Examkin

Logical Reasoning

666 soru

Tüm türler666Çoktan seçmeli343Çoklu seçim54Doğru / Yanlış70Eşleştirme166Sıralama18Boşluk doldurma10Kısa cevap5
Soru 81Soru →

Analyze the logical vulnerabilities present in the four domain-specific arguments below. Map the text of each argument to the precise structural characterization of its reasoning error.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Economics: Financial analysts note that every individual algorithmic trading model deployed by the banking consortium is rigorously programmed to suppress price volatility during sudden market shocks. Consequently, if all of these proprietary models are deployed simultaneously during a severe economic shock, the overall market volatility will undoubtedly be suppressed.
Linguistics: For linguists to conclusively demonstrate that two seemingly disparate regional dialects share a common ancestral proto-language, they must establish a comprehensive pattern of systematic phonetic correspondences. The recent phonological analysis of the highland and coastal dialects has revealed precisely such a pattern. Thus, this analysis definitively establishes that the dialects share a common ancestor.
Policy: Councilman Torres argues that municipal zoning laws should be overhauled to allow for mixed-use residential development in the industrial sector. However, we should reject this proposal out of hand. Torres is a silent partner in a real estate firm that recently purchased large tracts of land in that exact sector, meaning he stands to profit immensely from the rezoning.
Geophysics: According to geophysical theories, the presence of a massive subterranean iron deposit or a recent, localized meteorite impact will each independently generate a significant magnetic anomaly. Our survey of the Tularosa Basin detected such an anomaly, yet extensive excavations have definitively ruled out a meteorite impact. Therefore, there must be a massive subterranean iron deposit beneath the basin.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Economics maps to the system/components flaw (Composition). Linguistics maps to the necessary/sufficient confusion. Policy maps to the vested interest attack (Source Motive). Geophysics maps to assuming sufficient conditions are exclusive causes.
Each argument exhibits a distinct structural vulnerability. The Economics argument fallaciously transfers a characteristic of individual components to the entire system (Composition). The Linguistics argument treats phonetic correspondences, which are necessary to establish a common ancestor, as sufficient to guarantee it. The Policy argument attacks a proposal by citing the proponent's financial motives rather than addressing the merits of the rezoning (Ad Hominem). The Geophysics argument assumes that because iron deposits and meteorite impacts are sufficient to cause a magnetic anomaly, no other cause is possible, thus ruling out the meteorite impact and erroneously concluding an iron deposit must be present.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the Economics argument to identify its structural flaw.
The argument shifts from the properties of individual parts to the property of the entire system.
Identifying this shift reveals the fallacy of composition, which matches the description regarding drawing a conclusion about an entire system based on its independent components.
2
Evaluate the Linguistics argument's use of conditional logic.
The argument states that phonetic correspondences are required ('must establish') but concludes that finding them 'definitively establishes' the common ancestor.
This is a classic necessary versus sufficient flaw, mapping to the description that treats a condition 'without which a claim cannot be established' as one that 'guarantees' it.
3
Assess the Policy argument's critique of the councilman.
The argument dismisses the rezoning proposal strictly because Torres stands to profit financially.
This constitutes an attack on the source's vested interest rather than the proposal's merits, mapping directly to the 'vested interest' description.
4
Deconstruct the causal reasoning in the Geophysics argument.
The argument observes an anomaly and concludes that since a meteorite didn't cause it, an iron deposit must have, despite both being only stated as sufficient.
This ignores other potential causes, matching the description that assumes one of the known independently sufficient conditions must be the true cause.

Anahtar Kavram

Logical Flaw Identification and Structural Abstraction
Soru 82Soru →

Match each argument on the left with the evidentiary finding on the right that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Marine biologists observed that deep-sea vent crabs graze on bacterial mats almost exclusively immediately following pulses of dissolved methane from hydrothermal vents. They concluded that methane surges directly trigger the crabs' grazing activity.
A developmental study found that children whose parents frequently used spatial terms during block play scored significantly higher on geometric rotation tests three months later than peers. The researchers concluded that hearing spatial terms actively enhances geometric reasoning in young children.
To curb urban vehicular emissions, a metropolitan transit agency eliminated fares on its light-rail network. Because total rail ridership increased by 40 percent over the subsequent six months, planners concluded that the fare-free policy successfully lowered automotive carbon emissions.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The marine biology argument pairs with the finding isolating methane in a controlled aquarium; the spatial language argument pairs with the finding controlling for children's baseline spatial aptitude; and the transit policy argument pairs with the finding confirming that new light-rail riders shifted specifically from gasoline automobiles.
Each matched pair directly targets and resolves the core analytical vulnerability of its argument. For the marine biology argument, the controlled aquarium finding eliminates environmental confounding variables. For the developmental study, controlling for baseline aptitude rules out selection bias and reverse causation. For the transit policy, demonstrating that new riders displaced automobile trips confirms that increased ridership actually reduced automobile emissions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the reasoning gap in the marine biology argument.
The argument assumes methane directly causes feeding, ignoring potential confounding variables that accompany hydrothermal venting events.
Strengthening a causal claim requires isolating the causal agent or eliminating third-variable explanations.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the developmental language study.
The argument fails to account for preexisting spatial aptitude that might have caused both higher test scores and greater parental engagement.
Strengthening an observational correlation requires ruling out selection bias and reverse causality.
3
Identify the reasoning gap in the municipal transit argument.
The argument equates higher public transit use with reduced car emissions without establishing where the new passengers originated.
Strengthening a policy claim requires verifying the substitution mechanism from the polluting activity.
4
Match each argument with its uniquely targeted strengthener.
Each argument pairs precisely with the finding that resolves its specific logical vulnerability.
Each strengthener supplies the exact evidentiary bridge required by its respective argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening causal and inductive arguments by isolating causal variables, controlling for baseline selection bias, and confirming essential substitution mechanisms.
Soru 83Soru →

Each excerpt below presents an academic argument that relies on an unstated premise. Match each argument with the implicit assumption on which its conclusion necessarily depends.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Marine Geochemist: Benthic foraminifera shells preserved in deep-sea sediment cores show marked spikes in barium-to-calcium ratios specifically during deglaciation phases. Because continental river runoff is the primary global source of dissolved barium entering ocean basins, pulses of intense glacial meltwater discharge must have reached the deep abyss during these climate transitions.
Phonologist: Infants raised in bilingual households maintain the ability to distinguish non-native tonal contrasts significantly longer into infancy than do infants raised in monolingual households. Because exposure to diverse acoustic pitch contours is known to delay perceptual narrowing, infant-directed speech in bilingual environments must possess acoustic pitch variations that monolingual speech lacks.
Economist: Following a municipal fee levied on single-use beverage containers, discarded container litter along public riverbanks dropped by 40 percent in six months. Because municipal sanitation schedules and cleanup budgets remained completely unchanged, the fee must have successfully motivated consumers to curtail their container usage or utilize proper recycling receptacles.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Each argument correctly matches its corresponding defender assumption: the marine geochemistry argument depends on the assumption that sediment chemical alteration did not produce the barium signal; the phonology argument depends on the assumption that non-acoustic cognitive mechanisms did not cause the perceptual delay; and the economics argument depends on the assumption that third-party collectors did not remove the litter after disposal.
For each pair, the right-hand statement functions as a vital defender assumption. Applying the Negation Test confirms their necessity: if post-depositional seafloor processes created the barium spikes, the geochemist's inference that surface meltwater penetrated the abyss is unsupported; if domain-general attention accounts for prolonged tonal discrimination, the phonologist's claim about acoustic properties in bilingual speech is unjustified; if third-party salvagers cleaned up the cans, the economist's claim regarding changed consumer habits is unwarranted.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and primary evidence in each argument on the left.
The geochemist infers meltwater penetration from shell chemistry; the phonologist infers unique acoustic contours in speech from auditory performance; the economist infers changed consumer disposal behavior from reduced litter counts.
Establishing the precise logical leap in each argument isolates what must be true for the author's reasoning to stand.
2
Apply the Negation Test to determine which unstated assumption is strictly required by each argument.
Negating the geochemist's match (post-depositional migration did cause the barium) invalidates the runoff conclusion; negating the phonologist's match (domain-general attentional adaptations caused the retention) invalidates the speech-input inference; negating the economist's match (scavengers collected the containers) breaks the link between litter reduction and consumer behavioral change.
A necessary assumption must fatally undermine the conclusion when logically negated.
3
Match each argument ID to its corresponding necessary assumption ID.
Pair the geochemist's argument with the sediment migration assumption, the phonologist's argument with the cognitive mechanism assumption, and the economist's argument with the third-party collector assumption.
Ensures all one-to-one logical dependencies are correctly paired without mismatching across domains.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Model and the Negation Test)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 84Soru →

Paleontologist: Fossil specimens of *Eoconstrictor*, an ancient snake from the Eocene epoch, exhibit cranial and vertebral adaptations characteristic of modern arboreal snakes that hunt in high forest canopies. Additionally, fossilized stomach contents from three distinct specimens contain remains of an arboreal lizard species. Therefore, *Eoconstrictor* must have hunted primarily in tree canopies rather than foraging along the forest floor.

Which of the following statements, if true, undermine the paleontologist's argument? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The arboreal lizard species identified in the gut contents spent substantial periods basking on the forest floor, where it was most easily ambushed.; Biomechanical models indicate that the bone density and mass of *Eoconstrictor* would have prevented it from climbing or navigating slender canopy branches.

Cevap

The statements showing that the prey was accessible on the forest floor and that the predator had physical constraints preventing canopy climbing both undermine the conclusion.
The argument concludes that the predator hunted primarily in tree canopies based on two premises: anatomical similarity to modern arboreal snakes and the presence of arboreal lizard remains in its stomach. The statements that weaken this reasoning show that the arboreal lizard prey was accessible on the forest floor during basking and that the predator possessed physical traits that made climbing into canopies biomechanically unfeasible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and main conclusion
Premises: The snake exhibits skeletal traits seen in canopy hunters, and its stomach contents contained an arboreal lizard. Conclusion: The snake hunted primarily in tree canopies rather than on the forest floor.
Clarifying the conclusion and supporting evidence reveals the core assumption: that anatomical similarity and prey identity necessarily imply canopy foraging behavior.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities and alternative explanations
The argument assumes that arboreal prey could only be caught in trees and that morphological traits definitively indicate canopy locomotion.
Weakeners will either offer an alternative explanation for how canopy prey was consumed on the ground or demonstrate why canopy hunting was improbable.
3
Evaluate each choice to identify all statements that weaken the reasoning
The choice showing that the lizards basked on the ground severs the link between prey type and canopy hunting, while the choice showing biomechanical climbing limitations directly counters the feasibility of canopy hunting.
Both statements independently introduce evidence that diminishes the plausibility of the paleontologist's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying alternative explanations and physical constraints to weaken causal and behavioral inferences
Soru 85Soru →

Cognitive neuropsychologists evaluating language recovery in a prospective clinical cohort established the following facts:

• Any patient exhibiting damage to the left inferior parietal lobule experiences severe phonological retrieval deficits.
• All patients with severe phonological retrieval deficits fail the rapid naming latency benchmark unless they receive structured multimodal speech therapy.
• No patient in the prospective clinical cohort who failed the rapid naming latency benchmark was able to maintain unassisted conversational fluency.
• Some patients in the cohort who received structured multimodal speech therapy nevertheless failed the rapid naming latency benchmark.
• Patient K is a participant in the prospective clinical cohort who maintained unassisted conversational fluency.

Based on the statements above, which of the following must be true? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Patient K did not fail the rapid naming latency benchmark.; If Patient K exhibits damage to the left inferior parietal lobule, Patient K received structured multimodal speech therapy.

Cevap

The statements establishing that Patient K did not fail the rapid naming latency benchmark and that Patient K received structured multimodal speech therapy if exhibiting damage to the left inferior parietal lobule must both be true.
The claim that Patient K did not fail the rapid naming latency benchmark is directly deduced via the contrapositive of the rule that benchmark failure precludes conversational fluency. The conditional claim regarding left inferior parietal lobule damage follows because such damage guarantees a phonological deficit, which would have caused benchmark failure in the absence of therapy; because Patient K did not fail, therapy must have occurred if the damage exists.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between conversational fluency and the rapid naming benchmark for Patient K.
The stimulus states that no cohort member who failed the benchmark maintained fluency. Because Patient K maintained fluency, Patient K cannot have failed the benchmark.
Applying the contrapositive of the universal rule linking benchmark failure to loss of fluency directly establishes Patient K's benchmark outcome.
2
Evaluate the conditional chain starting from hypothetical damage to the left inferior parietal lobule for Patient K.
Parietal damage guarantees a phonological retrieval deficit. A deficit guarantees failing the benchmark unless therapy is received. Since Step 1 established that Patient K avoided failing the benchmark, having the deficit necessitates having received therapy.
Modus tollens on the conditional rule (Deficit and No Therapy entails Failure) combined with the proven non-failure yields Therapy when Deficit is present.
3
Evaluate the remaining claims against the stimulus to confirm invalid inferences.
Claims asserting universal success from therapy, universal success from the absence of parietal damage, or the complete absence of parietal damage in Patient K are unsupported.
The premises allow individuals receiving therapy to fail and do not restrict other causes of failure or prohibit Patient K from having damage if treated.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional chaining, contraposition, and exception clauses in formal deductive logic
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 86Soru →

Match each paradoxical scenario with the underlying explanatory mechanism that most effectively resolves its apparent discrepancy.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A forestry management department deployed autonomous thermal-imaging drones across a protected woodland to curb illegal timber harvesting. Although satellite audits showed a marked decline in overall regional deforestation, official departmental records indicated a 40 percent rise in documented poaching violations over the subsequent year.
A manufacturing facility required assembly-line workers to wear powered ergonomic back braces designed to reduce musculoskeletal strain from heavy lifting. Over the subsequent six months, the number of worker-reported lower-back fatigue complaints and injury claims rose significantly.
Preservationists installed an airtight, humidity-controlled vault door on an ancient limestone tomb to protect delicate mineral frescoes from moisture damage. Within months, paint flaking on the frescoes accelerated dramatically compared to when the tomb was ventilated by natural outdoor drafts.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Thermal drone surveillance matches detection enhancement; ergonomic back braces match behavioral risk compensation; airtight tomb sealing matches emergence of secondary degradation agents.
Each mechanism resolves its paired paradox by supplying a distinct causal bridge: detection bias explains how recorded infractions can rise while actual deforestation drops; risk compensation explains how protective equipment can lead to higher strain through behavioral overexertion; and secondary degradation explains how eliminating one environmental risk factor can unintentionally introduce or amplify another.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conflicting premises within each scenario.
Identified three distinct paradoxes: (1) increased recorded violations despite lower deforestation, (2) increased injury claims despite supportive equipment, and (3) accelerated fresco degradation despite protective sealing.
Resolving a discrepancy requires identifying the two seemingly incompatible facts that must be reconciled.
2
Identify the underlying causal mechanism that bridges each pair of conflicting facts.
Linked drone monitoring to detection bias, ergonomic vests to compensatory overexertion, and airtight sealing to secondary environmental consequences.
A valid resolution provides a bridge that explains how both established premises can be simultaneously true without contradiction.
3
Verify that each mechanism resolves only its intended scenario without ambiguity.
Confirmed that each scenario-mechanism pair forms a logically consistent and mutually exclusive match.
Ensures structural rigor and eliminates cross-matching ambiguity.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving Discrepancies via Detection Bias, Risk Compensation, and Unintended Environmental Consequences
Soru 87Soru →

A semiconductor manufacturing facility recently introduced an ultra-pure chemical wash designed to eliminate microscopic surface particulates from silicon wafers prior to thermal oxidation. Pre-process measurements confirmed that wafers treated with the new wash had nearly ninety percent fewer surface particulates than wafers cleaned with the conventional solvent wash. Paradoxically, following the standard high-temperature thermal oxidation phase, the proportion of wafers exhibiting severe crystal lattice fractures was significantly higher among batches treated with the ultra-pure wash than among those cleaned with the conventional solvent.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Trace residues deposited by the conventional solvent wash formed a temporary thermal buffer that moderated the initial rate of heat absorption, whereas completely bare silicon absorbs heat unevenly.

Cevap

The statement explaining that trace residues from the conventional solvent wash acted as a thermal buffer that moderated heat absorption successfully resolves the discrepancy.
The correct option reconciles both established facts by demonstrating an unstated compensatory function of the conventional solvent wash. While the ultra-pure wash achieved its goal of eliminating particulates, it also removed trace residues that had previously acted as a protective buffer against rapid and uneven heat absorption. Because bare silicon heats unevenly, the cleaner wafers experienced severe thermal stress during oxidation, resulting in more fractures despite having fewer initial particulates.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the two conflicting facts presented in the stimulus.
Fact 1: The ultra-pure wash successfully removed 90% more surface particulates than the conventional wash. Fact 2: Batches treated with the ultra-pure wash suffered significantly higher rates of severe crystal lattice fractures during high-temperature oxidation.
Resolving a paradox requires identifying the exact tension between two established premises without treating either as an argument conclusion.
2
Formulate a bridging mechanism that allows both facts to be simultaneously true.
The correct explanation must provide a reason why cleaner wafers (or the process of stripping away all residues) leads to increased thermal fracture susceptibility during the subsequent heating stage.
The correct answer must bridge the gap without contradicting either premise.
3
Evaluate the choices to identify the causal factor that explains the divergence.
The choice showing that conventional solvent residues provided an unforeseen protective buffer against rapid, uneven heating explains why completely residue-free wafers fractured more severely.
This establishes a compensatory side-effect where eliminating all surface contaminants removes a vital thermal moderator.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving apparent discrepancies through unintended consequences and compensatory mechanisms
Soru 88Soru →

Environmental policy analysts documented the following regulatory conditions governing regional water management: Every municipal district that experienced a severe groundwater deficit implemented mandatory aquifer replenishment protocols. No municipal district that implemented mandatory aquifer replenishment protocols permitted unmetered commercial extraction. Some municipal districts that implemented mandatory aquifer replenishment protocols also qualified for federal infrastructural subsidies. Furthermore, any municipal district that qualified for federal infrastructural subsidies was required to publish monthly hydrological audits, and no district required to publish monthly hydrological audits was exempt from state oversight penalties.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some municipal districts that are subject to state oversight penalties do not permit unmetered commercial extraction.

Cevap

At least some municipal districts that are subject to state oversight penalties do not permit unmetered commercial extraction.
The stimulus establishes that some districts implemented mandatory aquifer replenishment protocols and qualified for federal infrastructural subsidies. Any district that qualified for subsidies had to publish monthly hydrological audits, which in turn means it was not exempt from state oversight penalties. Simultaneously, any district that implemented replenishment protocols did not permit unmetered commercial extraction. Therefore, the specific districts belonging to that intersecting group must be subject to state oversight penalties while not permitting unmetered commercial extraction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the universal conditional statements and negative universal constraints into formal chains.
Severe Deficit implies Replenishment Protocols. Replenishment Protocols implies No Unmetered Extraction. Subsidies implies Monthly Audits. Monthly Audits implies Subject to State Oversight Penalties (not exempt).
Establishing individual conditional relationships allows valid contrapositive and sequential deductions.
2
Identify the existential quantifier premise linking the two conditional branches.
There exists a non-empty set of municipal districts that both implemented Replenishment Protocols and qualified for Subsidies.
Quantifier premises ('some') serve as the bridge between otherwise independent conditional chains.
3
Synthesize the properties of the entities residing within the intersection.
Any district in this intersection does not permit unmetered extraction (via the Replenishment Protocol branch) and is subject to state oversight penalties (via the Subsidies to Audits to Penalties chain).
This deductively proves that at least some districts subject to oversight penalties do not permit unmetered commercial extraction.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier Intersection and Conditional Chaining
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 89Soru →

Each passage below presents an academic argument that depends on an unstated foundational premise. Match each numbered argument with the implicit assumption on which its conclusion strictly depends.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Archaeogeneticist: DNA extracted from Bronze Age human remains reveals ancestral strains of the bacterium Yersinia pestis that lacked the ymt gene, which enables flea-borne vector transmission. Because flea-borne transmission is necessary for the rapid transmission rates characteristic of historical bubonic pandemics, these prehistoric bacterial strains could not have caused widespread outbreaks across dispersed geographic settlements.
Financial Econometrician: High-frequency algorithmic trading firms deploy line-of-sight microwave relay networks between electronic exchanges because microwaves propagate roughly 30 percent faster through air than laser pulses do through fiber-optic lines. Consequently, algorithmic firms that rely exclusively on fiber-optic cables will be completely unable to execute profitable statistical arbitrage orders.
Atmospheric Chemist: Proposed solar geoengineering programs plan to inject sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere to reflect solar radiation; however, high concentrations of sulfate aerosols catalyze ozone-destroying reactions on the surfaces of polar stratospheric clouds. Therefore, implementing stratospheric aerosol injection on a planetary scale will inevitably produce severe thinning of the global ozone shield.
Cognitive Ethologist: Bottlenose dolphins emit individual-specific signature whistles. When acoustic playback experiments broadcast synthetic copies of these signature whistles, dolphins respond preferentially to the synthesized calls of maternal relatives rather than familiar non-kin. Thus, dolphin kin recognition is mediated primarily by the frequency contour of signature whistles rather than by subtle variations in individualized vocal timbre.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Argument 1 matches the assumption regarding non-vector human transmission mechanisms; Argument 2 matches the assumption regarding the nonexistence of viable long-horizon arbitrage strategies; Argument 3 matches the assumption regarding ozone catalysis outside polar stratospheric cloud conditions; Argument 4 matches the assumption regarding the acoustic elimination of vocal timbre in synthesized playbacks.
Each correctly matched pair identifies a foundational unstated bridge or defender assumption. In every case, applying the Negation Test reveals that denying the matched premise destroys the inferential link between the stated premises and the author's specific conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Argument 1 (Bronze Age Yersinia pestis)
Identified the gap between lacking a flea-borne transmission gene and the inability to spread between distant settlements.
The author presumes that no other transmission pathway (such as human pastoral migration) could have facilitated distant spread without the flea vector.
2
Analyze Argument 2 (Microwave telecommunications)
Identified the extreme claim that lack of microwave transmission precludes ANY profitable statistical arbitrage.
The conclusion requires that no profitable statistical arbitrage exists at latency horizons where microwave speed advantages are irrelevant.
3
Analyze Argument 3 (Stratospheric geoengineering)
Identified the scope jump from polar stratospheric cloud reactions to severe global ozone depletion.
The author must assume that sulfate-induced depletion is not strictly limited to polar cloud environments in a manner that spares the broader global ozone layer.
4
Analyze Argument 4 (Dolphin vocal recognition)
Identified the controlled variable assumption in the acoustic playback experiment.
To attribute dolphin recognition to frequency contours rather than vocal timbre, the synthesized playback must not have retained the vocal timbre of the original vocalizers.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption: Identifying unstated premises required by an argument's logic via the Negation Test.
Soru 90Soru →

Economist: A recent three-year study compared manufacturing firms that adopted automated inventory management software with firms that retained manual tracking systems. The automated firms experienced a 30 percent greater reduction in unscheduled assembly line shutdowns. The study's authors concluded that implementing automated inventory management directly causes reductions in assembly line shutdowns by preventing component shortages caused by manual record-keeping errors.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the study's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The firms that invested in the automated software had concurrently overhauled their aging production machinery as part of a broader facility modernization initiative.

Cevap

The statement indicating that the firms investing in automated software simultaneously overhauled their production machinery as part of a broader modernization program.
The argument concludes that automated software was the direct cause of the decrease in shutdowns. The correct answer undermines this by introducing a confounding variable: these same firms modernized their mechanical equipment at the same time. This alternative factor provides an independent, plausible reason why line shutdowns decreased, thereby casting substantial doubt on the claim that the software was responsible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and underlying evidence in the stimulus.
Evidence: Automated inventory firms had a 30 percent greater reduction in shutdowns than manual tracking firms. Conclusion: Automated software directly caused this reduction by eliminating manual record-keeping errors.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the causal claim from the empirical correlation.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the causal claim.
The author assumes that no other confounding variable or alternative cause distinguishes the automated firms from the manual firms during the study period.
Causal conclusions based on observational group comparisons are vulnerable to unaddressed third variables.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the option that supplies an alternative cause.
The choice showing that automated firms also overhauled aging production machinery accounts for the reduced shutdowns through improved mechanical reliability rather than inventory logging.
Providing a confounding factor directly undermines the validity of attributing the outcome exclusively to the software.

Anahtar Kavram

Alternative Explanations in Causal Arguments
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 91Soru →

Materials scientists evaluating marine protective treatments established the following facts regarding commercial hull applications:

• Any protective coating that incorporates fluoropolymer matrix F resists barnacle adhesion in saltwater environments.
• Every coating that resists barnacle adhesion in saltwater environments also prevents hull corrosion, provided the coating is applied at temperatures of at least 15°C.
• Whenever a coating prevents hull corrosion and the vessel receives bi-monthly freshwater washings, the vessel's scheduled drydock interval is extended beyond five years.
• Coating Z incorporates fluoropolymer matrix F, was applied to a commercial cargo vessel at a surface temperature of 21°C, and the vessel receives bi-monthly freshwater washings.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true based on them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The scheduled drydock interval for the commercial cargo vessel treated with Coating Z is extended beyond five years.

Cevap

The scheduled drydock interval for the commercial cargo vessel treated with Coating Z is extended beyond five years.
The conclusion that the drydock interval is extended beyond five years is fully derived through a complete chain of valid deductive steps: Coating Z incorporates fluoropolymer matrix F (ensuring barnacle resistance), was applied at 21°C (ensuring corrosion prevention), and receives bi-monthly freshwater washings (guaranteeing the extended drydock interval).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the conditional statements provided in the stimulus
(1) Fluoropolymer matrix F → Resists barnacle adhesion; (2) Resists barnacle adhesion + Applied at ≥ 15°C → Prevents hull corrosion; (3) Prevents hull corrosion + Bi-monthly washings → Drydock interval > 5 years.
Establishing explicit conditional chains allows for systematic deductive evaluation.
2
Apply the specific factual premises regarding Coating Z to the first two links of the chain
Coating Z has fluoropolymer matrix F, so it resists barnacle adhesion. Since it was applied at 21°C (which satisfies the ≥ 15°C threshold), Coating Z definitely prevents hull corrosion.
Testing the initial conditions verifies that the intermediate conclusion is soundly triggered.
3
Evaluate the final conditional link
Because Coating Z prevents hull corrosion and the vessel receives bi-monthly freshwater washings, the final necessary outcome is triggered: the scheduled drydock interval is extended beyond five years.
Completing the deduction identifies the statement that is logically guaranteed.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Modus Ponens
Soru 92Soru →

Agricultural Specialist: In order for any new grain cultivar to receive an official drought-hardy certification from the national agricultural board, the cultivar must maintain stable yields across three consecutive seasons of below-average precipitation. In recent field trials, the experimental grain cultivar 'ValoBarley' successfully maintained stable crop yields throughout three consecutive seasons of severe drought. Thus, ValoBarley will definitely be granted the official drought-hardy certification.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the agricultural specialist's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a requirement that is necessary for receiving the certification as if it were sufficient to guarantee that the certification is awarded

Cevap

The argument treats a condition that is necessary for certification as if it were sufficient to guarantee certification.
The rule explicitly uses the indicator 'In order for... must...', which establishes that maintaining yield stability during three drought seasons is a necessary condition for obtaining the certification. Demonstrating that ValoBarley met this condition only shows that one requirement has been satisfied; it does not guarantee that certification is assured, as other mandatory requirements may exist. The argument erroneously treats this necessary prerequisite as a sufficient condition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise 1: Certification requires stable yields across three consecutive drought seasons (Certification → 3 seasons stable yields). Premise 2: ValoBarley met the 3-season stable yield requirement. Conclusion: ValoBarley will definitely receive certification.
Clarifying the argumentative structure helps reveal whether the logic validly connects the evidence to the claim.
2
Analyze the conditional logic connecting the rule to the conclusion.
The rule states that 3 seasons of stable yields is a necessary condition ('must maintain'). The author reasons from the satisfaction of this necessary condition to the guarantee of the outcome.
Meeting a prerequisite does not guarantee the outcome, because there may be other mandatory criteria (e.g., grain quality, pest resistance, regulatory filing).
3
Select the option that accurately describes this conditional error.
The statement describing the confusion of a necessary requirement with a sufficient guarantee directly matches the flaw.
This accurately reflects the classic formal logic fallacy committed in the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Confusion
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 93Soru →

Historian of science: Proponents of the "purity criterion" in art conservation advocate completely removing all 19th-century varnish coatings from Renaissance oil paintings on the grounds that these layers were applied after the original artists' deaths. However, archival chemistry demonstrates that over centuries, these varnish layers chemically fused with the underlying upper pigment glaze. Consequently, stripping the varnish inevitably extracts original pigment particles as well. Therefore, adhering strictly to the purity criterion directly undermines the core goal of preserving the artwork's historical authenticity.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed in the historian of science's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: demonstrating that implementing a proposed standard produces consequences that defeat the fundamental objective the standard was meant to advance

Cevap

The argument proceeds by demonstrating that implementing a proposed standard produces consequences that defeat the fundamental objective the standard was meant to advance.
The author focuses on the goal of the 'purity criterion' (historical authenticity) and demonstrates that the physical consequence of following its recommendation (stripping the varnish, which also strips pigment) directly subverts that very goal. The statement accurately abstracts this technique as showing that applying a proposed standard defeats the fundamental objective that standard is intended to achieve.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the opponent's position and justification
Proponents argue for removing 19th-century varnish coatings under the 'purity criterion' to protect historical authenticity because the coatings were added after the artists died.
Identifying the target view and its stated underlying objective is necessary to understand the purpose of the policy.
2
Analyze the evidence introduced by the author
The author provides a chemical fact: stripping the fused varnish inevitably removes original pigment particles along with it.
This establishes the physical mechanism that leads to an unintended practical outcome.
3
Evaluate the main conclusion and its relation to the opponent's objective
The author concludes that strictly following the criterion undermines the very authenticity it aims to preserve.
The argumentative technique is an internal refutation/reductio showing that the recommended course of action directly subverts its own stated purpose.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning: Self-Defeating / Pragmatically Inconsistent Proposals
Soru 94Soru →

Archaeologist: Excavations at the Bronze Age settlement of Tell el-Marwa revealed that grinding stones from the early occupational layer were made exclusively from local sandstone, whereas those from the late layer were predominantly made from imported basalt. Because basalt is significantly harder and more durable than sandstone, producing finer flour with far less stone grit, researchers concluded that the inhabitants switched to basalt primarily to improve the dietary quality and texture of their grain products.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the researchers' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Human skeletal remains from the late occupational layer exhibit significantly less dental enamel abrasion and microscopic tooth fracturing than do remains from the early layer.

Cevap

The finding that human skeletal remains from the late occupational layer exhibit significantly less dental enamel abrasion and microscopic tooth fracturing than remains from the early layer.
The correct response provides direct physical evidence that the population experienced the specific dietary improvement hypothesized by the researchers. Observing reduced tooth wear and enamel fracturing in late-period skeletons confirms that food processed with basalt contained less abrasive grit, strongly reinforcing the claim that the transition was tied to dietary quality.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus to isolate the premises and conclusion.
Premises establish that early tools were local sandstone while late tools were imported basalt, which produces finer flour with less grit. The conclusion asserts that inhabitants switched to basalt primarily to improve dietary quality and grain texture.
Clarifying the argument's structure identifies the underlying assumption connecting tool composition to intended dietary improvement.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the argument.
The argument assumes that the switch to basalt actually yielded a tangible dietary benefit and was not driven by non-culinary factors or resource scarcity.
Strengthening requires corroborating the expected physical outcome of the dietary improvement or ruling out competing explanations.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement providing the strongest support.
Direct physical evidence showing a reduction in tooth enamel wear among late-layer inhabitants confirms that grit in the food supply was substantially reduced, reinforcing the dietary explanation.
Empirical confirmation of the predicted effect directly validates the causal explanation.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening an argument by providing empirical confirmation of an expected outcome or unstated assumption.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 95Soru →

Complete the legal theorist's formal argument by filling in the blank with the precise condition that logically guarantees the argument's conclusion.

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

Premise 1: Any sovereign trade agreement that lacks binding multilateral enforcement mechanisms is incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage.
Premise 2: Any regulatory framework that fails to protect critical national infrastructure.
Premise 3: The Proposed Trans-Pacific Cyber Accord is a sovereign trade agreement that lacks binding multilateral enforcement mechanisms.
Conclusion: Therefore, the Proposed Trans-Pacific Cyber Accord fails to protect critical national infrastructure.
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

is incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage
Premise 1 and Premise 3 together prove deductively that the Proposed Trans-Pacific Cyber Accord is incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage. For the conclusion ('The Accord fails to protect critical national infrastructure') to follow with absolute certainty, Premise 2 must establish a universal rule dictating that any framework that is incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage inevitably fails to protect critical national infrastructure. Inserting 'is incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage' completes the valid transitive chain (A→B→C→D)(A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C \rightarrow D).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the established premises and the target conclusion
Premise 3 and Premise 1 establish that the Proposed Trans-Pacific Cyber Accord belongs to the category of agreements that are incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage. The conclusion asserts that the Accord fails to protect critical national infrastructure.
Deconstructing the argument into formal conditional terms reveals the starting subject and the final deduced attribute.
2
Map the inferential gap between the intermediate predicate and the conclusion
We have the chain: [Trans-Pacific Accord] →\rightarrow [Lacks binding enforcement] →\rightarrow [Incapable of deterring cyberespionage]. The conclusion requires: [Trans-Pacific Accord] →\rightarrow [Fails to protect critical national infrastructure].
A sufficient assumption must provide a 100% deductive bridge linking the intermediate property to the final predicate.
3
Formulate the missing universal conditional statement
Premise 2 must state that [Incapable of deterring cyberespionage] →\rightarrow [Fails to protect critical national infrastructure]. Therefore, the blank must be filled with 'is incapable of deterring state-sponsored cyberespionage'.
Supplying this specific antecedent completes the unbroken conditional chain: [Accord] →\rightarrow [Incapable of deterring cyberespionage] →\rightarrow [Fails to protect infrastructure].

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Conditional Bridging in Formal Syllogisms
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 96Soru →

Paleoanthropologist: Any technological practice that requires the multi-stage thermal alteration of mineral raw materials demonstrates that its practitioners possessed working-memory capacity equivalent to that of modern humans. In the Middle Stone Age, the fabrication of silcrete micro-blades invariably required multi-stage thermal alteration. Recent excavations at the southern coastal site of Pinnacle Point have uncovered an abundance of complex composite tools bound by organic adhesives. Therefore, the Middle Stone Age inhabitants of Pinnacle Point possessed working-memory capacity equivalent to that of modern humans.

The paleoanthropologist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: All composite tools bound by organic adhesives that were produced at Pinnacle Point incorporated silcrete micro-blades.

Cevap

The statement that all composite tools bound by organic adhesives produced at Pinnacle Point incorporated silcrete micro-blades logically guarantees the conclusion.
The conclusion claims that the inhabitants of Pinnacle Point possessed modern working-memory capacity. The premises establish that fabricating silcrete micro-blades guarantees multi-stage thermal alteration, which in turn guarantees modern working memory. The archaeological evidence at Pinnacle Point only establishes the presence of composite tools bound by organic adhesives. Assuming that all such composite tools produced at Pinnacle Point incorporated silcrete micro-blades connects the physical evidence to the beginning of the deductive chain, proving the conclusion with 100% certainty.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into formal premises and identify the conclusion.
Premise 1: Multi-stage thermal alteration of minerals implies working-memory equivalent to modern humans. Premise 2: Fabricating silcrete micro-blades implies multi-stage thermal alteration. Premise 3: Inhabitants of Pinnacle Point produced composite tools bound by organic adhesives. Conclusion: Inhabitants of Pinnacle Point possessed working-memory equivalent to modern humans.
Sufficient assumption questions require identifying the exact gap in the deductive chain.
2
Determine the conditional chain established by the premises.
Fabrication of silcrete micro-blades leads to multi-stage thermal alteration, which in turn proves modern working-memory capacity.
Combining the first two conditional premises establishes the pathway to the conclusion.
3
Identify the unlinked term in the evidence and bridge it to the conditional chain.
The evidence only mentions composite tools bound by organic adhesives. To reach the conclusion, this evidence must guarantee the starting point of the chain: the fabrication of silcrete micro-blades.
Connecting adhesive-bound composite tools directly to silcrete micro-blades deductively forces the conclusion to follow.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption Deductive Bridging
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 97Soru →

Museum conservator: Recent chemical analysis reveals that the varnish applied to seventeenth-century oil paintings gradually darkens over time, obscuring the artist's original color palette. Some critics advocate removing this aged varnish entirely from all displayed works. However, completely stripping the varnish risks permanently damaging the fragile pigment layers beneath. Therefore, conservators should clean only the outermost dirt from the varnish surface rather than removing the varnish entirely.

Which of the following best describes the role played in the museum conservator's argument by the claim that completely stripping the varnish risks permanently damaging the fragile pigment layers beneath?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It is a premise offered to support the argument's main recommendation.

Cevap

It is a premise offered to support the argument's main recommendation.
The claim that stripping the varnish risks permanently damaging the fragile pigment layers serves as factual evidence explaining why conservators ought to refrain from complete removal and instead perform surface cleaning. It directly supports the final prescriptive conclusion without receiving support from any prior statement, making it a basic premise.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and the structural components of the stimulus.
The main conclusion is the recommendation: 'Therefore, conservators should clean only the outermost dirt from the varnish surface rather than removing the varnish entirely.'
Locating the final claim and its indicator words clarifies the overall direction of the argument.
2
Analyze how the targeted statement relates logically to the main conclusion.
The statement about the risk of permanent pigment damage explains why the critics' approach should be rejected in favor of the conservator's proposed action.
Evaluating whether the statement is supported by other claims or serves as support for another claim determines its functional role.
3
Match the identified relationship to the accurate functional description.
Because the statement is an unsupported factual assertion providing direct rational support for the recommendation, it acts as a premise.
Distinguishing basic premises from intermediate and final conclusions ensures accurate role identification.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the functional role of a premise supporting a prescriptive conclusion
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 98Soru →

The Municipal Transit Authority recently implemented an automated dispatch system designed to optimize bus route allocations. Although the system demonstrably reduced average commuter wait times across the city, the municipal oversight board mandated that the transit authority immediately suspend the automated system. The board justified this intervention by pointing out that because the underlying neural network architecture prevents human supervisors from reconstructing the precise rationale behind individual route alterations, affected commuters who dispute service reallocations cannot be provided with an intelligible explanation.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the municipal oversight board's mandate?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A public administrative body should not employ a decision-making system, regardless of its aggregate efficiency benefits, if that system prevents the agency from providing an intelligible rationale to individuals who contest decisions affecting them.

Cevap

A public administrative body should not employ a decision-making system, regardless of its aggregate efficiency benefits, if that system prevents the agency from providing an intelligible rationale to individuals who contest decisions affecting them.
The argument concludes that the oversight board was justified in mandating the suspension of the automated dispatch system because commuters disputing service changes cannot be given an intelligible explanation, despite the system's demonstrable efficiency gains. The correct principle provides the exact missing bridge: it establishes that preventing an agency from providing an intelligible rationale to individuals contesting decisions is sufficient to prohibit deploying the system, regardless of aggregate efficiency.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus and isolate premises and conclusion
Premises: The automated system reduced average wait times, but its architecture prevents supervisors from explaining the rationale for specific route alterations to commuters disputing service changes. Conclusion: The oversight board was justified in mandating the immediate suspension of the system.
Principle-Justify questions require identifying the exact gap between factual premises and normative conclusions.
2
Identify the logical gap to bridge
The premises show a trade-off between aggregate efficiency gains and individualized procedural explainability. The board prioritized explainability over efficiency to justify suspension.
The correct principle must state a general normative rule that makes the lack of explainability a sufficient condition for suspending or prohibiting the system despite its efficiency benefits.
3
Evaluate candidate principles against the structural requirement
The principle asserting that an administrative body should not use a decision-making system if it precludes providing intelligible rationales to contesting individuals—even with aggregate efficiency gains—fully bridges the gap.
This conditional rule directly yields the conclusion when applied to the facts in the stimulus without requiring extra assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Principle Justification / Normative Bridging
Soru 99Soru →

A commercial air carrier recently terminated its contract with a software vendor that developed its automated flight-rescheduling algorithm. The airline took this action after discovering that, although the algorithm reduced total passenger delays across the network more effectively than human dispatchers, it achieved these efficiencies by disproportionately canceling flights on low-demand regional routes where passengers have no alternative transportation. The airline's executives maintained that passengers in isolated regions should not bear a disproportionate burden merely to optimize system-wide travel times. Which of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the airline executives' decision?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A transportation service provider should not adopt a measure that increases overall operational efficiency if that measure achieves its gains by concentrating severe burdens on a subset of users who have no alternative options.

Cevap

A transportation service provider should not adopt a measure that increases overall operational efficiency if that measure achieves its gains by concentrating severe burdens on a subset of users who have no alternative options.
The argument's conclusion is that the airline was justified in rejecting the algorithm because isolated passengers should not bear a disproportionate burden merely to optimize system-wide travel times. The correct principle establishes that an organization should not adopt an efficiency-increasing measure if that measure achieves its gains by concentrating severe burdens on users who lack alternatives. When applied to the carrier's situation, this rule directly validates the executives' decision to terminate the contract.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises and the conclusion of the argument.
Premise: The algorithm improves overall efficiency (reduces total delays) but does so by disproportionately canceling flights for isolated regional passengers who lack alternatives. Conclusion: The executives were justified in terminating the contract and rejecting the algorithm.
Principle-Justify questions require finding an underlying rule that connects the factual scenario directly to the judgment reached.
2
Identify the logical gap between the premises and the normative conclusion.
The argument assumes that an overall gain in efficiency is unacceptable if it comes at the expense of unfairly burdening vulnerable users with no alternatives.
A valid principle must act as a bridge from 'imposes concentrated harm on alternative-less passengers' to 'should not be used / contract should be terminated'.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the rule that provides a sufficient bridge without logical reversal or extreme claims.
The rule prohibiting efficiency measures that achieve gains by concentrating severe burdens on users lacking alternatives directly justifies the executives' decision.
Applying this rule to the facts yields the exact judgment made by the airline executives.

Anahtar Kavram

Principle Justification (Bridging Descriptive Premise to Normative Conclusion)
Soru 100Soru →

Ecologist: Every songbird species capable of vocal mimicry possesses a specialized syringeal muscle structure. However, certain avian species indigenous to the cloud forest lack this specialized syringeal muscle structure. Therefore, some avian species indigenous to the cloud forest are not songbird species capable of vocal mimicry.

Which of the following arguments is most similar in its logical reasoning to the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Every oil painting restored using traditional resin varnish develops surface micro-cracking over time. Certain sixteenth-century portraits in the municipal gallery have not developed surface micro-cracking over time. Thus, some sixteenth-century portraits in the municipal gallery are not oil paintings restored using traditional resin varnish.

Cevap

The argument concerning sixteenth-century portraits in the municipal gallery and traditional resin varnish is most similar in its logical reasoning to the original argument.
The correct argument precisely matches the logical blueprint of the stimulus. Both arguments begin with a universal conditional rule (All members of group A possess feature B), introduce a factual premise indicating that certain members of a subcategory C lack feature B, and conclude validly via modus tollens that some members of subcategory C are not members of group A.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Abstract the logical structure of the stimulus argument.
Premise 1: All X have characteristic Y (Universal conditional: X -> Y).
Premise 2: Some members of category Z do not have characteristic Y (Particular negative: Some Z are not-Y).
Conclusion: Therefore, some members of category Z are not members of group X (Valid contrapositive deduction: Some Z are not-X).
Deconstructing the argument into symbolic premises and conclusions isolates the reasoning pattern from the topic.
2
Evaluate the validity and quantifier strength of the stimulus conclusion.
The argument is logically valid and derives a particular negative claim ('some... are not') based on a contrapositive application of the universal premise to a subset.
Parallel reasoning requires matching both logical validity and modal/quantifier certainty.
3
Compare each option against the abstracted logical skeleton.
The choice discussing oil paintings restored with resin varnish establishes: (1) All paintings restored with resin varnish (X) develop micro-cracking (Y); (2) Some sixteenth-century portraits (Z) do not develop micro-cracking (not-Y); (3) Therefore, some sixteenth-century portraits (Z) are not paintings restored with resin varnish (not-X).
This is an exact structural and quantifier match to the stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Quantifier Syllogism and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 5 / 34Sonraki
Logical Reasoning Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 5 | Examkin