Weakening Arguments

40 soru

Soru 21Soru

A shipping port recently installed automated inspection cranes at two of its primary terminals, resulting in a significant reduction in customs clearance delays at those locations. Based on this success, the port authority concludes that installing automated inspection cranes across all remaining terminals will eliminate customs processing backlogs port-wide. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the port authority's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The remaining terminals exclusively process non-standard cargo that requires manual physical inspection regardless of crane automation.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the remaining terminals process non-standard cargo requiring manual inspection regardless of crane automation.
The author concludes that expanding automated crane installation to remaining terminals will eliminate backlogs, assuming those terminals will experience the same benefits as the first two. The correct option reveals that the remaining terminals handle cargo requiring manual physical inspection regardless of crane automation. Because automated cranes cannot bypass manual inspection requirements, installing them will not eliminate backlogs at those terminals, directly undermining the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's premise and conclusion
Premise: Automated cranes reduced delays at two primary terminals. Conclusion: Installing automated cranes at all remaining terminals will eliminate port-wide backlogs.
Understanding the logic gap between the sample terminals and the remaining terminals is essential for weakening the argument.
2
Identify the central assumption
The author assumes that the conditions at the remaining terminals are sufficiently similar to those at the test terminals so that automated cranes will yield the same results.
Weakening questions target unstated assumptions that bridge evidence to conclusions.
3
Select the option that undermines this assumption
Finding that remaining terminals handle cargo requiring manual inspections demonstrates that automated cranes will not resolve backlogs at those locations.
Showing a key difference between the test group and remaining group negates the feasibility of the plan.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a generalization by demonstrating unrepresentative sample conditions
Soru 22Soru

To combat severe peak-hour traffic congestion on the city's central highway, municipal planners plan to convert one of the four existing traffic lanes in each direction into a dedicated lane for high-speed express commuter buses. Planners estimate that the increased speed and reliability of these express buses will convince 20 percent of current private automobile commuters to switch to public transit, thereby significantly reducing overall highway traffic congestion during peak commuting hours.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the municipal planners' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Converting one of the four traffic lanes in each direction into a dedicated bus lane reduces the highway capacity for remaining private vehicles by 25 percent, exacerbating bottleneck delays for those vehicles.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the evidence that converting an existing lane reduces highway vehicle capacity for private automobiles by 25 percent, which exceeds the 20 percent reduction in vehicle volume and thus increases overall bottleneck delays.
The correct answer identifies a fatal flaw in the plan's mathematical trade-off. Converting 1 out of 4 lanes reduces capacity for general traffic by 25 percent (1/41/4). Even if 20 percent of automobile drivers switch to buses, the remaining 80 percent of traffic must fit into 75 percent of the original road capacity. As a result, congestion per available lane actually increases, directly refuting the claim that overall traffic congestion will decrease.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and underlying premises of the argument.
Premise: Converting 1 of 4 existing lanes to a dedicated bus lane will attract 20% of automobile commuters to express buses. Conclusion: Overall highway traffic congestion during peak hours will decrease significantly.
Understanding the precise link between premise (volume reduction) and conclusion (congestion reduction) reveals key unstated assumptions about highway capacity.
2
Identify the core unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that removing 20% of vehicle drivers will decrease congestion despite taking away 1 out of 4 general lanes (a 25% drop in general capacity).
A plan to reduce congestion by taking away existing road capacity fails if the reduction in road capacity exceeds the reduction in vehicle volume.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement that undermines this assumption.
The option pointing out that dedicated lane conversion cuts general traffic capacity by 25% demonstrates that remaining traffic will experience worse bottlenecking, directly counteracting the 20% volume drop.
Showing that net throughput capacity falls faster than demand volume invalidates the claim that traffic congestion will decrease.

Anahtar Kavram

Plan-to-Goal Feasibility & Capacity Offsets
Soru 23Soru

To combat the depletion of its primary freshwater aquifer, a coastal agricultural district plans to install solar-powered desalination micro-turbines along drainage channels. These turbines will convert brackish surface runoff into water suitable for crop irrigation. District officials project that because the converted water will meet 35 percent of the district's current annual irrigation volume, agricultural pumpage from the aquifer will decrease significantly over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the district officials' projection?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Farmers in the district plan to use the converted runoff to cultivate high-yield crop varieties that require routine soil flushing with pure freshwater from the aquifer to prevent salt buildup.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that using converted brackish runoff requires farmers to routinely flush soil with pure freshwater drawn from the aquifer. This unstated operational side effect directly undermines the expected net reduction in aquifer pumpage.
The correct answer identifies an unintended operational consequence: using desalinated brackish water increases salt accumulation in soil, which in turn requires farmers to pump pure freshwater from the aquifer to flush the crops. This extra freshwater demand counteracts the projected 35 percent savings, severely undermining the claim that total aquifer pumpage will decrease.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core argument
Premise: Micro-turbines will supply desalinated runoff equal to 35% of current irrigation volume. Conclusion: Aquifer pumpage will decrease significantly over the next five years.
Identifying the premise-to-conclusion leap reveals the author's unstated assumption that total freshwater demand from the aquifer will drop proportionately to the new water supply.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and vulnerability
The argument assumes that introducing desalinated runoff will not trigger secondary actions or requirements that increase freshwater consumption from the aquifer.
Weakening questions for plan-to-goal arguments often rely on identifying unexpected secondary consequences that negate the goal.
3
Evaluate the choices for logical impact
The finding that farmers must flush fields with aquifer freshwater to mitigate salt buildup from the converted runoff demonstrates that using the new water source directly causes additional freshwater pumpage, invalidating the net savings projection.
This provides new empirical evidence directly attacking the central assumption of net pumpage reduction.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Plan Feasibility and Counterproductive Side Effects
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 24Soru

A regional agricultural authority plans to subsidize the replacement of traditional flood irrigation with subsurface drip irrigation across farms in a drought-prone river basin. Because subsurface drip irrigation reduces per-acre water loss to evaporation by 35 percent, the authority concludes that implementing this technology region-wide will substantially increase the total volume of water remaining in the basin's underground aquifer each year. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the agricultural authority's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A substantial portion of the unevaporated water applied during traditional flood irrigation percolates down through the soil and recharges the aquifer, whereas drip irrigation delivers water directly to roots with virtually no deep soil percolation.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that unevaporated flood irrigation water previously percolated down to recharge the aquifer, whereas drip irrigation eliminates this percolation.
The correct answer weakens the argument by demonstrating that traditional flood irrigation served a vital function in replenishing the aquifer through deep soil percolation. By replacing flood irrigation with drip irrigation—which supplies only enough water for plant absorption—the basin loses its primary mechanism for aquifer recharge. Thus, even though evaporation is reduced, the net input of water into the underground aquifer decreases, directly undermining the authority's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument core
Premise: Subsurface drip irrigation reduces per-acre water loss from evaporation by 35%. Conclusion: Region-wide adoption will substantially increase the total volume of water remaining in the underground aquifer.
Identifying the explicit premise and conclusion isolates the author's underlying assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that water lost to evaporation is the only factor determining how much water reaches or stays in the aquifer, and that water not lost to evaporation was not already returning to the aquifer under flood irrigation.
Weakening questions require finding new information that shatters the link between the premise and conclusion.
3
Evaluate the impact of the correct answer choice
If unevaporated water under flood irrigation regularly seeped down to recharge the aquifer, then flood irrigation was actually replenishing the underground water storage. Drip irrigation eliminates this recharge mechanism, meaning less total water reaches the aquifer despite reduced evaporation.
This directly refutes the conclusion that aquifer levels will increase.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal and Plan-to-Goal Arguments via Countervailing Factors
Soru 25Soru

To reduce municipal water treatment expenses, Metro City's utility department plans to install bio-filters containing specialized bacterial strains in the main reservoir. Laboratory tests demonstrated that these bacteria rapidly break down microplastics, which currently clog standard filtration membranes at downstream treatment facilities. Department officials conclude that implementing these bio-filters will significantly decrease overall water treatment operating costs across the city. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the utility department's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The bacterial strains release acidic organic compounds during microplastic digestion that severely corrode plant intake pumps, creating new repair costs that exceed membrane maintenance savings.

Cevap

The statement regarding the release of acidic organic compounds during microplastic digestion that corrode intake pumps and create costs exceeding membrane savings most seriously weakens the argument.
The correct answer weakens the argument by demonstrating an unintended negative consequence of the proposed solution. If the bacterial digestion process releases corrosive byproducts that damage intake pumps and incur replacement costs higher than the savings from reduced membrane clogging, the net financial impact will be negative, directly refuting the conclusion that overall expenses will decrease.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Lab tests show specialized bacteria digest microplastics that clog downstream membranes. Conclusion: Deploying these bio-filters will significantly decrease overall city water treatment operating costs.
Understanding the logic chain reveals the underlying assumption that microplastic removal will yield net financial savings.
2
Identify the unstated assumption in the plan.
The argument assumes that deploying the bacterial bio-filters will not introduce new hidden operational expenses or side effects that outweigh the cost savings from clogging reduction.
A plan-based argument is vulnerable to evidence showing unexpected negative side effects or implementation barriers.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that shatters this assumption.
The choice describing corrosive acidic compounds proves that implementing the bio-filters introduces a new repair expense that exceeds the savings gained from reduced membrane clogging.
This directly invalidates the conclusion that overall water treatment operating costs will decrease.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument via Implementation Side Effects
Soru 26Soru

To protect 14th-century sandstone monuments from winter freeze-thaw weathering, municipal heritage conservators plan to apply a hydrophobic silicone nanofilm across the exterior surfaces of all downtown stone structures. Laboratory tests confirm that the nanofilm prevents external rainwater from penetrating sandstone pores by up to 98 percent. The conservators conclude that applying this coating will significantly reduce the rate of structural cracking and surface spalling caused by freeze-thaw cycles over the next decade.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conservators' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Groundwater drawn up through the porous foundations of sandstone monuments evaporates primarily through exterior stone surfaces, and the nanofilm prevents trapped internal moisture from escaping.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that groundwater drawn up through porous foundations evaporates through exterior surfaces and that the nanofilm prevents this internal moisture from escaping.
The conservators assume that blocking external rainwater will prevent water from collecting and freezing inside the sandstone. The correct option reveals that moisture also enters the monuments from below via groundwater. Because the nanofilm creates an impermeable seal, this rising groundwater becomes trapped beneath the stone surface, where it will freeze during winter and cause severe internal cracking and spalling. This directly negates the expected benefit of the plan.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure into premise and conclusion
Premise: Hydrophobic nanofilm stops 98% of external rainwater from penetrating sandstone. Conclusion: Applying the nanofilm will significantly reduce freeze-thaw cracking and spalling over the next decade.
Identifying the explicit logical bridge allows us to uncover the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the central unstated assumption of the author
The argument assumes that external rainwater is the sole or primary source of water responsible for freeze-thaw damage inside the sandstone.
Weakening questions require finding evidence that demonstrates why the premise might fail to guarantee the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the impact of new information on the underlying assumption
If groundwater enters through foundations and cannot escape due to the barrier, trapped internal moisture will freeze and expand, exacerbating structural damage despite keeping rainwater out.
Demonstrating an alternative cause of severe moisture damage directly breaks the connection between keeping rainwater out and preventing freeze-thaw cracking.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal Arguments by Identifying Trapped Alternative Factors
Soru 27Soru

To address declining attendance, the city history museum recently eliminated its admission fee, expecting the policy to attract first-time visitors. Six months after the policy took effect, total monthly attendance figures were identical to those recorded during the same period in the previous year. Museum administrators concluded that free admission failed to attract first-time visitors because local residents simply lack interest in regional history.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the administrators' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the six-month period following the policy change, major road construction rendered the museum's primary parking area inaccessible, causing a sharp drop in visits by regular patrons.

Cevap

The statement regarding road construction rendering the parking area inaccessible weakens the conclusion by demonstrating that total attendance could remain flat even if first-time visitor numbers increased.
The conclusion relies on equating flat total attendance with a failure to attract first-time visitors. The correct option demonstrates that regular patron attendance dropped significantly due to parking accessibility issues. Consequently, total attendance could remain unchanged even if a substantial number of first-time visitors responded to the free admission offer, thereby exposing a flaw in the administrators' reasoning.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion
Premise: Total attendance remained identical before and after eliminating entry fees. Conclusion: Free admission failed to attract first-time visitors because local residents lack interest.
Understanding the logic gap requires clearly isolating what evidence was used to justify the conclusion.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that no other factor reduced attendance among existing regular visitors during the same six-month period.
If regular attendance dropped simultaneously, total attendance numbers could mask a rise in first-time visitors.
3
Evaluate the correct weakening option
The option noting that road construction disrupted parking and caused a sharp drop in regular patrons shows that first-time visitor numbers could have increased while total attendance stayed constant.
Demonstrating an offsetting decline in another segment of visitors breaks the link between static overall attendance and the supposed failure to attract new visitors.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating alternative causes and offsetting variables in causal argument evaluation
Soru 28Soru

To reduce long-term municipal energy expenses, the city of Varna plans to replace standard double-pane glass with advanced electrochromic smart glass across all municipal office buildings. The smart glass automatically darkens in response to intense sunlight, significantly reducing the energy needed to power air-conditioning systems during warm months. City planners estimate that the resulting energy savings will fully offset the initial purchase and installation costs within four years. Therefore, the planners conclude that adopting smart glass will reduce the city's total administrative operating costs over the next ten years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planners' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Electrochromic smart glass blocks a substantial portion of natural visible light when darkened, requiring office buildings to run internal electric lighting at full capacity during daylight hours.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that electrochromic smart glass blocks natural visible light when darkened, forcing municipal office buildings to run internal electric lighting at full capacity during daylight hours.
The correct answer identifies a major counterproductive side effect of the proposed plan. If the smart glass reduces natural light entry when darkened, artificial lighting must be operated at full capacity during peak daylight hours. This added electrical load directly offsets the energy saved on air conditioning, undermining the planners' conclusion that total administrative operating costs will decrease over the ten-year period.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Smart glass darkens in sunlight, reducing summer air-conditioning energy use. Premise: Energy savings offset purchase and installation costs in 4 years. Conclusion: Smart glass installation will reduce total administrative operating costs over 10 years.
Identifying the explicit premises and conclusion reveals the core assumption.
2
Identify the central unstated assumption
The planners assume that reducing air-conditioning energy use will yield a net reduction in overall energy expenses without creating offsetting operational costs during the 10-year timeframe.
A plan-to-goal argument relies on the assumption that hidden side effects or secondary costs will not negate the projected benefits.
3
Evaluate the impact of new factual information
If darkening the glass necessitates running electric lights at full capacity throughout the day, the electricity cost for lighting increases significantly whenever air-conditioning savings occur, negating the expected net cost reduction.
Showing a direct, counteracting financial cost undermines the conclusion that net administrative expenses will decline.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Causal Argument via Unintended Side Effects
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 29Soru

To reduce cargo loss from food spoilage during long-distance transport, a logistics firm plans to equip all its refrigerated trucks with automated high-precision humidity sensors. The firm argues that because elevated humidity is the primary catalyst for mold proliferation in boxed produce, real-time sensor alerts allowing drivers to manually open external air vents whenever humidity spikes will significantly lower the rate of produce spoilage. Which of the following, if true, most undermines the reasoning behind the logistics firm's plan?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Opening external air vents during highway transit introduces ambient outdoor moisture and road dust into the cargo bay, creating optimal conditions for rapid mold spore activation inside the produce packaging.

Cevap

The statement that opening external air vents during highway transit introduces ambient outdoor moisture and road dust into the cargo bay, creating optimal conditions for rapid mold spore activation inside produce packaging.
The correct answer identifies a fatal flaw in the plan's execution mechanism. The author assumes that opening external vents when humidity spikes will lower spoilage. However, if opening those vents introduces outside moisture and dust that actively accelerates mold spore activation inside the packaging, taking the planned action will actually increase or exacerbate produce spoilage rather than reduce it.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise, plan, and central assumption.
Premise: Elevated humidity causes mold proliferation in boxed produce. Plan: Install real-time humidity sensors so drivers can open external air vents when humidity spikes. Conclusion: This plan will significantly lower produce spoilage.
Identifying the unstated assumption is essential for evaluating argument validity.
2
Identify the core underlying assumption of the plan.
The argument assumes that opening external air vents when humidity spikes will successfully lower internal humidity without introducing new factors that promote mold growth.
Weakening questions targeting plans typically break the connection between the action taken and the desired goal.
3
Evaluate the impact of introducing new evidence on the central assumption.
If opening the vents introduces ambient moisture and dust that activates mold spores inside the packaging, the proposed action directly causes the exact harm it was designed to prevent.
Showing that an action produces a counterproductive side effect directly undermines the feasibility of achieving the stated goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Plan-to-Goal Causal Breakdown and Counterproductive Side Effects
Soru 30Soru

To reduce financial losses caused by perishable produce spoilage, a regional supermarket chain plans to replace its standard delivery trucks with high-speed refrigerated vans, cutting transit time from distribution warehouses to retail stores by 40 percent. Company executives argue that because fruits and vegetables degrade continuously while in transit, this faster transport schedule will significantly decrease the proportion of produce that spoils before reaching store shelves. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the executives' argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The vast majority of produce spoilage occurs during backroom holding periods at retail stores prior to shelf placement due to inadequate store refrigeration capacity.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that the vast majority of produce spoilage occurs during backroom holding periods at retail stores prior to shelf placement due to inadequate store refrigeration capacity.
The executives assume that transit time is a major driver of overall produce spoilage before shelf placement. The correct option demonstrates that the vast majority of spoilage happens after transit while produce waits in store backrooms with poor refrigeration. Because transit is not the primary point of failure, cutting transit time will not significantly decrease the proportion of produce that spoils.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Produce degrades continuously during transit, and high-speed vans will reduce transit time by 40%. Conclusion: Faster transport will significantly decrease the proportion of produce that spoils before reaching shelves.
Understanding the precise logical link between the premise (transit time reduction) and the conclusion (spoilage reduction) is required to identify unstated assumptions.
2
Identify the central assumption.
The argument assumes that transit duration is a primary cause of total pre-shelf spoilage, and that eliminating transit time will substantially impact total spoilage rates.
A weakening statement must target this underlying assumption by showing that transit time reduction will not produce the expected outcome.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that undermines the central assumption.
The correct choice reveals that the primary location of spoilage is backroom store holding areas, not transit. Thus, reducing transit time leaves the main source of spoilage completely unaddressed.
Demonstrating an unaddressed major bottleneck undermines the claim that the plan will achieve its intended goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Plan-to-Goal Weakening and Bottleneck Identification
Soru 31Soru

A pharmaceutical company plans to transition from traditional synthetic batch processing to enzyme-catalyzed continuous-flow processing to manufacture its primary hypertension medication. In small-scale laboratory trials, continuous-flow processing achieved a 40 percent reduction in raw material waste and required significantly shorter reaction times per production run. Based on these findings, company management concluded that implementing continuous-flow processing on a commercial scale will substantially reduce the overall per-unit manufacturing cost of the medication. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the management's conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The specialized enzymes required for continuous-flow processing degrade rapidly under high-volume pressure in commercial reactors, necessitating frequent and costly replacement.

Cevap

The conclusion is most weakened by the finding that the specialized enzymes degrade rapidly under high-volume commercial pressure, requiring frequent and expensive replacements that offset raw material savings.
The correct answer demonstrates that scaling up the continuous-flow process introduces a substantial operational expense—frequent, costly enzyme replacement—that was not present or impactful during small-scale laboratory trials. This directly undermines management's assumption that laboratory savings will translate into overall per-unit cost reductions at the commercial level.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and main conclusion of the argument.
Premises: Small-scale trials of continuous-flow processing reduced raw material waste by 40% and shortened reaction times. Conclusion: Full commercial implementation will significantly lower overall per-unit manufacturing costs.
Understanding the logic gap between small-scale lab success and commercial financial viability is key to finding the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption in the reasoning.
The argument assumes that the cost benefits observed in small-scale trials will not be negated by new, unexpected expenses that arise when scaling up to commercial production.
To weaken a plan-to-cost argument, look for a factor that introduces significant new costs unique to full-scale operations.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that breaks the central assumption.
The statement regarding rapid enzyme degradation under commercial pressure identifies a severe recurring cost unique to commercial scaling that directly neutralizes the efficiency gains.
This hidden operational drawback demonstrates that total per-unit manufacturing costs may actually rise rather than fall.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Causal / Plan-to-Cost Argument via Unintended Scaling Costs
Soru 32Soru

To reduce patient wait times for critical care, a hospital network plans to replace its manual paper triage system with an automated algorithmic triage program. In a preliminary trial, the software analyzed patient vital signs and symptom checklists in under 15 seconds, compared to the 8 minutes required by triage nurses. Hospital management concludes that implementing this software across all its emergency departments will significantly decrease the average time critical-care patients wait before receiving treatment from an emergency physician. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the hospital management's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Hospital safety rules require an attending emergency physician to manually verify and sign off on any algorithm-generated triage score before a patient can be transferred to a critical care bed.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that hospital safety rules mandate an attending emergency physician to manually verify and sign off on algorithm-generated triage scores before transferring patients to critical care.
The argument assumes that reducing triage time from 8 minutes to 15 seconds will decrease overall wait times for critical-care patients. The option pointing out mandatory physician sign-off before transfer introduces a procedural dependency on physician availability. Because physicians must clear the triage result before transfer occurs, the delay is simply shifted to physician sign-off availability, directly undermining the conclusion that overall wait times will decrease.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion
Premise: Automated software triages patients in 15 seconds vs. 8 minutes for nurses. Conclusion: Implementing software will reduce average wait times for critical-care patients before seeing a physician.
The conclusion relies on the unstated assumption that saving time at the initial triage intake stage directly translates into faster overall access to a physician.
2
Formulate the central assumption
The argument assumes no downstream procedural bottlenecks will offset or eliminate the time saved during the 15-second triage phase.
To weaken a plan-to-goal argument, an option must show that an unstated obstacle or side effect prevents the plan from achieving its stated goal.
3
Evaluate the choices for a weakening factor
Mandating physician sign-off on the automated score prior to transfer introduces a bottleneck tied directly to physician availability, undermining the time savings.
If patients cannot proceed until a busy physician signs off, the total wait time to receive critical care remains constrained by physician availability rather than initial triage speed.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments - Uncovering Downstream Bottlenecks
Soru 33Soru

To protect vulnerable alpine wildflowers from being trampled by foot traffic, park authorities plan to replace the ground-level soil path through a popular mountain meadow with an elevated wooden boardwalk. They reason that elevating the walking surface will prevent hikers from stepping on the surrounding vegetation, thereby allowing damaged plant populations to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The broad wooden planks of the elevated boardwalk cast dense shade and redirect rainwater, suppressing the growth of delicate alpine plant species directly adjacent to the pathway.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that the broad wooden planks of the elevated boardwalk cast dense shade and redirect rainwater, suppressing the growth of delicate alpine plant species directly adjacent to the pathway.
The correct answer identifies an unforeseen side effect of the proposed plan. If the boardwalk blocks sunlight and redirects rainwater away from the adjacent soil, the plants will suffer from lack of vital nutrients regardless of whether foot traffic is removed. This directly undermines the argument's conclusion that the boardwalk will allow plant populations to recover.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument.
Premise: Replacing soil paths with elevated boardwalks keeps hikers' feet off the ground. Conclusion: This change will allow damaged alpine wildflower populations to recover.
Understanding the logic underlying the plan is necessary to locate unstated assumptions.
2
Identify the central assumption underlying the plan.
The author assumes that elevating the path will not create any alternative conditions that hinder or destroy the wildflower population.
Weakening a plan-to-goal argument typically requires identifying an unintended side effect or bottleneck that prevents goal achievement.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that invalidates the assumption.
Showing that the physical structure of the boardwalk blocks essential sunlight and rainfall demonstrates that the plan itself will harm the plants, preventing their recovery.
This directly counteracts the central claim that the boardwalk will enable vegetation recovery.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument via Unintended Side Effects
Soru 34Soru

To increase the proportion of borrowed books returned on or before their due date, the Metro Central Library system plans to eliminate all monetary overdue fines and instead send automated daily text reminders starting three days prior to each book's due date. Library administrators reason that monetary fines create anxiety that deters patrons from returning late books promptly, whereas text notifications directly address the primary reason for late returns: patrons simply forgetting the due date. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest ground for doubting that the library system's plan will achieve its goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A survey of library patrons revealed that most late returns are driven by the physical inconvenience of visiting a branch rather than forgetfulness, and patrons are even less motivated to make prompt return trips when monetary penalties are absent.

Cevap

The plan is most weakened by evidence showing that late returns are primarily caused by the inconvenience of visiting a branch rather than forgetfulness, and that eliminating fines decreases patrons' motivation to return books on time.
The correct answer undermines the fundamental assumption of the plan. The library assumes that forgetfulness is the main cause of late returns and that fines are counterproductive. If late returns are actually caused by the inconvenience of visiting a branch, text reminders will not solve the underlying problem. Furthermore, if eliminating fines removes patrons' motivation to make the trip, the plan will actively decrease on-time returns.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and main premise of the argument.
Conclusion: Replacing monetary overdue fines with text reminders will increase on-time book returns. Main Premise: Late returns occur primarily because patrons forget due dates, and fines cause anxiety.
Understanding the central assumption—that forgetfulness causes late returns—is essential to evaluating how to weaken the conclusion.
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption.
The argument assumes that text reminders will fix the main cause of late returns (forgetfulness) and that eliminating fines will not decrease on-time returns.
To weaken a plan-to-goal argument, one must show that the plan fails to address the real problem or introduces counterproductive incentives.
3
Select the choice that directly attacks the core assumption.
The option showing that convenience, not forgetfulness, drives late returns and that removing fines reduces motivation directly undermines the plan's feasibility.
This shows both that the text reminders address a non-primary factor and that removing fines makes the goal harder to achieve.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument
Soru 35Soru

To reduce severe crop damage caused by an invasive species of burrowing rodents, agricultural authorities in a rural valley plan to introduce a native raptor species known to prey heavily on small mammals. The authorities reason that establishing a population of these raptors in the valley will significantly decrease the rodent population, thereby protecting local grain harvests. Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The invasive rodents forage and move exclusively underground at night, whereas the raptors hunt strictly during daylight hours above open ground.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the invasive rodents forage exclusively underground at night while the raptors hunt strictly during daylight hours above ground.
The conclusion relies on the assumption that introducing raptors will result in significant predation of the invasive rodents. The correct option shows a complete temporal and spatial mismatch: the rodents are active only underground at night, while the raptors hunt only above ground during the day. Because the raptors will not encounter the rodents, the plan cannot achieve its goal of reducing the rodent population.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Raptors prey heavily on small mammals. Conclusion: Introducing raptors will significantly decrease the population of burrowing rodents and protect grain harvests.
Understanding the logical jump from raptor predation habits to effective rodent reduction isolates the underlying assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that the raptors will actually encounter and hunt these specific invasive rodents in this valley environment.
If environmental or behavioral barriers prevent raptors from preying on the rodents, the plan will fail.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for information that undermines this assumption.
The option stating that rodents are active underground at night while raptors hunt above ground during the day demonstrates that predator and prey will not interact.
A complete temporal and spatial mismatch negates the causal mechanism relied upon by the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Plan Weakening (Behavioral and Temporal Mismatch)
Soru 36Soru

To cut long-distance cargo transit expenses, a regional freight company plans to replace its entire fleet of diesel transport trucks with electric trucks powered by newly developed solid-state batteries. Management reasons that because electric trucks incur 40 percent lower energy costs per mile than diesel trucks and require significantly fewer routine engine maintenance services, making this transition will substantially reduce the company's total annual operational expenses over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The solid-state batteries required for these electric transport trucks degrade rapidly under continuous long-distance heavy usage and require full replacement every two years at a cost exceeding the total energy savings achieved during that period.

Cevap

The statement regarding rapid battery degradation and expensive replacement costs most seriously weakens the argument by demonstrating that total operational costs over five years will actually increase rather than decrease.
The conclusion relies on the assumption that lower energy costs and fewer routine maintenance services will lead to lower net operational expenses. The option pointing out that the batteries degrade rapidly and require replacement every two years at a cost exceeding the total energy savings directly refutes this assumption by introducing a major ongoing expense that makes the transition more costly overall.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion
Premises: Electric trucks have 40% lower energy costs per mile and fewer routine engine maintenance needs. Conclusion: Transitioning the fleet will substantially reduce total annual operational expenses over five years.
Identifying the logic path allows us to uncover the author's unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The author assumes that energy savings and lower engine maintenance will not be offset by other unexpected, mandatory operational costs unique to electric trucks over the five-year timeframe.
A weakening answer choice will target and undermine this unstated assumption.
3
Evaluate the impact of new information on the assumption
If solid-state batteries require replacement every two years at a cost greater than the total energy savings, overall expenses over five years will rise, directly invalidating the conclusion.
Pointing out a massive, recurrent operational expense directly disproves the claim of reduced total operational expenses.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating plan-to-goal feasibility by identifying hidden or offsetting operational costs
Soru 37Soru

To revitalize downtown retail commerce, the city of Vaelen converted a five-block stretch of Main Street from a vehicle-accessible thoroughfare into a pedestrian-only zone. City officials reasoned that eliminating car traffic would encourage visitors to spend more time browsing local shops, thereby increasing total retail sales in the district. However, three months after the conversion, total retail sales along Main Street were 15 percent lower than during the same three-month period last year. Consequently, city officials concluded that the pedestrian zone failed to attract shoppers and directly harmed retail commerce. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city officials' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the three-month period following the conversion, overall retail sales throughout the entire city dropped by 35 percent due to a major regional economic downturn.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by establishing that citywide retail sales fell by 35 percent during the same period, showing that Main Street actually outperformed the regional trend.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal relationship: the pedestrian conversion caused the 15 percent drop in retail sales. Showing that overall citywide retail sales plunged by 35 percent during the exact same timeframe provides crucial baseline context. It demonstrates that sales on Main Street actually declined far less than expected given the severe regional downturn, which strongly suggests the pedestrian zone buffered Main Street from a worse fate rather than causing the decline.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and premises.
Premise: Main Street sales fell 15% after pedestrian conversion. Conclusion: The conversion failed to attract shoppers and directly caused the sales decline.
Understanding the precise causal link asserted by the author is necessary to weaken it.
2
Identify the unstated assumption in the author's causal leap.
The author assumes no external factor (such as a broader economic slump) was responsible for the 15% drop in sales.
A weakening answer choice will often present an alternative cause or show that the baseline performance was affected by outside variables.
3
Evaluate the choices to find evidence undermining the assumed cause.
Showing that citywide retail sales dropped 35% demonstrates that Main Street's 15% drop was actually a relative success, undermining the claim that the pedestrian zone harmed commerce.
If the broader market fell much more sharply, the pedestrian zone likely helped protect Main Street from an even steeper decline.

Anahtar Kavram

Causal Fallacy and Baseline Confounding Variables
Soru 38Soru

To increase net profit margins across its retail locations, Apex Electronics plans to eliminate its complimentary home-delivery service for large household appliances. Management reasons that operating delivery trucks incurs substantial fuel and labor expenses without direct customer fees, and that customers will simply choose to transport their purchases home themselves using store pickup options. Therefore, management concludes that eliminating free delivery will reduce operational costs without sacrificing total sales revenue. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A majority of Apex's appliance customers lack personal vehicles capable of transporting bulky items and would purchase from competing retailers that offer home delivery.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the evidence that a majority of appliance buyers cannot transport large items themselves and will buy from competitors providing delivery, directly undermining the assumption that sales revenue will remain unaffected.
The argument relies on the central assumption that eliminating free appliance delivery will not decrease sales revenue because customers will easily shift to self-pickup. The correct answer presents new evidence showing that most target customers physically cannot transport large appliances themselves and will turn to competitors who still offer home delivery. This demonstrates that eliminating the delivery service will lead to substantial revenue loss, directly weakening the claim that profit margins will improve.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and key premises of the argument.
Premise: Operating delivery trucks adds fuel and labor costs without charging fees, and management assumes customers will switch to store pickup. Conclusion: Eliminating free delivery will cut costs without reducing sales revenue.
Understanding the logical jump between premise and conclusion highlights the unstated assumptions.
2
Formulate the central unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that customers have the means and willingness to pick up large appliances themselves rather than taking their business to a competitor offering delivery.
Weakening questions require finding evidence that breaks the link between the premise and conclusion.
3
Evaluate the choices to find information that undermines the central assumption.
The statement showing that most customers lack suitable vehicles and will switch to competitors directly undermines the claim that sales revenue will not suffer.
If sales revenue drops significantly due to lost customers, total net profit margins may decrease despite lower operating costs.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Causal and Plan-to-Goal Arguments
Soru 39Soru

To reduce employee turnover caused by workplace burnout, a technology firm plans to institute a mandatory four-day workweek while keeping salaries unchanged and maintaining existing weekly project deadlines. Management reasons that granting employees a three-day weekend every week will lower overall stress levels, thereby improving job satisfaction and reducing voluntary resignations. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Compressing the same total volume of weekly tasks into four days significantly increases daily work intensity and stress during working hours.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that compressing the unchanged weekly workload into four days increases daily stress during working hours.
The argument relies on the assumption that a three-day weekend will produce a net reduction in employee stress and burnout. The correct choice weakens the argument by exposing a major flaw in the plan: because weekly deadlines remain unchanged, employees must complete 40 hours of workload across 4 days. This compressed schedule creates high daily stress during working days, which directly negates the anticipated reduction in overall burnout.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Providing a mandatory three-day weekend will give employees extra time off. Conclusion: Giving employees an extra day off each week will reduce overall stress levels and lower employee turnover caused by burnout.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the core causal claim.
2
Identify the key unstated assumption.
The author assumes that the extra day off will actually lower net stress without introducing new, equal, or greater sources of workplace stress.
The conclusion relies on net stress decreasing as a result of the schedule change.
3
Evaluate the option that undermines this assumption.
If weekly project deadlines remain unchanged, completing five days of work in four days creates severe daily time pressure and stress during the workweek, offsetting or exceeding any stress relief from the long weekend.
Showing an unintended negative consequence directly negates the assumed benefit of reduced overall stress.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument via Implementation Constraints
Tahmini Süre:1m 50s
Soru 40Soru

To reduce fuel expenditure across its ocean cargo fleet, a maritime shipping company plans to apply a new hydrodynamic coating to the underwater hulls of all its vessels. In controlled tank tests, vessels treated with the coating experienced a 12 percent reduction in drag compared to untreated vessels. The company's directors conclude that applying this coating will significantly lower the fleet's total annual fuel expenditure.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the directors' conclusion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In actual ocean environments, marine organisms rapidly adhere to the specialized coating, creating surface roughness that negates the drag reduction unless the hulls undergo frequent and costly cleanings.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that in actual ocean environments, marine organisms rapidly adhere to the specialized coating, creating surface roughness that negates the drag reduction unless the hulls undergo frequent and costly cleanings.
The conclusion relies on the assumption that the 12 percent drag reduction measured in controlled tank tests will produce significant real-world net fuel savings. The correct option directly shatters this assumption by revealing that real ocean conditions cause biological growth on the coating that negates drag reduction and adds substantial maintenance costs, thereby preventing the expected net savings.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument structure
Premise: Controlled tank tests showed a 12% reduction in drag for coated hulls. Conclusion: Applying the coating across the fleet will significantly lower total annual fuel expenditure.
Identifying the explicit premises and conclusion reveals the underlying assumption connecting test results to real-world financial outcomes.
2
Identify the key unstated assumption
The argument assumes that performance in controlled tank tests will translate directly to real-world ocean conditions without introducing prohibitive secondary costs.
A weakening item must attack this gap between laboratory performance and net operational cost savings.
3
Evaluate the options against the key assumption
The statement regarding marine organisms accumulating on the hull demonstrates that operational ocean conditions actively destroy the drag reduction effect and introduce heavy maintenance costs.
This directly undermines the conclusion that total annual fuel expenditure will significantly decrease.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments - Unstated Assumptions in Causal/Experimental Transitions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 2 / 2
Weakening Arguments Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 2 | Examkin