Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 341Soru →

For each of the following paradoxical scenarios, identify the additional piece of information that best reconciles the seemingly contradictory evidence.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Despite the transportation department adding two new lanes to the chronically congested Route 9 in an effort to speed up traffic, average peak commute times on the highway increased over the following year.
In an attempt to maximize total revenue, a prestigious cosmetics firm heavily discounted its best-selling signature perfume; however, the total number of bottles sold plummeted shortly thereafter.
A local government initiated a program offering free nutritional supplements to combat an epidemic of a specific vitamin deficiency, yet the overall prevalence of this deficiency in the region remained entirely unchanged.
A municipality heavily subsidized the installation of high-efficiency residential air conditioning units to reduce summer power consumption, yet the city's total residential electricity usage hit record highs the following summer.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Properly align each paradoxical outcome with the underlying mechanism that allows both original premises to coexist without contradiction.
In 'Bridging Conflicting Premises' questions, the correct answer must provide new information that acts as a bridge, allowing the two seemingly contradictory facts to coexist. For the transportation scenario, induced demand explains the traffic increase. For the retail scenario, the loss of prestige explains the sales drop. For the health scenario, a flaw in the distribution method explains the lack of improvement. For the energy scenario, a rebound effect in usage behavior explains the rise in power consumption. Each pairing successfully resolves the apparent discrepancy without invalidating either of the original premises.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze and resolve the transportation paradox regarding Route 9.
Matched the highway expansion paradox with the premise regarding latent demand from alternative transit.
This explains how adding capacity paradoxically worsened commute times by attracting a massive influx of new drivers.
2
Analyze and resolve the retail pricing paradox.
Matched the perfume discounting paradox with the premise regarding status-signaling and prestige.
This explains how lowering the price of a luxury good can decrease sales by destroying its primary appeal of exclusivity.
3
Analyze and resolve the public health intervention paradox.
Matched the free supplement program paradox with the premise regarding inaccessible distribution centers.
This explains why providing free vitamins failed to reduce severe deficiencies, as the affected population couldn't access them.
4
Analyze and resolve the environmental policy paradox.
Matched the high-efficiency air conditioning paradox with the premise regarding increased usage durations.
This explains why increased appliance efficiency led to higher overall electricity usage due to a change in consumer habits.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Conflicting Premises (Resolving Paradoxes)
Soru 342Soru →

To combat medical errors, a regional health authority mandated a 20 percent reduction in the maximum allowable consecutive shift hours for hospital physicians. Post-implementation audits, utilizing the exact same stringent criteria as in previous years, confirmed that the average physician's level of exhaustion at the end of a shift decreased substantially. However, despite the total number of patient admissions remaining unchanged, the absolute number of medical errors definitively caused by physician fatigue actually increased.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The shortened shifts necessitate a significantly higher number of patient handoffs between physicians, a complex communication process highly susceptible to errors if the transferring physician is experiencing even moderate fatigue.

Cevap

The option stating that shortened shifts necessitate a higher number of patient handoffs, which are susceptible to errors under moderate fatigue.
The correct answer successfully bridges the conflicting premises by introducing an unintended structural consequence of the new policy. Shorter shifts mathematically require more shift changes. If a shift change (handoff) is a highly vulnerable process that can be derailed by even 'moderate fatigue,' then increasing the frequency of these handoffs provides a logical mechanism for total fatigue-related errors to rise, even though the extreme end-of-shift exhaustion was eliminated.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conflicting premises presented in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Average physician exhaustion at the end of a shift decreased. Premise 2: Total medical errors definitively caused by fatigue increased, despite constant patient volume.
Identifying the exact parameters of the paradox is required before attempting to find the logical bridge.
2
Determine the constraints for a valid resolution.
The correct answer must explain how doctors who are generally less exhausted could still produce more total fatigue-related errors, without contradicting the fact that the errors are indeed caused by fatigue.
A valid resolution introduces a new variable that allows both seemingly incompatible facts to be true simultaneously.
3
Evaluate the options against the structural parameters of the paradox.
Identify the option that introduces a new vulnerability (increased frequency of handoffs) that triggers fatigue errors even at the new, lower exhaustion levels.
Only one option provides a causal mechanism linking the implementation of shorter shifts directly to an increase in opportunities for fatigue-related errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Conflicting Premises by identifying structural consequences
Soru 343Soru →

University Administrator: The university is facing a severe budget deficit this year. We could eliminate this deficit by drastically increasing student tuition. However, our charter explicitly caps tuition increases at three percent annually, which is far below the increase that would be required to eliminate the deficit. It follows inescapably that we will be forced to significantly reduce the number of faculty members.

Which one of the following arguments contains a flawed pattern of reasoning most similar to the flawed pattern in the university administrator's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The city needs to reduce its carbon emissions by 20 percent. Transitioning all municipal vehicles to electric power would achieve this target. But the city's current budget cannot accommodate the upfront costs of purchasing electric vehicles. Therefore, the city will have to impose strict limits on driving within the city limits.

Cevap

The argument concluding that the city will have to impose strict driving limits because it cannot afford electric vehicles.
The correct answer exactly parallels the flawed reasoning of the stimulus. In the original argument, a goal is stated (eliminating a deficit), one potential solution is identified (increasing tuition) but then ruled out due to constraints, leading to the conclusion that a second, specific solution (reducing faculty) must be taken. This is a False Dilemma because it implicitly assumes there are no other ways to reduce the deficit. The correct answer mirrors this perfectly: it presents a goal (reducing emissions), identifies a solution (electric vehicles) but rules it out, and leaps to the conclusion that a second specific solution (strict driving limits) is mandatory, ignoring other potential ways to reduce emissions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the university administrator's argument to identify the premises and conclusion.
Premise 1: Drastic tuition increases could eliminate the deficit. Premise 2: Tuition increases are capped by the charter and cannot eliminate the deficit. Conclusion: The university must reduce the number of faculty.
Understanding the structural components of the argument is the necessary first step in Parallel Reasoning questions.
2
Identify the core logical flaw in the original argument.
The argument assumes that because one specific solution (raising tuition) is impossible, another specific solution (reducing faculty) is the only remaining option. It ignores other potential ways to eliminate a deficit (e.g., cutting administrative costs, raising alumni donations).
To accurately find a parallel flaw, the exact nature of the logical error—in this case, a False Dilemma—must be isolated.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find an argument that exhibits the exact same False Dilemma structure.
The correct option must present a goal, offer one potential solution, rule out that solution due to a constraint, and conclude that a completely different, specific solution is the only option, without explicitly limiting the choices in the premises.
Parallel Flaw requires matching both the abstract logical structure and the specific type of reasoning error.

Anahtar Kavram

False Dilemma (False Dichotomy)
Soru 344Soru →

Archaeologist: Recent excavations of the ancient settlement of Tlanex indicate a stark division in material culture. The highland sector contains thousands of intricately carved jade artifacts, whereas the lowland sector contains almost exclusively unpolished clay implements. Because the jade artifacts required hundreds of hours of specialized labor to produce, they were undoubtedly luxury items of immense value. Consequently, the inhabitants of the highland sector must have belonged to a significantly higher socioeconomic class than the inhabitants of the lowland sector.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the archaeologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The artifacts recovered from the highland and lowland sectors were not deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.

Cevap

The argument requires assuming that the artifacts recovered from the highland and lowland sectors were not deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.
To test if an assumption is necessary, we apply the Negation Technique: we make the statement false and see if the argument survives. If we negate the correct answer, it becomes: 'The artifacts recovered from the highland and lowland sectors WERE deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.' If the exact same group of people simply used the highland sector for one thing (e.g., storing wealth or ceremonies) and the lowland sector for another (e.g., farming or daily work), then there are no distinct 'inhabitants of the highland sector' to compare against 'inhabitants of the lowland sector.' Because negating this statement completely destroys the argument, the original statement is a logically necessary assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The inhabitants of the highland sector belonged to a significantly higher socioeconomic class than the inhabitants of the lowland sector.
This sets the target for the necessary assumption. The author is making a comparative claim about two distinct groups of people.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The highland sector contains immensely valuable luxury jade artifacts, while the lowland sector contains almost exclusively unpolished clay implements.
This establishes the evidence used to draw the conclusion: a geographical division of material wealth.
3
Find the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The author equates 'where artifacts are found' with 'where distinct socioeconomic classes lived'.
The author assumes the artifacts represent two different populations living in two different areas, rather than one population using different areas for different tasks (e.g., living in the highlands and working in the lowlands).
4
Apply the Negation Technique to the correct option to verify it is necessary.
Negated correct option: 'The artifacts WERE deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.'
If this negated statement is true, there are no separate 'highland inhabitants' and 'lowland inhabitants' to compare. The entire argument collapses, proving this assumption is strictly necessary.

Anahtar Kavram

Defender Assumption / Negation Technique
Soru 345Soru →

To investigate the effects of the amino acid taurine, researchers placed laboratory mice on a diet completely devoid of it, adding the synthetic filler Zylotol to maintain identical caloric intake. These mice soon exhibited severe cognitive decline compared to a control group on a standard diet. The researchers concluded that taurine deficiency directly causes cognitive impairment. A critic countered that Zylotol’s mild neurotoxic properties actually caused the observed decline. Nevertheless, the researchers maintained their original conclusion.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers' original conclusion in light of the critic's objection?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A separate group of mice fed a diet completely devoid of taurine but supplemented with an inert, non-toxic filler instead of Zylotol exhibited the exact same degree of cognitive decline.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that a separate group of mice fed an inert filler instead of Zylotol exhibited the exact same degree of cognitive decline.
The correct answer isolates the proposed cause (taurine deficiency) by completely removing the confounding variable (Zylotol) introduced by the critic. By demonstrating that an inert, non-toxic filler produces the exact same cognitive decline when taurine is absent, it definitively proves that the absence of taurine—not the presence of Zylotol—was the true cause of the impairment. This directly and powerfully supports the researchers' original conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and the premises.
Conclusion: Taurine deficiency directly causes cognitive impairment. Premise: Mice deprived of taurine and given Zylotol showed severe cognitive decline.
To establish the core argument of the researchers.
2
Identify the gap and the critic's specific objection.
The critic points out a confounding variable: Zylotol's mild neurotoxicity could be the actual cause of the decline, not the lack of taurine.
To understand the vulnerability in the researchers' reasoning that must be addressed.
3
Determine what logical move is needed to strengthen the researchers' conclusion.
We need evidence that isolates taurine deficiency as the true cause by explicitly ruling out Zylotol as the cause of the observed cognitive decline.
A strong strengthener in a causal dispute will effectively eliminate the alternative causal explanation provided by the critic.
4
Evaluate the options against this requirement.
The correct option removes Zylotol from the equation entirely (using an inert filler) and shows the decline still occurs to the exact same degree. This proves taurine deficiency alone is responsible.
To find the only choice that decisively resolves the causal dispute in favor of the researchers.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Reasoning: Ruling Out Alternative Explanations
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 346Soru →

In an effort to reduce respiratory illnesses, the local government of Oakhaven subsidized the installation of advanced air-purification systems in homes. These systems have been scientifically proven to eliminate 99 percent of common indoor allergens, such as dust mites and pet dander. Within a year, the majority of Oakhaven households had installed the systems. Nevertheless, public health records indicate that the total number of severe asthma attacks in Oakhaven actually increased over that same year.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The advanced air-purification systems drastically reduce indoor humidity, creating excessively dry air that severely irritates the respiratory tract and triggers asthma attacks.

Cevap

The advanced air-purification systems drastically reduce indoor humidity, creating excessively dry air that severely irritates the respiratory tract and triggers asthma attacks.
The correct answer resolves the paradox by introducing an unintended negative consequence of the air-purification systems. While the systems successfully perform their stated function of removing allergens, they simultaneously create excessively dry air. This dry air acts as a new, independent trigger for asthma attacks. This perfectly bridges the gap, explaining how the systems can be working exactly as intended regarding allergen removal while still ultimately causing an increase in the overall number of asthma attacks.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the first premise
The air-purification systems eliminate 99 percent of indoor allergens and were installed in a majority of homes.
Understanding the expected positive outcome (fewer asthma attacks).
2
Identify the second premise (the conflict)
The total number of severe asthma attacks in the city actually increased over the same year.
Pinpointing the exact nature of the surprising outcome.
3
Evaluate options for a bridging mechanism
Locate an option that allows both premises to be true by introducing a new factor caused by the systems that triggers asthma independently of allergens.
A valid resolution must explain the increase in attacks without denying the reduction in allergens.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Conflicting Premises
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 347Soru →

Policy Analyst: In an effort to reduce the municipality's overall greenhouse gas emissions, the local government recently shifted all non-essential administrative staff to a four-day workweek, closing their respective office buildings completely on Fridays. Since this scheduling change took effect, metered energy consumption in these municipal facilities has decreased by exactly one-fifth on Fridays compared to the historical average. Therefore, this policy will inevitably yield a net reduction in the municipality's total greenhouse gas emissions.

Which of the following are assumptions on which the policy analyst's argument depends? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The energy previously consumed by the municipal offices on Fridays was generated by sources that produce greenhouse gas emissions.; The administrative staff's energy usage at their residences on Fridays does not increase to a level that completely offsets the energy savings achieved by closing the municipal offices.

Cevap

The correct assumptions are that the previously consumed energy was generated by emission-producing sources, and that staff home energy usage does not completely offset the office savings.
For the analyst's conclusion about a 'net reduction in total emissions' to follow from the premise about a 'decrease in energy consumption', two things must be true: the energy being saved must actually have been responsible for emissions, and the savings must not be wiped out by increased energy consumption elsewhere (such as employees' homes).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the argument.
Premise: Closing offices on Fridays reduced Friday energy consumption by 20%. Conclusion: This policy will yield a net reduction in the municipality's total greenhouse gas emissions.
Identifying the exact premises and the main conclusion is the first step in finding gaps in the reasoning.
2
Identify logical gaps between the premises and the conclusion.
Gap 1: Equating 'energy consumption' with 'greenhouse gas emissions'. Gap 2: Assuming the Friday savings are not negated by increases elsewhere (like at home on Fridays or in the office Mon-Thu).
Necessary assumptions almost always bridge a gap between the evidence provided and the specific wording of the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the answer choices using the Negation Test.
Negating the correct options destroys the conclusion. If the energy wasn't producing emissions, saving it doesn't reduce emissions. If home usage offsets the savings, there is no net reduction.
The Negation Test is the definitive way to prove whether a statement is strictly necessary for an argument to hold.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying necessary defender and bridge assumptions using the Negation Test.
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 348Soru →

Read the argument below. Apply the Variance Test to evaluate the argument by matching the possible factual discoveries (left) to their logical impact on the agricultural economist's core conclusion (right).

Agricultural Economist: To combat declining yields of the traditional Zea corn crop, valley farmers are being encouraged to switch to a genetically modified variant, Zea-Max. Zea-Max is highly resistant to the region's most common pests, which routinely destroy a large portion of the harvest. Since pest damage is currently the primary cause of crop loss in the valley, adopting Zea-Max will undoubtedly lead to a significant increase in the farmers' overall annual profits.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Discovery: Zea-Max requires significantly more expensive fertilizers than the traditional corn.
Discovery: Zea-Max requires the exact same standard fertilizers as the traditional corn.
Discovery: Buyers pay significantly less per bushel for Zea-Max than for traditional corn.
Discovery: Buyers pay the exact same price per bushel for Zea-Max as for traditional corn.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matching aligns discoveries that increase costs or decrease selling price with a weakening impact, and aligns discoveries that keep costs and prices stable with a strengthening impact.
A valid argument evaluation requires identifying the assumptions made to reach the core conclusion. Here, the agricultural economist concludes that higher crop yields (due to pest resistance) will inherently lead to higher profits. However, profit depends on both revenue and cost. Discoveries that increase costs (such as expensive fertilizers) or decrease revenue per unit (such as a lower market price) directly weaken the argument by attacking these unstated assumptions. Conversely, discoveries that confirm costs and prices remain stable strengthen the argument by shielding it from these potential vulnerabilities. Therefore, the discoveries match perfectly with their corresponding logical impacts.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that adopting Zea-Max will lead to a significant increase in the farmers' overall annual profits.
Understanding the precise conclusion is necessary to determine what information would strengthen or weaken it.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Zea-Max is highly resistant to pests, and pest damage is currently the primary cause of crop loss.
The premises show the argument's logic: less pest damage means higher crop yield, which the author assumes automatically means higher profits.
3
Analyze the assumptions linking higher yield to higher profit.
The argument assumes that the costs of growing Zea-Max are not significantly higher, and the selling price is not significantly lower, than traditional corn.
Profit is calculated as Total Revenue minus Total Cost. If costs rise or revenue per unit drops, a higher crop yield might not result in higher profit.
4
Apply the Variance Test to the discoveries regarding fertilizer costs.
Expensive fertilizer introduces a new cost, weakening the profit claim. Conversely, standard fertilizer eliminates this cost risk, strengthening the claim.
This demonstrates how opposite factual outcomes to the evaluative question 'Does Zea-Max cost more to grow?' logically impact the argument.
5
Apply the Variance Test to the discoveries regarding market price.
A lower selling price reduces revenue per unit, weakening the profit claim. A stable selling price eliminates this revenue risk, strengthening the claim.
This demonstrates how opposite factual outcomes to the evaluative question 'Does Zea-Max sell for less?' logically impact the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Variance Test in Evaluating Arguments
Soru 349Soru →

To be considered a true artist, one must produce a masterpiece and possess profound vision. The CEO's new strategic plan for the conglomerate is universally hailed by financial analysts as a masterpiece. Furthermore, the CEO demonstrated profound vision by accurately anticipating the recent global market crash and adjusting the company's investments accordingly. Therefore, the CEO is a true artist.

The argument's reasoning is deeply flawed. Which of the following accurately describes an instance of equivocation (the illicit shifting of a term's meaning) committed by the author? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It uses "vision" to mean creative or aesthetic imagination in one context, but strategic or predictive foresight in another context.; It employs the term "masterpiece" to denote a monumental work of fine art initially, but later uses it to describe a highly successful corporate strategy.; It shifts the meaning of the word "artist" from a creator of traditional art forms to a practitioner exhibiting high-level competence in a corporate profession.

Cevap

The correct choices are those that identify the shifts in meaning for the terms 'vision', 'masterpiece', and 'artist'.
The correct choices accurately identify the three distinct semantic shifts occurring in the stimulus. The author takes terms traditionally associated with the fine arts ('vision', 'masterpiece', 'artist') and applies them in a fundamentally different, metaphorical sense to a corporate executive's business acumen. Because the argument relies on these words maintaining a consistent literal meaning to logically connect the first premise to the conclusion, these shifts constitute equivocations.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem to determine the specific task.
The stem requires identifying instances of 'equivocation' (the shifting of a term's meaning). It explicitly asks to 'Select all that apply', meaning multiple choices will be correct.
Understanding the exact constraint of the question is crucial, as the argument contains multiple types of logical flaws.
2
Evaluate the stimulus for any terms that change meaning between the premises and the conclusion.
The terms 'artist', 'masterpiece', and 'vision' are used in a fine arts context in the first sentence, but are applied in a corporate/financial context in the subsequent sentences.
Equivocation occurs when an argument relies on a word maintaining a single definition, but illicitly switches between two different definitions.
3
Evaluate each option against the findings from Step 2.
Three options accurately describe the semantic shifts of 'vision', 'masterpiece', and 'artist'.
These options directly answer the prompt's request to identify instances of equivocation.
4
Analyze the remaining incorrect options to ensure they do not describe an equivocation.
One incorrect option describes a conditional logic flaw (necessary vs. sufficient). Another describes a causal flaw. Neither describes a semantic shift.
Distractors in hard questions often describe actual flaws present in the stimulus that do not answer the specific question being asked.

Anahtar Kavram

Equivocation (Uncertain Use of a Term)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 350Soru →

To alleviate severe traffic congestion, the metropolitan government of Meridia implemented a 'congestion charge'—a substantial toll levied on any vehicle entering the central business district during designated peak commuting hours. One year after the policy's implementation, the total volume of vehicles entering the district during these peak hours had decreased by 25 percent. City officials declared the policy a resounding success. However, critics point out that during the same year, a severe national economic downturn caused a 25 percent drop in office employment within Meridia's central business district. The critics argue that the economic downturn, not the congestion charge, was responsible for the traffic reduction. The city officials reject this criticism, maintaining that the congestion charge was indeed the primary driver of the decreased peak-hour traffic.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the city officials' position?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Following the implementation of the charge, there was a substantial increase in the volume of vehicle traffic entering the central business district during the thirty minutes immediately preceding and the thirty minutes immediately following the designated peak hours.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that there was a substantial increase in vehicle traffic just outside the designated peak hours.
The core logical task is to isolate the true cause of the 25 percent traffic reduction: the congestion charge (as officials claim) or the economic downturn (as critics claim). The correct answer must provide evidence that supports the toll as the active mechanism. If the economic downturn were the primary cause, the unemployed individuals would simply cease their daily commute, leading to a general reduction in morning and evening traffic. However, the correct choice demonstrates a sharp increase in traffic volume in the thirty-minute windows immediately outside the tolled peak hours. This specific behavioral shift—adjusting travel times to avoid a penalty—is a direct fingerprint of the congestion charge. It strongly supports the officials' position by demonstrating that the toll is actively influencing commuter behavior, rather than commuters simply disappearing due to job loss.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion being supported.
The city officials' position is that the congestion charge, not the economic downturn, was the primary driver of the decreased peak-hour traffic.
Before evaluating options, you must isolate the exact claim that needs strengthening.
2
Analyze the logical gap.
The argument presents two concurrent phenomena (the toll and the downturn) that could both cause a reduction in traffic.
To strengthen the officials' claim, we must find evidence that isolates the toll as the active cause and rules out the downturn.
3
Determine the behavioral implications of each cause.
If the downturn caused the drop, unemployed commuters would simply stop driving to the district entirely. If the toll caused the drop, commuters would still need to travel but would shift their schedules to avoid the penalty.
Finding a distinct 'fingerprint' for one of the causes allows us to definitively choose between them.
4
Evaluate the options against this framework.
The option showing a traffic spike in the thirty minutes before and after the peak hours perfectly matches the behavioral fingerprint of a toll.
This definitively proves that the toll is actively influencing commuter behavior, rather than commuters simply disappearing due to job loss.

Anahtar Kavram

Isolating Causal Variables
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 351Soru →

Below are five brief arguments, each containing a specific logical vulnerability. Match each argument on the left to the abstract description of its flawed reasoning on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The architectural commission mandates that all historical district renovations maintain a 'conservative' aesthetic. The proposed gallery renovation relies on energy-efficient materials that conserve resources more effectively than traditional counterparts. Hence, the gallery's proposal fully satisfies the commission's aesthetic mandate.
An ecosystem can attain long-term equilibrium only if its apex predator population remains tightly constrained. In the sprawling northern taiga, recent conservation efforts have successfully implemented strict hunting quotas that keep the wolf population rigidly controlled. Consequently, the taiga ecosystem will soon achieve long-term equilibrium.
A recent survey of established novelists indicates a strong positive correlation between the frequency with which a writer hand-writes drafts and the critical acclaim their published works receive. It follows that aspiring novelists looking to maximize their critical reception ought to abandon their word processors in favor of pen and paper.
Each individual musician in the newly formed metropolitan symphony orchestra is a globally recognized virtuoso known for flawless timing and impeccable pitch. Therefore, the orchestra's inaugural performance will undoubtedly be a masterpiece of unified and perfectly synchronized musical expression.
In a recent poll of subscribers to 'Culinary Avant-Garde' magazine, over 80% reported that they strongly prefer molecular gastronomy techniques over traditional cooking methods. Therefore, we can safely conclude that the general dining public is rapidly losing interest in traditional cuisine.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings logically link each stimulus to its specific formal reasoning error: Argument 1 demonstrates Equivocation; Argument 2 commits a Necessary vs. Sufficient condition flaw; Argument 3 contains a Correlation vs. Causation error; Argument 4 commits a Fallacy of Composition; and Argument 5 relies on an Unrepresentative Sample.
The correct matches accurately pair each flawed argument stimulus with the formal description of its logical error, representing standard LSAT reasoning vulnerabilities such as Equivocation, Conditional Logic errors, Causal Flaws, Composition Flaws, and Sampling Flaws.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Argument 1 to identify how the term 'conservative' is used differently in the premise versus the conclusion.
Identifies equivocation on the word 'conservative'.
Tracking term definitions is essential when a conclusion relies on satisfying a mandate.
2
Evaluate Argument 2's conditional logic regarding ecosystem equilibrium and apex predators.
Recognizes the confusion between a necessary condition and a sufficient condition.
The premise states equilibrium happens 'only if' predators are constrained, but the conclusion treats it as a guarantee.
3
Assess Argument 3's inference about hand-writing drafts and critical acclaim.
Identifies a flawed leap from correlation to causation.
The argument observes a correlation but prescribes an action, assuming direct causality without eliminating alternative explanations.
4
Examine Argument 4's reasoning moving from individual musicians to the orchestra as a whole.
Recognizes the part-to-whole composition fallacy.
Individual traits (virtuosity) do not automatically transfer to the collective entity (orchestral synchronization).
5
Analyze Argument 5's use of a subscriber poll to make a general claim.
Identifies an unrepresentative sample flaw.
The sample group is highly biased toward avant-garde cuisine and cannot represent the general public.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Formal and Informal Logical Flaws in Arguments
Soru 352Soru →

Agricultural Scientist: The new Lumina strain of tomatoes has been genetically modified to produce a natural compound that repels the silverleaf whitefly, a major agricultural pest. In controlled greenhouse trials, Lumina plants suffered 80 percent less whitefly damage than conventional tomato plants. Therefore, transitioning to the Lumina strain in our region's commercial outdoor farms will undoubtedly lead to a significant increase in overall tomato yields.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the agricultural scientist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The natural compound produced by the Lumina strain does not repel the insects that are necessary for pollinating tomatoes in outdoor farms.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the natural compound produced by the Lumina strain does not repel the insects necessary for pollinating tomatoes.
This is a required assumption because applying the logical negation technique destroys the argument's conclusion. If we negate this statement to read, 'The natural compound produced by the Lumina strain DOES repel the insects that are necessary for pollinating tomatoes in outdoor farms,' the argument falls apart. If the plants repel the very insects needed to pollinate them, they will not bear fruit, making a 'significant increase in overall tomato yields' impossible. Thus, the scientist must assume the natural pesticide does not have this catastrophic side effect.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
Transitioning to the Lumina strain in commercial outdoor farms will lead to a significant increase in overall tomato yields.
Understanding the exact scope of the conclusion ('significant increase in overall yields' in 'outdoor farms') is critical for finding the necessary gap.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Lumina plants produce a compound that repels whiteflies, and in greenhouse trials, they suffered 80 percent less damage from this pest.
This establishes the evidence used to predict the future success of the crop.
3
Spot the logical gap in the reasoning.
The argument shifts from controlled greenhouse success (reducing pest damage) to outdoor agricultural success (increasing actual fruit yield).
Yield requires more than just pest resistance; in an outdoor environment, other factors (like pollination) are crucial.
4
Apply the Negation Technique to the answer choices.
Negating the correct option results in: 'The compound DOES repel the insects necessary for pollinating.' This directly destroys the possibility of increasing tomato yields.
A necessary assumption is one that, if proven false, completely dismantles the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying the Negation Technique to identify necessary assumptions that rule out fatal alternative explanations (Defender Assumptions).
Soru 353Soru →

Read the following two short excerpts regarding energy policy.

Passage A:
Wind energy represents the single most important breakthrough in our fight against climate change. We must transition exclusively to wind power immediately, as it is our only realistic hope for a sustainable future. Traditional fossil fuels are a disastrous dead end that must be completely abandoned without delay.

Passage B:
Wind energy certainly offers a valuable component for a diversified clean energy portfolio. However, relying on it as a solitary solution is dangerously naive, given its intermittent nature. A truly robust strategy requires a balanced integration of wind, solar, and advanced nuclear technologies.

Match each topic on the left with the description on the right that best characterizes the authors' tones and attitudes toward that topic.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

The general value of wind energy
Relying entirely on wind energy
Continued use of fossil fuels

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The general value of wind energy matches the shared positive attitude; relying entirely on wind energy matches Author A's support versus Author B's criticism; continued use of fossil fuels matches Author A's absolute rejection.
By closely reading the descriptive language, we can see Author A is zealously pro-wind and anti-fossil fuels, whereas Author B is moderately pro-wind but strongly against a wind-exclusive strategy. These explicit tone markers allow us to perfectly align each topic with its corresponding attitude description.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the authors' tones regarding the general value of wind energy.
Author A praises it as a breakthrough, and Author B acknowledges it as a valuable component. Both are positive.
This establishes that both authors share a generally favorable attitude toward wind energy itself.
2
Compare the authors' attitudes toward relying exclusively on wind energy.
Author A demands an exclusive transition to wind, while Author B criticizes this as dangerously naive.
This highlights a sharp contrast where Author A is highly supportive and Author B is highly critical of a wind-only approach.
3
Identify Author A's attitude toward fossil fuels.
Author A uses the phrase 'disastrous dead end' and demands they be abandoned.
This explicitly demonstrates a tone of harsh criticism and absolute rejection.

Anahtar Kavram

Tone and Attitude Comparison
Soru 354Soru →

Under the updated nomenclature established by the interstellar taxonomy committee, any celestial body that has a mass less than 13 Jupiter masses and is not gravitationally bound to a star is designated a planetary-mass isolated object (PMIO). No PMIOs have internal temperatures sufficient to ignite deuterium fusion. Furthermore, every celestial body possessing a detectable circumplanetary dust disk either has an internal temperature sufficient to ignite deuterium fusion or is actively accreting mass from a surrounding stellar nursery. Astronomers recently identified three celestial bodies in the Orion Molecular Cloud that are designated as PMIOs and possess detectable circumplanetary dust disks.

Which of the following must be true based on the information provided above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The three recently identified celestial bodies in the Orion Molecular Cloud are actively accreting mass from a surrounding stellar nursery.

Cevap

The correct answer is the one stating that the three recently identified celestial bodies in the Orion Molecular Cloud are actively accreting mass from a surrounding stellar nursery.
The correct answer accurately traces a multi-step conditional chain. We are told the three bodies are PMIOs, meaning they lack deuterium fusion. We are also told they have disks, meaning they must either have deuterium fusion or be actively accreting mass. Since we know they lack deuterium fusion, they are logically forced into the second category: they must be actively accreting mass.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditions applied to the three newly identified celestial bodies.
The three bodies are designated as PMIOs and possess detectable circumplanetary dust disks.
This establishes the factual starting point to trigger the conditional rules.
2
Apply the rule regarding PMIOs to the three bodies.
Because they are PMIOs, the three bodies do not have internal temperatures sufficient to ignite deuterium fusion.
The stimulus categorically states 'No PMIOs have internal temperatures sufficient to ignite deuterium fusion.'
3
Apply the rule regarding circumplanetary dust disks.
Because they have detectable circumplanetary dust disks, the bodies must either ignite deuterium fusion OR actively accrete mass.
The stimulus dictates a mandatory 'either/or' requirement for any object possessing a detectable circumplanetary dust disk.
4
Synthesize the results from Step 2 and Step 3.
Since the bodies cannot ignite deuterium fusion (Step 2), they must satisfy the other half of the 'either/or' condition: they must be actively accreting mass from a surrounding stellar nursery.
When one option of a mandatory binary requirement is definitively eliminated, the remaining option becomes a logical certainty.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal Logic Deductions with Inclusive Disjunctions and Conditionals
Soru 355Soru →

Analyze the logical vulnerabilities present in the four domain-specific arguments below. Map the text of each argument to the precise structural characterization of its reasoning error.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Economics: Financial analysts note that every individual algorithmic trading model deployed by the banking consortium is rigorously programmed to suppress price volatility during sudden market shocks. Consequently, if all of these proprietary models are deployed simultaneously during a severe economic shock, the overall market volatility will undoubtedly be suppressed.
Linguistics: For linguists to conclusively demonstrate that two seemingly disparate regional dialects share a common ancestral proto-language, they must establish a comprehensive pattern of systematic phonetic correspondences. The recent phonological analysis of the highland and coastal dialects has revealed precisely such a pattern. Thus, this analysis definitively establishes that the dialects share a common ancestor.
Policy: Councilman Torres argues that municipal zoning laws should be overhauled to allow for mixed-use residential development in the industrial sector. However, we should reject this proposal out of hand. Torres is a silent partner in a real estate firm that recently purchased large tracts of land in that exact sector, meaning he stands to profit immensely from the rezoning.
Geophysics: According to geophysical theories, the presence of a massive subterranean iron deposit or a recent, localized meteorite impact will each independently generate a significant magnetic anomaly. Our survey of the Tularosa Basin detected such an anomaly, yet extensive excavations have definitively ruled out a meteorite impact. Therefore, there must be a massive subterranean iron deposit beneath the basin.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Economics maps to the system/components flaw (Composition). Linguistics maps to the necessary/sufficient confusion. Policy maps to the vested interest attack (Source Motive). Geophysics maps to assuming sufficient conditions are exclusive causes.
Each argument exhibits a distinct structural vulnerability. The Economics argument fallaciously transfers a characteristic of individual components to the entire system (Composition). The Linguistics argument treats phonetic correspondences, which are necessary to establish a common ancestor, as sufficient to guarantee it. The Policy argument attacks a proposal by citing the proponent's financial motives rather than addressing the merits of the rezoning (Ad Hominem). The Geophysics argument assumes that because iron deposits and meteorite impacts are sufficient to cause a magnetic anomaly, no other cause is possible, thus ruling out the meteorite impact and erroneously concluding an iron deposit must be present.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the Economics argument to identify its structural flaw.
The argument shifts from the properties of individual parts to the property of the entire system.
Identifying this shift reveals the fallacy of composition, which matches the description regarding drawing a conclusion about an entire system based on its independent components.
2
Evaluate the Linguistics argument's use of conditional logic.
The argument states that phonetic correspondences are required ('must establish') but concludes that finding them 'definitively establishes' the common ancestor.
This is a classic necessary versus sufficient flaw, mapping to the description that treats a condition 'without which a claim cannot be established' as one that 'guarantees' it.
3
Assess the Policy argument's critique of the councilman.
The argument dismisses the rezoning proposal strictly because Torres stands to profit financially.
This constitutes an attack on the source's vested interest rather than the proposal's merits, mapping directly to the 'vested interest' description.
4
Deconstruct the causal reasoning in the Geophysics argument.
The argument observes an anomaly and concludes that since a meteorite didn't cause it, an iron deposit must have, despite both being only stated as sufficient.
This ignores other potential causes, matching the description that assumes one of the known independently sufficient conditions must be the true cause.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Flaw Identification and Structural Abstraction
Soru 356Soru →

Match each argument on the left with the evidentiary finding on the right that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Marine biologists observed that deep-sea vent crabs graze on bacterial mats almost exclusively immediately following pulses of dissolved methane from hydrothermal vents. They concluded that methane surges directly trigger the crabs' grazing activity.
A developmental study found that children whose parents frequently used spatial terms during block play scored significantly higher on geometric rotation tests three months later than peers. The researchers concluded that hearing spatial terms actively enhances geometric reasoning in young children.
To curb urban vehicular emissions, a metropolitan transit agency eliminated fares on its light-rail network. Because total rail ridership increased by 40 percent over the subsequent six months, planners concluded that the fare-free policy successfully lowered automotive carbon emissions.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The marine biology argument pairs with the finding isolating methane in a controlled aquarium; the spatial language argument pairs with the finding controlling for children's baseline spatial aptitude; and the transit policy argument pairs with the finding confirming that new light-rail riders shifted specifically from gasoline automobiles.
Each matched pair directly targets and resolves the core analytical vulnerability of its argument. For the marine biology argument, the controlled aquarium finding eliminates environmental confounding variables. For the developmental study, controlling for baseline aptitude rules out selection bias and reverse causation. For the transit policy, demonstrating that new riders displaced automobile trips confirms that increased ridership actually reduced automobile emissions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the reasoning gap in the marine biology argument.
The argument assumes methane directly causes feeding, ignoring potential confounding variables that accompany hydrothermal venting events.
Strengthening a causal claim requires isolating the causal agent or eliminating third-variable explanations.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the developmental language study.
The argument fails to account for preexisting spatial aptitude that might have caused both higher test scores and greater parental engagement.
Strengthening an observational correlation requires ruling out selection bias and reverse causality.
3
Identify the reasoning gap in the municipal transit argument.
The argument equates higher public transit use with reduced car emissions without establishing where the new passengers originated.
Strengthening a policy claim requires verifying the substitution mechanism from the polluting activity.
4
Match each argument with its uniquely targeted strengthener.
Each argument pairs precisely with the finding that resolves its specific logical vulnerability.
Each strengthener supplies the exact evidentiary bridge required by its respective argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal and inductive arguments by isolating causal variables, controlling for baseline selection bias, and confirming essential substitution mechanisms.
Soru 357Soru →

Each excerpt below presents an academic argument that relies on an unstated premise. Match each argument with the implicit assumption on which its conclusion necessarily depends.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Marine Geochemist: Benthic foraminifera shells preserved in deep-sea sediment cores show marked spikes in barium-to-calcium ratios specifically during deglaciation phases. Because continental river runoff is the primary global source of dissolved barium entering ocean basins, pulses of intense glacial meltwater discharge must have reached the deep abyss during these climate transitions.
Phonologist: Infants raised in bilingual households maintain the ability to distinguish non-native tonal contrasts significantly longer into infancy than do infants raised in monolingual households. Because exposure to diverse acoustic pitch contours is known to delay perceptual narrowing, infant-directed speech in bilingual environments must possess acoustic pitch variations that monolingual speech lacks.
Economist: Following a municipal fee levied on single-use beverage containers, discarded container litter along public riverbanks dropped by 40 percent in six months. Because municipal sanitation schedules and cleanup budgets remained completely unchanged, the fee must have successfully motivated consumers to curtail their container usage or utilize proper recycling receptacles.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Each argument correctly matches its corresponding defender assumption: the marine geochemistry argument depends on the assumption that sediment chemical alteration did not produce the barium signal; the phonology argument depends on the assumption that non-acoustic cognitive mechanisms did not cause the perceptual delay; and the economics argument depends on the assumption that third-party collectors did not remove the litter after disposal.
For each pair, the right-hand statement functions as a vital defender assumption. Applying the Negation Test confirms their necessity: if post-depositional seafloor processes created the barium spikes, the geochemist's inference that surface meltwater penetrated the abyss is unsupported; if domain-general attention accounts for prolonged tonal discrimination, the phonologist's claim about acoustic properties in bilingual speech is unjustified; if third-party salvagers cleaned up the cans, the economist's claim regarding changed consumer habits is unwarranted.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and primary evidence in each argument on the left.
The geochemist infers meltwater penetration from shell chemistry; the phonologist infers unique acoustic contours in speech from auditory performance; the economist infers changed consumer disposal behavior from reduced litter counts.
Establishing the precise logical leap in each argument isolates what must be true for the author's reasoning to stand.
2
Apply the Negation Test to determine which unstated assumption is strictly required by each argument.
Negating the geochemist's match (post-depositional migration did cause the barium) invalidates the runoff conclusion; negating the phonologist's match (domain-general attentional adaptations caused the retention) invalidates the speech-input inference; negating the economist's match (scavengers collected the containers) breaks the link between litter reduction and consumer behavioral change.
A necessary assumption must fatally undermine the conclusion when logically negated.
3
Match each argument ID to its corresponding necessary assumption ID.
Pair the geochemist's argument with the sediment migration assumption, the phonologist's argument with the cognitive mechanism assumption, and the economist's argument with the third-party collector assumption.
Ensures all one-to-one logical dependencies are correctly paired without mismatching across domains.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Model and the Negation Test)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 358Soru →

Paleontologist: Fossil specimens of *Eoconstrictor*, an ancient snake from the Eocene epoch, exhibit cranial and vertebral adaptations characteristic of modern arboreal snakes that hunt in high forest canopies. Additionally, fossilized stomach contents from three distinct specimens contain remains of an arboreal lizard species. Therefore, *Eoconstrictor* must have hunted primarily in tree canopies rather than foraging along the forest floor.

Which of the following statements, if true, undermine the paleontologist's argument? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The arboreal lizard species identified in the gut contents spent substantial periods basking on the forest floor, where it was most easily ambushed.; Biomechanical models indicate that the bone density and mass of *Eoconstrictor* would have prevented it from climbing or navigating slender canopy branches.

Cevap

The statements showing that the prey was accessible on the forest floor and that the predator had physical constraints preventing canopy climbing both undermine the conclusion.
The argument concludes that the predator hunted primarily in tree canopies based on two premises: anatomical similarity to modern arboreal snakes and the presence of arboreal lizard remains in its stomach. The statements that weaken this reasoning show that the arboreal lizard prey was accessible on the forest floor during basking and that the predator possessed physical traits that made climbing into canopies biomechanically unfeasible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and main conclusion
Premises: The snake exhibits skeletal traits seen in canopy hunters, and its stomach contents contained an arboreal lizard. Conclusion: The snake hunted primarily in tree canopies rather than on the forest floor.
Clarifying the conclusion and supporting evidence reveals the core assumption: that anatomical similarity and prey identity necessarily imply canopy foraging behavior.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities and alternative explanations
The argument assumes that arboreal prey could only be caught in trees and that morphological traits definitively indicate canopy locomotion.
Weakeners will either offer an alternative explanation for how canopy prey was consumed on the ground or demonstrate why canopy hunting was improbable.
3
Evaluate each choice to identify all statements that weaken the reasoning
The choice showing that the lizards basked on the ground severs the link between prey type and canopy hunting, while the choice showing biomechanical climbing limitations directly counters the feasibility of canopy hunting.
Both statements independently introduce evidence that diminishes the plausibility of the paleontologist's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying alternative explanations and physical constraints to weaken causal and behavioral inferences
Soru 359Soru →

Passage A
The recent push to expand antitrust enforcement beyond the 'consumer welfare' standard fundamentally misapprehends the institutional limits of the judiciary. Proponents of the structuralist approach argue that antitrust laws should be wielded to break up monopolies in order to disperse political power and protect democratic institutions. While it is undeniable that massive corporate conglomerates exert substantial political influence, the judiciary is not the appropriate vehicle for redressing such imbalances. Judges are equipped to evaluate quantifiable metrics, such as output restrictions and price increases. When courts are instead asked to determine how much market share constitutes an unacceptable threat to democracy, they are left without objective legal standards, inevitably transforming antitrust enforcement into an exercise in arbitrary, subjective policymaking.

Passage B
For nearly a century, the primary objective of antitrust law was the preservation of a decentralized economy, operating on the understanding that concentrated market power inherently translates into dangerous political leverage. The modern reduction of antitrust jurisprudence to the 'consumer welfare' standard—which focuses exclusively on short-term price effects—is a historical aberration. Defenders of this narrow approach often claim that evaluating the political consequences of corporate consolidation requires sociological judgments that courts are incapable of making. Yet this ahistorical defense ignores the reality that, prior to the 1970s, courts routinely and successfully applied structuralist antitrust principles. Evaluating market dominance and its threat to democratic competition requires no more subjective guesswork than is demanded by the highly malleable econometric models currently used to predict consumer pricing.

Statement: The authors of Passage A and Passage B are committed to disagreeing over whether large corporate conglomerates possess the ability to exert influence over political systems.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. Both authors agree that large corporate conglomerates exert political influence; their disagreement centers on whether antitrust law and the judiciary are the appropriate tools to address this influence.
The statement is false because it misidentifies a shared premise as a point of contention. Passage A explicitly states, 'While it is undeniable that massive corporate conglomerates exert substantial political influence...' thereby conceding the point. Passage B builds its argument on the premise that 'concentrated market power inherently translates into dangerous political leverage.' Because both authors acknowledge that corporate conglomerates exert political influence, they do not disagree on this issue. Their actual disagreement is about institutional competence—specifically, whether the judiciary is equipped to use antitrust laws to remedy this political influence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Passage A's stance on whether corporate conglomerates exert political influence.
Passage A explicitly concedes this premise, stating, 'it is undeniable that massive corporate conglomerates exert substantial political influence.'
Identifying the first author's explicit view on the core concept of the proposition is required to establish one side of the potential disagreement.
2
Analyze Passage B's stance on whether corporate conglomerates exert political influence.
Passage B asserts this premise as foundational, stating that 'concentrated market power inherently translates into dangerous political leverage.'
Identifying the second author's view allows for a direct comparison against the first author's view.
3
Compare the two stances to evaluate the statement.
Since both authors acknowledge that corporate conglomerates exert political influence, they do not disagree on this specific proposition. The statement claiming they disagree on this point is therefore false.
A genuine point of disagreement requires one author to affirm a proposition and the other to reject it.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Shared Premises from Points of Disagreement in Comparative Reading
Soru 360Soru →

Cognitive neuropsychologists evaluating language recovery in a prospective clinical cohort established the following facts:

• Any patient exhibiting damage to the left inferior parietal lobule experiences severe phonological retrieval deficits.
• All patients with severe phonological retrieval deficits fail the rapid naming latency benchmark unless they receive structured multimodal speech therapy.
• No patient in the prospective clinical cohort who failed the rapid naming latency benchmark was able to maintain unassisted conversational fluency.
• Some patients in the cohort who received structured multimodal speech therapy nevertheless failed the rapid naming latency benchmark.
• Patient K is a participant in the prospective clinical cohort who maintained unassisted conversational fluency.

Based on the statements above, which of the following must be true? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Patient K did not fail the rapid naming latency benchmark.; If Patient K exhibits damage to the left inferior parietal lobule, Patient K received structured multimodal speech therapy.

Cevap

The statements establishing that Patient K did not fail the rapid naming latency benchmark and that Patient K received structured multimodal speech therapy if exhibiting damage to the left inferior parietal lobule must both be true.
The claim that Patient K did not fail the rapid naming latency benchmark is directly deduced via the contrapositive of the rule that benchmark failure precludes conversational fluency. The conditional claim regarding left inferior parietal lobule damage follows because such damage guarantees a phonological deficit, which would have caused benchmark failure in the absence of therapy; because Patient K did not fail, therapy must have occurred if the damage exists.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between conversational fluency and the rapid naming benchmark for Patient K.
The stimulus states that no cohort member who failed the benchmark maintained fluency. Because Patient K maintained fluency, Patient K cannot have failed the benchmark.
Applying the contrapositive of the universal rule linking benchmark failure to loss of fluency directly establishes Patient K's benchmark outcome.
2
Evaluate the conditional chain starting from hypothetical damage to the left inferior parietal lobule for Patient K.
Parietal damage guarantees a phonological retrieval deficit. A deficit guarantees failing the benchmark unless therapy is received. Since Step 1 established that Patient K avoided failing the benchmark, having the deficit necessitates having received therapy.
Modus tollens on the conditional rule (Deficit and No Therapy entails Failure) combined with the proven non-failure yields Therapy when Deficit is present.
3
Evaluate the remaining claims against the stimulus to confirm invalid inferences.
Claims asserting universal success from therapy, universal success from the absence of parietal damage, or the complete absence of parietal damage in Patient K are unsupported.
The premises allow individuals receiving therapy to fail and do not restrict other causes of failure or prohibit Patient K from having damage if treated.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional chaining, contraposition, and exception clauses in formal deductive logic
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 18 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin