Tüm alıştırma soruları

3960 soru

Soru 1701Soru →

Agricultural scientist: Over the past year, many farmers in the Oakhaven region transitioned to using a newly developed pest-control spray on their apple orchards. A recent survey shows that orchards using the new spray suffered, on average, a 15 percent higher rate of crop damage from insects compared to orchards that continued using the traditional pesticide. Therefore, the new pest-control spray must be less effective at repelling insects than the traditional pesticide.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the agricultural scientist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Farmers in Oakhaven generally switch to alternative pest-control methods only after their orchards suffer insect infestations that the traditional pesticide has failed to manage.

Cevap

The statement indicating that farmers generally switch to alternative pest-control methods only after their orchards suffer insect infestations that the traditional pesticide failed to manage.
The correct answer introduces a selection bias, which serves as an alternative explanation for the observed correlation. If farmers only use the new spray when their orchards are already suffering from severe infestations that the old pesticide could not handle, then the new spray is being tested exclusively on the most heavily infested orchards. This underlying condition explains the higher rate of crop damage and completely severs the assumed causal link that the new spray itself is less effective.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is: 'Therefore, the new pest-control spray must be less effective at repelling insects than the traditional pesticide.'
Understanding the main point the author is trying to prove is the first step in evaluating any argument.
2
Identify the premise supporting the conclusion.
The evidence is that orchards using the new spray suffered a 15 percent higher rate of crop damage than those using the traditional pesticide.
This establishes the correlation used to justify the causal conclusion.
3
Locate the logical flaw or gap in the reasoning.
The scientist assumes that the higher damage rate was caused by the new spray's ineffectiveness, ignoring other possible causes like selection bias (i.e., perhaps only the worst-off orchards switched to the new spray).
In causal arguments based on correlation, there is often a failure to consider alternative explanations or reverse causation.
4
Evaluate the options to find one that exploits this gap.
The option stating that farmers only use the new spray when traditional methods fail provides a reason why those specific orchards would have higher damage regardless of the new spray's effectiveness.
This directly undermines the causal relationship claimed in the conclusion, effectively weakening the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying alternate causes for an observed correlation (Selection Bias)
Soru 1702Soru →

Marine Biologist: Over the past decade, the population of the silver-finned reef shark in the Salerian Sea has declined by nearly 40 percent. During this same period, commercial fishing operations have steadily increased their use of deep-water drift nets in the region. Since drift nets frequently entangle large marine predators, environmentalists have blamed the fishing industry. However, recent surveys show that the shark population has declined just as sharply in the northern marine sanctuary, where all commercial fishing has been strictly banned for twenty years. Therefore, the increased use of drift nets cannot be the primary cause of the shark's decline.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the marine biologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The silver-finned reef shark is a highly migratory species that spends several months each year foraging in the commercial fishing zones before returning to the northern marine sanctuary.

Cevap

The statement that the silver-finned reef shark is a highly migratory species that travels between the sanctuary and commercial fishing zones.
The correct answer exploits a crucial assumption in the marine biologist's argument: that the sharks living in the sanctuary stay in the sanctuary. If the sharks migrate into the commercial fishing zones for part of the year, they are exposed to the drift nets. This perfectly explains how drift nets could be the primary cause of the population decline even for sharks counted in the fishing-free sanctuary. By showing how the cause (nets) can still produce the effect (decline) despite the author's counter-evidence, this severely weakens the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the increased use of drift nets cannot be the primary cause of the shark's decline.
This is the main claim the marine biologist is trying to prove based on the provided evidence.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The primary premise is that the shark population declined just as sharply in a marine sanctuary where fishing is banned.
Understanding the evidence helps identify the logical gap the author is relying on.
3
Identify the assumption connecting the premise to the conclusion.
The argument assumes that the sharks in the sanctuary are a distinct, isolated population that is never exposed to the drift nets used in the commercial zones.
If the sanctuary sharks are exposed to the nets elsewhere, the decline in the sanctuary could still be caused by those nets.
4
Select the option that attacks this assumption.
The option stating the sharks migrate between the zones directly attacks the assumption.
If they migrate, the sanctuary sharks are being killed by the nets when they leave the sanctuary, which perfectly explains why the sanctuary population is also dropping. This destroys the biologist's reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying implicit spatial or temporal assumptions in causal reasoning.
Soru 1703Soru →

Ecologist: A forest ecosystem is truly stable only if it contains a highly diverse network of mycorrhizal fungi. Recent soil analyses confirm that the newly protected Blackwood Reserve contains one of the most highly diverse networks of mycorrhizal fungi ever documented in the region. Therefore, we can confidently conclude that the Blackwood Reserve is a stable forest ecosystem.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the ecologist's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It treats a condition that is required for a forest ecosystem to be stable as a condition that guarantees the stability of that ecosystem.

Cevap

The argument treats a condition that is required for a forest ecosystem to be stable as a condition that guarantees the stability of that ecosystem.
The correct answer accurately identifies that the ecologist confuses a necessary condition with a sufficient condition. The first premise establishes that a highly diverse network of mycorrhizal fungi is required (a necessary condition) for a stable ecosystem. The argument then observes that the Blackwood Reserve meets this requirement and incorrectly concludes that simply meeting this requirement is enough (a sufficient condition) to guarantee that the ecosystem is stable.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and main conclusion.
Premise 1: If a forest ecosystem is stable, it must have highly diverse fungi (Stable -> Diverse Fungi). Premise 2: Blackwood Reserve has highly diverse fungi. Conclusion: Blackwood Reserve is stable.
Breaking down the argument structure is essential to evaluating its logical validity.
2
Analyze the logical relationship between the premises and the conclusion.
The argument affirms the necessary condition (the presence of diverse fungi) and incorrectly uses it to deduce the sufficient condition (that the ecosystem is stable).
This identifies the exact gap or error in the reasoning process.
3
Select the option that accurately describes this specific logical error.
The correct option states that the argument confuses a required (necessary) condition with a guaranteeing (sufficient) condition.
This matches the 'necessary vs. sufficient' flaw demonstrated in the stimulus perfectly.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws
Soru 1704Soru →

Sociologist: A thriving metropolitan arts sector requires a persistent influx of philanthropic capital. We also know that whenever a metropolitan area sustains a thriving arts sector, it invariably experiences an accelerated rate of gentrification. Thus, we can safely conclude that an accelerated rate of gentrification within a metropolitan area ensures that the region is receiving a persistent influx of philanthropic capital.

The reasoning in the sociologist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument...

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a phenomenon that is an inevitable byproduct of a particular condition as sufficient to guarantee a prerequisite for that condition

Cevap

The option stating that the argument treats a phenomenon that is an inevitable byproduct of a particular condition as sufficient to guarantee a prerequisite for that condition.
The argument establishes that a thriving arts sector necessitates both philanthropic capital (a prerequisite) and gentrification (an inevitable byproduct). The sociologist then incorrectly concludes that the presence of gentrification is sufficient to prove the presence of philanthropic capital. The correct answer choice perfectly translates this specific structural error into abstract terms.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the formal logic of the first premise.
Thriving Arts Sector -> Philanthropic Capital (A thriving arts sector is sufficient to know there is capital; capital is the necessary prerequisite).
Identifying the baseline conditional relationship established by the word 'requires'.
2
Map the formal logic of the second premise.
Thriving Arts Sector -> Gentrification (A thriving arts sector is sufficient to know gentrification is happening; gentrification is an inevitable byproduct).
Tracking the second relationship established by the words 'whenever' and 'invariably'.
3
Map the formal logic of the conclusion.
Gentrification -> Philanthropic Capital (Gentrification ensures the presence of capital).
Identifying exactly what the author is trying to prove based on the premises.
4
Compare the conclusion to the premises to isolate the logical gap.
The author knows two things that result from a thriving arts sector, and incorrectly concludes that the presence of one resulting factor (gentrification) guarantees the presence of the other factor (capital).
This reveals the structural flaw: assuming two necessary conditions of a common sufficient condition guarantee each other.
5
Translate the specific terms into the abstract language of the answer choices.
Gentrification = inevitable byproduct. Thriving Arts Sector = particular condition. Philanthropic Capital = prerequisite.
Matching the conceptual logic to the highly abstract language used in top-difficulty LSAT questions.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying complex conditional logic flaws using abstract structural descriptions.
Soru 1705Soru →

For centuries, historians characterized the period following the collapse of the Roman Empire in Western Europe as a "Dark Age"—a time of cultural stagnation and intellectual regression. This view, widely accepted until the mid-twentieth century, suggests that scientific inquiry essentially ceased until the Renaissance. However, recent archaeological discoveries compel a reevaluation of this consensus. Excavations across Europe have uncovered complex watermills, advanced agricultural tools, and sophisticated metalworking techniques dating precisely to this supposedly stagnant era. These artifacts indicate that far from halting entirely, technological innovation adapted to changing economic realities and continued at a steady pace. Rather than a period of intellectual darkness, the early medieval era was characterized by significant, albeit localized, technological problem-solving that laid the groundwork for later agricultural revolutions.

Which of the following most accurately describes the primary purpose of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: challenge a widely accepted historical narrative by presenting new archaeological evidence

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the purpose is to challenge a widely accepted historical narrative by presenting new archaeological evidence.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the author's rhetorical strategy. The passage establishes a longstanding historical consensus regarding the 'Dark Age' and then explicitly uses 'recent archaeological discoveries' to compel a 'reevaluation' of that consensus. Therefore, the overarching purpose is to challenge that historical narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural flow of the passage.
The passage begins by outlining a traditional historical view (the 'Dark Age'), pivots with the word 'However', and then introduces new archaeological findings to argue that the traditional view is incorrect.
Tracking the structural shifts helps determine the author's rhetorical strategy.
2
Determine the author's rhetorical intent based on the structure.
The structure reveals that the author's intent is argumentative and revisionist—they are actively opposing an established belief.
The primary purpose must reflect the author's overarching goal, not just the content they discuss.
3
Distinguish between the main point and the primary purpose.
The main point is that technological progress occurred during the early medieval era. The primary purpose is the broader action of using evidence to overturn the older historical consensus.
Primary purpose questions require an active rhetorical verb that captures the author's motive.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the author's rhetorical intent and structural objective.
Soru 1706Soru →

Analyze the following natural language arguments concerning interstellar mission protocols. Match each argument to its exact underlying formal symbolic conditional structure. Let the variables XX, YY, and ZZ represent the distinct conditions or events in the order they logically appear.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A spacecraft can initiate the landing sequence only if it has cleared the debris field. The debris field will not be cleared unless the shield generator is fully operational. Thus, if a spacecraft lacks a fully operational shield generator, it cannot initiate the landing sequence.
Approval from the science directorate is required for commencing the drilling operation. Approval from the science directorate requires submission of a hazard report. Therefore, if a hazard report has been submitted, the drilling operation will commence.
The crew will experience optimal gravity only if the rotation module is engaged. The rotation module will be engaged only if the primary reactor is functioning. The primary reactor is currently offline. Thus, the crew will not experience optimal gravity.
If the navigation sensors detect an anomaly, the main thrusters will automatically shut down. The main thrusters shutting down will cause the auxiliary beacons to activate. The navigation sensors did not detect an anomaly. Thus, the auxiliary beacons will not activate.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The arguments logically map as follows: the landing sequence argument features a contrapositive chain; the drilling operation argument features an illegal reversal flaw; the gravity argument features a valid modus tollens deduction; and the navigation sensors argument features an illegal negation flaw.
Each natural language argument uniquely translates into one of the provided formal skeletons based on strict syntactic indicators ('only if', 'unless', 'requires', 'causes'). Carefully mapping the sufficient and necessary conditions reveals two flawed arguments (one illegal reversal, one illegal negation) and two valid deductions (one contrapositive, one modus tollens chain).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the 'landing sequence' argument into formal logic.
X -> Y, ~Z -> ~Y. Conclusion: ~Z -> ~X.
Understanding 'only if' as introducing a necessary condition, and 'unless' as 'if not' reveals the valid conditional chain.
2
Translate the 'drilling operation' argument into formal logic.
X -> Y, Y -> Z. Conclusion: Z -> X.
Identifying 'is required for' and 'requires' helps spot the illegal reversal flaw where the conclusion reverses the established sufficient-necessary relationship.
3
Translate the 'optimal gravity' argument into formal logic.
X -> Y, Y -> Z, ~Z. Conclusion: ~X.
Chaining the two 'only if' statements creates a transitive path. Denying the final necessary condition (~Z) validly denies the initial sufficient condition (~X).
4
Translate the 'navigation sensors' argument into formal logic.
X -> Y, Y -> Z, ~X. Conclusion: ~Z.
The chain is established by 'if' and 'cause'. The premise denies the initial sufficient condition (~X) to wrongly deny the final necessary condition (~Z), which is an illegal negation.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Conditional Logic
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 1707Soru →

Historians of technology often attribute the rapid expansion of the British textile industry in the late eighteenth century solely to the invention of the steam engine. However, this view overlooks a crucial precursor. Before steam power became widespread, the development of the water frame—a spinning machine powered by waterwheels—dramatically accelerated yarn production. This early mechanization required factories to be situated near fast-flowing rivers, fundamentally shifting the industry away from decentralized home-based production. The massive increase in yarn output generated by the water frame created a critical bottleneck in the weaving process, which in turn directly spurred investors to fund the development of steam-powered power looms to handle the surplus yarn. Thus, it was the overproduction of yarn by water-powered machines, rather than the mere availability of steam technology, that initially necessitated the mechanization of the weaving sector.

According to the passage, which of the following directly caused investors to fund the development of steam-powered power looms?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An excess of yarn produced by early water-powered spinning machines.

Cevap

An excess of yarn produced by early water-powered spinning machines.
The correct answer accurately paraphrases the explicit causal statement in the passage. The text states that 'The massive increase in yarn output... directly spurred investors to fund the development of steam-powered power looms.' 'Massive increase in yarn output' is perfectly captured by 'An excess of yarn'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the passage to locate the specific mention of 'investors' and 'steam-powered power looms'.
Found in the sentence: 'The massive increase in yarn output generated by the water frame created a critical bottleneck in the weaving process, which in turn directly spurred investors to fund the development of steam-powered power looms...'
Identifying the specific textual reference ensures the answer is based on explicit causal statements rather than inferences or outside knowledge.
2
Identify the direct cause (antecedent) stated in that sentence.
The cause is identified as 'The massive increase in yarn output generated by the water frame'.
The question specifically asks for the direct cause of the investors' funding.
3
Match this cause to the options provided.
The correct option accurately paraphrases 'massive increase in yarn output' as 'An excess of yarn'.
Correct answers on the LSAT frequently paraphrase the text rather than quoting it verbatim.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying explicit cause-and-effect relationships within a passage
Soru 1708Soru →

Target Argument: A commercial spacecraft is cleared for launch only if its primary propulsion system passes a rigorous stress test. Passing this stress test requires that all fuel valves be completely free of micro-fractures. Consequently, any spacecraft whose fuel valves contain micro-fractures will not be cleared for launch.

Candidate Argument: No medical diagnostic algorithm is approved for clinical use unless it is validated on a diverse patient dataset. Validation on a diverse patient dataset is impossible without the explicit consent of multiple hospital networks. Thus, any diagnostic algorithm that has not been approved for clinical use must lack the explicit consent of multiple hospital networks.

Statement: The Candidate Argument exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is logically parallel to that of the Target Argument.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The correct answer is False because the two arguments differ fundamentally in their logical validity. The Target Argument forms a valid transitive chain (Cleared -> Passes -> Free of fractures) and correctly draws a contrapositive conclusion (~Free of fractures -> ~Cleared). In contrast, the Candidate Argument builds a structurally similar chain (Approved -> Validated -> Consent) but draws an invalid conclusion by illegally negating the sufficient condition (~Approved -> ~Consent). An invalid argument is never logically parallel to a valid one.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the Target Argument into formal conditional logic.
Premise 1: Cleared for launch (C) -> Passes stress test (P). Premise 2: Passes stress test (P) -> Free of micro-fractures (F). Chain: C -> F. Conclusion: Contains micro-fractures (~F) -> Not cleared (~C).
To establish the underlying logical skeleton and assess the validity of the Target Argument.
2
Evaluate the validity of the Target Argument.
The conclusion (~F -> ~C) is the valid contrapositive of the derived premise chain (C -> F). The Target Argument is structurally valid.
A candidate argument can only be logically parallel if it matches both the structural pattern and the validity of the target.
3
Translate the Candidate Argument into formal conditional logic.
Premise 1: Approved (A) -> Validated (V). Premise 2: Validated (V) -> Consent (C). Chain: A -> C. Conclusion: Not approved (~A) -> Lacks consent (~C).
To map the Candidate Argument's structure, looking past surface-level linguistic similarities.
4
Evaluate the validity of the Candidate Argument and compare it to the Target Argument.
The Candidate Argument's conclusion (~A -> ~C) incorrectly negates the sufficient condition, committing an illegal negation flaw. Because the Target Argument is valid and the Candidate Argument is flawed, they are not logically parallel.
Arguments with divergent logical validities cannot be considered parallel in reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Conditional Logic
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1709Soru →

For centuries, the common law of contracts was anchored in the principle of substantive justice; courts frequently scrutinized agreements to ensure an equitable exchange of value, occasionally voiding contracts deemed grossly unfair. During the nineteenth century, however, this paradigm was largely supplanted by the "will theory" of contract. Under this new doctrine, the courts' role was strictly limited to enforcing the mutual agreement—the "convergence of wills"—of the parties, regardless of the objective fairness of the terms.

The prevailing historical consensus attributes this doctrinal shift almost exclusively to the rise of industrial capitalism. Proponents of this view argue that the burgeoning commercial economy required absolute predictability. Specifically, the expansion of futures markets and complex commercial networks necessitated that executory contracts—agreements to perform actions in the future—be strictly enforced without the uncertainty of post hoc judicial reviews of fairness.

While the economic imperatives of industrialization undoubtedly played a crucial role, this purely materialistic explanation overlooks a critical intellectual catalyst. The ascendancy of the will theory was equally indebted to the contemporaneous rise of classical liberal political philosophy. Classical liberalism posited that the essence of individual liberty lay in the freedom of autonomous agents to bind themselves through voluntary agreement. By redefining contractual obligation as a manifestation of personal liberty rather than a matter of societal fairness, classical liberalism provided the ideological scaffolding necessary for the will theory to take root. Therefore, understanding the nineteenth-century transformation of contract law requires recognizing it as a confluence of both economic necessity and a profound shift in political ideology.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The nineteenth-century transition in contract law from substantive justice to the will theory was propelled by both the economic demands of industrial capitalism and the ideological tenets of classical liberalism.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the transition in contract law was propelled by both the economic demands of industrial capitalism and the ideological tenets of classical liberalism.
The correct answer perfectly encapsulates the passage's dual-cause argument. The final sentence of the passage acts as a clear thesis statement: 'understanding the nineteenth-century transformation of contract law requires recognizing it as a confluence of both economic necessity and a profound shift in political ideology.' The correct option accurately paraphrases this concluding synthesis.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the passage to determine the author's primary goal.
Paragraph 1 introduces the shift from substantive justice to the will theory. Paragraph 2 explains the standard economic rationale for this shift. Paragraph 3 introduces the author's addition: classical liberalism was an equally important intellectual cause.
Understanding the function of each paragraph reveals the overarching conclusion the author is building toward.
2
Synthesize the core argument based on the structural analysis.
The author is arguing that the purely economic explanation for the rise of the will theory is incomplete, and that a complete understanding requires acknowledging the ideological contribution of classical liberalism.
The main point must encompass the author's complete, finalized thought, usually found where they resolve competing ideas or complete a narrative.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the synthesized core argument.
The correct choice must mention both the economic and the ideological causes of the shift to the will theory. Options focusing only on the historical background or only on the economic needs are subsidiary points.
Distinguishing the main point from subsidiary points is critical; true statements from the text are often wrong answers if they only capture a fraction of the author's argument.

Anahtar Kavram

The main point of a passage is the comprehensive claim that all other paragraphs and details work together to support. In this passage, the author's main point synthesizes the economic context (Paragraph 2) with their novel ideological addition (Paragraph 3).
Soru 1710Soru →

Historically, anthropologists often operated under the assumption that hunter-gatherer societies possessed strictly egalitarian social structures, lacking any formalized hierarchy or wealth disparity. However, archaeological findings frequently challenge this uniform characterization. The presence of elaborate burial sites containing rare, imported artifacts alongside certain individuals, while others were interred with nothing, suggests that distinct social stratification existed in some pre-agricultural communities.

The author refers to "elaborate burial sites containing rare, imported artifacts" primarily to...

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: provide physical evidence that contradicts a traditional historical assumption regarding hunter-gatherer societies

Cevap

The correct answer states that the reference provides physical evidence that contradicts a traditional historical assumption regarding hunter-gatherer societies.
The passage begins by establishing a baseline assumption held by historical anthropologists: that hunter-gatherer societies were strictly egalitarian. The author then pivots, stating that archaeological findings challenge this idea. The reference to the burial sites immediately follows as the concrete, physical example of those findings, proving that social stratification and wealth disparity did exist.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the specific detail within the passage's structure.
The phrase "elaborate burial sites containing rare, imported artifacts" appears in the final sentence.
Understanding the immediate context of a detail is necessary to determine its function.
2
Analyze the sentences preceding the detail to identify the author's argument.
The first sentence introduces a traditional assumption (that hunter-gatherers were strictly egalitarian). The second sentence states that "archaeological findings frequently challenge" this assumption.
The rhetorical purpose of a specific detail is almost always linked to the broader claim it follows or precedes.
3
Determine how the detail relates to that broader claim.
The burial sites are an example of the "archaeological findings" that challenge the traditional assumption.
Connecting the specific example to the general claim reveals its function.
4
Evaluate the answer choices to find the one that matches this function.
The correct option accurately describes the detail as evidence contradicting a traditional assumption.
This completes the task of identifying the rhetorical role of the specific detail.

Anahtar Kavram

Function of Specific Details
Soru 1711Soru →

Below are four distinct valid arguments. Identify the underlying logical architecture of each by pairing it with its correct formal description.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

If the central bank raises interest rates this quarter, then inflation will stabilize by year-end. However, inflation will definitively not stabilize by year-end. Therefore, the central bank will not raise interest rates this quarter.
The newly discovered geological fault line was formed either by tectonic subduction or by localized volcanic activity. Core samples have conclusively ruled out localized volcanic activity. Thus, the fault line was formed by tectonic subduction.
If patients exhibit symptoms of prolonged sleep deprivation, their cognitive reaction times degrade. If their cognitive reaction times degrade, they become a liability when operating heavy machinery. Hence, if patients exhibit symptoms of prolonged sleep deprivation, they become a liability when operating heavy machinery.
All federally funded research grants mandate open-access publication of their final findings. The upcoming quantum computing initiative is a federally funded research grant. Consequently, the quantum computing initiative mandates open-access publication of its final findings.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The central bank argument pairs with Denying the Consequent; the fault line argument pairs with Elimination; the sleep deprivation argument pairs with Transitivity; and the research grant argument pairs with Categorical Application.
Each argument successfully demonstrates a distinct form of valid logical deduction. The central bank argument relies on Modus Tollens (denying the consequent). The fault line argument utilizes Disjunctive Syllogism (eliminating one alternative to affirm the other). The sleep deprivation argument uses Hypothetical Syllogism (chaining conditional statements). The research grant argument is an example of Universal Instantiation (applying a categorical rule to a specific instance).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure of the central bank argument.
The structure is 'If A then B. Not B. Therefore, Not A.'
Identifying the conditional reasoning pattern is necessary to find its formal description.
2
Analyze the logical structure of the fault line argument.
The structure presents an 'either-or' scenario and explicitly rules out one option to conclude the other must be true.
Recognizing the disjunctive nature of the premises leads to the correct structural match.
3
Analyze the logical structure of the sleep deprivation argument.
The argument links two conditional statements using a shared term ('cognitive reaction times degrade') to form a new overarching conditional.
Spotting the chained conditionals distinguishes this from single-conditional or categorical arguments.
4
Analyze the logical structure of the research grant argument.
The argument introduces a universal rule using 'All' and applies it to a specific instance ('the quantum computing initiative').
This categorical application is a hallmark of universal instantiation.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Valid Structure
Soru 1712Soru →

Read the following passage. Which sentence explicitly states the author's overall thesis? (Enter only the sentence number, e.g., '2')

[1] The traditional historiography of the industrial revolution emphasizes the rapid adoption of steam power as the primary catalyst for economic transformation in nineteenth-century Britain. [2] Revisionist historians have rightly contested this monocausal narrative by highlighting the indispensable role of highly skilled artisanal labor in fabricating the early steam engines, noting that without precision engineering, such theoretical innovations would have remained economically inert. [3] Yet, both traditionalists and revisionists operate under the flawed assumption that the locus of industrial transformation was exclusively technological and mechanical. [4] In reality, the most fundamental driver of the British industrial revolution was not the deployment of new machinery or the refinement of artisanal skills, but rather the unprecedented structural reorganization of credit and capital markets that allowed such physical innovations to be commercialized at scale. [5] The emergence of provincial joint-stock banks provided the necessary liquidity to bridge the temporal gap between raw material acquisition and the sale of finished manufactured goods. [6] Consequently, the early textile magnates were able to decouple production volume from their immediate personal wealth, scaling their operations to meet global demand. [7] To focus strictly on the physical infrastructure of the factory system is thus to mistake the visible symptoms of economic modernization for its underlying financial engine.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 4; Sentence 4; four; Sentence four; [4]

Cevap

Sentence 4
Sentence 4 explicitly states the author's central thesis: that the fundamental driver of the British industrial revolution was the structural reorganization of credit and capital markets, not technological or mechanical developments. The rest of the passage either sets up this claim by critiquing prior views or supports it with specific historical evidence regarding banking and textile production.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage's structural progression
Identified that Sentences 1 and 2 present existing historical frameworks, Sentence 3 provides a critique of those frameworks, Sentence 4 offers an alternative affirmative claim, and Sentences 5-7 provide evidence and concluding thoughts for that claim.
Determining the function of each sentence is necessary to separate background information and subsidiary arguments from the central thesis.
2
Evaluate sentences with concluding or transitional language
Discarded Sentence 6 ('Consequently...') and Sentence 7 ('...is thus to mistake...') as the main thesis.
Sentence 6 represents a subsidiary consequence of the banking changes, not the overarching argument. Sentence 7 is a concluding rhetorical flourish reiterating the critique from Sentence 3, rather than stating the affirmative thesis itself.
3
Locate the explicit affirmative claim of the author
Selected Sentence 4.
Sentence 4 provides the direct, comprehensive statement of the author's central argument: that financial reorganization, rather than technological or mechanical development, was the primary driver of the industrial revolution. All other sentences serve to introduce, support, or reiterate this specific point.

Anahtar Kavram

Explicit Main Point Identification
Soru 1713Soru →

Read the following passage regarding the legal debate over asteroid mining under the Outer Space Treaty. Based strictly on the explicitly stated arguments in the text, match each viewpoint or group with the statement that best captures its explicit main point.

Passage:
The imminent realization of commercial asteroid mining has ignited fierce debate over the interpretation of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (OST). Traditional legal scholars argue that the treaty’s non-appropriation clause strictly prohibits any commercial exploitation of celestial bodies, asserting that the extraction of resources constitutes a de facto claim of sovereignty, which the OST expressly forbids. In their view, all private mining efforts are fundamentally illegal under current international law.

Conversely, a pragmatist coalition of space-faring nations and commercial entities maintains that the OST only prohibits national appropriation of celestial territory, not the extraction and ownership of the resources themselves. They point to the historical analogy of international waters, where fishing is permitted despite the ocean itself belonging to no single nation, explicitly contending that resource extraction is a permissible use of space.

Meanwhile, a bloc of developing nations advances a different interpretation, explicitly contending that the OST implicitly designates space as the "common heritage of mankind." This group argues that any extracted space resources must be shared equitably among all nations, effectively precluding exclusive corporate profits and requiring a redistributive international regime.

While these varying interpretations highlight the ambiguity of the Cold War-era treaty, the current trajectory of unilateral national legislation regulating space mining is unsustainable. The explicit thesis of this essay is that the international community must urgently negotiate a new, comprehensive multilateral framework for space resources to prevent conflicting national laws from sparking severe geopolitical crises.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Traditional legal scholars
Pragmatist coalition
Developing nations bloc
The passage's author

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Traditional legal scholars match with the view that private extraction is unlawful. The Pragmatist coalition matches with the view that owning resources isn't claiming sovereignty. The Developing nations bloc matches with the view that benefits must be shared fairly. The Author matches with the need for a new global regulatory framework.
Each viewpoint in the passage is introduced with a distinct, explicitly stated main argument. The traditional scholars focus on the illegality of mining under current treaty law. The pragmatists distinguish between territorial sovereignty and resource ownership to argue mining is permissible. The developing nations focus on equitable distribution of resources. The author concludes with their own explicit thesis calling for a new international framework to prevent conflict.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first paragraph to identify the traditional legal scholars' main point.
They argue that the non-appropriation clause prohibits commercial exploitation, making private mining illegal.
This corresponds directly to the statement about private extraction being fundamentally unlawful.
2
Analyze the second paragraph to identify the pragmatist coalition's main point.
They maintain that the treaty prohibits appropriating territory, but not extracting and owning resources.
This corresponds to the statement that owning extracted resources does not constitute a prohibited claim of sovereignty.
3
Analyze the third paragraph to identify the developing nations bloc's main point.
They contend space is the 'common heritage of mankind' and resources must be shared equitably.
This aligns with the statement about distributing benefits fairly and precluding exclusive corporate profits.
4
Analyze the final paragraph to isolate the author's explicit thesis.
The author explicitly states the thesis is the urgent need for a new multilateral framework to prevent geopolitical crises.
This precisely matches the statement calling for a new global regulatory framework immediately.

Anahtar Kavram

Explicit Main Point Identification across multiple viewpoints
Soru 1714Soru →

During the late nineteenth century, common law courts faced a conceptual impasse regarding corporate liability for intentional torts. Traditional legal doctrine held that a corporation, as an artificial legal construct, lacked the requisite mental state—or *mens rea*—necessary to commit acts involving malice or fraudulent intent. Consequently, early jurisprudence often dictated that only the individual human agents acting on behalf of the corporation could be held liable for such transgressions. To bridge this gap, courts gradually expanded the doctrine of *respondeat superior*, allowing the intent of the agent to be imputed directly to the corporate entity. Many contemporary legal historians characterize this doctrinal evolution primarily as a pragmatic jurisprudential maneuver designed to ensure that plaintiffs could recover damages from well-capitalized corporate defendants rather than judgment-proof employees. However, this pragmatic interpretation obscures the deeper theoretical transformation that occurred. The jurisprudence establishing corporate liability for intentional torts did not merely provide a convenient mechanism for compensation; rather, it signaled a fundamental reconceptualization of the corporate entity itself. By attributing subjective intent to the corporation, courts ceased to treat it merely as a convenient aggregation of individual interests and began to recognize it as a distinct, autonomous legal actor capable of possessing its own institutional will.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The courts' establishment of corporate liability for intentional torts constituted a fundamental reconceptualization of the corporation as an autonomous actor with its own will, rather than merely a pragmatic method for securing compensation.

Cevap

The main point is that the legal shift allowing corporations to be held liable for intentional torts was not just a pragmatic financial maneuver, but a fundamental reconceptualization of the corporation as an autonomous entity possessing its own will.
The correct answer accurately captures the author's primary argument, which is introduced in the second half of the passage following the transition word 'However'. The author explicitly contrasts their view (that the legal shift was a fundamental reconceptualization of the corporation) against the view of contemporary legal historians (that the shift was merely pragmatic).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the passage to separate background context from the author's primary argument.
The first half establishes historical context (the difficulty of assigning intent to corporations) and the legal mechanism used to solve it (respondeat superior).
Identifying background information prevents mistaking subsidiary premises for the main point.
2
Identify the competing viewpoints presented in the text.
Legal historians view the shift as a pragmatic move for compensation. The author argues this 'obscures the deeper theoretical transformation.'
In passages featuring multiple viewpoints, the author's main point is usually located where they state their own position relative to the others.
3
Locate the author's thesis statement and synthesize its meaning.
The thesis is in the final two sentences: the shift 'signaled a fundamental reconceptualization' of the corporation as a 'distinct, autonomous legal actor.'
The main point must encompass the author's ultimate conclusion about the topic being discussed.
4
Evaluate the options to find the one that matches this synthesized thesis without being too broad or focusing on subsidiary details.
The option stating that the establishment of liability constituted a fundamental reconceptualization of the corporation as an autonomous actor perfectly captures the author's thesis.
Correct answers in main point questions must comprehensively cover the author's core argument, distinguishing it from mere background facts.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Main Point from Subsidiary Points
Soru 1715Soru →

Passage A
For centuries, legal scholars have predominantly viewed the enactment of the 1710 Statute of Anne—the world’s first comprehensive copyright law—as a watershed moment in the recognition of authors' natural rights. According to this deeply entrenched historical narrative, the statute represents a philosophical triumph of the individual over the collective. Prior to this legislation, the concept of intellectual property as an inherent right of the creator was virtually nonexistent; rights to texts were held almost exclusively by printers and publishers. Proponents of the natural-rights interpretation argue that the statute fundamentally redefined the relationship between creators and their work by enshrining the idea that authors possess an inherent, moral entitlement to the fruits of their intellectual labor. By firmly placing the author at the center of the copyright ecosystem, the law reflected a broader cultural movement that elevated original thought, suggesting that as the concept of individual genius gained cultural currency, the law naturally evolved to shield these independent creators from exploitation. The primary significance of the statute is thus understood as the codification of a philosophical ideal.

Passage B
A closer examination of the political and economic landscape of early eighteenth-century England reveals that the romanticized narrative of early copyright law as a champion of authors’ rights is largely a retrospective projection. The true impetus behind the Statute of Anne was not philosophical, but fiercely pragmatic: it was a calculated legislative intervention aimed at dismantling the oppressive monopoly of the Stationers’ Company. For decades, this powerful guild of printers and booksellers had maintained absolute control over the book trade, suppressing competition and dictating terms to both the state and the public. When the Stationers' perpetual licensing system expired, they actively lobbied parliament for a new legal framework to preserve their dominance. Ironically, the resulting statute, while ostensibly granting rights to authors, was primarily a regulatory mechanism designed to introduce statutory limits on copyright terms and stimulate a competitive marketplace. The authors themselves were merely convenient instruments in a broader economic policy, swiftly transferring their newfound, temporary rights back to publishers in exchange for publication. Therefore, early copyright was less a philosophical awakening than a strategic economic tool deployed to regulate industry monopolies.

Based on the passages, which of the following statements accurately describe the joint primary purpose shared by both authors? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: To examine the historical motivations and fundamental significance behind the establishment of early copyright legislation; To present distinct theoretical interpretations regarding the original catalysts for the passage of the Statute of Anne

Cevap

The correct selections are the options stating that the passages examine the historical motivations behind early copyright legislation and present distinct theoretical interpretations regarding the original catalysts for the Statute of Anne.
The correct selections accurately capture the overarching rhetorical umbrella that covers both texts. Both passages are fundamentally concerned with analyzing the origins and significance of the 1710 Statute of Anne. While Passage A outlines the traditional philosophical interpretation (the natural rights of creators) and Passage B offers a revisionist economic interpretation (breaking industry monopolies), their shared, high-level purpose is to explore, examine, and offer theoretical interpretations regarding the historical catalysts for this landmark legislation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main point and rhetorical goal of Passage A.
Passage A functions to outline the traditional, philosophy-based view that the Statute of Anne was created to formally recognize and protect the natural rights and individual genius of authors.
Understanding the isolated purpose of the first text is the necessary baseline for comparison.
2
Identify the main point and rhetorical goal of Passage B.
Passage B functions to argue against the philosophical view, asserting instead that the Statute of Anne was a pragmatic, economic tool designed to break the publishing monopoly of the Stationers' Company.
Understanding the isolated purpose of the second text provides the second half of the comparative analysis.
3
Synthesize a joint primary purpose that encompasses both texts without misrepresenting either.
Both texts are engaged in the shared enterprise of interpreting the history, origin, and significance of the 1710 Statute of Anne. They represent competing viewpoints on the same historical phenomenon.
The correct joint purpose must act as an umbrella that covers the distinct arguments made by both authors.

Anahtar Kavram

Determining the shared rhetorical and functional goal of two comparative reading passages that offer competing historical interpretations of a single subject.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1716Soru →

Political Sociologist: To foster genuine civic engagement, a local government must provide its citizens with transparent access to public records. When citizens lack this transparency, they inevitably become cynical about the political process and withdraw from public participation. The municipality of Oakhaven has recently overhauled its digital infrastructure, successfully guaranteeing complete public access to all municipal records. Consequently, Oakhaven is guaranteed to experience a resurgence in genuine civic engagement.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the political sociologist's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition that is necessary for bringing about a desired state of affairs as if it were a condition sufficient to bring about that state of affairs

Cevap

The argument treats a condition that is necessary for bringing about a desired state of affairs as if it were a condition sufficient to bring about that state of affairs.
The sociologist's argument states that transparent access is 'must' or 'required' for civic engagement. In conditional logic, this makes transparency a necessary condition. The author then observes that Oakhaven has achieved this transparency and concludes that civic engagement is 'guaranteed' to happen. This relies on the flawed assumption that fulfilling a necessary condition is sufficient to guarantee the outcome, matching the abstract description perfectly.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional statements in the premises.
Premise 1 establishes that Transparent Access is a requirement (necessary condition) for Genuine Civic Engagement. Premise 2 confirms the contrapositive: without Transparent Access, there is no Genuine Civic Engagement.
Identifying the formal logic structure is required to spot the exact logical gap in conditional reasoning.
2
Identify the argument's conclusion.
The conclusion states that because Oakhaven has achieved Transparent Access, it will definitely experience Genuine Civic Engagement.
Comparing the premises to the conclusion reveals how the author applies the evidence to reach their final claim.
3
Evaluate the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion.
The author affirms the necessary condition (Transparent Access) to conclude the sufficient condition (Civic Engagement), committing the fallacy of Affirming the Consequent.
This abstractly identifies the flaw needed to select the correct option.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Conditional Logic Flaws (Illegal Reversal / Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions)
Soru 1717Soru →

Read the following passage regarding antitrust enforcement.

[1] For decades, antitrust enforcement in the United States has been guided almost exclusively by the consumer welfare standard, a legal doctrine that measures monopolistic harm primarily through the lens of increased consumer prices. [2] Under this framework, regulatory agencies have largely permitted massive consolidations within the digital technology sector, provided that the merged entities continue to offer free or heavily subsidized services to the public. [3] Some legal scholars defend this permissive approach, arguing that the rapid pace of digital innovation inherently prevents long-term market dominance, thereby rendering aggressive antitrust intervention both unnecessary and potentially stifling to technological advancement. [4] This defense, however, fundamentally misapprehends the unique economics of platform monopolies; the consumer welfare standard is wholly inadequate for regulating modern digital markets because it fails to account for how data consolidation and network effects allow tech giants to completely stifle competition without ever raising consumer prices. [5] By hoarding proprietary user data, these platforms create insurmountable barriers to entry for prospective competitors, effectively neutralizing the threat of innovation from smaller startups. [6] Consequently, the continued reliance on price-centric antitrust metrics will only ensure the entrenchment of anti-competitive practices that degrade user privacy and suppress broader economic dynamism.

Which sentence explicitly states the author's main point in the passage? Provide only the corresponding sentence number.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 4; Sentence 4; four; Four

Cevap

Sentence 4
Sentence 4 is correct because it encapsulates the author's central argument: that the consumer welfare standard is entirely inadequate for regulating modern digital monopolies due to their unique, non-price-based anti-competitive behaviors. The rest of the passage either sets up this argument, attributes opposing views, or provides evidence and consequences to support this central claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage structure to separate background information and opposing views from the author's own voice.
Sentences 1 and 2 provide background on the consumer welfare standard. Sentence 3 introduces an opposing scholarly view defending this standard.
Identifying attributed viewpoints prevents confusing the author's overarching argument with the views they are critiquing.
2
Locate the primary structural turning point where the author introduces their explicit argument.
Sentence 4 begins with 'This defense, however, fundamentally misapprehends...', directly refuting the opposing view and stating that the consumer welfare standard is inadequate for modern digital markets.
The author's thesis in rigorous academic prose is typically introduced through contrast language that pivots away from the conventional or attributed view.
3
Evaluate the remaining sentences to determine if they state a broader point or merely support the claim introduced in the turning point.
Sentence 5 provides the mechanism (hoarding data) as supporting evidence, and Sentence 6 offers a concluding implication of failing to change the standard. Neither encapsulates the complete argument as comprehensively as Sentence 4.
A main point must reflect the central thesis; supporting details and implications are subsidiary to the main argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the author's explicit thesis in a passage with multiple viewpoints and complex argumentative structures.
Soru 1718Soru →

Analyze the natural language arguments below and match each to its precise formal symbolic structure. Use variables XX, YY, and ZZ to represent the distinct conditions in the order they appear.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

If the chemical plant reduces its emissions, the local water quality will improve. Furthermore, the endangered fish population will recover if the water quality improves. The chemical plant clearly did not reduce its emissions, because the fish population is not recovering.
Class sizes will not decrease. After all, the university decided against increasing tuition. Yet we know that if tuition increases, more faculty can be hired, and if more faculty are hired, class sizes decrease.
If the new software is intuitive, employees will adopt it quickly. A rapid adoption rate guarantees that overall productivity will rise. Thus, since overall productivity has indeed risen, the new software must be intuitive.
The governor signed the bill. Since signing the bill ensures the transportation budget will expand, and an expanded budget means the highway repair project will begin, the highway project will definitely begin.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The chemical plant argument is a Valid Contrapositive. The university tuition argument is an Invalid Negation. The software argument is an Invalid Reversal. The governor argument is a Valid Transitive chain.
Each natural language argument corresponds exactly to one symbolic representation by mapping its sufficient and necessary conditions in order. The correct match depends on whether the given premise affirms or denies either the beginning or the end of the conditional chain.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the 'chemical plant' argument into symbolic logic.
Plant reduces (XX) →\rightarrow Water improves (YY). Water improves (YY) →\rightarrow Fish recover (ZZ). Fact: Fish do not recover (∼Z\sim Z). Conclusion: Plant did not reduce (∼X\sim X).
Tracking the argument formally reveals a valid application of the contrapositive across a conditional chain.
2
Translate the 'university tuition' argument into symbolic logic.
Tuition increases (XX) →\rightarrow Faculty hired (YY). Faculty hired (YY) →\rightarrow Class sizes decrease (ZZ). Fact: Tuition does not increase (∼X\sim X). Conclusion: Class sizes will not decrease (∼Z\sim Z).
This highlights the logical flaw of illegal negation, as the absence of a sufficient condition does not guarantee the absence of a necessary condition.
3
Translate the 'new software' argument into symbolic logic.
Software intuitive (XX) →\rightarrow Adopted quickly (YY). Adopted quickly (YY) →\rightarrow Productivity rises (ZZ). Fact: Productivity rose (ZZ). Conclusion: Software intuitive (XX).
This uncovers the flaw of illegal reversal, where affirming a necessary condition is incorrectly used to deduce that the sufficient condition was met.
4
Translate the 'governor bill' argument into symbolic logic.
Signs bill (XX) →\rightarrow Budget expands (YY). Budget expands (YY) →\rightarrow Project begins (ZZ). Fact: Signs bill (XX). Conclusion: Project begins (ZZ).
This represents a straightforward, valid transitive chain application (Modus Ponens) moving from a sufficient trigger to the ultimate necessary outcome.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Conditional Logic
Soru 1719Soru →

The Quine-Putnam indispensability argument has long served as a bulwark for mathematical realism, asserting that our ontological commitment to abstract mathematical entities is justified by their indispensable role in our best empirical scientific theories. To undermine this realist position, nominalist philosophers have sought to demonstrate that science can proceed without quantifying over numbers, sets, or functions. Hartry Field’s brand of mathematical fictionalism represents the most ambitious of these attempts; by completely nominalizing Newtonian mechanics, Field sought to prove that mathematical entities are merely 'useful fictions'—convenient, but strictly dispensable, descriptive tools.

Yet, acknowledging the technical success of Field’s project does not require accepting its underlying philosophical mandate. The sheer complexity and unwieldiness of nominalized scientific theories render them practically unusable for actual scientific inquiry. The realist, therefore, need not dispute the theoretical possibility of a mathematics-free science to maintain their position. Thus, while fictionalist formalization effectively demonstrates the logical dispensability of mathematical entities in scientific theories, it ultimately fails to provide a compelling epistemological justification for abandoning the vastly more pragmatic framework of mathematical realism.

Which of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Although fictionalist projects successfully establish that mathematical entities are logically unnecessary for scientific theories, they fail to offer adequate epistemological grounds for rejecting the practical utility of mathematical realism.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that although fictionalist projects successfully establish that mathematical entities are logically unnecessary for scientific theories, they fail to offer adequate epistemological grounds for rejecting the practical utility of mathematical realism.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the passage's explicit conclusion found in the final sentence. It captures both the author's concession (that nominalists like Field have proven mathematical entities aren't strictly logically necessary) and the author's ultimate thesis (that this logical proof doesn't provide a good epistemological reason to abandon the highly pragmatic system of mathematical realism).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem
The stem asks for the 'main point of the passage', which requires identifying the author's overarching thesis.
Understanding the task ensures we look for a comprehensive summary of the author's argument rather than a subsidiary detail or a description of purpose.
2
Scan the passage for explicit structural cues or thesis statements
The final sentence begins with 'Thus,' indicating a conclusion: 'Thus, while fictionalist formalization effectively demonstrates the logical dispensability of mathematical entities... it ultimately fails to provide a compelling epistemological justification for abandoning the vastly more pragmatic framework of mathematical realism.'
Authors of dense academic passages often explicitly summarize their main point at the end of the text, especially following a concession ('Yet, acknowledging...').
3
Evaluate the options against the identified explicit thesis
The correct option perfectly paraphrases the final sentence, capturing both the concession (fictionalism proves logical dispensability) and the primary contention (it fails to justify abandoning pragmatic realism).
A valid main point answer must encompass the entire scope of the author's argument without distorting the degree of certainty or shifting the focus to a minor premise.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Explicitly Stated Theses in Concession-Based Arguments
Soru 1720Soru →

Marine Geoarchaeologist: Deep sediment cores extracted from the silted ancient harbor of Portus Albus reveal a dramatic, threefold increase in coarse sand and marine shell fragments dating between 420 CE and 450 CE, accompanied by a sharp decline in ballast stones dropped by merchant ships. Because coarse sand and shell fragments are typically swept into sheltered harbors only by catastrophic marine inundations, such as tsunamis, the harbor's sudden decline as a commercial maritime center during this period must have been initiated by a major tsunami event rather than economic migration.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermine the geoarchaeologist's argument? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Commercial trade records and tax ledgers indicate that merchant fleets permanently redirected their operations to a deeper neighboring port in 410 CE, well before the initial deposition of the coarse sand layer.; Municipal records from 425 CE document the deliberate dumping of thousands of tons of coastal sand and crushed shell aggregate to reinforce the harbor's decaying earthen seawalls.

Cevap

The argument is undermined both by evidence establishing that economic abandonment preceded the sediment deposition and by evidence providing an alternative explanation for the presence of the coarse sand and shell aggregate.
The argument concludes that a tsunami initiated the port's commercial decline based on coarse sediment layers and declining ballast stones. The choice establishing that merchant fleets had already permanently moved elsewhere in 410 CE breaks the timeline, proving the abandonment began prior to the sediment event. The choice documenting the deliberate dumping of sand and shell aggregate to reinforce seawalls provides an alternate explanation for the sediment layer, eliminating the need for a tsunami hypothesis.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure and core causal claim.
The premises state that sediment cores show increased coarse sand/shells and decreased ballast stones between 420 CE and 450 CE, and that coarse sediment enters sheltered harbors only via extreme marine events like tsunamis. The author concludes that a tsunami event, rather than economic migration, initiated the harbor's commercial decline.
Isolating the conclusion and underlying causal assumptions is required before identifying potential weaknesses.
2
Evaluate unstated assumptions and vulnerability points in the causal reasoning.
The author assumes that (1) the coarse sediment must have been deposited by a natural disaster rather than artificial human construction, and (2) the timing of the decline aligns chronologically with the sediment deposition.
Attacking either the assumed cause (providing an alternate cause) or the assumed chronological sequence weakens a causal conclusion.
3
Assess the options against the weaken criteria.
The statement showing that merchant activity ceased in 410 CE demonstrates that economic abandonment preceded the sediment event, breaking the causal timeline. The statement showing deliberate seawall reinforcement provides a plausible alternative explanation for the sediment layer.
Both statements independently undermine the author's conclusion that a tsunami initiated the commercial abandonment.

Anahtar Kavram

Undermining causal arguments via chronological inconsistency and alternative explanations
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
ÖncekiSayfa 86 / 198Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — LSAT | Examkin