Topic Development

357 questions

Question 161Question

Sea otters are among the few marine mammals known to use tools. To crack open the hard shells of prey like clams and mussels, an otter will float on its back, place a flat rock on its chest, and hammer the shellfish against the rock. _Many people enjoy visiting aquariums to watch sea otters swim and play._ This tool-use behavior is not just a clever trick; it is a vital survival skill passed down from mothers to their pups.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on how sea otters use tools to feed.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on how sea otters use tools to feed.
The paragraph focuses on how wild sea otters use tools (rocks) to crack open food shells, which is a vital survival skill. The underlined sentence, which discusses people visiting aquariums to watch sea otters, deviates from this central topic. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted because it disrupts the paragraph's cohesive focus.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the unique tool-use behavior of sea otters (using rocks to crack shells to get food) and explains that this is a vital survival skill.
Determining the main idea allows us to evaluate whether the underlined sentence supports or distracts from it.
2
Analyze the underlined sentence to see if it aligns with the paragraph's focus.
The underlined sentence mentions people watching sea otters in public aquariums. This is unrelated to the biological and evolutionary tool-use behaviors of wild sea otters.
This step determines whether the sentence is relevant to the topic.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that correctly identifies the decision and the rhetorical reason.
The decision is to delete the sentence, and the correct reason is that it interrupts the paragraph's focus on tool use.
This leads directly to selecting the correct answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 162Question

In the mid-twentieth century, scholars of Maya hieroglyphic writing widely believed that the inscriptions on stone monuments, or stelae, were purely astronomical calendars and mystical calculations. The prevailing view, championed by leading Mayanist J. Eric S. Thompson, held that the Maya were a peaceful, time-obsessed people whose writing did not record historical events or individuals. However, Tatiana Proskouriakoff, an architect and archaeologist, challenged this consensus through meticulous spatial and temporal analysis of the stelae at Piedras Negras. By plotting the dates inscribed on consecutive monuments, she discovered that the timespans between key dates corresponded perfectly to the natural length of a human life. Proskouriakoff proposed that these monuments actually commemorated the lifespans, accessions, and military victories of historical rulers.

The writer wants to conclude the passage with a sentence that reinforces the significance of Proskouriakoff's discovery and ties back to the paragraph's discussion of Maya writing. Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Her groundbreaking insight shifted the paradigm of Maya studies, revealing that the complex glyphs recorded a rich history of human dynasties rather than mere calendar calculations.

Answer

The sentence noting that her groundbreaking insight shifted the paradigm of Maya studies by showing that the complex glyphs recorded a history of human dynasties rather than mere calendar calculations.
The correct option effectively reinforces the significance of Proskouriakoff's discovery by contrasting the original view (calendar calculations) with the new historical understanding (human dynasties). It is grammatically correct and matches the academic tone of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to identify the main thesis and context.
The passage details a historical shift in Mayanist scholarship, moving from the belief that glyphs were strictly astronomical to realizing they documented real history and human rulers, initiated by Tatiana Proskouriakoff.
Identifying the central theme is necessary to select a concluding sentence that logically wraps up the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option with 'actual history, this discovery' is a comma splice, and the option with 'opens... and revolutionized' contains an inconsistent tense shift.
An ACT concluding sentence must be grammatically correct before evaluating its rhetorical suitability.
3
Select the option that best fulfills the rhetorical goal.
The option addressing Thompson's preface and medals introduces new, unrelated details. The option addressing the paradigm shift to recording human dynasties directly links back to the starting conflict (calendars vs. history) and reinforces the significance of the work.
A strong concluding sentence must summarize the passage's main points without introducing unsupported details.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 163Question

[1] __________________________________________________ Today, visitors can check out digital tablets, attend coding workshops, and use 3D printers in maker spaces. These services demonstrate that the library is no longer just a warehouse for printed texts, but a dynamic center for modern learning and collaboration.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Modern public libraries have evolved to provide communities with access to a wide range of new technology.

Answer

Modern public libraries have evolved to provide communities with access to a wide range of new technology.
The choice that mentions the evolution of modern libraries to provide new technology is correct because it directly introduces the paragraph's details about tablets, coding workshops, and 3D printers. It sets up the reader to understand that the paragraph will discuss these new services.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Read the paragraph to identify its main ideas and supporting details.
The paragraph describes technological services at modern libraries, such as digital tablets, coding workshops, and 3D printers.
An effective introduction must establish the main focus of the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that best sets up this focus on new technology and services.
The statement about libraries evolving to offer new technology aligns perfectly with the paragraph's details.
The introductory sentence must prepare the reader for the specific supporting details that follow.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical errors and relevance.
The other options either contain grammatical errors (fragment, redundant phrasing, tense shift) or fail to reflect the paragraph's actual content.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect and off-topic distractors confirms the correct choice.

Key Concept

Establishing paragraph introductions and topic sentences
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 164Question

Passage Excerpt:
In the early nineteenth century, Mary Anning searched the coastline of Lyme Regis, uncovering remarkable fossils that would challenge established scientific beliefs. Hoping to make a historic discovery, she meticulously documented her finds, contributing significantly to the emerging field of paleontology.

The writer wants to replace the underlined portion to emphasize the physical challenges Anning faced while searching for fossils. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Braving freezing winds and dangerous rockslides,

Answer

The correct option is the phrase describing the freezing winds and dangerous rockslides, as it is grammatically correct and directly addresses the prompt's request to emphasize physical challenges.
The correct choice is the option that mentions freezing winds and dangerous rockslides. This introductory participial phrase is grammatically correct and directly describes the physical environmental hazards Anning faced, satisfying the writer's goal of emphasizing physical challenges.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goal stated in the prompt.
The goal is to find a detail that emphasizes the physical challenges Mary Anning faced while searching for fossils.
Understanding the prompt's precise criteria is necessary to filter out choices that do not meet the rhetorical goal.
2
Evaluate the options for grammatical correctness when inserted into the sentence context.
The option beginning with 'She searched' is grammatically incorrect because it results in a comma splice. The remaining options are grammatically valid introductory elements.
An option must be grammatically correct to be the right answer, regardless of whether it meets the rhetorical goal.
3
Select the grammatically correct option that best fulfills the rhetorical goal.
The option mentioning 'freezing winds and dangerous rockslides' directly details physical hazards, whereas the options about 'lacking formal scientific training' and 'hoping to make a historic discovery' do not.
Comparing the valid options against the specific rhetorical criteria reveals the most effective choice.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:45s
Question 165Question

Sound Mirrors of Denge

Before the invention of radar, the military relied on concrete acoustic mirrors, affectionately known as "listening ears," to detect incoming enemy aircraft. Erected along the southern and eastern coasts of Great Britain during the 1920s and 1930s, these massive curved concrete structures were designed to reflect and concentrate sound waves. By focusing sound onto a microphone positioned at the focal point, listeners could detect the distant drone of airplane engines miles before they were visible to the naked eye.

The science behind the mirrors was simple yet elegant. Sound waves travel through the air and strike the curved face of the concrete bowl. Just as a curved mirror reflects light to a single point, the acoustic mirror reflected sound waves to a central collector. Operators wearing headphones would sit in nearby cabins, listening intently to the amplified static of the English Channel. If they heard a hum, they could calculate the direction of the aircraft based on which mirror received the strongest signal.

However, the rapid advancement of aviation technology quickly outpaced the capabilities of these concrete behemoths. By the mid-1930s, military aircraft were traveling at speeds that rendered the acoustic mirrors virtually useless. A plane would be detected only minutes before it arrived, leaving insufficient time to scramble defense fighter planes. The development of radar in 1935 ultimately sealed the fate of the sound mirrors, rendering them obsolete relics of a bygone era. Today, the mirrors at Denge stand as haunting monuments to a brief moment in military history.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that traces the transition from acoustic detection technology to electromagnetic detection systems in early twentieth-century military defense. Would this essay accomplish that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because the essay focuses on the history, mechanism, and eventual obsolescence of acoustic mirrors, mentioning radar only as the technology that replaced them.

Answer

No, because the essay focuses on the history, mechanism, and eventual obsolescence of acoustic mirrors, mentioning radar only as the technology that replaced them.
The option stating that the essay would not meet the goal because it focuses on acoustic mirrors and only mentions radar as the technology that replaced them is correct. The hypothetical goal requires the essay to trace a transition between two distinct types of technology. While the essay does describe acoustic mirrors and notes that radar replaced them, it provides no information on how electromagnetic systems work or the history of their development, meaning it does not fulfill the stated goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the hypothetical goal proposed in the prompt.
The goal is to trace the transition from acoustic detection technology to electromagnetic detection systems (such as radar) in early twentieth-century military defense.
Understanding the precise requirements of the goal is essential to determine whether the passage satisfies them.
2
Evaluate the passage content against the hypothetical goal.
The passage is almost entirely about concrete acoustic mirrors (sound mirrors), detailing their function, mechanics, and decline. Radar is mentioned only once in the final paragraph as the technology that replaced them.
This shows that the passage does not trace the transition or explain electromagnetic systems in detail; it only uses radar as a concluding historical detail.
3
Select the correct option based on the evaluation.
The essay fails to meet the goal. The option stating 'No, because the essay focuses on the history, mechanism, and eventual obsolescence of acoustic mirrors, mentioning radar only as the technology that replaced them' accurately reflects this evaluation.
The correct option must state that the goal was not met and provide the accurate reason based on the text's actual focus.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 166Question

A researcher is writing a short article about the history of medicine:

When Alexander Fleming returned to his laboratory after a vacation in 1928, he noticed something unusual in one of his petri dishes. A patch of mold had grown, and the bacteria immediately surrounding it had been destroyed. This accidental observation led to the discovery of penicillin, the world's first antibiotic.

Which choice best concludes the paragraph by emphasizing the historical significance of Fleming's discovery?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultimately, this chance event revolutionized medicine by paving the way for modern treatments of bacterial infections.

Answer

The sentence that begins with 'Ultimately' and explains how the chance event revolutionized medicine by paving the way for modern treatments of bacterial infections.
The sentence emphasizing that the event revolutionized medicine is grammatically correct, logically connected, and directly fulfills the prompt's request to emphasize the historical significance of the discovery.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goal requested by the question.
The final sentence must conclude the paragraph and emphasize the historical significance of the discovery of penicillin.
This establishes the target criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Examine the grammatical structure of the options.
Eliminate the choice with the comma splice, the choice with the verb tense shift, and the choice with the misplaced comma before a restrictive clause.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be grammatically correct as well as rhetorically appropriate.
3
Evaluate the remaining option for logical flow and relevance.
The sentence beginning with 'Ultimately' connects Fleming's observation to the broader history of medicine without introducing grammatical errors or irrelevant details.
It acts as a strong conclusion by summarizing the impact of the discovery.

Key Concept

Selecting concluding sentences that summarize paragraph focus and satisfy specific rhetorical objectives.
Question 167Question

Emily Warren Roebling's Bridge

[1]
In 18721872, when chief engineer Washington Roebling became bedridden with caisson disease (commonly known as "the bends") while supervising construction of the Brooklyn Bridge, the monumental project faced an immediate crisis. His wife, Emily Warren Roebling, stepped into the breach. Although she did not possess a formal degree in engineering, she possessed a keen intellect and a determined spirit. She began by taking detailed notes, carrying messages between her husband and the construction site, and translating complex mathematical calculations.

[2]
As the years progressed, Emily's duties expanded far beyond those of a mere messenger. She undertook a rigorous self-study of civil engineering, materials science, cable construction, and stress analysis. Soon, she was representing her husband at meetings with trustees, inspectors, and contractors, ensuring that the daily operations of the massive public works project proceeded without interruption. Her deep understanding of the project's technical demands earned her the respect of both the bridge's builders and its stakeholders.

[3]
When the Brooklyn Bridge officially opened in 18831883, Emily Warren Roebling was the first person to cross it in a carriage, carrying a rooster as a symbol of victory. Her contribution, though largely uncredited in official annals for decades, was essential to the completion of the bridge. The structure stands today not only as a feat of nineteenth-century engineering but also as a testament to her perseverance and intellectual adaptability.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that profiles the specific technical engineering innovations developed to construct the Brooklyn Bridge. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because the essay focuses primarily on Emily Warren Roebling's administrative, technical, and communicative role in sustaining the project during her husband's illness.

Answer

The essay would not fulfill the goal because it focuses primarily on Emily Warren Roebling's administrative, technical, and communicative role in sustaining the project during her husband's illness.
The correct option is the one stating that the essay does not fulfill the goal because it focuses primarily on Emily Warren Roebling's role rather than profiling specific technical engineering innovations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the hypothetical goal stated in the question stem: to write an essay that profiles the specific technical engineering innovations developed to construct the Brooklyn Bridge.
Understand that the essay must focus on technological inventions and designs specific to the bridge's construction.
Establishes the criteria against which the entire essay must be evaluated.
2
Read and analyze the passage to identify its actual main theme and focus.
Determine that the passage profiles Emily Warren Roebling's personal contributions, her study, and her leadership during her husband's illness, rather than detailing the bridge's technical innovations.
Allows comparison between the actual content of the essay and the hypothetical goal.
3
Decide whether the goal is met and evaluate the options accordingly.
Conclude that the goal is not met (direction is 'No') because the essay's focus is on Emily's administrative and communicative role, making the option explaining this focus the correct answer.
Connects the analysis of the passage to the correct yes/no option and its supporting reason.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 168Question

In 1840, Great Britain introduced the Penny Black, the world's first adhesive postage stamp. Prior to its release, postage was paid by the recipient rather than the sender, and the rate was calculated based on the distance the letter traveled. The Penny Black simplified this system by establishing a flat rate of one penny, regardless of distance, as long as the letter weighed under half an ounce.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the passage:

"Stamps are now collected by millions of people worldwide as a popular hobby called philately."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it shifts the focus of the passage from the historical reform of the postal system to a general discussion of modern hobbies.

Answer

No, because it shifts the focus of the passage from the historical reform of the postal system to a general discussion of modern hobbies.
The correct answer is the option indicating that the writer should not add the sentence because it shifts the focus of the passage from the historical reform of the postal system to a general discussion of modern hobbies. The paragraph strictly discusses the creation and simplifying function of the Penny Black stamp in 1840. The proposed sentence introduces a modern-day hobby, which is a digression from the historical narrative.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the existing paragraph.
The paragraph is focused on the historical introduction of the Penny Black in 1840 and how it reformed and simplified the British postal system.
To determine relevance, we must first establish the specific topic and scope of the passage.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence discusses modern stamp collecting (philately) as a popular global hobby.
We must compare the content of the proposed sentence with the established focus of the passage.
3
Determine whether to add or delete the sentence based on its relevance.
The sentence should not be added because it introduces an irrelevant shift from historical reform to modern hobbies. This aligns with the option explaining that it shifts the focus of the passage.
An addition is only appropriate if it supports or expands upon the main topic without creating a distraction.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 169Question

Cooling with the Cosmos

[1]
In an era dominated by mechanical air conditioning, which consumes vast amounts of electricity and relies on potent greenhouse gases, engineers are turning to an ancient thermodynamic principle: radiative cooling. All objects emit thermal radiation in the form of electromagnetic waves, primarily infrared light. Normally, Earth's atmosphere acts as a thermal blanket, absorbing and re-emitting this heat back to the surface. However, there exists a narrow spectral window—between wavelengths of 8 and 13 micrometers—where the atmosphere is highly transparent. In this "sky window," infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface passes directly through the atmosphere and escapes into the freezing void of outer space.

[2]
Historically, passive radiative cooling was only effective at night, as daytime solar radiation easily overwhelms the cooling effect. To achieve daytime radiative cooling, researchers in the 2010s developed specialized metamaterials. These materials are engineered to reflect over 95 percent of incoming solar radiation while simultaneously emitting thermal energy in the 8-to-13 micrometer infrared range. By applying these ultra-reflective, selectively emissive films to roofs, buildings can cool themselves below the ambient air temperature without consuming any electricity, even under direct sunlight.

[3]
While the potential energy savings of this technology are immense, widespread adoption faces significant hurdles. Current metamaterials are expensive to produce at scale and tend to degrade when exposed to harsh outdoor weathering. Furthermore, radiative cooling is least effective in humid regions, where atmospheric water vapor absorbs the outgoing infrared radiation, effectively closing the sky window. Nevertheless, as researchers refine these materials, passive cooling could become a cornerstone of sustainable urban design, utilizing the cold expanse of the universe as a natural heat sink.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay explaining the physical principles behind passive radiative cooling and the constraints currently preventing its commercial viability. Is the statement that this essay successfully fulfills that goal true or false?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The correct answer is True because the essay successfully addresses both components of the stated goal. In the first paragraph, the writer explains the physical principles of radiative cooling, detailing how electromagnetic radiation in the 8-to-13 micrometer 'sky window' escapes the atmosphere into space. In the third paragraph, the writer outlines the specific constraints hindering the commercial viability of the technology, including high manufacturing costs, degradation from weather exposure, and performance limitations in humid climates.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key components of the writer's hypothetical goal.
The goal has two main parts: (1) explaining the physical principles of passive radiative cooling, and (2) explaining the constraints currently preventing its commercial viability.
To determine if the essay achieves the goal, we must first break the goal down into its required criteria.
2
Analyze the passage to see if the first component (physical principles of passive radiative cooling) is addressed.
Paragraph 1 explains that objects emit thermal radiation (infrared light) and that a 'sky window' between 8 and 13 micrometers allows this radiation to bypass the atmosphere and escape into outer space.
This step verifies if the underlying scientific mechanism is explained as required by the goal.
3
Analyze the passage to see if the second component (constraints preventing commercial viability) is addressed.
Paragraph 3 discusses the obstacles: high production costs ('expensive to produce at scale'), durability issues ('degrade when exposed to harsh outdoor weathering'), and environmental limitations ('least effective in humid regions').
This step checks if the practical limitations and constraints are identified as required by the goal.
4
Synthesize the findings to evaluate the statement.
Since both components of the goal are thoroughly addressed in the passage, the essay successfully achieves the writer's goal, making the statement true.
Combining the analyses from previous steps allows us to make the final determination.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 170Question

[1]
In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were using a large horn antenna at Bell Telephone Laboratories in Holmdel, New Jersey, to detect weak radio signals from the spaces between galaxies. However, their efforts were frustrated by a persistent background hiss that was louder than expected. The noise did not vary by day, night, or season, suggesting it did not originate from the sun or a localized celestial source.

[2]
Determined to isolate the source of the interference, the pair systematically checked their equipment. They pointed the antenna toward New York City to see if urban radio broadcasts were responsible, but the hiss remained constant. They even cleaned the antenna of pigeon droppings that had accumulated inside the horn, yet the mysterious static persisted. Penzias and Wilson were out of conventional explanations.

[3]
Meanwhile, physicists at nearby Princeton University led by Robert Dicke were theorizing that if the Big Bang had occurred, it would have left behind a faint, uniform remnant radiation throughout the universe. When Dicke heard of the Bell Labs scientists' unexplained static, he realized they had found exactly what his team was searching for. Penzias and Wilson had accidentally detected the cosmic microwave background radiation, a discovery that earned them the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics and provided crucial evidence for the Big Bang theory.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that describes how a major scientific discovery was made through accidental observations rather than planned experimentation. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it describes how Penzias and Wilson unintentionally detected cosmic microwave background radiation while attempting to eliminate static from their antenna.

Answer

Yes, because it describes how Penzias and Wilson unintentionally detected cosmic microwave background radiation while attempting to eliminate static from their antenna.
The correct answer is the option stating 'Yes, because it describes how Penzias and Wilson unintentionally detected cosmic microwave background radiation while attempting to eliminate static from their antenna.' The passage outlines how Penzias and Wilson were trying to measure radio signals and systematically ruled out sources of static, only to realize later that they had accidentally discovered the cosmic microwave background radiation. This directly demonstrates a major scientific discovery made through accidental observations rather than planned experimentation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the writer's proposed goal.
The goal is to describe a major scientific discovery made through accidental observations rather than planned experimentation.
Understanding the target goal is the first step in evaluating if the passage meets it.
2
Evaluate the passage content against the proposed goal.
The passage describes how Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered cosmic microwave background radiation while troubleshooting equipment hiss and cleaning pigeon droppings, which was entirely unplanned.
Determining if the text aligns with the goal helps identify the correct direction (Yes or No).
3
Evaluate the options for the correct direction and reasoning.
The correct option must state 'Yes' and accurately explain that the discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation was an accidental byproduct of trying to clean and fix their antenna, which matches the option describing their unintentional detection of static.
This confirms the correct choice based on both the correct overall direction and the accurate description of the passage's details.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 171Question

The following sentences are taken from a draft of an essay about animal navigation. To ensure that the paragraph logically develops its claim about how desert ants find their way and supports it with necessary details, what is the most logical order for these sentences?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The most logical order of the sentences begins with introducing the main concept of path integration, followed by the requirement of tracking direction and distance, detailing the direction component, detailing the distance component, and concluding with how these two measurements are integrated to navigate home.
The correct order begins with the introduction of path integration as a navigation system. It then defines the two essential data points: direction and distance. Next, it details how the ant determines direction, followed by how it determines distance. Finally, it concludes by explaining how the ant integrates these two measurements to calculate its return vector.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory claim or topic sentence of the paragraph.
The sentence introducing the desert ant's reliance on path integration serves as the natural beginning because it establishes the central topic.
A logical paragraph must first state its main claim before explaining the mechanisms or details supporting it.
2
Link the central concept to its operational components.
The sentence starting with 'This system' refers back to 'path integration' and introduces the two key variables: direction and distance.
Transition words like 'This system' create a direct cohesive link to the preceding sentence, setting up the subsequent supporting evidence.
3
Order the detailed evidence explaining each component.
The sentence explaining the first component (direction) must precede the sentence explaining the second component (distance).
Presenting the details in the same order they were introduced (direction first, then distance) maintains paragraph unity and clear structure.
4
Identify the concluding sentence that synthesizes the details.
The sentence starting with 'By integrating these twin measurements' logically concludes the paragraph by showing the outcome of the two components described.
A conclusion should tie the supporting evidence back to the initial claim, showing how the ant successfully finds its way home.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 172Question

Consider the following paragraph:

[1] __________________________________________________ Before its development, early bicycles like the 'penny-farthing' featured a massive front wheel and a tiny rear wheel, making them extremely difficult to mount and prone to dangerous forward crashes. In 1885, John Kemp Starley introduced the safety bicycle, which featured two wheels of equal size, a chain drive, and a steerable front wheel. This new design made bicycling accessible and safe for the general public, triggering a cycling craze in the late nineteenth century.

The writer wants to begin the paragraph with a sentence that establishes the main topic. Which of the following choices best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The development of the safety bicycle transformed personal transport by offering a much safer alternative to early, unstable bicycle designs.

Answer

The development of the safety bicycle transformed personal transport by offering a much safer alternative to early, unstable bicycle designs.
The correct option introducing the safety bicycle as a safer alternative to early designs is grammatically correct and establishes the topic of the paragraph. It provides a logical antecedent for the pronoun 'its' in the subsequent sentence ('Before its development...').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the purpose of the sentence to be inserted in the blank.
The sentence must introduce the paragraph's main focus (the transition from early dangerous bicycles to the safety bicycle) and provide a proper grammatical transition to the next sentence.
The writer wants to establish the topic and introduce the paragraph effectively.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of each option.
Three options contain clear grammatical errors: one is a sentence fragment, one has a semicolon error, and one has a subject-verb agreement error. Only one option is grammatically correct.
Standard English conventions must be followed on the ACT.
3
Confirm that the grammatically correct option fits the topic development goal.
The option describing the development of the safety bicycle as a safer alternative to early designs introduces the paragraph's subject and sets up the pronoun reference 'its' in the next sentence.
This ensures logical coherence and topic development.

Key Concept

Establishing paragraph introductions and thesis statements while maintaining grammatical correctness.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 173Question

In 1970, when graphic designer Hiroshi Ohchi founded the design journal *Idea*, he sought to bridge the aesthetic gap between Japanese traditional art and Western modernism. Ohchi believed that the clean lines of Bauhaus could find common ground with the minimalist principles of Zen. Ohchi wanted the journal to serve as an international forum for graphic design trends. Consequently, the journal became a global platform, introducing avant-garde Japanese typography to international audiences.

The writer wants to replace the bolded text with a statement that provides a specific, concrete example of how Ohchi blended Japanese traditional art and Western modernism in the journal's early layouts. Which choice best fulfills this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: He curated cover designs that paired bold, sans-serif European typefaces with asymmetrical, hand-drawn kanji characters.

Answer

He curated cover designs that paired bold, sans-serif European typefaces with asymmetrical, hand-drawn kanji characters.
The correct answer most effectively meets the rhetorical goal by describing a concrete, specific design choice (curated cover designs) and detailing how it combined Western modernist typography (sans-serif European typefaces) with traditional Japanese art elements (asymmetrical, hand-drawn kanji).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the rhetorical goal specified in the prompt.
The prompt asks for a choice that provides a specific, concrete example of how Ohchi blended Japanese traditional art and Western modernism in the journal's early layouts.
Understanding the exact criteria of the rhetorical goal is necessary to evaluate the options.
2
Evaluate the choices for specificity and relevance to the layout designs and the blending of the two styles.
The correct choice mentions 'cover designs' (layouts) and specifies 'sans-serif European typefaces' (Western modernism) paired with 'hand-drawn kanji characters' (Japanese traditional art). Other options fail to address layouts directly or lack specific, concrete details.
Filtering out options that do not meet the double criteria of being specific/concrete and demonstrating the hybrid design style.
3
Check the grammatically incorrect options to eliminate them.
The option beginning with 'His studies in Munich' contains a comma splice, which makes it grammatically unacceptable.
An option must be grammatically correct to be chosen as the correct answer in the English section.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 174Question

In 1977, oceanographers exploring the Galapagos Rift made a startling discovery. Deep on the ocean floor, where no sunlight could penetrate, they found hydrothermal vents spewing superheated, mineral-rich water. Instead of finding a barren wasteland, they observed thriving ecosystems teeming with giant tube worms, blind crabs, and vast colonies of bacteria. These organisms did not rely on photosynthesis; instead, they survived on chemical energy through a process called chemosynthesis.

The writer wants to add a concluding sentence to the paragraph that wraps up the discussion of chemosynthesis and reinforces the main idea of the passage (that this discovery revealed a new way life can thrive without sunlight). Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: This ground-breaking discovery proved that diverse life could flourish in the absolute darkness of the deep ocean.

Answer

This ground-breaking discovery proved that diverse life could flourish in the absolute darkness of the deep ocean.
The correct option successfully summarizes the paragraph's main focus by stating that this discovery proved that diverse life could flourish in the absolute darkness of the deep ocean, which directly wraps up the discussion of how chemosynthesis enables organisms to survive without sunlight.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the paragraph's main idea and focus.
The paragraph describes the discovery of deep-sea hydrothermal vents where life thrives without sunlight using chemosynthesis.
To choose an effective conclusion, the sentence must align with the passage's main theme of life thriving in darkness.
2
Evaluate the options for transition logic and relevance.
The option showing that diverse life could flourish in the absolute darkness is highly relevant and summarizes the paragraph.
A good conclusion reinforces the main idea without introducing new, irrelevant information.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical correctness and topical focus.
The other options either introduce new topics (Atlantic Ocean, deep-sea mining) or contain grammatical errors like comma splices and tense shifts.
An ACT conclusion must be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Question 175Question

Passage Excerpt:

In 1957, inventors Alfred Fielding and Marc Chavannes sealed two plastic shower curtains together, creating a sheet of trapped air bubbles. They originally hoped to market this textured material as a trendy three-dimensional wallpaper. ________ Finally, in 1960, IBM began using the material to protect its fragile computers during shipping, launching the product's global success as Bubble Wrap.

Given that all the choices are true, which choice most effectively emphasizes the contrast between the inventors' high expectations for their wallpaper and the actual market response?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although they anticipated high demand for their innovative decor, consumers showed no interest in the plastic sheets.

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that although they anticipated high demand for their innovative decor, consumers showed no interest in the plastic sheets.
The correct option successfully establishes the contrast requested by the prompt. It pairs the high expectations of the inventors ('anticipated high demand') against the unfavorable market reaction ('consumers showed no interest') in a grammatically correct sentence structure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal, which is to contrast the high expectations of the inventors with the negative reaction of the market.
The correct sentence must contain both elements: high expectations ('anticipated high demand') and a lack of interest ('consumers showed no interest').
Understanding the prompt's exact rhetorical criteria is necessary to eliminate options that deviate from this goal.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness and alignment with the rhetorical goal.
Two options are grammatically correct but fail to address the rhetorical goal. One option contains a comma splice grammatical error. Only one option meets both the grammatical and rhetorical requirements.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be both grammatically sound and rhetorically appropriate.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 176Question

The following passage is from an essay about maritime archaeology.

**The Preservation of the *Mary Rose***

[1] In 1982, the Tudor warship *Mary Rose* was raised from the Solent seabed after four centuries underwater. [2] The ship’s wooden hull, though remarkably intact, was highly vulnerable to rapid decay once exposed to the air. [3] To prevent the waterlogged oak from shrinking and warping as it dried, conservationists sprayed the hull with polyethylene glycol (PEG), a water-soluble polymer. [4] Over several decades, PEG slowly penetrated the wood cells, replacing the water and supporting the cell walls. [5] Archeologists also recovered thousands of artifacts from the site, including longbows, leather shoes, and pewter plates. [6] Once the wood was fully stabilized, the spraying was stopped, allowing the hull to be slowly air-dried for public display.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces details about the excavation that are tangential to the paragraph's focus on the chemical stabilization of the hull.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it introduces details about the excavation that are tangential to the paragraph's focus on the chemical stabilization of the hull.
The paragraph focuses narrowly on the chemical stabilization and preservation of the waterlogged wooden hull of the *Mary Rose* using polyethylene glycol (PEG). Sentence 5 shifts the focus to other artifacts recovered from the site, interrupting the explanation of the wood preservation process. Therefore, deleting the sentence improves the unity and cohesion of the paragraph.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses specifically on the scientific and chemical preservation of the *Mary Rose*'s waterlogged wooden hull using polyethylene glycol (PEG) to prevent warping and shrinking.
Understanding the paragraph's precise focus is necessary to evaluate whether Sentence 5 contributes to or disrupts that focus.
2
Analyze the content of Sentence 5 and determine its relation to the paragraph's focus.
Sentence 5 describes various artifacts (longbows, shoes, plates) recovered from the shipwreck site, which does not relate to the chemical stabilization of the wooden hull.
This step determines whether the sentence is relevant or tangential.
3
Evaluate the options to choose the one that correctly identifies the decision to delete the sentence and provides the correct rhetorical justification.
The option advocating for deletion because the details are tangential to the focus on chemical stabilization of the hull is correct.
This matches the logical reasoning that irrelevant details should be removed to maintain paragraph unity.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 177Question

In 1756, British civil engineer John Smeaton was commissioned to rebuild the Eddystone Lighthouse, a structure off the coast of Devon that had repeatedly succumbed to the brutal storms of the English Channel. Smeaton recognized that standard mortar, which required exposure to air to set, would dissolve long before it could cure in the spray of the sea. To address this challenge, he conducted a series of rigorous experiments testing various lime mixtures. He discovered that limestone containing a high proportion of clay, when mixed with volcanic ash, created a hydraulic mortar that actually hardened underwater. This breakthrough allowed Smeaton to successfully complete the lighthouse and laid the foundation for modern cement. Roman builders had previously used a similar mix of volcanic ash and lime to build the Pantheon, which still stands today.

Given the context of the paragraph, should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete it, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Smeaton's experimental process and the direct legacy of his lighthouse project.

Answer

Delete the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Smeaton's experimental process and the direct legacy of his lighthouse project.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces historical information about ancient Roman builders that is outside the scope of the paragraph. The paragraph is focused specifically on the 1756 project by John Smeaton to build the Eddystone Lighthouse and the legacy of his experiments. Mentioning the Roman Pantheon digresses from this narrative flow.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details British civil engineer John Smeaton's task of rebuilding the Eddystone Lighthouse in 1756, his challenge with standard mortar, his experiments, and his development of hydraulic mortar, which paved the way for modern cement.
Establishing the central theme is necessary to determine whether a sentence contributes to or detracts from paragraph unity.
2
Evaluate the function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence states that Roman builders previously used a similar lime mixture to build the Pantheon.
Understanding the precise claim of the candidate sentence allows you to compare it to the overall narrative arc.
3
Determine if the sentence is relevant to the paragraph's focus.
The sentence introduces an digression about ancient Roman concrete. While it shares keywords like 'lime' and 'volcanic ash,' it shifts the historical timeline and narrative focus away from Smeaton's 18th-century experiments and legacy.
Evaluating logical relevance prevents the inclusion of off-topic information that merely shares surface-level vocabulary.
4
Select the option that correctly identifies the decision to delete and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The correct option states that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on Smeaton's work and legacy.
Aligns the logical decision with the standard ACT writing goals of maintaining focus and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 178Question

Deep-Sea Oasis

[1]
For generations, oceanographers operated under a fundamental assumption: all marine life ultimately depended on sunlight. Photosynthetic phytoplankton at the ocean's surface formed the base of the marine food web. It was believed that the abyssal plains, shrouded in perpetual darkness, could support only a sparse population of scavengers relying on "marine snow"—organic debris drifting down from above.

[2]
This view was shattered in 1977 during an expedition in the Pacific Ocean near the Galápagos Islands. Researchers aboard the submersible Alvin descended more than 2,500 meters to the ocean floor. Instead of a barren desert, they discovered hydrothermal vents spewing superheated, mineral-rich water. Surrounding these vents were dense, thriving ecosystems teeming with giant tube worms, blind crabs, and massive clams, all thriving in conditions previously thought to be completely uninhabitable.

[3]
The key to this thriving community was chemosynthesis, a process completely independent of sunlight. Specialized bacteria utilized the toxic hydrogen sulfide dissolved in the vent fluids to produce organic molecules, serving as the primary producers for this alien ecosystem. This discovery revolutionized our understanding of life's adaptability and opened new possibilities for where life might exist elsewhere in the universe.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that describes how a major scientific discovery challenged a long-held biological assumption. Would this essay successfully fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it explains how the discovery of hydrothermal vent ecosystems disproved the belief that all marine life relies on sunlight.

Answer

Yes, because the essay explains how the discovery of hydrothermal vent ecosystems disproved the belief that all marine life relies on sunlight.
The correct answer is correct because the passage explicitly describes the previous biological assumption that all marine life depends on sunlight (Paragraph 1) and then explains how the discovery of hydrothermal vents driven by chemosynthesis disproved this assumption (Paragraphs 2 and 3).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the long-held biological assumption mentioned in the essay.
The first paragraph states that scientists assumed all marine life depended on sunlight.
To evaluate if the goal is met, we must determine if the essay contains the assumption mentioned in the goal.
2
Identify the scientific discovery and see if it challenged this assumption.
The second and third paragraphs describe the 1977 discovery of hydrothermal vents where life thrives via chemosynthesis, completely independent of sunlight.
We must verify if the discovery challenged the identified assumption.
3
Determine if the overall essay fulfills the writer's goal.
Yes, the essay describes the discovery and how it directly challenged the assumption that life requires sunlight.
This establishes the correct direction (Yes) and the matching reasoning.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 179Question

[1] In the early nineteenth century, Mary Anning patrolled the crumbling cliffs of Lyme Regis, England, uncovering fossils that would challenge established scientific doctrines about the history of the Earth. Despite her lack of formal education, Anning possessed an extraordinary talent for locating and excavating specimens. Her discoveries, which included the first correctly identified ichthyosaur skeleton and a nearly complete plesiosaur, provided crucial evidence for the emerging theory of extinction.

[2] At the time, many scientists believed that species did not go extinct, arguing that all creatures created by God must still exist somewhere on the globe. Anning's fossils, however, depicted bizarre, ancient marine reptiles that resembled no living animals. Her work forced the scientific community to acknowledge that the prehistoric world was vastly different from the modern one. _________

The writer wants to conclude the passage with a sentence that emphasizes the historical significance of Anning’s discoveries and ties back to the main idea of the passage. Which of the following choices best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultimately, these discoveries helped lay the groundwork for modern paleontology, transforming how scientists understood the history of life on Earth.

Answer

Ultimately, these discoveries helped lay the groundwork for modern paleontology, transforming how scientists understood the history of life on Earth.
The correct option is the one stating that these discoveries helped lay the groundwork for modern paleontology. This sentence directly reinforces the passage's main thesis, which centers on how Mary Anning's fossil discoveries challenged traditional scientific views and reshaped human understanding of Earth's history. It achieves this while remaining grammatically correct and avoiding the introduction of new, off-topic details.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the writing goal specified in the prompt.
The sentence must emphasize the historical significance of Anning's discoveries and tie back to the main idea of the passage (how her fossils challenged established doctrines).
Understanding the goal helps filter out options that focus on minor or unrelated details.
2
Evaluate each option for relevance, focus, and grammatical correctness.
The sentence about laying the groundwork for paleontology fits the focus perfectly. The option about the shop introduces unrelated details. The option about geology contains a comma splice. The option with 'discovers' has a tense shift.
Ensuring the chosen sentence is both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.
3
Confirm the most effective concluding sentence.
The sentence stating that these discoveries helped lay the groundwork for modern paleontology is correct because it directly addresses the scientific impact without any grammatical errors.
This satisfies both the thematic and grammatical constraints of the question.

Key Concept

Selecting effective concluding sentences that align with the passage's main thesis and maintain grammatical consistency.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 180Question

Before the advent of modern bioinformatics, Margaret Dayhoff revolutionized biochemistry by organizing vast amounts of biological data. In 1965, she published the first volume of the *Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure*, a compendium that compiled all known protein sequences. [1] Dayhoff was determined to make this information accessible to researchers worldwide, envisioning a future where computational tools would decode the molecular blueprints of life. To achieve this, she developed a one-letter code for amino acids, which significantly reduced the data storage requirements for early computers.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that highlights the challenges Dayhoff faced in obtaining protein sequences from global researchers during a period of limited communication technology. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Gathering these sequences required Dayhoff to write physical letters to international scientists, who then mailed back their handwritten data.

Answer

Gathering these sequences required Dayhoff to write physical letters to international scientists, who then mailed back their handwritten data.
The correct option, which discusses writing physical letters to international scientists who mailed back their handwritten data, directly addresses the prompt's request. It illustrates the global nature of the research ('international scientists'), the challenges in obtaining data, and the limitations of communication technology during that era ('physical letters', 'mailed back').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to highlight: (1) the challenges Dayhoff faced in obtaining sequences, (2) the global/international scope of the researchers, and (3) the limitations of communication technology at the time.
Understanding all criteria of the prompt is necessary to evaluate the options.
2
Evaluate each option against the grammatical correctness requirement and the rhetorical goal.
The option about writing physical letters to international scientists who mailed back handwritten data is grammatically correct and meets all rhetorical criteria. The options about hardcover printing and insulin/hemoglobin are grammatically correct but mismatch the rhetorical goal. The option joining two independent clauses with a comma is a comma splice.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect choices and those that do not address the prompt's criteria leads to the correct answer.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
PreviousPage 9 / 18Next