential logical gaps (Supporter and Defender assumptions).
Gap 1: Does giving power to laymen inherently take it away from the Church? Gap 2: Did the Church actually hold the power during ordeals, or were the clerics secretly working for the crown?
Necessary assumptions must either bridge a gap between premises (Supporter) or defend the argument against a fatal counterargument (Defender).
3
Evaluate the choices using the Logical Negation Test.
Negating the correct options destroys the conclusion. Negating the incorrect options leaves the conclusion intact.
The Negation Test is the definitive proof of a necessary assumption; if the negated assumption makes the conclusion logically impossible, the assumption is strictly required.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Multiple Necessary Assumptions using the Logical Negation Test
Soru 2509Soru →

Archaeologist: Recent mass-spectrometry analysis of Late Bronze Age bronze artifacts recovered in southern Scandinavia revealed that their tin content matches the isotopic composition of tin deposits found exclusively in the Iberian Peninsula and southwestern Britain. Because copper ore was abundant locally in Scandinavian deposits, historians had assumed that Scandinavian metalworking communities operated within a self-sustaining regional exchange network. However, the presence of British and Iberian tin in these artifacts demonstrates that Scandinavian societies engaged in direct, long-distance maritime trade voyages to the Atlantic coast of Europe during this period.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the archaeologist's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Atlantic tin present in the Scandinavian bronze artifacts was not acquired entirely through a series of intermediate overland trade transactions across continental Europe.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that the Atlantic tin present in the Scandinavian bronze artifacts was not acquired entirely through a series of intermediate overland trade transactions across continental Europe.
The archaeologist draws a direct link between the physical presence of Iberian and British tin in Scandinavia and direct Scandinavian maritime voyages. For this conclusion to hold, it must not be the case that the ore reached Scandinavia via down-the-line overland intermediary trade across central Europe. Negating the statement about intermediary overland transactions directly refutes the claim of direct maritime voyages, confirming that the argument strictly depends on this assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the premises and the conclusion in the archaeologist's argument.
Premises: Scandinavian bronze artifacts contain tin matching the unique isotopic signature of British and Iberian deposits; local Scandinavian copper was plentiful. Conclusion: Scandinavian societies engaged in direct, long-distance maritime trade voyages to the Atlantic coast.
Identifying the argument structure clarifies the exact logical leap between the evidence and the main claim.
2
Identify the unstated logical gap (the missing link).
The archaeologist infers direct Scandinavian travel to the source solely from the physical presence of foreign ore in Scandinavian artifacts, overlooking the possibility of indirect acquisition via continental intermediaries.
A necessary assumption must eliminate alternative explanations that would sever the link between foreign artifacts and direct travel by the recipient society.
3
Apply the Negation Test to candidate statements.
Negating the statement regarding intermediate trade yields: 'The Atlantic tin was acquired entirely through intermediate overland trade transactions across continental Europe.' This negation completely destroys the archaeologist's conclusion that direct maritime voyages took place.
A statement is strictly necessary to an argument if and only if its logical negation fatally undermines the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Assumption eliminating alternative mechanisms of acquisition)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 2510Soru →

Passage A
The founders of the republic universally understood the "law of nations" to be an integral component of the general common law. Modern critics who insist that customary international law (CIL) requires statutory implementation to be domestically enforceable ignore this historical bedrock. While it is true that CIL lacks the formal electoral pedigree of a domestic statute, it is legitimately derived from the consistent practices of states acting out of a sense of legal obligation. Unless the national legislature has explicitly repudiated a specific international norm, domestic courts have a constitutional duty to recognize and apply established CIL as federal law. This judicial application does not usurp legislative prerogative; rather, it fulfills the foundational assumption that the state operates within a binding global legal framework.

Passage B
Advocates for the automatic incorporation of customary international law (CIL) into federal common law overlook the structural imperatives of democratic governance. It is true that early jurists respected the "law of nations" as part of the common law, but they operated in a jurisprudential era predating the modern positive state, wherein law was viewed as an abstract truth to be discovered rather than a rule to be actively made. Today, democratic legitimacy demands that any rule coercively binding citizens be enacted by politically accountable representatives. CIL is forged through opaque diplomatic consensus and state practice—mechanisms entirely detached from domestic legislative processes. Consequently, while CIL unquestionably binds the state politically in the international arena, it cannot be legitimately enforced by domestic judges absent affirmative statutory codification.

Based on the two passages, the authors would be most likely to disagree over the truth of which one of the following statements?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The absence of explicit legislative action regarding a norm of customary international law precludes domestic courts from enforcing that norm.

Cevap

The statement regarding whether the absence of explicit legislative action precludes domestic courts from enforcing a norm of customary international law.
The correct answer identifies a proposition where Passage A's author would answer 'no' and Passage B's author would answer 'yes.' Passage A states that 'Unless the national legislature has explicitly repudiated a specific international norm, domestic courts have a constitutional duty to recognize and apply' it. This means legislative silence (the absence of explicit action) does NOT prevent enforcement; rather, it mandates it. Conversely, Passage B argues that customary international law 'cannot be legitimately enforced by domestic judges absent affirmative statutory codification.' This means legislative silence DOES prevent enforcement. Therefore, they directly and unmistakably disagree on this exact point.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A's core stance on the enforcement of customary international law (CIL).
Passage A argues that domestic courts must enforce CIL unless the legislature has explicitly repudiated it.
To establish Passage A's position on the threshold for court enforcement.
2
Analyze Passage B's core stance on the enforcement of customary international law.
Passage B argues that domestic courts cannot enforce CIL unless there is affirmative statutory codification by the legislature.
To establish Passage B's position on the threshold for court enforcement.
3
Evaluate the options to find a proposition that yields a clear 'yes' from one author and a clear 'no' from the other.
Both authors agree that the legislature has ultimate authority and that CIL lacks democratic legitimacy, but they directly conflict on what domestic courts should do when the legislature is entirely silent.
A valid point of disagreement requires mutually exclusive stances.
4
Test the selected proposition against both texts.
Passage A rejects the proposition that legislative silence prevents enforcement, while Passage B affirms it.
To mathematically confirm that the correct answer represents a genuine point of mutual disagreement.

Anahtar Kavram

Points of Disagreement in Comparative Reading
Soru 2511Soru →

In an agricultural province, farmers recently adopted an advanced drip-irrigation technology engineered to reduce water loss from evaporation and soil runoff by forty percent per acre. Over the past three years, this technology was implemented across nearly all farms in the region. However, hydrological records show that the total volume of groundwater pumped from the region's shared aquifer for agricultural use increased substantially over those same three years, even though regional rainfall levels and the total acreage of cultivated farmland remained constant.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The increased water efficiency and lower per-acre operating costs prompted many farmers to replace drought-resistant grain crops with lucrative specialty fruits that require far more water per plant.

Cevap

The choice explaining that lower per-acre operating costs prompted farmers to switch to more water-intensive specialty crops.
The correct statement successfully bridges the two facts by introducing a shift in agricultural crop choice. While the irrigation hardware wastes 40% less water per acre, farmers responded to the lower marginal cost and precise water delivery by planting specialty fruit crops that consume substantially more total water than the previous drought-resistant grains. This allows per-acre efficiency to improve while total water extraction simultaneously increases across identical total acreage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly contradictory facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Drip irrigation reduced water loss per acre by 40% with total acreage and rainfall remaining unchanged. Fact 2: Total groundwater extracted from the aquifer increased substantially.
Resolving a paradox requires isolating the specific tension between the premises without assuming an unstated conclusion.
2
Determine the necessary bridging mechanism.
A valid explanation must show how more efficient per-acre irrigation can lead to higher aggregate water extraction across the same total land area.
The correct answer must allow both facts to be simultaneously true without rejecting either premise.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the required mechanism.
The statement regarding farmers switching from low-water grains to highly water-intensive fruit crops provides a direct compensatory mechanism that accounts for higher total extraction.
If the water requirements per acre rose drastically due to new crop selection, total water pumped can rise even when the delivery system itself is 40% less wasteful.

Anahtar Kavram

Reconciling an efficiency rebound effect where technological efficiency gains induce behavioral changes that increase total consumption.
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
Soru 2512Soru →

Urban climatologists studying heat mitigation in mid-latitude coastal cities documented several architectural design characteristics: Every commercial structure that incorporates an open-air central atrium utilizes cross-ventilation corridors. No building that utilizes cross-ventilation corridors requires continuous mechanical refrigeration during daytime hours. Furthermore, some commercial structures that maintain intensive green roofs also incorporate open-air central atriums.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some commercial structures that maintain intensive green roofs do not require continuous mechanical refrigeration during daytime hours.

Cevap

At least some commercial structures that maintain intensive green roofs do not require continuous mechanical refrigeration during daytime hours.
The correct answer properly synthesizes the existential quantifier with the conditional chain: since a subset of commercial structures with intensive green roofs has open-air central atriums, that subset necessarily has cross-ventilation corridors and consequently does not require continuous daytime mechanical refrigeration.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Symbolize the formal conditional premises and quantifier statement.
Atrium -> Corridors; Corridors -> No Daytime Refrigeration; Some Green Roofs have Atrium.
Clear formalization isolates the logical relationships connecting atriums, corridors, refrigeration, and green roofs.
2
Combine the universal conditional chain with the existential statement.
Atrium -> Corridors -> No Daytime Refrigeration yields Atrium -> No Daytime Refrigeration. Intersecting with (Some Green Roofs have Atrium) gives: Some Green Roofs -> No Daytime Refrigeration.
A member belonging to the intersection of green roofs and atriums must inherit all necessary conditions that flow from having an atrium.
3
Match the deduced claim to the corresponding statement.
The statement expressing that some commercial structures with intensive green roofs do not require continuous daytime mechanical refrigeration is strictly deduced.
This is a direct, unavoidable logical consequence of the premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier and Conditional Chain Intersection (Must Be True)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 2513Soru →

Read the following two passages regarding architectural preservation.

Passage A
Historical monuments are more than just their original architectural designs; they are tangible records of the passage of time. When we attempt to fully "restore" a ruin by rebuilding fallen walls and replacing weathered stone with pristine materials, we engage in an act of historical forgery. Such restorations erase the genuine marks of age and substitute a modern replica masquerading as antiquity. The only ethical approach to a historic ruin is stabilization—halting further deterioration through careful, unobtrusive maintenance while accepting the structure's fractured state as an essential part of its authentic identity.

Passage B
To leave a magnificent architectural achievement in ruins out of a misplaced reverence for decay is to abandon the original creators' vision. A cathedral or fortress was designed as a unified, functional entity, not as a crumbling romantic landscape. True architectural conservation goes beyond mere stabilization; it requires reestablishing the building's structural and aesthetic integrity. By judiciously reconstructing missing elements, even if it requires extrapolating from the surviving fabric, we allow contemporary observers to experience the monument not as a melancholic relic, but in the triumphant completeness its designers intended.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a central point of disagreement between the authors of the two passages?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Whether rebuilding the missing portions of a historical ruin is an appropriate practice in architectural conservation.

Cevap

The authors disagree on whether rebuilding the missing portions of a historical ruin is an appropriate practice in architectural conservation.
The correct answer accurately captures the central conflict: the author of Passage A argues that reconstructing a ruin by rebuilding fallen walls is an "act of historical forgery" and that the only ethical approach is mere stabilization. In contrast, the author of Passage B argues that true conservation requires "reconstructing missing elements" to reestablish the building's original structural and aesthetic integrity. Therefore, the two authors hold diametrically opposed views on the legitimacy of rebuilding missing parts.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A to determine its core argument and prescriptions.
Passage A argues that restoring ruins through rebuilding is 'historical forgery' and states that 'the only ethical approach... is stabilization.'
Identifying the author's strict stance against adding new materials sets the baseline for finding a conflict.
2
Analyze Passage B to determine its core argument and prescriptions.
Passage B argues that conservation must go beyond mere stabilization and explicitly advocates for 'reconstructing missing elements' to show the building's intended completeness.
Understanding the second author's opposing mandate allows for direct comparison with Passage A.
3
Synthesize the two stances to identify the precise point of mutual disagreement.
Author A strictly forbids rebuilding fallen walls, while Author B explicitly requires reconstructing missing elements. Therefore, the appropriateness of rebuilding missing portions is the exact point at issue.
A valid point of disagreement must be a proposition that one author clearly affirms and the other clearly rejects.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the precise point of contention between two authors by contrasting their explicit recommendations and underlying premises.
Soru 2514Soru →

A municipal water authority in a desert metropolis installed high-precision automated acoustic leak-detection sensors throughout its subterranean pipe network. Within one year of full deployment, municipal repair crews detected and repaired three times as many underground pipe leaks as they had in any previous year. Paradoxically, during that same one-year period, the total volume of treated water lost to subterranean leaks across the municipal system increased by more than 15 percent, even though overall water consumption and the total number of new pipe ruptures remained unchanged from previous annual averages.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Because the sensors flagged thousands of previously undetected micro-leaks, repair crews spent the vast majority of their time excavating minor fissures, substantially increasing the response time required to reach and fix rare, high-volume pipeline fractures.

Cevap

The statement explaining that fixing thousands of newly detected micro-leaks caused repair crews to take substantially longer to respond to rare, high-volume pipeline fractures resolves the paradox.
The correct response introduces an operational bottleneck: the vast influx of detected micro-fissures absorbed repair crew resources, which substantially lengthened the duration that rare, large-volume main bursts were left flowing before crews arrived. Because a single large rupture can discharge far more water over several hours than hundreds of pinhole leaks lose over weeks, this resource shift perfectly reconciles a 300% increase in completed repairs with a 15% increase in total volume lost.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly conflicting factual premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Repair crews fixed three times as many underground leaks as in any previous year, with new ruptures and total consumption remaining constant. Premise 2: Total volume of water lost through leaks increased by over 15 percent.
Resolving a paradox requires isolating the tension between the action taken (tripling repairs) and the counterintuitive outcome (higher total water loss).
2
Formulate a causal bridge that allows both facts to be simultaneously true without denying either premise.
Look for a factor showing that the composition or duration of leaks changed—specifically, that although the number of repaired leaks increased, the volume lost per unit time or duration of major leaks increased due to diverted repair capacity.
Total water loss depends on both the rate of discharge and the duration of each leak, not merely the raw count of repaired leaks.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that provides this causal bridge.
The explanation detailing that repair crews became tied up with micro-leaks, delaying response to major high-volume bursts, accounts for both the higher repair count (thousands of micro-leaks fixed) and the higher aggregate volume lost (major bursts ran longer).
This bridges the gap by showing that count of repairs went up while the severity/duration of unaddressed high-loss events worsened.

Anahtar Kavram

Reconciling an apparent contradiction by identifying a trade-off between leak frequency (count) and leak severity/duration (volume).
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 2515Soru →

Legal scholar: It is a mistake to permit automated voice-biometric matching to serve as definitive evidence of identity in criminal prosecutions. Proponents contend that high identification accuracy in controlled acoustic testing demonstrates the technology's readiness for judicial use. But controlled settings eliminate the variable background noise, recording compression, and emotional vocal strain inherent to genuine forensic audio. Such confounding variables introduce substantial error rates in real-world forensic contexts. Thus, automated voice biometrics cannot reliably isolate unique vocal signatures from evidentiary recordings, meaning that their uncritical acceptance in court poses a grave risk of wrongful conviction.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the legal scholar's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Automated voice-biometric matching should not be accepted as conclusive proof of identity in criminal prosecutions.

Cevap

Automated voice-biometric matching should not be accepted as conclusive proof of identity in criminal prosecutions.
The author begins by asserting that it is a mistake to permit automated voice-biometric matching as definitive evidence of identity in criminal prosecutions. Every subsequent sentence—critiquing proponents' reliance on laboratory testing, detailing real-world acoustic variables, and noting the risk of wrongful conviction—is provided to substantiate this initial judgment. Thus, the option stating that automated voice-biometric matching should not be accepted as conclusive proof of identity represents the ultimate main point.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the structural components of the stimulus
Identified the opening claim (author's thesis), the counter-position (proponents' claim), the factual premises regarding confounding variables in real-world audio, and the subsidiary conclusions regarding unreliability and wrongful conviction risk.
Isolating the function of each statement prevents confusing supporting premises with the ultimate conclusion.
2
Apply the 'Why / Because' test between candidate conclusions
The author asserts that voice-biometrics cannot be definitive evidence BECAUSE they are unreliable in forensic settings, not the other way around.
The ultimate conclusion is supported by other claims in the argument but does not itself serve as a supporting premise for any further claim.
3
Match the identified main conclusion to the corresponding option
The statement expressing that automated voice-biometric matching should not be accepted as conclusive proof of identity directly paraphrases the opening assertion.
The correct answer to a Main Point question must capture the author's overarching takeaway without understating or overgeneralizing its scope.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing the author's primary conclusion from intermediate conclusions, supporting premises, and opposing viewpoints.
Soru 2516Soru →

Archivist: If a historical repository maintains its ambient relative humidity strictly between 45 and 50 percent, its centuries-old vellum manuscripts will remain entirely free from destructive mold proliferation. Recent climate-control logs reveal that the regional repository experienced severe system fluctuations and failed to keep relative humidity within this specified range. We can conclude, therefore, that mold will inevitably proliferate on the repository's vellum manuscripts.

The archivist's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition that is sufficient to ensure the prevention of mold as though it were necessary for preventing mold

Cevap

The argument treats a condition that is sufficient to ensure the prevention of mold as though it were necessary for preventing mold.
The argument's premises establish only that keeping humidity within 45–50% is sufficient to prevent mold. It does not establish that this range is the sole method of prevention. Failing to meet this specific condition does not prove that mold will proliferate, so the argument illicitly treats a sufficient condition as a necessary one.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus to isolate the premises and the main conclusion.
Premise 1 states that keeping humidity between 45% and 50% guarantees no mold. Premise 2 states that humidity was not kept in this range. The conclusion asserts that mold will proliferate.
Deconstructing the argument structure reveals the specific logical leap made by the author.
2
Formalize the conditional logic and evaluate the inferential validity.
The first premise provides a sufficient condition for mold prevention: (Humidity 45–50%) → (No Mold). The author observes (Not Humidity 45–50%) and concludes (Mold Proliferation). This commits the fallacy of denying the antecedent (mistaken negation).
Failing to satisfy a sufficient condition does not guarantee the failure of the resulting outcome, as other protective factors may prevent mold.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the option that accurately describes this structural error.
The correct option precisely notes that the author treats a sufficient condition for preventing mold as if it were a necessary requirement.
Accurately matching the abstract description to the underlying conditional error solves flaw-in-the-reasoning items.

Anahtar Kavram

Confusing Sufficient and Necessary Conditions (Mistaken Negation)
Tahmini Süre:1m 25s
Soru 2517Soru →

Each passage below presents an academic argument that relies on an unstated foundational premise. Match each numbered argument with the underlying assumption on which its conclusion logically depends.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Paleoclimatologist: High-altitude bristlecone pines exhibited accelerated radial ring growth during the mid-6th century. Because volcanic sulfate aerosol spikes in polar ice cores coincide with this exact period, this anomalous growth surge must have been an indirect biological response to volcanic ash deposition enriching alpine soils, rather than to regional temperature fluctuations.
Economist: Over the past three years, regional biotechnology start-ups that transitioned entirely to remote work filed 20 percent fewer patents per researcher than fully in-person firms. Since patent quality and external venture funding remained identical across both groups, this decrease proves that spontaneous face-to-face interaction is essential for generating innovative breakthroughs in biotechnology.
Marine Biologist: Caribbean reef cuttlefish display vibrant, high-contrast iridescent patterns when foraging near predatory lionfish, but maintain cryptic camouflage when solitary. Because lionfish detect prey primarily through movement rather than contrast, the high-contrast display must function as an intraspecific warning signal to conspecifics rather than as a deterrent directed at the predator.
Agronomist: Applying pyrolyzed biochar to weathered tropical oxisols consistently increased maize yields by 35 percent in field trials where synthetic fertilizer was withheld. Given that biochar itself contains negligible bioavailable nitrogen, its yield-enhancing effect must result entirely from biochar improving soil moisture retention rather than from altering nutrient availability.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Argument 1 matches the assumption that volcanic ash reached high-altitude pine habitats in sufficient quantities to alter soil chemistry. Argument 2 matches the assumption that remote biotechnology firms did not systematically shift toward non-patentable trade secrets. Argument 3 matches the assumption that high-contrast patterns do not disrupt lionfish strikes through motion-dazzle effects. Argument 4 matches the assumption that biochar does not increase the availability of native mineral nutrients already present in the soil.
Each pair correctly matches an argument with an unstated premise that survives the Negation Test: (1) The bristlecone pine argument requires that volcanic ash physically reached the trees in amounts sufficient to affect soil; if negated, the soil-enrichment mechanism is impossible. (2) The remote work biotechnology argument requires that remote firms did not simply shift toward non-patentable trade secrets; if negated, fewer patents do not imply less innovation. (3) The cuttlefish argument requires that the display does not disrupt lionfish predatory strikes via optical dazzle during movement; if negated, the display could directly thwart predators. (4) The biochar agronomy argument requires that biochar does not increase the availability of preexisting native minerals; if negated, the yield increase could indeed be nutrient-related.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion and evidence for each argument passage
Identified the primary causal or categorical conclusion and the specific premise gaps for all four passages.
Necessary assumptions must bridge logical gaps between stated premises and the conclusion or defend the conclusion against potential fatal defeaters.
2
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions for each argument
Verified that negating each matched assumption completely destroys the validity of its corresponding conclusion.
A necessary assumption is one whose logical negation renders the argument's conclusion untenable.
3
Differentiate between necessary premises and irrelevant or overly strong distractors across the pairs
Established unique 1-to-1 correspondences between the four academic domain arguments and their required foundational premises.
Ensures that each argument is paired with its specific unstated assumption without ambiguity.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption Identification via the Negation Test
Tahmini Süre:2m 40s
Soru 2518Soru →

Match each argument on the left with the evidentiary finding on the right that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Agronomists noted that apple orchards sprayed with zinc oxide nanoparticles showed significantly lower rates of calcium-deficiency disorders than untreated orchards, and concluded that the nanoparticles enhance root-to-fruit calcium transport.
Biologists observed that coyotes inhabiting areas near major highway corridors maintain home ranges 40 percent smaller than forest-dwelling coyotes, and concluded that traffic noise restricts their territorial movement.
Researchers found that early childhood bilinguals outperformed late bilinguals on non-verbal executive control tasks, concluding that early dual-language acquisition directly reinforces domain-general inhibitory neural circuits.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Match left_1 (apple orchard calcium transport) to right_1 (phloem sap calcium mobility), left_2 (coyote territory size and traffic noise) to right_2 (range expansion upon noise dampening), and left_3 (early bilingualism and inhibitory circuits) to right_3 (longitudinal prefrontal growth following immersion).
Each evidentiary finding directly substantiates the core causal mechanism asserted in the corresponding argument. For the agricultural argument, showing increased calcium mobility in the phloem while soil levels remain constant confirms the internal transport mechanism. For the ecological argument, showing territory expansion when noise is mitigated isolates acoustic disturbance from physical highway boundaries. For the cognitive argument, showing structural prefrontal changes after language exposure against a control group confirms the developmental causality.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the causal hypothesis and unstated assumptions in each argument on the left.
Argument 1 posits nanoparticle-induced internal transport; Argument 2 posits acoustic noise as the behavioral constraint; Argument 3 posits early language acquisition as the neurodevelopmental cause.
Strengthening an argument requires finding evidence that substantiates the proposed causal mechanism or rules out confounding factors.
2
Evaluate the evidentiary findings on the right to match each with its corresponding causal claim.
Finding 1 validates internal mobilization; Finding 2 isolates acoustic disturbance using a natural control; Finding 3 provides longitudinal neural imaging data tied to immersion onset.
Each strengthener addresses the specific inferential gap and potential alternative explanations of its respective argument.
3
Verify that each pair is uniquely linked and that no cross-application creates ambiguity.
Each domain (agronomy, wildlife ecology, cognitive neuroscience) maps uniquely and unequivocally to its corresponding evidentiary finding.
Ensures unambiguous, logically sound matching across all pairs.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal arguments by corroborating the mechanism of action or controlling for confounding variables.
Soru 2519Soru →

Five years ago, the municipal transit agency in the city of Vaelen replaced all diesel buses on its primary express corridors with electric buses equipped with substantially quieter electric motors. Urban planners anticipated that eliminating diesel engine noise would significantly reduce peak-hour ambient roadside noise levels along these corridors. However, acoustic monitoring conducted over the four years following the transition revealed that average peak-hour roadside noise along these routes actually increased slightly, despite traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, and pavement conditions remaining unchanged. Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Because of their heavy onboard battery arrays, the electric buses weigh considerably more than the diesel buses they replaced, causing their tires to produce more road-contact noise than the motor noise eliminated.

Cevap

The statement explaining that the heavier weight of electric buses causes tire-contact noise that exceeds the engine noise eliminated most effectively resolves the discrepancy.
The correct response provides an unstated causal factor that directly accounts for the increase in total noise: vehicle weight. Because the heavy battery packs make the electric buses significantly heavier, the noise generated by their tires interacting with the pavement increased by an amount greater than the noise eliminated by replacing the diesel engines. This allows the stated facts to coexist: the motors are quieter, traffic parameters remained constant, yet total measured roadside noise increased.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two competing facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Buses with substantially quieter motors replaced loud diesel buses while speed, volume, and pavement remained constant. Fact 2: Roadside ambient noise levels along those corridors increased slightly.
Resolving a paradox requires clearly isolating the two seemingly incompatible premises that must both remain true.
2
Formulate a bridging mechanism that allows both facts to coexist simultaneously.
Look for an auxiliary factor introduced by the electric buses that generates new noise from a source other than the motor (such as weight, aerodynamics, or tire friction) without altering speed or traffic volume.
An effective resolution must explain the increase in total sound output without denying that the motors themselves are quieter.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one providing this bridging causal mechanism.
The explanation regarding increased vehicle weight from battery packs causing greater tire-surface noise accounts for the net increase in overall sound levels.
This bridges the gap by showing that motor noise was replaced by a larger amount of tire-friction noise.

Anahtar Kavram

Reconciling Apparent Discrepancies via Unaccounted Compensatory Mechanisms
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 2520Soru →

Scenario: A metropolitan library network installed automated self-checkout kiosks across all branches to reduce patron wait times at staffed service desks. Within one year, over 70 percent of standard book checkouts shifted to the automated kiosks; however, the average wait time for patrons queuing at the staffed service desks increased by 40 percent.

Statement: The proposition that routine checkouts previously lowered average desk transaction durations, whereas the remaining desk interactions now almost exclusively comprise complex archival and account inquiries requiring extensive staff attention, successfully resolves the apparent discrepancy.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The auxiliary proposition successfully reconciles the paradox by demonstrating a selection effect that altered the average transaction duration at staffed desks.
The statement accurately identifies that shifting routine transactions to kiosks produced a compositional change at the staffed desks. By leaving only complex, time-consuming inquiries for staff to resolve, the average service time per patron rose, causing average queue times to increase even though overall desk foot traffic declined.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly contradictory facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Over 70 percent of book checkouts moved to self-service kiosks. Fact 2: Average wait times at staffed service desks increased by 40 percent.
Resolving a paradox requires isolating both premises without treating either as false.
2
Evaluate the mechanism introduced in the statement.
The statement explains that removing quick, simple checkouts left behind a concentrated pool of complex, long-duration inquiries at the staffed desks.
A valid resolution must provide a bridging mechanism that allows both premises to coexist logically.
3
Determine whether the bridging mechanism explains the statistical outcome.
Because the remaining interactions require substantially more time per patron, the average waiting time per queued patron increases despite the lower overall transaction volume.
Connecting the shifting transaction baseline to the statistical average confirms that the statement successfully resolves the discrepancy.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolution of an apparent statistical paradox via selection bias and compositional shift in transaction duration.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
ÖncekiSayfa 126 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin