Tüm alıştırma soruları

379 soru

Soru 1Soru →

A car towing a trailer is permitted to use the right-hand lane of a motorway with three or more lanes to overtake slower traffic.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
According to the UK Highway Code, drivers of vehicles towing a trailer must not use the right-hand lane on a motorway that has three or more lanes in operation. Therefore, the statement claiming this is permitted is false.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the vehicle configuration and the road setup in the statement.
The statement specifies a car towing a trailer on a motorway with three or more lanes.
Different lane regulations apply to specific vehicle classes and towing combinations on multi-lane motorways.
2
Recall UK Highway Code Rule 265 regarding motorway lane restrictions.
Vehicles towing a trailer are prohibited from using the right-hand lane when three or more lanes are in operation.
This regulation maintains traffic flow and prevents larger, speed-restricted vehicle combinations from obstructing the outermost overtaking lane.
3
Determine the validity of the statement.
The statement claims that such overtaking in the right-hand lane is permitted, which contradicts the legal rule.
Because the action is prohibited under standard conditions, the statement is false.

Anahtar Kavram

Motorway right-hand lane prohibitions for vehicles towing trailers
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 2Soru →

On a road marked with double white lines where the line nearest to your vehicle is solid, you are permitted to cross the solid line to overtake a pedal cycle travelling at 10 mph or less, provided the manoeuvre can be completed safely.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is correct because Highway Code Rule 129 explicitly allows drivers to cross or straddle a solid white line on their side of the road to pass a pedal cycle, horse rider, or road maintenance vehicle moving at 10 mph (16 km/h) or less, or to pass a stationary vehicle, as long as the road is clear and it is safe to do so.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary legal restriction for double white lines where the nearest line is solid.
Highway Code Rule 129 states that drivers must not cross or straddle a continuous white line on their side of the carriageway as a general rule.
Establishing the standard prohibition creates the legal baseline for evaluating exemptions.
2
Assess the statutory exemptions permitted under Rule 129.
Drivers may cross the solid line if safe to enter adjoining premises, turn into a side road, pass a stationary vehicle, or overtake a pedal cycle, horse, or road maintenance vehicle moving at 10 mph or less.
Exemptions prevent unreasonable and hazardous congestion behind exceptionally slow or stationary obstructions.
3
Apply the exemption criteria to the situation described in the statement.
The statement specifies overtaking a pedal cycle travelling at 10 mph or less when safe, which matches the exact legal exception in Rule 129.
Matching the condition to the legal rule confirms the statement is true.

Anahtar Kavram

Highway Code Solid White Line Overtaking Exceptions
Soru 3Soru →

In Great Britain, newly qualified drivers are legally required to display green 'P' plates on their vehicle for at least six months after passing their driving test.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. Displaying green 'P' plates after passing the practical driving test is voluntary in Great Britain, not a legal requirement.
In Great Britain, displaying green 'P' plates is optional. Drivers may display them voluntarily to encourage other road users to show extra patience and understanding while they gain confidence, but there is no legal obligation to do so.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the vehicle status indicator referenced in the statement.
The statement specifies green 'P' (probationary) plates for newly qualified drivers.
Learner drivers and newly qualified drivers have different legal rules governing plate display.
2
Determine the legal status of green 'P' plates under UK road traffic law.
Green 'P' plates are optional and may be used for any duration chosen by the driver.
While red 'L' plates are mandatory for learner drivers, 'P' plates are solely an advisory measure to inform other road users of inexperience.
3
Evaluate the validity of the statement.
The claim of a legal requirement is incorrect.
Because there is no compulsory requirement to display 'P' plates for six months or any other timeframe, the statement is false.

Anahtar Kavram

Probationary ('P') plate regulations and voluntary usage for newly qualified drivers in Great Britain
Tahmini Süre:30s
Soru 4Soru →

Driving at a sustained speed of 70 mph can increase a vehicle's fuel consumption by up to 30% compared to driving at 50 mph.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. Driving at 70 mph uses up to 30% more fuel than driving at 50 mph due to the sharp increase in aerodynamic drag.
The statement is true because air resistance rises rapidly as vehicle speed increases. Overcoming this higher aerodynamic drag requires greater engine power output, causing fuel consumption to increase by up to 30% at 70 mph compared to 50 mph.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Examine the physical relationship between vehicle road speed and aerodynamic drag.
Aerodynamic resistance increases exponentially as vehicle speed rises, meaning the power required to push the car through the air at 70 mph is considerably higher than at 50 mph.
Air resistance is the primary resistive force acting on a vehicle at motorway speeds.
2
Evaluate the fuel consumption differential established by DVSA eco-safe driving benchmarks.
The extra engine load needed to overcome increased air resistance results in up to a 30% increase in fuel consumption when cruising at 70 mph compared to 50 mph.
Fuel injection rates must increase to maintain engine power output against higher aerodynamic forces.
3
Determine the accuracy of the statement.
The statement matches official DVSA figures and environmental guidelines exactly.
Maintaining moderate, legal cruising speeds directly reduces fuel burn and carbon emissions.

Anahtar Kavram

Vehicle Speed, Aerodynamic Resistance, and Fuel Consumption
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 5Soru →

A qualified driver supervising a learner driver from the passenger seat is legally subject to the same alcohol limits and drink-drive penalties as if they were physically driving the vehicle.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. A qualified driver supervising a provisional licence holder is legally considered in charge of the vehicle and must adhere to the same alcohol limits and legal penalties as an active driver.
The statement is true because UK road traffic law establishes that an accompanying driver supervising a learner driver is legally in charge of the vehicle. Consequently, the supervisor must remain strictly within legal alcohol limits and faces identical legal penalties, including mandatory driving bans and heavy fines, if found over the prescribed limit.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the legal status of an accompanying supervisor under UK road traffic law.
A person supervising a learner driver is legally classified as being in charge of the motor vehicle.
Effective supervision requires full cognitive alertness, hazard perception, and the physical readiness to intervene if necessary.
2
Determine how drink-driving regulations apply to a person in charge of a vehicle.
The statutory alcohol limits for breath, blood, and urine apply directly to the supervisor.
The law prohibits being in charge of a vehicle while over the legal limit or unfit through drink or drugs.
3
Evaluate the truth value of the statement regarding penalties and legal limits.
The statement is true.
Failure to comply exposes the supervisor to mandatory driving disqualification, endorsements, and fines identical to those faced by an impaired driver.

Anahtar Kavram

Legal responsibilities and alcohol limits applicable to supervising drivers
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 6Soru →

Drinking a caffeinated beverage produces an immediate stimulant effect that instantly reverses driving fatigue, allowing a tired driver to continue their journey safely without stopping for a rest break.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because caffeine does not act immediately; it requires roughly 15 to 20 minutes to enter the bloodstream and produce any stimulant effect. Furthermore, chemical stimulants cannot replace genuine rest. Under The Highway Code, a fatigued driver must pull over in a safe location, consume caffeine, and take a short 15-minute nap rather than attempting to continue driving.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the physiological timing and effect of caffeine on driver alertness
Caffeine requires approximately 15 to 20 minutes to be absorbed and stimulate the central nervous system, meaning its effects are not instantaneous.
Understanding absorption delay is necessary to evaluate the immediate safety of continuing to drive while fatigued.
2
Compare the proposed action with official Highway Code guidelines for managing fatigue
The Highway Code requires stopping in a safe location to rest and combining caffeinated drinks with a short nap rather than continuing to drive.
Stimulants cannot substitute for sleep, and continuing to drive while exhausted creates a severe risk of micro-sleeps and collisions.

Anahtar Kavram

Driver Fatigue Countermeasures and Caffeine Absorption Latency
Soru 7Soru →

Although using a hands-free device while driving is not banned under specific handheld mobile phone regulations, a driver can still be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention if the device distracts them from safely controlling the vehicle.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because the law requires drivers to maintain proper control of their vehicle at all times. If using hands-free equipment causes distraction, delayed hazard reactions, or poor lane discipline, the driver can be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Examine the legal requirements regarding driver alertness and vehicle control under UK road traffic regulations.
Drivers must maintain proper control of their vehicle at all times under Highway Code Rule 149.
Safe driving requires constant scanning and immediate reaction to emerging road hazards.
2
Evaluate whether hands-free device usage is exempt from penalties related to driver distraction.
While hands-free usage is not penalised under the specific handheld mobile phone ban, careless driving laws still apply if driving performance deteriorates.
Cognitive distraction from conversations can divert mental focus and impair hazard perception.

Anahtar Kavram

Driver legal responsibility and cognitive distraction when using hands-free in-vehicle equipment
Soru 8Soru →

Under UK road safety law, it is illegal to fit a rear-facing child car seat in a front passenger seat protected by an active front airbag.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True: UK law strictly prohibits fitting a rear-facing child car seat in a front seat protected by an active front airbag.
UK law makes it illegal to use a rear-facing child car seat in a front seat fitted with an active airbag because the violent inflation of the airbag can cause severe or fatal head and neck trauma to the child.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the child restraint configuration and the vehicle safety feature involved.
The statement describes placing a rear-facing child restraint in a passenger seat with an active front airbag.
Airbag deployment dynamics directly impact occupant restraints situated directly in front of them.
2
Apply the relevant UK Highway Code and legal safety requirements.
The law prohibits rear-facing child seats in front of active frontal airbags unless the airbag is deactivated.
The explosive deployment force can strike the back of the child seat and cause catastrophic injuries.

Anahtar Kavram

Rear-facing child seat placement and front airbag deactivation rules
Tahmini Süre:30s
Soru 9Soru →

A vehicle equipped with a standard factory-fitted electronic engine immobiliser is fully protected against relay attacks when the keyless entry smart fob is stored unprotected inside a nearby house.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because relay theft intercepts and magnifies the wireless signal from an unprotected key fob inside a property. When this amplified signal reaches the car, the electronic immobiliser and keyless entry system recognize it as the genuine key, unlocking the doors and allowing the engine to start.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze how an electronic engine immobiliser verifies authorization
An immobiliser enables the engine to start once it receives the matching cryptographic transponder code from the paired smart key.
Understanding the wireless authentication process is necessary to evaluate potential system bypasses.
2
Examine how relay attack theft functions against keyless systems
Relay devices capture and boost the genuine radio signal between the vehicle and a key fob stored inside a nearby building.
Determines whether an immobiliser receives the valid signal required to permit operation.
3
Assess whether the immobiliser prevents vehicle theft during a relay attack
Because the authentic signal is relayed, the immobiliser recognizes the key as authorized and disarms, allowing the vehicle to be unlocked and driven away.
Concludes that a standard factory immobiliser alone does not protect against relay theft without physical signal-blocking measures.

Anahtar Kavram

Keyless entry vulnerability and electronic immobiliser limitations during relay attacks
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 10Soru →

Under UK road traffic law, a driver is permitted to hold and interact with a handheld mobile phone while stopped at red traffic lights, provided the vehicle's engine has temporarily cut out due to an automatic start-stop system.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. Drivers are strictly prohibited from holding and using a mobile phone while waiting at traffic lights, even when the engine has stopped automatically.
The statement is false because UK Highway Code Rule 149 strictly prohibits holding and using a mobile phone or handheld interactive device while driving. This legal restriction applies fully when waiting at red traffic lights or queuing in traffic, even if the engine has temporarily turned off via an automatic start-stop system. Handheld phone usage is only permitted when safely and lawfully parked with the engine switched off, or in a genuine emergency making a 999/112 call where stopping safely is impossible.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine whether waiting at red traffic lights with an automatic start-stop engine constitutes active driving.
The vehicle is stationary within the flow of live traffic, meaning the driver is still legally driving.
Temporary stops at signals or junctions do not mean the journey has concluded or that the vehicle is parked.
2
Apply UK Highway Code Rule 149 and relevant road traffic regulations regarding handheld device usage.
Holding and interacting with a handheld mobile phone remains completely prohibited in this situation.
The ban on handheld devices applies continuously throughout driving, including when stationary in traffic queues and at red lights.

Anahtar Kavram

Highway Code regulations and legal prohibitions concerning handheld mobile phone use and in-vehicle distractions.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 11Soru →

Under UK road traffic law, a child aged 3 years or older is legally permitted to travel in the rear seat of a car using an adult seatbelt if a suitable child restraint is unavailable during an unexpected emergency over a short distance.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True — UK regulations allow a child aged 3 or older to use an adult seatbelt in the rear seat during an unexpected emergency over a short distance if no child seat is available.
The statement is true because UK road traffic regulations and the Highway Code make specific provision for unexpected emergencies over a short distance, allowing children aged 3 years or older to use an adult seatbelt in the rear seat when a child seat is unavailable.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the standard UK child restraint requirement for children under 135 cm and under 12 years old.
The general rule mandates the use of an approved child car seat suitable for the child's weight and height.
Establishing the baseline legal requirement is necessary before evaluating statutory exceptions.
2
Evaluate the statutory exceptions to child restraint requirements under UK road traffic law.
Exceptions exist for children aged 3 and above: travelling in licensed taxis/private hire vehicles, unexpected short-distance emergencies, and when two fitted child seats prevent fitting a third.
UK legislation (The Motor Vehicles Wearing of Seat Belts Regulations) specifies narrow conditions where an adult belt may be used in the rear.
3
Determine if the scenario satisfies all statutory conditions (child aged 3+, rear seat, unexpected emergency, short distance).
All conditions are met, confirming the legality of the arrangement.
The exemption strictly applies only in the rear seat and never in the front passenger seat or for children under 3 years old.

Anahtar Kavram

Child seat legal exemptions under UK road traffic regulations
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 12Soru →

While travelling on a wet, fast-moving road with an aggressively tailgating vehicle behind you, maintaining the standard four-second wet-weather separation gap from the vehicle in front is the safest action, as increasing it further could frustrate the following driver and provoke a dangerous overtaking manoeuvre.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is false.
The statement is false because the standard wet-weather gap of four seconds is only a baseline. When you are being tailgated, your rear safety margin is dangerously compromised. To compensate, you must expand your forward separation distance beyond the standard four seconds. This allows you to respond to hazards ahead by slowing down progressively, which protects you by giving the aggressive driver behind enough time to react.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the baseline environmental safety margin for the current conditions.
The standard dry-weather gap is two seconds; in wet weather, this minimum baseline doubles to four seconds.
Road surface conditions directly dictate the minimum necessary stopping distance.
2
Evaluate the impact of the additional hazard presented by the tailgater.
Being followed too closely severely compromises your rear safety margin.
The driver behind will not have enough space or time to stop if you are forced to brake firmly.
3
Apply the defensive driving protocol for managing a tailgater.
You must smoothly reduce your speed to expand the distance to the vehicle in front significantly beyond the standard four-second baseline.
A larger forward buffer allows you to decelerate progressively if the traffic ahead slows, giving the tailgater more time to react and preventing a rear-end collision.
4
Assess the psychological distractor presented in the statement.
The concern about frustrating the tailgater must not override physical safety physics.
The Highway Code prioritizes collision avoidance over the emotional state of aggressive drivers.

Anahtar Kavram

Compounding Safety Margins and Tailgater Management
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 13Soru →

If your vehicle's tyre tread depth is worn down to the legal minimum of 1.6mm, your braking distance on a completely dry, clean tarmac road will be significantly longer compared to using new tyres with 8mm of tread.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
Tyre tread is essential for gripping wet roads because it disperses water. However, on a completely dry, clean surface, a tyre with 1.6mm of tread still maintains a massive amount of rubber-to-road contact. Consequently, the braking distance will not be significantly longer than with a new tyre. The extreme danger of low tread depth lies in wet conditions, where the braking distance would dramatically and dangerously increase.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the environmental conditions specified in the scenario.
The scenario explicitly states the road is 'completely dry' and 'clean tarmac', comparing minimum legal tread (1.6mm) to new tread (8mm).
Environmental factors dictate how the vehicle's components interact with the road surface.
2
Recall the physical purpose of tyre tread grooves.
Tyre tread is designed to act as channels to clear water away from the contact patch, maintaining grip in wet conditions.
Understanding the mechanical function of the tread is necessary to evaluate its impact on braking.
3
Evaluate the impact of worn tread specifically on a dry surface.
Because there is no water to disperse on a dry road, a tyre with less tread puts a large, uninterrupted block of rubber in contact with the tarmac. Therefore, the braking distance is not significantly increased.
Applying physical principles to the specific dry conditions provided isolates the true factor affecting the braking distance.

Anahtar Kavram

Tyre tread primarily affects braking distance in wet conditions by clearing water; on dry roads, its impact on braking distance is minimal.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 14Soru →

When passing an active emergency scene on the opposite carriageway of a high-speed road, defensive driving principles require you to regularly alternate your gaze between the incident and your own path of travel in order to anticipate any hazards that might cross the central reservation.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because deliberately dividing your attention to monitor an incident on the opposite carriageway is a dangerous form of distraction often referred to as rubbernecking. Even if justified as 'anticipating hazards', looking away from your immediate path severely delays your reaction time. The primary risk in this situation is that drivers directly in front of you may brake suddenly if they become distracted by the same scene. Therefore, your focus must remain entirely on the traffic ahead in your own lane.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the driving environment and the proposed action described in the statement.
The scenario involves a major incident on the opposite carriageway and suggests deliberately dividing your visual attention between the road ahead and the incident.
Identifying the specific hazard (the distraction itself) and the suggested driver response is necessary to evaluate the statement.
2
Evaluate the justification provided for the action ('anticipating hazards crossing the central reservation').
While anticipating hazards is a core driving principle, misapplying it to justify looking away from your immediate path of travel is extremely dangerous.
The highest immediate risk comes from the traffic directly in front of you, not the contained incident on the opposite side.
3
Apply official DVSA guidance regarding roadside incidents and external distractions.
DVSA rules explicitly state that drivers must ignore incidents on the opposite carriageway and focus entirely on the road ahead to avoid causing secondary rear-end collisions.
Maintaining concentration on your own carriageway ensures you can react instantly if the vehicle in front brakes suddenly.

Anahtar Kavram

Prioritising immediate path focus over external distractions
Soru 15Soru →

On the approach to a pedestrian crossing within the area marked by white zig-zag lines, a driver is legally permitted to cross the centre of the road to overtake a pedal cyclist travelling at 8 mph, provided the road ahead is clear and at least 1.5 metres of passing clearance is maintained.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False - Overtaking any moving vehicle (including a pedal cyclist) within white zig-zag markings on the approach to a pedestrian crossing is strictly prohibited under Rule 191 of the Highway Code, regardless of speed.
Under UK Highway Code Rule 191, drivers MUST NOT overtake any moving vehicle within the area controlled by white zig-zag markings on the approach to a pedestrian crossing. This absolute prohibition applies equally to pedal cycles, even if they are travelling well below 10 mph and lateral clearance is available.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the specific road environment and markings described in the scenario.
The vehicle is within the white zig-zag markings on the approach to a pedestrian crossing.
Zig-zag markings designate a high-risk pedestrian safety zone subject to specialized regulatory restrictions.
2
Apply the relevant Highway Code regulation governing zig-zag markings (Rule 191).
Rule 191 creates an absolute prohibition against overtaking the lead moving vehicle or any moving vehicle within the zig-zag area.
Overtaking near crossings can obscure approaching pedestrians from view and creates severe collision risks.
3
Distinguish between solid white line overtaking exceptions (Rule 129) and pedestrian crossing rules (Rule 191).
The allowance to pass road users travelling at 10 mph (16 km/h) or less applies solely to continuous solid white centre lines under Rule 129 and does not override Rule 191.
Pedestrian safety rules in crossing approaches strictly override general overtaking exceptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinction between solid white line overtaking exceptions (Rule 129) and absolute overtaking prohibitions within pedestrian crossing zig-zag zones (Rule 191)
Soru 16Soru →

Under the UK Highway Code, drivers travelling on a restricted road in a built-up area are prohibited from sounding their vehicle's horn between 23:00 and 07:00 unless another road user poses a danger.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false because Highway Code Rule 112 establishes the horn restriction on restricted roads in built-up areas from 23:30 (11:30 pm) to 07:00 (7:00 am), not from 23:00.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the governing Highway Code rule for vehicle horn usage and noise abatement
Highway Code Rule 112 specifies the legal boundaries and nighttime curfew for sounding a vehicle's horn.
Determining the exact legal framework is required to verify statutory time windows and exceptions.
2
Verify the precise restricted hours for horn usage on restricted roads in built-up areas
The prohibited window is 23:30 to 07:00.
Rule 112 strictly defines the start of the built-up area night curfew as 23:30 (11:30 pm), rather than 23:00 (11:00 pm).
3
Compare the statement's specified timeframe with the statutory requirement
The statement asserts that the restriction starts at 23:00, which is legally inaccurate by 30 minutes.
Because the stated curfew start time conflicts with the Highway Code, the statement is false.

Anahtar Kavram

Highway Code Rule 112 horn curfew restrictions in built-up areas (23:30 to 07:00)
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 17Soru →

An Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) guarantees a shorter stopping distance on every type of road surface, including loose gravel and deep snow.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The statement is false. The main function of ABS is to allow the driver to maintain steering control during heavy braking by preventing the wheels from locking. On loose surfaces such as snow, ice, or loose gravel, an ABS-equipped vehicle may actually require a greater stopping distance than a vehicle with locked wheels.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary purpose of an Anti-lock Braking System (ABS).
ABS is designed to prevent wheels from locking during emergency braking, enabling the driver to retain steering control.
Understanding the fundamental objective of ABS distinguishes steering control from stopping distance reduction.
2
Assess how ABS performs on loose road surfaces such as gravel or snow.
On loose surfaces, preventing wheel lock prevents the formation of a wedge of surface material in front of the tyres, which can lengthen the distance required to stop.
This confirms that ABS does not guarantee shorter stopping distances in every condition.

Anahtar Kavram

Function and limitations of Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) on loose surfaces
Tahmini Süre:30s
Soru 18Soru →

Under the Highway Code, you must not wear tinted glasses, sunglasses, or tinted contact lenses when driving at night or in conditions of poor visibility if they restrict your vision.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because Highway Code Rule 94 specifically prohibits wearing tinted glasses, sunglasses, or tinted lenses at night or during conditions of poor visibility if they reduce or restrict vision.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the relevant eyesight and driving regulations under UK road traffic rules.
Highway Code Rule 94 governs vision requirements and eyewear restrictions in dark or poor visibility conditions.
Clear, unrestricted vision is vital for driver hazard perception and road safety.
2
Evaluate the effect of tinted lenses during night driving and low-visibility conditions.
Tinted lenses reduce available light transmission to the retina, significantly diminishing contrast and making hazards harder to detect.
Using tinted eyewear when light levels are already diminished creates an immediate driving hazard.
3
Determine the accuracy of the statement based on UK driving standards.
The statement accurately reflects mandatory safety guidance prohibiting vision-restricting tinted eyewear at night or in poor visibility.
The rule is an established UK standard designed to ensure optimal driver vision.

Anahtar Kavram

Eyewear restrictions and driver vision requirements in poor visibility and night driving
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 19Soru →

Under UK law, if you require glasses or contact lenses to meet the minimum eyesight standard, you must wear them every time you drive.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True — prescribed corrective lenses must be worn at all times while driving if they are needed to satisfy the statutory eyesight standard.
The statement is true because the law strictly requires anyone who relies on spectacles or contact lenses to satisfy the minimum eyesight standard to wear them whenever they drive.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the statutory requirement for drivers who need corrective lenses to reach the minimum visual acuity standard.
Recognise that wearing prescribed lenses is mandatory whenever operating a vehicle on public roads.
Maintaining adequate visual acuity is essential for hazard detection and road safety under all conditions.

Anahtar Kavram

Mandatory use of prescribed corrective lenses while driving
Tahmini Süre:30s
Soru 20Soru →

A driver travelling on a dual carriageway subject to the national speed limit is legally permitted to exceed 70 mph temporarily when overtaking a slower vehicle.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
Under UK road traffic law and the Highway Code, statutory speed limits are absolute maximums and must never be exceeded under any circumstances, including when overtaking. If a driver cannot complete an overtaking manoeuvre without breaking the speed limit, they must remain behind the slower vehicle.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the legal status of the national speed limit for passenger cars on dual carriageways.
The national speed limit for a standard passenger car on a dual carriageway is 70 mph, which functions as an absolute legal ceiling.
Highway Code Rule 124 and Rule 125 establish that speed limits represent absolute maximum speeds permitted on designated road classes.
2
Evaluate whether UK traffic law provides temporary speed exemptions for overtaking slower-moving traffic.
No temporary speed limit exemption exists for standard road users during an overtake.
Overtaking manoeuvres must always be executed safely and completely within the prevailing legal speed limit.
3
Determine the veracity of the statement.
The statement is False.
Exceeding the statutory speed limit at any point during an overtake constitutes an unlawful speeding offence.

Anahtar Kavram

Absolute nature of legal speed limits during overtaking
Tahmini Süre:45s
Sayfa 1 / 19Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — UK Driving Theory Test | Examkin