Examkin

Must Be True / Most Strongly Supported

88 soru

Tüm türler88Çoktan seçmeli45Çoklu seçim23Doğru / Yanlış20
Soru 41Soru →

According to municipal aquifer management regulations, any commercial facility operating in the Green River basin that extracts more than 50,000 gallons of groundwater daily is classified as a Tier-1 consumer. Every Tier-1 consumer is required to install digital ultrasonic flow meters on all active wellheads. Furthermore, any facility required to install digital ultrasonic flow meters must submit to an annual hydrologic audit. Clearwater Brewing operates in the Green River basin and has not submitted to an annual hydrologic audit.

Statement: Clearwater Brewing does not extract more than 50,000 gallons of groundwater daily.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The conclusion is logically valid via modus tollens across a transitive chain: Extraction > 50,000 gallons leads directly to a mandatory audit; therefore, the absence of an audit necessitates that extraction cannot exceed 50,000 gallons.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the conditional premises provided in the regulatory framework
Extracts >50,000 gallons daily → Tier-1 consumer → Required to install ultrasonic flow meters → Required to submit to annual hydrologic audit.
Establishing the linked conditional relationships clarifies what is logically necessitated by high-volume extraction.
2
Form the contrapositive of the complete conditional chain
No annual hydrologic audit → Not required to install ultrasonic flow meters → Not a Tier-1 consumer → Does not extract >50,000 gallons daily.
A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive.
3
Apply the factual information regarding Clearwater Brewing to the contrapositive
Since Clearwater Brewing has not submitted to an annual hydrologic audit, it must be true that it does not extract more than 50,000 gallons of groundwater daily.
Matching the given condition to the contrapositive guarantees the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 42Soru →

Agricultural researchers monitored test plots of drought-stressed legumes under varying soil and management conditions. In every plot where mycorrhizal fungal colonization exceeded 40 percent, root nodule nitrogen fixation remained stable throughout the dry season. However, no plot that received synthetic nitrogen fertilizer achieved mycorrhizal fungal colonization above 25 percent. In the southern test valley, all plots managed under the regenerative protocol maintained stable root nodule nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season, but several of these regenerative plots had received synthetic nitrogen fertilizer.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some legume plots with mycorrhizal fungal colonization of 25 percent or less maintained stable root nodule nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season.

Cevap

At least some legume plots with mycorrhizal fungal colonization of 25 percent or less maintained stable root nodule nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season.
The stimulus establishes that several regenerative plots in the southern valley received synthetic fertilizer. By the rule that no plot receiving synthetic fertilizer exceeds 25 percent colonization, these specific plots must have had colonization rates of 25 percent or less. Because all regenerative plots in that valley maintained stable nitrogen fixation throughout the dry season, these specific plots maintained stable fixation despite having colonization rates at or below 25 percent. Thus, it is logically guaranteed that at least some plots with colonization of 25 percent or less maintained stable nitrogen fixation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Extract and formalize the factual premises from the stimulus
Premise 1: Fungal colonization > 40% guarantees stable nitrogen fixation. Premise 2: Synthetic fertilizer guarantees fungal colonization <= 25%. Premise 3: All southern valley regenerative plots had stable nitrogen fixation, and some of these plots received synthetic fertilizer.
Isolating the formal relationships prevents conflating sufficient conditions with necessary conditions.
2
Synthesize the premises regarding the subset of southern valley regenerative plots that received synthetic fertilizer
The regenerative plots that received synthetic fertilizer must have fungal colonization <= 25% (by Premise 2). At the same time, because they are regenerative plots in the southern valley, they maintained stable nitrogen fixation (by Premise 3).
Combining these specific constraints produces a deductively guaranteed overlap.
3
Derive the valid deductive inference
There exist plots (specifically, the fertilized southern valley regenerative plots) that had fungal colonization <= 25% while maintaining stable nitrogen fixation.
This matches the statement that at least some plots with colonization of 25% or less maintained stable nitrogen fixation.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier Intersection and Sufficient vs. Necessary Conditions
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
Soru 43Soru →

According to the protocol of the Highfield Agricultural Research Station, every wheat cultivar that demonstrates drought resistance is selected for regional field trials. In addition, no wheat cultivar selected for regional field trials is treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing. A newly developed cultivar, Solstice-9, demonstrated drought resistance at the station.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing.

Cevap

Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing.
The stimulus establishes a transitive conditional chain: drought resistance guarantees selection for regional field trials, and selection for field trials guarantees that no synthetic nitrogen fertilizer is applied during testing. Since Solstice-9 possesses drought resistance, it necessarily follows that Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the stated conditional relationships and specific factual premise in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Drought Resistance → Selected for Regional Field Trials. Premise 2: Selected for Regional Field Trials → NOT Treated with Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer. Fact: Solstice-9 has Drought Resistance.
Establishing the formal conditional rules is necessary to deduce valid deductive inferences.
2
Apply the conditional chain to the specific instance of Solstice-9.
Solstice-9 has Drought Resistance → Solstice-9 is Selected for Regional Field Trials → Solstice-9 is NOT Treated with Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer.
A valid deductive syllogism combines universal conditional premises with a specific initiating fact.
3
Select the statement that directly matches the derived necessary conclusion.
The statement specifying that Solstice-9 is not treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers during testing is logically guaranteed.
Must Be True questions require a choice that is strictly provable from the premises without additional assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Two-step conditional chaining and deductive instantiation
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 44Soru →

Premises:
- Every manuscript acquired by the Crestview Historical Society that was created prior to 1700 undergoes spectral imaging before being placed on public exhibition.
- The illuminated manuscript Codex Solaris was created in 1640 and was acquired by the Crestview Historical Society.
- The Codex Solaris is currently on public exhibition at the Crestview Historical Society.

Statement:
Based on the premises above, the Codex Solaris underwent spectral imaging before being placed on public exhibition.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because it is a direct deductive consequence of the premises. The stimulus establishes that every manuscript acquired by the society and created before 1700 undergoes spectral imaging before exhibition. Since the Codex Solaris was acquired by the society, created in 1640, and is exhibited, the imaging procedure must have taken place.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional rule established in the stimulus.
Rule: (Acquired by Crestview Society) AND (Created prior to 1700) AND (Placed on public exhibition) → Underwent spectral imaging prior to exhibition.
Identifying the formal structure of the universal premise allows for direct deductive application.
2
Evaluate the facts concerning the Codex Solaris against the antecedent conditions.
The Codex Solaris is acquired by the society, was created in 1640 (which is prior to 1700), and is currently on public exhibition.
All necessary triggers for the conditional rule are fully satisfied by the specific subject.
3
Deduce the necessary outcome.
The Codex Solaris must have undergone spectral imaging prior to exhibition; thus, the statement is conclusively True.
Applying modus ponens directly yields the guaranteed factual conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Universal conditional deduction (Modus Ponens)
Soru 45Soru →

Every monoclonal antibody treatment approved by the Federal Health Directorate for autoimmune disorders must either undergo a specialized glycosylation assay or be synthesized exclusively via mammalian expression vectors. No pharmaceutical candidate synthesized exclusively via mammalian expression vectors is exempt from cold-chain temperature logging during cross-border transit. Furthermore, any therapeutic agent subjected to the specialized glycosylation assay exhibits batch-to-batch molecular homogeneity. Nexovira is a monoclonal antibody treatment approved by the Federal Health Directorate for autoimmune disorders that is exempt from cold-chain temperature logging during cross-border transit.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Nexovira exhibits batch-to-batch molecular homogeneity.

Cevap

Nexovira exhibits batch-to-batch molecular homogeneity.
The stimulus establishes that Nexovira is an approved autoimmune monoclonal antibody treatment that is exempt from transit cold-chain temperature logging. Because synthesis via mammalian expression vectors strictly precludes cold-chain exemptions, Nexovira's exemption guarantees via contrapositive that it was not synthesized via mammalian vectors. Consequently, under the Directorate's approval rule, Nexovira must have undergone the specialized glycosylation assay. Since undergoing this assay guarantees batch-to-batch molecular homogeneity, Nexovira must possess this characteristic.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the formal conditional rules and relationships given in the stimulus.
Approved Treatment → (Glycosylation Assay OR Mammalian Vectors); Mammalian Vectors → NOT Exempt from cold-chain logging; Glycosylation Assay → Molecular Homogeneity.
Establishing explicit conditional chains allows for accurate multi-step deduction.
2
Apply the contrapositive of the cold-chain transit rule to the factual profile of Nexovira.
Because Nexovira is exempt from cold-chain logging, it was NOT synthesized exclusively via mammalian expression vectors.
If a necessary condition is negated, the sufficient condition must also be negated.
3
Evaluate the disjunctive requirement for approved autoimmune treatments and trace the resulting implication.
Since Nexovira is an approved treatment but did not use mammalian expression vectors, it must have undergone the glycosylation assay, which in turn guarantees batch-to-batch molecular homogeneity.
Eliminating one branch of an 'either/or' requirement strictly necessitates the truth of the remaining branch.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Disjunctive Syllogism
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 46Soru →

To qualify for the Advanced Renewable Energy (ARE) subsidy, a municipal power plant must utilize either geothermal extraction or tidal harnessing technologies, but not both. Any plant that utilizes geothermal extraction must possess a Class 4 seismic mitigation system. However, no plant commissioned prior to 2010 possesses a Class 4 seismic mitigation system. Most municipal power plants commissioned prior to 2010 qualify for the ARE subsidy. Every plant that qualifies for the ARE subsidy and utilizes tidal harnessing technologies is subject to federal maritime jurisdiction.

Which of the following statements must be true based on the information above? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Most municipal power plants commissioned prior to 2010 are subject to federal maritime jurisdiction.; At least some municipal power plants subject to federal maritime jurisdiction do not possess a Class 4 seismic mitigation system.

Cevap

The correct statements are that most municipal power plants commissioned prior to 2010 are subject to federal maritime jurisdiction, and that at least some municipal power plants subject to federal maritime jurisdiction do not possess a Class 4 seismic mitigation system.
By tracing the conditional logic: 1) Any plant commissioned prior to 2010 does not have a Class 4 system. 2) Because geothermal extraction requires a Class 4 system, no pre-2010 plant uses geothermal extraction. 3) We are told most pre-2010 plants qualify for the ARE subsidy. 4) To qualify for this subsidy, a plant must use either geothermal or tidal, but not both. Since these pre-2010 ARE-qualifying plants do not use geothermal, they must use tidal technologies. 5) Therefore, most pre-2010 plants both qualify for the ARE subsidy and utilize tidal technologies. 6) Because any plant meeting both these conditions is subject to federal maritime jurisdiction, it must be true that most pre-2010 plants are subject to federal maritime jurisdiction. Furthermore, since these specific plants are pre-2010 (meaning they lack Class 4 systems) and are subject to maritime jurisdiction, it follows necessarily that at least some plants subject to maritime jurisdiction do not possess Class 4 systems.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional relationship between geothermal extraction, seismic mitigation, and plant age.
Since pre-2010 plants lack Class 4 systems, and Class 4 systems are required for geothermal extraction, no pre-2010 plants can utilize geothermal extraction.
This establishes a negative constraint that forces a specific alternative in the next step.
2
Apply the subsidy requirement rules to the pre-2010 plants.
Most pre-2010 plants qualify for the ARE subsidy. Because they cannot use geothermal extraction, they must satisfy the subsidy requirement by utilizing tidal harnessing technologies.
The ARE subsidy requires either geothermal or tidal. Eliminating geothermal leaves only tidal.
3
Synthesize the findings with the rule regarding federal maritime jurisdiction.
Since these 'most' pre-2010 plants both qualify for the ARE subsidy and utilize tidal technologies, they trigger the sufficient condition for federal maritime jurisdiction.
This proves the first correct statement: Most pre-2010 plants are subject to federal maritime jurisdiction.
4
Evaluate the intersection of the established groups to derive further inferences.
Because these specific pre-2010 plants are subject to maritime jurisdiction and lack Class 4 systems, it must be true that at least some plants under maritime jurisdiction lack Class 4 systems.
This proves the second correct statement by combining the established characteristics of the pre-2010 subgroup.

Anahtar Kavram

Must Be True / Most Strongly Supported
Soru 47Soru →

Consider the following statements:

Under the Interplanetary Spaceflight Accord, every commercial vehicle operating in low Earth orbit that carries pressurized volatile propellants must either be equipped with an autonomous passivation valve or maintain a continuous active telemetry link with the orbital safety registry. Any orbital vehicle equipped with an autonomous passivation valve must undergo thermal-vacuum qualification prior to launch. Furthermore, no vehicle that undergoes thermal-vacuum qualification is permitted to utilize non-radiation-hardened microcontrollers in its flight control system. The Aethelgard-4 is a commercial vehicle operating in low Earth orbit that carries pressurized volatile propellants and utilizes a non-radiation-hardened microcontroller in its flight control system.

Based strictly on the information provided, evaluate the truth value of the following statement:
The Aethelgard-4 maintains a continuous active telemetry link with the orbital safety registry.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True — Based strictly on the premises, the Aethelgard-4 must maintain a continuous active telemetry link with the orbital safety registry.
The statement must be true because the Aethelgard-4 meets the criteria for low Earth orbit operations with volatile propellants, requiring either a passivation valve or continuous telemetry. Since its flight computer uses non-radiation-hardened components, it cannot have undergone thermal-vacuum qualification, ruling out the passivation valve. Consequently, the active telemetry link is logically required.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Extract and formalize the conditional rules from the regulatory premises.
Rule 1: (Low Earth Orbit and Pressurized Volatile Propellants) -> (Autonomous Passivation Valve OR Continuous Active Telemetry Link). Rule 2: Autonomous Passivation Valve -> Thermal-Vacuum Qualification. Rule 3: Thermal-Vacuum Qualification -> NOT Non-Radiation-Hardened Microcontrollers.
Translating the prose into structured conditional statements establishes the formal relationships between technical requirements.
2
Apply contraposition to the conditional chain using the factual characteristics of the Aethelgard-4.
Non-Radiation-Hardened Microcontroller -> NOT Thermal-Vacuum Qualification -> NOT Autonomous Passivation Valve.
Because the Aethelgard-4 is known to utilize non-radiation-hardened microcontrollers, following the contrapositives of Rules 3 and 2 eliminates the possibility that it has an autonomous passivation valve.
3
Apply disjunctive syllogism to the first conditional rule.
Since the Aethelgard-4 triggers Rule 1 and cannot satisfy the disjunction via an autonomous passivation valve, it must satisfy the remaining disjunct: maintaining a continuous active telemetry link.
When a necessary disjunctive requirement has one disjunct proven false, the other disjunct must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining, Contraposition, and Disjunctive Syllogism
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 48Soru →

The Silver Basin Ecological Reserve applies strict conservation protocols to all newly restored wetland plots:

• Every wetland plot designated as an active waterfowl habitat receives supplemental aeration during the dry season.
• Any wetland plot that receives supplemental aeration during the dry season is planted exclusively with native emergent reeds.
• No wetland plot planted exclusively with native emergent reeds is treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers.
• Last year, Plot 7 and Plot 12 were both designated as active waterfowl habitats, whereas Plot 4 was treated with synthetic nitrogen fertilizers.

If the statements above are true, which of the following statements must also be true? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Plot 7 was planted exclusively with native emergent reeds.; Plot 4 was not designated as an active waterfowl habitat last year.

Cevap

The statements establishing that Plot 7 was planted exclusively with native emergent reeds and that Plot 4 was not designated as an active waterfowl habitat must both be true.
The stimulus establishes a strict conditional chain: Active Waterfowl Habitat → Supplemental Aeration → Native Emergent Reeds → No Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer. Because Plot 7 was designated as an active waterfowl habitat, following the chain forward guarantees that it was planted exclusively with native emergent reeds. Through contrapositive reasoning (Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer → No Native Emergent Reeds → No Supplemental Aeration → Not Active Waterfowl Habitat), the fact that Plot 4 received synthetic nitrogen fertilizers guarantees that it was not designated as an active waterfowl habitat.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the conditional chain from the general rules in the stimulus.
Active Waterfowl Habitat → Supplemental Aeration → Native Emergent Reeds → No Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer. The contrapositive is: Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer → Not Native Emergent Reeds → No Supplemental Aeration → Not Active Waterfowl Habitat.
Establishing the directional conditional logic is necessary to identify valid forward deductions and contrapositives.
2
Apply the specific facts provided for Plot 7 and Plot 4 to the conditional relationships.
Plot 7 satisfies the sufficient condition of being an active waterfowl habitat, which guarantees that it received aeration, was planted with native emergent reeds, and received no synthetic fertilizer. Plot 4 satisfies the condition of receiving synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which by contrapositive guarantees it was not planted with native reeds, did not receive aeration, and was not an active waterfowl habitat.
Directly testing factual premises against the chain reveals which claims are logically guaranteed.
3
Evaluate the remaining options for logical fallacies.
Claims asserting that non-fertilized plots must receive aeration, that all reed-planted plots must be waterfowl habitats, or that Plot 12 used organic fertilizers are invalid due to conditional reversal, unwarranted extreme scope, and unaddressed information.
Eliminating invalid deductions confirms the exact set of statements that must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 49Soru →

Paleoclimatologists analyzing polar ice cores have established the following:

• Every polar ice core segment that exhibits an anomalous sulfate spike without an accompanying basaltic cryptotephra deposit was formed during a period of non-explosive effusive volcanism.
• In the Amundsen-Scott ice core, every segment corresponding to the mid-Holocene climatic anomaly contains either a basaltic cryptotephra deposit or a high concentration of micro-meteoritic iridium, but not both.
• No polar ice core segment containing a high concentration of micro-meteoritic iridium was formed during a period of non-explosive effusive volcanism.
• Sample AS-442 is a segment from the Amundsen-Scott ice core that corresponds to the mid-Holocene climatic anomaly and exhibits an anomalous sulfate spike.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Sample AS-442 contains a basaltic cryptotephra deposit.

Cevap

Sample AS-442 contains a basaltic cryptotephra deposit.
The deduction proceeds by indirect proof. Sample AS-442 corresponds to the mid-Holocene anomaly, meaning it must have either basaltic cryptotephra or high iridium, but not both. If sample AS-442 did not contain basaltic cryptotephra, it would necessarily contain high iridium. Under this scenario, because it has an anomalous sulfate spike without basaltic cryptotephra, it would have to be formed during non-explosive effusive volcanism (by the first premise). However, the third premise establishes that containing high iridium strictly precludes being formed during non-explosive effusive volcanism. Because this creates an impossible contradiction, the initial assumption must be false: sample AS-442 must contain a basaltic cryptotephra deposit.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the known properties of sample AS-442 from the stimulus.
Sample AS-442 is from the Amundsen-Scott core, corresponds to the mid-Holocene climatic anomaly, and exhibits an anomalous sulfate spike.
Establishing the initial factual conditions sets the boundary for applying the conditional and disjunctive rules.
2
Apply the exclusive disjunction for mid-Holocene segments to sample AS-442.
Sample AS-442 must contain either basaltic cryptotephra OR high micro-meteoritic iridium, but cannot contain both.
The stimulus explicitly defines this mutual exclusivity for all mid-Holocene Amundsen-Scott segments.
3
Test the hypothetical assumption that sample AS-442 lacks basaltic cryptotephra.
If AS-442 lacks basaltic cryptotephra, it MUST have high iridium (by step 2) AND it MUST have been formed during non-explosive effusive volcanism (by the first premise, since it has a sulfate spike and no cryptotephra).
Evaluating the negation of the target condition reveals whether a logical contradiction arises.
4
Evaluate the result of step 3 against the third premise.
The third premise states that no segment with high iridium was formed during non-explosive effusive volcanism. This directly contradicts the outcome of step 3.
A valid deductive argument cannot result in mutually contradictory states.
5
Draw the necessary deductive conclusion by indirect proof (reductio ad absurdum).
Because assuming the absence of basaltic cryptotephra produces a direct contradiction, sample AS-442 must contain a basaltic cryptotephra deposit.
Eliminating one branch of a strict disjunction logically necessitates the truth of the other.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive synthesis through conditional contraposition and proof by contradiction in exclusive disjunctions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 50Soru →

The Municipal Transit Authority maintains the following operational regulations for municipal bus routes:

• Every bus route that operates along the North Ridge corridor is classified as a high-altitude transit line.
• Any transit line classified as a high-altitude transit line requires winterized traction control systems.
• No transit line that requires winterized traction control systems is authorized for solo-operator night shifts unless it maintains dedicated thermal battery preheating.
• Route 42 operates along the North Ridge corridor and is authorized for solo-operator night shifts.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Route 42 maintains dedicated thermal battery preheating.

Cevap

Route 42 maintains dedicated thermal battery preheating.
The conclusion that Route 42 maintains dedicated thermal battery preheating is logically guaranteed. Route 42 operates on the North Ridge corridor, which means it is a high-altitude line and therefore requires winterized traction control. Under the regulations, any line requiring winterized traction control cannot be authorized for solo-operator night shifts unless it maintains dedicated thermal battery preheating. Because Route 42 is authorized for those night shifts, it must maintain dedicated thermal battery preheating.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the conditional relationships established by the stimulus rules
North Ridge corridor → High-altitude transit line → Requires winterized traction control. (Requires winterized traction control AND Authorized for solo-operator night shifts) → Dedicated thermal battery preheating.
Establishing the chain of necessary conditions allows direct evaluation of specific cases.
2
Apply the factual premises regarding Route 42 to the conditional chain
Route 42 is on North Ridge → Route 42 is a high-altitude line → Route 42 requires winterized traction control.
Determines which properties Route 42 necessarily possesses based on its route.
3
Synthesize the traction control requirement with the authorization rule
Since Route 42 requires winterized traction control and is authorized for solo-operator night shifts, it must satisfy the necessary condition: maintaining dedicated thermal battery preheating.
Completes the deductive inference guaranteed by the premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Necessary Condition Derivation
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 51Soru →

Under the Northern Abyssal Maritime Protocol, every deep-sea exploration vessel operating in the Northern Abyssal Zone that is equipped with autonomous acoustic mapping sensors is required to carry a dual-redundant power core. No vessel carrying a dual-redundant power core is permitted to enter the benthic sanctuary unless it has received benthic environmental clearance. Furthermore, every vessel that has received benthic environmental clearance has completed a closed-loop coolant inspection. The research vessel Vanguard operates in the Northern Abyssal Zone and is equipped with autonomous acoustic mapping sensors, but it has not completed a closed-loop coolant inspection.

Based on the information above, which of the following statements must be true? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Vanguard carries a dual-redundant power core.; The Vanguard is not permitted to enter the benthic sanctuary.

Cevap

The statements indicating that the Vanguard carries a dual-redundant power core and that the Vanguard is not permitted to enter the benthic sanctuary must both be true.
The premises establish two deductive chains: first, the Vanguard's location and equipment satisfy the sufficient condition requiring a dual-redundant power core; second, by contrapositive, the absence of a coolant inspection proves the Vanguard lacks environmental clearance, which in turn bars any vessel with a dual-redundant power core from entering the sanctuary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deduce the power core status of the Vanguard from the first rule.
The Vanguard is established to carry a dual-redundant power core.
The stimulus specifies that any vessel in the Northern Abyssal Zone equipped with acoustic mapping sensors must carry a dual-redundant power core, and the Vanguard satisfies both trigger conditions.
2
Apply the contrapositive to the coolant inspection rule.
The Vanguard has not received benthic environmental clearance.
Since benthic environmental clearance requires completing a closed-loop coolant inspection, failing to complete the inspection guarantees that clearance was not received.
3
Evaluate the entry restriction for the benthic sanctuary.
The Vanguard is prohibited from entering the benthic sanctuary.
Any vessel with a dual-redundant power core cannot enter without clearance; having established that the Vanguard has the core and lacks clearance, it cannot enter.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 52Soru →

The Antiquarian Document Restoration Society enforces the following conservation protocols for illuminated manuscripts:

• Every fourteenth-century parchment manuscript undergoing aqueous pigment stabilization must first receive an infrared reflectography assessment.
• No document that receives an infrared reflectography assessment is approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning unless it has also been certified as having stable organic binders.
• The manuscript Codex Veridicus is a fourteenth-century parchment manuscript treated at the Guild Workshop, where it underwent aqueous pigment stabilization and was approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning.

Statement: Codex Veridicus was certified as having stable organic binders.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The stimulus provides sufficient premises to prove the claim with certainty. Codex Veridicus meets the exact conditions that mandate an infrared reflectography assessment, and because it was subsequently approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning, it was required by the protocol to possess certification for stable organic binders.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional premises stated in the conservation protocol.
Rule 1: (14th-century parchment AND aqueous stabilization) → infrared reflectography assessment. Rule 2: (Infrared reflectography assessment AND approved for ultrasonic cleaning) → certified stable organic binders.
Translating rules into strict logical relations allows for step-by-step deductive chaining without unwarranted assumptions.
2
Apply the factual details regarding Codex Veridicus to Rule 1.
Codex Veridicus meets both conditions for Rule 1 (it is a 14th-century parchment manuscript and underwent aqueous stabilization), so it definitely received an infrared reflectography assessment.
Modus ponens on Rule 1 establishes that Codex Veridicus received the infrared reflectography assessment.
3
Combine the result from Step 2 with the second factual premise to apply Rule 2.
Codex Veridicus received an infrared reflectography assessment AND was approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning. By Rule 2, it necessarily follows that Codex Veridicus was certified as having stable organic binders.
Applying the conjunction of the two conditions to Rule 2 strictly yields the necessary requirement of certification.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive conditional chaining and necessary condition satisfaction in formal logic
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 53Soru →

Consider the following historical regulations established by the Grand Mint of Venice regarding precious metal coinage:

• Every gold ducat batch certified for overseas commerce underwent double cupellation refining.
• Any coinage batch subjected to double cupellation refining that also achieved a fineness rating above 0.995 was exempt from bullion remelt audits.
• No batch produced during the winter quarantine failed to achieve a fineness rating above 0.995.
• Some gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine were certified for overseas commerce.

Statement: Based on the records above, at least some gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine were exempt from bullion remelt audits.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The deductive claim strictly follows from the conjunction of the conditional rules and the existential premise.
The statement must be true because the premises provide a closed deductive chain: the existential premise guarantees the existence of gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine that were certified for overseas commerce. Under the stated rules, overseas-certified gold ducats underwent double cupellation refining, and winter quarantine production guarantees a fineness rating above 0.995. Possessing both characteristics strictly triggers the exemption from bullion remelt audits, proving that at least some winter quarantine batches were exempt.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the existential premise providing the starting subject.
There exists a non-empty set of gold ducat batches that were both produced during the winter quarantine and certified for overseas commerce.
Existential claims ('some') anchor deduction by establishing the actual existence of items possessing specific combined properties.
2
Apply the universal conditional rules to the identified batch subset.
For any batch in this subset: (1) Overseas certification guarantees double cupellation refining; (2) Winter quarantine production guarantees a fineness rating above 0.995.
Universal conditionals apply without exception to any member satisfying their respective antecedent conditions.
3
Synthesize the resulting properties against the rule for audit exemption.
Because these batches possess both double cupellation refining and a fineness rating above 0.995, they meet the joint sufficient condition for exemption from bullion remelt audits.
When all antecedent conditions of a compound conditional are met, the consequent must follow.
4
Evaluate the statement's truth value.
The statement that at least some gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine were exempt from remelt audits must be true.
The conclusion is derived with complete deductive certainty.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier Intersection and Compound Conditional Synthesis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 54Soru →

The faculty senate at a research university recently adopted new bylaws governing research funding. The bylaws stipulate that any grant proposal involving human subjects must be reviewed by the ethics board unless the proposal is exclusively funded by an internal departmental budget. Furthermore, no proposal that is reviewed by the ethics board can be approved for expedited processing. Every proposal that is exclusively funded by an internal departmental budget is exempt from the standard peer-review process.

Based on these bylaws, it must be true that if a grant proposal involving human subjects is approved for expedited processing, it is exempt from the standard peer-review process.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is logically guaranteed by chaining the contrapositive of the expedited processing rule through the 'unless' exception of the human subjects rule, ultimately triggering the peer-review exemption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the premises into formal conditional statements.
Premise 1: Human Subjects → (Ethics Board OR Exclusively Internal). Premise 2: Ethics Board → NOT Expedited. Premise 3: Exclusively Internal → Exempt from Peer Review.
Formalizing the rules prevents misinterpretation of complex logical operators, particularly the word 'unless'.
2
Analyze the conditions provided in the statement to be evaluated.
The statement proposes a specific scenario: a grant proposal has both Human Subjects (HS) and Expedited Processing (EXP).
These act as sufficient conditions from which we must derive the necessary outcome to test the statement.
3
Apply the contrapositive of Premise 2 to the Expedited condition.
Premise 2 states: Ethics Board → NOT Expedited. The contrapositive is: Expedited → NOT Ethics Board. Therefore, this proposal was NOT reviewed by the Ethics Board.
We must follow the logical chain backward from the known outcome (Expedited Processing).
4
Evaluate Premise 1 using the deduced information.
Premise 1 requires Human Subjects proposals to go to the Ethics Board UNLESS they are Exclusively Internal. Since our proposal bypassed the Ethics Board, it must trigger the exception: it is Exclusively Internal.
In a necessary condition involving a disjunction (A or B), if one option (A) is eliminated, the other (B) must be true.
5
Apply the deduction from Step 4 to Premise 3.
Since the proposal is Exclusively Internal, Premise 3 dictates it is Exempt from Peer Review. This matches the outcome predicted by the statement perfectly.
This completes the logical chain from the initial conditions to the required outcome, proving the statement must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal Logic, Conditional Chaining, and Contrapositives
Soru 55Soru →

In mammalian cellular physiology, any cell undergoing mitochondrial autophagy activates the Parkin-dependent ubiquitination pathway unless it has sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient. Every cell that activates the Parkin-dependent ubiquitination pathway produces elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin. Furthermore, any cell that exhibits lysosomal membrane permeabilization suffers severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient, and no cell producing elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin can initiate caspase-independent apoptosis.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any cell undergoing mitochondrial autophagy that initiates caspase-independent apoptosis has sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient.

Cevap

Any cell undergoing mitochondrial autophagy that initiates caspase-independent apoptosis has sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient.
The stimulus establishes a strict conditional chain: if a cell undergoes mitochondrial autophagy and lacks severe inner membrane electrochemical gradient disruption, it must activate the Parkin-dependent ubiquitination pathway, which in turn guarantees elevated phosphorylated ubiquitin, thereby precluding caspase-independent apoptosis. Via contrapositive deduction, any cell that initiates caspase-independent apoptosis cannot satisfy both initial conditions; therefore, if such a cell is indeed undergoing mitochondrial autophagy, it must have sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional statements and exception rules in the stimulus.
Autophagy AND (No Gradient Disruption) implies Parkin Activation; Parkin Activation implies Elevated Phosphorylated Ubiquitin; Elevated Phosphorylated Ubiquitin implies No Caspase-Independent Apoptosis.
Translating the prose into structured conditional links clarifies the logical pathway and reveals the trigger conditions.
2
Chain the valid implications to form a composite deductive rule.
(Autophagy AND No Gradient Disruption) implies No Caspase-Independent Apoptosis.
Transitive linking across the intermediate terms (Parkin Activation and Phosphorylated Ubiquitin) connects the starting physiological states directly to the terminal apoptotic consequence.
3
Derive the contrapositive of the composite conditional statement.
If a cell initiates Caspase-Independent Apoptosis, it is NOT the case that (Autophagy AND No Gradient Disruption). For a cell that is undergoing Autophagy, it MUST have sustained Severe Gradient Disruption.
The contrapositive of any valid conditional statement is logically equivalent and necessarily true.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Synthesis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 56Soru →

Ecologists studying alpine plant communities in the Cascade Range recorded the following observations regarding high-altitude perennial species:

• Every perennial species that produces anthocyanin-rich floral pigments possesses cellular cold-shock proteins.
• Any species possessing cellular cold-shock proteins is capable of surviving prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis.
• Some alpine perennial species that are pollinated exclusively by bumblebees produce anthocyanin-rich floral pigments.
• No species capable of surviving prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis exhibits early-spring dormancy.

Based on the ecologists' observations, which of the following statements must be true? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some alpine perennial species that are pollinated exclusively by bumblebees are capable of surviving prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis.; No alpine perennial species that exhibits early-spring dormancy produces anthocyanin-rich floral pigments.

Cevap

The statements that must be true are the one asserting that at least some bumblebee-pollinated alpine perennials can survive prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis, and the one stating that no species exhibiting early-spring dormancy produces anthocyanin-rich floral pigments.
The statements asserting sub-zero survival for some bumblebee-pollinated species and the absence of anthocyanin production in dormant species are deductively guaranteed. First, because some bumblebee-pollinated perennials produce anthocyanin, and all anthocyanin producers possess cold-shock proteins that confer sub-zero survival without necrosis, at least some bumblebee-pollinated perennials must possess this survival capacity. Second, the full conditional chain shows that every anthocyanin-producing species avoids early-spring dormancy; taking the contrapositive confirms that no species with early-spring dormancy can produce anthocyanin.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional rules and quantifier relationships from the stimulus.
Anthocyanin →\rightarrow Cold-shock proteins →\rightarrow Sub-zero survival without necrosis →\rightarrow No early-spring dormancy. Additionally: Some Bumblebee-pollinated →\rightarrow Anthocyanin.
Translating premises into symbolic logic clarifies valid inferences, quantifier overlaps, and contrapositives.
2
Chain the quantifier premise through the conditional sequence.
Since some bumblebee-pollinated species produce anthocyanins, and all anthocyanin producers possess cold-shock proteins and survive sub-zero temperatures, there exist bumblebee-pollinated species with sub-zero survival capability.
An existential quantifier (Some XX are YY) combined with universal conditionals (Y→ZY \rightarrow Z) guarantees that Some XX are ZZ.
3
Derive the contrapositive of the full conditional chain.
The conditional chain Anthocyanin →\rightarrow No early-spring dormancy yields the contrapositive: Early-spring dormancy →\rightarrow No anthocyanin.
A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive, establishing that any plant with early-spring dormancy cannot produce anthocyanins.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional chaining, contrapositive derivation, and quantifier intersection in deductive logic
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 57Soru →

Geochemists studying paleoclimate records in subterranean cave formations have established the following premises:

• Every stalagmite specimen from the Hanlin formation that preserves intact lipid biomarkers exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios.
• Any stalagmite specimen from this formation that has undergone calcite recrystallization fails to preserve intact lipid biomarkers.
• A stalagmite specimen exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios only if it formed during an era of elevated precipitation.
• Analysis of Hanlin specimen H-4 confirms that it preserves intact lipid biomarkers.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Hanlin specimen H-4 formed during an era of elevated precipitation.

Cevap

Hanlin specimen H-4 formed during an era of elevated precipitation.
The stimulus provides a direct deductive chain. We are told that Hanlin specimen H-4 possesses intact lipid biomarkers. According to the first premise, any specimen with intact lipid biomarkers exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios. According to the third premise, exhibiting depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios occurs 'only if' the specimen formed during an era of elevated precipitation, meaning that elevated precipitation is a necessary condition for depleted ratios. Chaining these validly (L→D→PL \rightarrow D \rightarrow P) proves conclusively that specimen H-4 must have formed during an era of elevated precipitation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the conditional rules and specific factual premise from the stimulus into formal logical statements.
Let LL = preserves intact lipid biomarkers, DD = exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios, RR = undergone calcite recrystallization, and PP = formed during an era of elevated precipitation. The premises establish: (1) L→DL \rightarrow D, (2) R→¬LR \rightarrow \neg L (or L→¬RL \rightarrow \neg R), (3) D→PD \rightarrow P ('DD only if PP'), and (4) Fact: L(H-4)L(\text{H-4}) is true.
Formalizing the statements eliminates ambiguity regarding sufficient and necessary indicators such as 'every', 'any', and 'only if'.
2
Chain the conditional relationships starting from the known factual premise regarding specimen H-4.
From L(H-4)L(\text{H-4}) and rule (1) L→DL \rightarrow D, we deduce D(H-4)D(\text{H-4}). From D(H-4)D(\text{H-4}) and rule (3) D→PD \rightarrow P, we deduce P(H-4)P(\text{H-4}).
Applying modus ponens across the valid transitive chain L→D→PL \rightarrow D \rightarrow P yields the deductively guaranteed conclusion that H-4 formed during an era of elevated precipitation.
3
Evaluate the remaining options to confirm they either represent invalid formal fallacies or introduce unwarranted assumptions.
All alternative options commit classic logical errors such as conditional reversal, mistaken negation, or conflating sufficient conditions with exclusive causes.
Ensures that exactly one option is logically guaranteed by the premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Chaining and Valid Deductive Inferences
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 58Soru →

An epigrapher examining monumental inscriptions from an ancient provincial capital established the following criteria regarding the city's recovered public decrees:

• Any decree inscribed on basalt was commissioned directly by the royal court unless it was an agricultural land transfer.
• No decree commissioned directly by the royal court contains dialectical idioms from the northern hill country.
• Some decrees containing dialectical idioms from the northern hill country bear the personal seal of the city governor.
• All agricultural land transfers bear the personal seal of the city governor.

If the epigrapher's statements are true, which of the following statements must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any decree inscribed on basalt that contains dialectical idioms from the northern hill country is an agricultural land transfer.

Cevap

Any decree inscribed on basalt that contains dialectical idioms from the northern hill country is an agricultural land transfer.
According to the premises, any inscription on basalt is a royal commission unless it is an agricultural land transfer, which is logically equivalent to stating that if a basalt inscription is not a royal commission, it must be an agricultural transfer. The second premise establishes that royal commissions never contain northern hill country idioms; thus, by contraposition, any inscription containing northern idioms is not a royal commission. Therefore, any inscription that is on basalt and contains northern idioms cannot be a royal commission and must be an agricultural land transfer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional relationships stated in the stimulus.
Basalt AND NOT Agricultural Transfer implies Royal Commission; Royal Commission implies NOT Northern Idiom (contrapositive: Northern Idiom implies NOT Royal Commission); Some Northern Idiom have Governor Seal; Agricultural Transfer implies Governor Seal.
Translating multi-premise arguments into symbolic conditional logic prevents reasoning errors.
2
Synthesize the conditions for a decree that is both on basalt and contains northern hill country idioms.
Having northern idioms strictly guarantees that the decree is NOT a royal commission. Applying this to the first premise (Basalt AND NOT Royal Commission implies Agricultural Transfer), the decree must be an agricultural land transfer.
Chaining the contrapositive of the second premise into the conditional exception of the first premise yields a deductively valid conclusion.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to locate this direct logical deduction.
The statement asserting that any basalt decree containing northern idioms is an agricultural transfer matches the deduction exactly.
Must Be True questions require a choice that is logically guaranteed by the premises without external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Synthesis
Soru 59Soru →

Under the regional Maritime Safety and Emissions Accord, any commercial cargo vessel operating within the coastal protection zone that uses heavy fuel oil must be equipped with an exhaust gas cleaning system. Furthermore, no commercial cargo vessel equipped with an exhaust gas cleaning system is permitted to discharge washwater within the coastal protection zone unless it holds a certified closed-loop filtration permit. Last month, the commercial cargo vessel Ariadne operated within the coastal protection zone and discharged washwater in that zone without holding a certified closed-loop filtration permit.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Ariadne did not use heavy fuel oil while operating within the coastal protection zone last month.

Cevap

The Ariadne did not use heavy fuel oil while operating within the coastal protection zone last month.
The deduction follows strictly through consecutive contrapositives: discharging washwater in the coastal zone without the certified permit establishes that the Ariadne lacked an exhaust gas cleaning system. Operating in the coastal zone without this system guarantees that the vessel could not have used heavy fuel oil during that operation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional premises established by the Accord.
Premise 1: (Operates in coastal zone AND Uses heavy fuel oil) → Equipped with exhaust gas cleaning system.
Premise 2: (Equipped with exhaust gas cleaning system AND Discharges washwater in coastal zone) → Holds certified closed-loop filtration permit.
Formalizing the rules clarifies the requirements for operations in the coastal protection zone.
2
Apply the contrapositive of Premise 2 to the facts regarding the Ariadne.
The Ariadne discharged washwater in the coastal zone but did NOT hold a certified permit. Therefore, the Ariadne was NOT equipped with an exhaust gas cleaning system.
By Modus Tollens, failing the necessary condition (holding a permit) while discharging washwater means the vessel cannot have had an exhaust gas cleaning system.
3
Apply the contrapositive of Premise 1 to the result of Step 2.
Because the Ariadne was not equipped with an exhaust gas cleaning system, it could not simultaneously operate in the coastal zone and use heavy fuel oil. Since it did operate in the coastal zone, it must not have used heavy fuel oil.
Failing the necessary condition of Premise 1 forces the negation of the conjunction in the sufficient condition.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contraposition
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 60Soru →

An international planetary protection protocol for deep-space missions establishes the following rules:

• Any robotic lander targeting a celestial body with confirmed subsurface liquid water must undergo dry heat microbial reduction unless it is assembled entirely within an ultra-clean biobarrier.
• No robotic spacecraft assembled within an ultra-clean biobarrier is permitted to incorporate commercial off-the-shelf microprocessors.
• The planned Callisto Surface Probe is a robotic lander targeting a body with confirmed subsurface liquid water and incorporates commercial off-the-shelf microprocessors.

Statement: The Callisto Surface Probe is required to undergo dry heat microbial reduction.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The stimulus dictates that a lander targeting subsurface water must undergo dry heat reduction unless assembled in a biobarrier. By contrapositive logic, containing off-the-shelf microprocessors means the probe was not assembled in a biobarrier. Without that exemption, the mandatory dry heat reduction is triggered, proving the statement is definitively true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional rules given in the stimulus.
Rule 1: (Lander Targeting Subsurface Water AND NOT Biobarrier) → Dry Heat Reduction. Rule 2: Biobarrier → NOT Off-the-Shelf Microprocessors.
Establishing clear conditional logic rules is necessary to trace deductive requirements.
2
Take the contrapositive of Rule 2 and apply the factual premises regarding the probe.
Contrapositive of Rule 2: Off-the-Shelf Microprocessors → NOT Biobarrier. Since the Callisto Surface Probe incorporates commercial off-the-shelf microprocessors, it is NOT assembled within an ultra-clean biobarrier.
This determines whether the probe qualifies for the biobarrier exemption under Rule 1.
3
Synthesize the probe's characteristics with Rule 1.
The probe is a robotic lander targeting a body with subsurface water AND is NOT assembled within a biobarrier. Therefore, it must undergo dry heat microbial reduction.
Combining the validated premises triggers the necessary requirement of Rule 1.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Inference
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
ÖncekiSayfa 3 / 5Sonraki
Must Be True / Most Strongly Supported Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 3 | Examkin