Critical Reasoning: Inference and Conclusions

88 soru

Soru 41Soru

In an effort to lower operational expenses, several transatlantic cargo carriers retrofitted their fleets with automated wind-assisted propulsion sails. Although these sails reduce fuel consumption by up to 12 percent during open-ocean transit, deploying and recalibrating them in heavily congested coastal waters requires keeping two additional certified deck officers on shift. In port-dense maritime corridors where coastal navigation accounts for over 60 percent of total voyage time, the cumulative wage premiums for these extra officers exceed the total monetary value of fuel saved throughout the journey. Adopting this wind-assist technology will therefore fail to reduce overall voyage costs on port-dense routes unless ______.

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: the operational requirement for extra certified deck officers during coastal navigation can be eliminated through automated sail adjustments

Cevap

Adopting the wind-assist technology will fail to reduce overall voyage costs unless the operational requirement for extra certified deck officers during coastal navigation can be eliminated through automated sail adjustments.
The argument establishes a clear financial equation: wind-assisted sails reduce fuel costs, but using them in coastal waters imposes an officer wage premium. On port-dense routes, coastal navigation dominates the journey (>60%), causing officer wage premiums to exceed total fuel savings. Therefore, the technology cannot achieve its goal of reducing overall voyage costs unless the primary cost obstacle—the requirement for extra officers during coastal transit—is eliminated.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises and identify the core financial trade-off.
Fuel savings (up to 12% in open ocean) vs. Officer wage costs (2 extra officers needed during coastal navigation).
Understanding what drives costs establishes what must change for the conclusion to hold.
2
Evaluate the specific condition on port-dense routes.
Coastal navigation is >60% of voyage time, making officer wage premiums greater than total fuel savings.
The net result on port-dense routes is currently a net financial loss due specifically to extra officer wages.
3
Deduce the necessary condition to complete the conclusion logically.
To turn a net loss into a net cost reduction, the factor causing the excess expense (extra officer requirement during coastal transit) must be removed or neutralized.
The conclusion states the technology will fail to reduce overall costs 'unless [X]'; [X] must directly overcome or remove the cost impediment.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing an argument by identifying a necessary condition that resolves an operational trade-off.
Soru 42Soru

A rare species of deep-sea sponge produces a chemical compound called sponzenol only when exposed to water temperatures below 4C4^\circ\text{C}. In ocean regions where the water temperature is 4C4^\circ\text{C} or higher, these sponges never produce sponzenol. Marine researchers recently discovered a thriving colony of this sponge species in an uncharted trench in the South Pacific and confirmed that the sponges were actively producing sponzenol.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The water temperature in the uncharted trench where the sponges were discovered is below 4C4^\circ\text{C}.

Cevap

The water temperature in the uncharted trench where the sponges were discovered is below 4C4^\circ\text{C}.
The stimulus establishes a strict condition: sponges produce sponzenol only when the water temperature is strictly below 4C4^\circ\text{C}. Because researchers confirmed that the sponges in the trench were producing sponzenol, it must be true that the water temperature in that trench is below 4C4^\circ\text{C}.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the given conditional premise
Sponzenol production implies water temperature is below 4C4^\circ\text{C} (Production \rightarrow Temperature <4C< 4^\circ\text{C}).
The stimulus specifies that sponges produce sponzenol ONLY WHEN exposed to temperatures below 4C4^\circ\text{C}.
2
Apply the factual premise from the stimulus
The sponges in the newly discovered trench are actively producing sponzenol.
This fact triggers the condition required for sponzenol production.
3
Deduce the necessary conclusion
The water in the trench must be below 4C4^\circ\text{C}.
Since active production requires a temperature below 4C4^\circ\text{C}, this condition must be met.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Must-Be-True Statements and Valid Deductions
Soru 43Soru

Passage:
In 2022, a municipal public health board enacted a regulatory mandate stipulating that any water treatment facility constructed after the mandate's passage must incorporate advanced ultraviolet disinfection units. Official compliance reports confirm that every facility incorporating advanced ultraviolet disinfection units successfully reduced bacterial counts below threshold levels. Furthermore, municipal records indicate that total administrative overhead costs dropped in every municipality where a water treatment facility was constructed between 2022 and 2025.

Statement: Based on the passage above, it MUST BE TRUE that at least one water treatment facility incorporating advanced ultraviolet disinfection units was constructed between 2022 and 2025 in a municipality where total administrative overhead costs dropped.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is False because the passage provides conditional mandates and observations, but does not state or guarantee that any water treatment facility was actually constructed after 2022.
The correct answer is False because the passage sets forth conditional requirements (what occurs IF a facility is built) without establishing that any facility was built between 2022 and 2025. Without proof of actual construction, the statement is merely a 'could be true' scenario rather than a strictly required deduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure of the passage premises.
Premise 1: Facility constructed post-2022 → Must incorporate UV units (Conditional Rule). Premise 2: UV units → Reduced bacterial counts. Premise 3: Facility constructed between 2022 and 2025 → Administrative overhead dropped in that municipality.
Distinguish between conditional rules and existential facts in the stimulus.
2
Check whether the antecedent condition (that a facility was actually constructed post-2022) is established as fact.
The passage contains no premise asserting that any construction project actually took place after 2022.
Determine if the existence of at least one constructed facility is logically guaranteed.
3
Evaluate the truth value of the 'Must Be True' statement.
If zero facilities were constructed, all conditional rules remain uncontradicted, yet no such facility exists. Thus, the statement COULD be true (if construction occurred), but it DOES NOT MUST BE TRUE. Therefore, the assertion that it MUST be true is False.
Avoid the classic GMAT trap of confusing 'could be true' scenarios with 'must be true' deductions.

Anahtar Kavram

Avoiding 'Could Be True' and Existential Assumptions in Conditional Deduction
Soru 44Soru

In 2025, Apex Motors produced 10,000 electric vehicles, all of which were manufactured at its main manufacturing plant in City X. In that same year, 30 percent of the electric vehicles produced by Apex Motors were exported to international markets, while the remainder were sold domestically.

Which of the following statements can be properly inferred from the information provided above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Apex Motors sold exactly 7,000 electric vehicles domestically in 2025.

Cevap

Apex Motors sold exactly 7,000 electric vehicles domestically in 2025.
The passage establishes that Apex Motors produced 10,000 electric vehicles, 30 percent of which were exported and the remainder (70 percent) were sold domestically. Calculating 70 percent of 10,000 yields exactly 7,000 vehicles sold domestically. Therefore, this statement must be strictly true based solely on the provided premises.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the given facts in the passage
Total production = 10,000 vehicles. Exported percentage = 30%. Domestic percentage = remainder (100% - 30% = 70%).
Inference questions require deductions based strictly on the provided factual premises.
2
Calculate the domestic sales quantity
70% of 10,000 = 7,000 vehicles.
Mathematical certainty derived directly from the explicit facts.
3
Evaluate options against strict 'Must Be True' criterion
The statement calculating 7,000 domestic vehicle sales is guaranteed to be true, while all other options introduce unstated assumptions or speculative claims.
A valid GMAT inference must follow logically from the premises without external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing mathematical/deductive inferences from unstated assumptions and speculative claims
Soru 45Soru

A corporate governance protocol enforces the following rules regarding financial compliance:

1. Every department that incurs an annual operational deficit exceeding 10%10\% undergoes an automatic internal audit.
2. An internal audit takes place if and only if either the division vice president requests it or the central risk oversight committee flags the department's ledger.
3. Whenever the central risk oversight committee flags a department's ledger, that department is prohibited from submitting capital expansion proposals for the following fiscal year.

During the current fiscal year, the Logistics Department was not prohibited from submitting capital expansion proposals for the following fiscal year.

Evaluate the following statement based strictly on the information provided:

Statement: If the Logistics Department incurred an operational deficit exceeding 10%10\% during the current fiscal year, then its division vice president requested an internal audit.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The conclusion is logically unavoidable. The fact that Logistics was not prohibited from submitting capital proposals guarantees that the risk committee did not flag its ledger. Therefore, if a deficit over 10%10\% triggered an audit, the audit could only have been requested by the division vice president.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional statements into symbolic logic terms.
Let DD = Deficit >10%>10\%, AA = Internal Audit, VV = Vice President requests audit, RR = Risk committee flags ledger, PP = Prohibited from capital proposals.
Premise 1: DAD \rightarrow A
Premise 2: A(VR)A \leftrightarrow (V \lor R)
Premise 3: RPR \rightarrow P
Symbolic representation clarifies the logical relationships and valid inferences.
2
Derive deductions from the given fact using contrapositive logic.
Fact: ¬P\neg P (Not prohibited from submitting proposals).
From RPR \rightarrow P, taking the contrapositive (¬P¬R\neg P \rightarrow \neg R) yields ¬R\neg R (The risk committee did not flag the ledger).
A conditional statement and its contrapositive are logically equivalent.
3
Evaluate the antecedent condition of the statement (DD).
Assume DD (Logistics incurred a deficit >10%>10\%). By Modus Ponens on Premise 1 (DAD \rightarrow A), AA must be true (An internal audit took place).
If the sufficient condition of a valid conditional rule occurs, the necessary condition must also occur.
4
Combine the intermediate deductions to determine the truth of VV.
From Premise 2, A(VR)A \rightarrow (V \lor R). Since AA is true, the disjunction (VR)(V \lor R) must be true. Since ¬R\neg R was established in Step 2, disjunctive syllogism forces VV to be true.
If a disjunction 'A or B' is true and 'B' is false, then 'A' must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-step Conditional Deduction via Contrapositive and Disjunctive Syllogism
Soru 46Soru

Municipal planners in City X recently replaced traditional asphalt in high-density commercial zones with permeable interlocking concrete pavers to reduce storm runoff and mitigate the urban heat island effect. Although the pavers successfully absorbed rainfall and lowered surface temperatures, routine road maintenance costs rose significantly because traditional mechanical rotary sweepers dislodged the stabilizing joint sand between the pavers, requiring frequent re-sanding. To eliminate these extra maintenance expenses while preserving the environmental benefits, the city plans to replace its mechanical sweepers with high-pressure suction vacuum sweepers. However, this plan is unlikely to achieve its intended cost-saving goal because __________

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: high-pressure suction sweepers pull joint sand from between interlocking pavers at a rate equal to or greater than mechanical rotary sweepers do

Cevap

The passage is most logically completed by the statement that high-pressure suction sweepers pull joint sand from between interlocking pavers at a rate equal to or greater than mechanical rotary sweepers do.
The correct answer completes the logical chain of the passage. The passage identifies the root cause of increased maintenance costs as the dislodgement of joint sand by sweeping equipment. If high-pressure suction sweepers dislodge or extract joint sand at an equal or higher rate than mechanical rotary sweepers, switching to suction sweepers will not resolve the sand loss issue, thus failing to lower maintenance costs.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises and identify the core argument structure
Goal: Reduce road maintenance costs caused by lost joint sand while preserving environmental benefits of permeable pavers. Plan: Replace mechanical rotary sweepers with high-pressure suction vacuum sweepers.
The conclusion begins with 'However, this plan is unlikely to achieve its intended cost-saving goal because...', which requires a premise that explains why the new sweepers will fail to reduce joint sand maintenance costs.
2
Evaluate the mechanism of failure needed to complete the argument
The problem with the old sweepers was that they dislodged joint sand. For the new sweepers to fail at reducing costs, they must also dislodge joint sand to a similar or greater extent.
Completing a passage logically requires closing the gap between the proposed intervention and its stated failure mechanism.
3
Match against the option choices
The option stating that suction sweepers extract joint sand at an equal or greater rate directly demonstrates why switching equipment will not reduce re-sanding maintenance expenses.
This is the only choice that strictly builds upon the explicit premises without introducing unstated external factors.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing the Passage Logically
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 47Soru

Many city planners argue that constructing additional highway lanes is the most effective way to reduce urban traffic congestion. However, recent urban planning studies demonstrate that expanding highway capacity consistently attracts more vehicles onto the road, a phenomenon known as induced demand. Consequently, expanding highway lanes fails to deliver lasting congestion relief. Cities seeking sustainable traffic management should therefore shift their capital investments toward high-capacity public transit infrastructure.

Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Cities aiming for sustainable traffic management ought to direct their capital investments toward high-capacity public transit.

Cevap

Cities aiming for sustainable traffic management ought to direct their capital investments toward high-capacity public transit.
The author's primary goal is to advocate for a specific policy change: shifting traffic management investments toward high-capacity public transit. The final sentence uses the conclusion indicator 'therefore' to signal that this recommendation is the ultimate claim supported by the evidence regarding induced demand and the failure of highway expansion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of each sentence in the passage.
Sentence 1 provides background context/opposing view; Sentence 2 provides empirical evidence (premise); Sentence 3 draws an intermediate conclusion; Sentence 4 presents the author's main recommendation.
Identifying structural roles helps isolate the final claim from supporting evidence and background information.
2
Locate conclusion keywords and pivot markers.
The word 'therefore' in the final sentence signals the author's main logical destination.
Conclusion indicators explicitly mark the primary claim supported by preceding premises.
3
Match the identified main claim with the paraphrased option.
The option advocating a shift in capital investments toward public transit precisely matches the final sentence's recommendation.
The correct option must accurately restate the author's final claim without altering its scope or tone.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims
Soru 48Soru

Agricultural firms operating large commercial orchards recently replaced periodic manual inspections by agronomists with autonomous drone swarms equipped with hyperspectral cameras to detect fungal infections. Although the drone swarms identify fungal outbreaks several days earlier than human agronomists can, farms employing the drones ultimately suffered higher seasonal crop losses from fungal disease. This unexpected result is largely explained by the fact that manual agronomists routinely pruned infected branches immediately upon detection during their walkthroughs, whereas drone detection relies on scheduled follow-up spraying teams, so...

Which of the following most logically completes the passage above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: the delay between drone detection and the arrival of spraying teams allowed fungal spores to spread to adjacent healthy trees before any corrective action took place.

Cevap

The passage is logically completed by explaining that the delay between drone detection and the deployment of spraying teams allowed fungal spores to spread to adjacent healthy trees before any corrective action took place.
The correct option provides the missing causal link that bridges the premise gap: manual inspectors contained the disease instantly via immediate pruning, whereas the delay inherent in scheduling spraying teams after drone detection allowed fungal spores to spread to nearby healthy trees before treatment occurred. This directly explains why earlier detection by drones still resulted in higher overall crop loss.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core paradox presented in the stimulus premises.
Drones detect infection earlier than humans, yet drone-monitored farms suffer higher total crop losses.
Completing the passage requires resolving why earlier detection failed to yield better crop protection.
2
Examine the differentiating factor provided right before the blank.
Human inspectors performed immediate physical removal (pruning) upon detection, whereas drones trigger delayed follow-up treatments (spraying teams).
The sentence ending in 'so...' must connect this operational contrast to the negative outcome.
3
Synthesize the contrast to deduce the logical conclusion.
The lapse of time between automated drone detection and actual treatment allows the disease to spread further than it did under immediate manual pruning.
This provides a complete, self-contained causal explanation without introducing extraneous assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing the Passage Logically
Soru 49Soru

Consider the following passage:

A study of corporate executives found that every executive who completed an advanced management program recorded a minimum 15 percent increase in team productivity over the following year. Additionally, all executives in the study who received a performance bonus had completed the program.

Evaluate the following statement: Based strictly on the passage, the claim 'Completing the advanced management program guarantees that an executive will receive a performance bonus' is a valid logical inference.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. The claim represents an unwarranted speculation based on a conditional reversal, not a valid inference that must be true.
The claim is false because a valid inference in Critical Reasoning must strictly follow from the explicit facts given. The passage states that all bonus recipients completed the program, meaning program completion was a necessary requirement for getting a bonus. However, it does not state that completing the program automatically guarantees receiving a bonus. Inferring a guaranteed bonus reverses the conditional logic, making it an unwarranted speculation rather than a valid inference.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the explicit facts provided in the passage premises.
Premise 1: Program Completion leads to Productivity Increase of 15% or more. Premise 2: Receiving a Performance Bonus requires Program Completion (Bonus implies Program Completion).
A valid inference must strictly follow from the established premises without requiring external assumptions.
2
Analyze the logic of the claim being evaluated.
The claim states that Program Completion guarantees a Performance Bonus (Program Completion implies Bonus).
To determine whether the statement is a valid inference, we must check if the claim is guaranteed by the premises.
3
Compare the claim's conditional direction with the passage premise.
The passage states that completing the program is necessary for a bonus, but does not state that it is sufficient to receive one. Reversing this relationship is a speculative error, not a valid deduction.
An unstated premise or reversed condition cannot be treated as a valid inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing valid inferences (must be true) from unwarranted assumptions and conditional reversals
Soru 50Soru

Complete the passage logically by filling in the blank with the phrase that best concludes the argument.

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

To combat the growing hazard of orbital debris in Low Earth Orbit, space safety regulators have proposed requiring all commercial satellite operators to install heavy, automated de-orbit propulsion modules that force satellites into the atmosphere at the end of their operational life. However, environmental analysts point out that manufacturing and launching these heavy modules significantly increases rocket fuel consumption and atmospheric pollutant emissions during launch. Given that existing lightweight maneuvering thrusters already enable operational satellites to prevent over 98 percent of potential debris collisions during their active lifespan, mandating the inclusion of dedicated de-orbit modules will likely fail to achieve its net environmental risk reduction goal, because .
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

the atmospheric pollution generated during launch exceeds the marginal reduction in orbital risk provided after decommissioning
The correct completion logically synthesizes the two conflicting factors presented in the stimulus: the high environmental penalty of launching heavy de-orbit modules and the minimal marginal benefit gained over existing lightweight thrusters. Since active thrusters already eliminate over 98% of collision risks, the added environmental harm from extra launch emissions outweighs the tiny remaining collision risk mitigated after decommissioning.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises and identify the central tension in the argument.
The regulation aims to lower environmental/orbital risk. However, heavy de-orbit modules cause high environmental costs (launch emissions), while providing only a small marginal benefit because existing thrusters already handle 98% of collision risks.
To complete the passage logically, the conclusion must connect the premises to show why the overall environmental goal is undermined.
2
Synthesize the cost-benefit trade-off into a logical conclusion.
Since the environmental cost (increased emissions) is large and the remaining risk being addressed (under 2%) is small, the net impact of the policy will be negative.
The word 'because' requires an explanation directly supported by the relative magnitude of the environmental costs versus benefits stated in the passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing the Passage Logically
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 51Soru

Consider the following principles established by a marine bioarchaeology research consortium:

1. Every wooden artifact recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit that displays under 5%5\% cellulose degradation is classified as a Type-A Preserved artifact.
2. No artifact classified as Type-A Preserved is ever treated with polymer sealant X, because polymer sealant X is applied exclusively to timber that has sustained structural cell-wall collapse.
3. Any wooden artifact displaying under 5%5\% cellulose degradation that was submerged for over 400400 years has sustained structural cell-wall collapse unless it was deposited in anaerobic silt prior to 15001500 CE.

Statement: Based strictly on the principles above, a wooden artifact submerged for 600600 years that displays under 5%5\% cellulose degradation and has been treated with polymer sealant X was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit in which it was placed prior to 15001500 CE.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is True because the artifact's treatment with polymer sealant X logically guarantees that it was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit.
The statement is logically valid and must be true based on the provided premises. Principle 2 establishes that no Type-A Preserved artifact is treated with polymer sealant X. Consequently, any artifact treated with polymer sealant X cannot be a Type-A Preserved artifact. Principle 1 specifies that a Type-A Preserved artifact is any artifact that both comes from an anaerobic silt deposit and displays under 5% cellulose degradation. Because the artifact in question displays under 5% cellulose degradation yet is not a Type-A Preserved artifact, it must fail the location condition—meaning it was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit. If it was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit, it logically must not have been recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit in which it was placed prior to 1500 CE.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between polymer sealant X and the Type-A Preserved classification.
By Principle 2, no Type-A Preserved artifact is treated with polymer sealant X. Therefore, an artifact treated with polymer sealant X is NOT a Type-A Preserved artifact.
Direct modus tollens application on Principle 2.
2
Evaluate the criteria for Type-A Preserved classification using Principle 1.
Type-A Preserved requires two conditions: (A) Recovery from an anaerobic silt deposit, and (B) Displaying under 5% cellulose degradation. Since the artifact displays under 5% degradation but is NOT Type-A Preserved, it must fail condition A.
If (A and B) implies C, and we have B and NOT C, then NOT A must be true.
3
Synthesize the deduction regarding recovery location and historical timing.
Since the artifact was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit at all, it cannot have been recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit in which it was placed prior to 1500 CE.
Logical set containment: failing the general condition automatically falsifies any specific subset of that condition.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Logic and Contrapositive Chains
Soru 52Soru

A rare manuscript preservation protocol at a archival library dictates that every document crafted prior to the 15th century that has undergone chemical ink stabilization must be stored in a vacuum-sealed chamber. Furthermore, no document stored in a vacuum-sealed chamber is ever exposed to ambient fluorescent lighting. During a recent audit, conservators confirmed that several 14th-century codices in the library's collection have undergone chemical ink stabilization.

Statement: Based strictly on the facts provided, at least one document in the library's collection is not exposed to ambient fluorescent lighting.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement logically must be true based on the transitive combination of the conditional premises.
The statement is logically valid and guaranteed 100% by the premises. Connecting the conditional statements demonstrates that the stabilized 14th-century codices meet all conditions required to be in a vacuum-sealed chamber, which in turn guarantees they are not exposed to ambient fluorescent lighting.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the temporal and conditional scope of Premise 1.
Documents crafted prior to the 15th century AND chemically stabilized \rightarrow Vacuum-sealed chamber.
Establishing the precise criteria for mandatory vacuum-sealed storage.
2
Identify the scope of Premise 2.
Vacuum-sealed chamber \rightarrow NOT exposed to ambient fluorescent lighting.
Connecting vacuum-sealed storage to lighting conditions.
3
Apply existential premises (the factual evidence confirmed by conservators).
14th-century codices are prior to the 15th century, and several have undergone chemical ink stabilization.
Confirming that existing items in the collection satisfy the antecedent of the conditional rule.
4
Synthesize the chain to deduce the necessary conclusion.
Stabilized 14th-century codices \rightarrow Vacuum-sealed chamber \rightarrow NOT exposed to ambient fluorescent lighting. Hence, at least one document in the collection is not exposed to ambient fluorescent lighting.
Combining the existential premise with the transitive conditional chain yields a valid must-be-true statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Transitive Conditional Logic & Categorical Deduction
Soru 53Soru

Read the argument below and match each statement to its logical role within the argument.

Argument: A pharmaceutical company recently introduced a new drug designed to treat migraines. Although early clinical trials indicated high efficacy, several recent independent studies revealed significant side effects in long-term users. Therefore, health authorities ought to suspend approval of this medication until comprehensive safety trials are completed.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Health authorities ought to suspend approval of this medication until comprehensive safety trials are completed.
Several recent independent studies revealed significant side effects in long-term users.
Early clinical trials indicated high efficacy.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement regarding suspending approval matches 'Main Conclusion / Final Claim', the statement regarding side effects matches 'Premise / Supporting Evidence', and the statement regarding early clinical trial efficacy matches 'Concession / Counterargument Context'.
The claim advocating that health authorities suspend drug approval is the ultimate takeaway of the passage, directly supported by evidence of long-term side effects and signaled by 'Therefore'. The statement about side effects provides the necessary empirical reason for this action, and the statement regarding early efficacy is an acknowledged concession.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate structural signal words in the argument
Identified 'Although' introducing a concession, and 'Therefore' introducing the main claim.
Transition words signal logical relationships between premises and conclusions.
2
Identify the author's central recommendation
The final sentence ('Health authorities ought to suspend approval...') is supported by the rest of the text and makes a normative policy recommendation.
The main conclusion is the ultimate claim the author is advocating for.
3
Classify remaining supporting statements
The report of side effects provides evidence for the conclusion, while the initial high efficacy finding represents opposing evidence acknowledged by the author.
Distinguishing evidence from concessions clarifies the argument's support structure.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims
Soru 54Soru

Consider the following passage:

A three-year financial analysis of mid-sized manufacturing firms in Sector K revealed that every firm that fully automated its inventory tracking system achieved a reduction in warehousing overhead costs within twelve months. Furthermore, during those three years, no mid-sized manufacturing firm in Sector K that retained a fully manual inventory system achieved any reduction in warehousing overhead costs. Throughout the period of the analysis, overall energy costs for manufacturing facilities across Sector K decreased substantially.

Statement: Based solely on the information provided in the passage, it must be true that any mid-sized manufacturing firm in Sector K that achieved a reduction in warehousing overhead costs during the three-year period had automated its inventory tracking system at least partially.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The evaluated statement is a mathematically valid deduction derived directly from the passage premises via contraposition. Because the passage asserts that no fully manual firm reduced overhead costs, any firm that did reduce overhead costs logically could not be fully manual. Therefore, such a firm must have implemented at least partial automation. This requires zero unstated assumptions or speculative leaps.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the given premises and establish their formal logical structure.
Premise 1: Fully Automated Inventory System → Reduced Warehousing Overhead Costs.
Premise 2: Fully Manual Inventory System → NO Reduction in Warehousing Overhead Costs.
Premise 3: Energy costs across Sector K decreased substantially.
Deconstructing the passage into clear logical terms isolates facts from speculation.
2
Formulate the contrapositive of Premise 2.
The logical contrapositive of 'Fully Manual → NO Reduction' is 'Reduction → NOT Fully Manual'.
In formal logic, a conditional statement and its contrapositive are logically equivalent.
3
Evaluate the condition 'NOT Fully Manual'.
If an inventory tracking system is NOT fully manual, it must possess at least partial automation.
Binary categorization between fully manual and non-manual implies any non-manual system incorporates at least some degree of automation.
4
Compare the derived deduction with the evaluated statement.
The deduction confirms that any firm achieving a reduction in warehousing overhead costs MUST have automated its system at least partially. Thus, the statement is a valid logical inference ('Must Be True').
Valid inferences follow strictly from premises without requiring additional unstated assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Inferences from Assumptions and Speculations
Soru 55Soru

In an agricultural study of regional grain cooperatives, researchers monitored 200 wheat storage silos over twelve months. Every silo that maintained an internal relative humidity below 50% remained entirely free of Aspergillus mold contamination throughout the observation period. Furthermore, among the silos where Aspergillus mold was detected, none had been treated with specialized organic desiccant powders prior to storage. Which of the following statements must be true based solely on the information provided?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any wheat storage silo monitored in the study that developed Aspergillus mold contamination maintained an internal relative humidity of at least 50% during the study period.

Cevap

Any wheat storage silo monitored in the study that developed Aspergillus mold contamination maintained an internal relative humidity of at least 50% during the study period.
The passage establishes a strict conditional relationship: maintaining humidity below 50% guarantees that a silo remains entirely free of Aspergillus mold. The logical contrapositive of 'If Humidity < 50%, then No Mold' is 'If Mold is present, then Humidity was NOT < 50%' (meaning Humidity ≥ 50%). Therefore, any silo in which mold developed must have had a relative humidity of at least 50%.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the formal conditional structure in the premises.
Premise 1: If Humidity < 50% → No Aspergillus Mold.
Establishing the explicit conditional rule provided in the passage.
2
Formulate the logically valid contrapositive of Premise 1.
Contrapositive: If Aspergillus Mold is present → Humidity ≥ 50%.
The contrapositive of any valid conditional statement must also be strictly true.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that expresses this contrapositive deduction.
The statement asserting that any silo with Aspergillus mold maintained relative humidity of at least 50% matches the contrapositive perfectly.
Valid inference questions require deductions that are logically guaranteed without external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Contrapositive and Out-of-Scope Inference Traps
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 56Soru

Read the passage below and complete the argument logically by providing the missing conclusion in the blank.

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

A major commercial airline recently converted its legacy aircraft fleet to operate entirely on 100% synthetic aviation fuel, which contains zero aromatic hydrocarbons, replacing conventional jet fuel. While synthetic fuel burns cleaner and produces lower particulate emissions, the elastomer gaskets in legacy turbine fuel lines specifically require regular contact with aromatic hydrocarbons to maintain a slight physical swelling that prevents fuel line seepage. Because the airline did not add aromatic compounds to the synthetic fuel supply or replace the existing engine gaskets, aviation maintenance analysts concluded that operating the legacy fleet on unblended synthetic fuel will directly result in .
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

increased fuel leaks due to gasket shrinkage
The passage establishes two key facts: legacy gaskets need aromatic hydrocarbons to swell and prevent fuel leaks, and the new synthetic fuel lacks these aromatic compounds. Because the airline neither added aromatics nor replaced the gaskets, the gaskets will fail to maintain their swell, directly resulting in fuel line leakage due to gasket shrinkage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core premises provided in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Legacy engine elastomer gaskets require exposure to aromatic hydrocarbons to swell and maintain a leak-free seal. Premise 2: Pure synthetic aviation fuel lacks aromatic hydrocarbons. Premise 3: The airline switched to pure synthetic fuel without adding aromatics or replacing legacy gaskets.
Establishing the precise factual foundation is necessary before drawing a valid logical deduction.
2
Synthesize the premises to determine the necessary physical outcome.
Without aromatic hydrocarbons in the fuel, the elastomer gaskets will lose their required swelling, failing to seal fuel line connections properly.
Combining the requirement of the gaskets with the absence of aromatics in the new fuel directly implies seal breakdown.
3
Formulate the logial completion that directly bridges the premise chain to its missing conclusion.
The operation will lead to increased fuel leakage or fuel system seepage resulting from gasket shrinkage.
The conclusion must follow directly from the premises without introducing unsupported assumptions about extraneous engine failures or economic variables.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing a logical passage requires synthesizing facts given in the premises to infer the necessary consequence, avoiding unwarranted assumptions or shifts in scope.
Soru 57Soru

Every commercial flight route operating out of Hub H that utilizes wide-body aircraft is assigned a Tier-1 maintenance protocol. Any route at Hub H assigned a Tier-1 maintenance protocol is subjected to mandatory weekly safety audits unless that route serves exclusively international destinations. Last year, every route at Hub H subjected to mandatory weekly safety audits was operated by FlightCorp, and FlightCorp operated no routes at Hub H that served international destinations.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true about Hub H last year?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any route at Hub H that utilized wide-body aircraft but was not operated by FlightCorp served exclusively international destinations.

Cevap

Any route at Hub H that utilized wide-body aircraft but was not operated by FlightCorp served exclusively international destinations.
The statement regarding wide-body routes not operated by FlightCorp must be true based on the logical structure of the premises: Wide-body aircraft routes automatically receive Tier-1 maintenance. Tier-1 routes require weekly audits unless they are exclusively international. Because all audited routes were operated by FlightCorp, any non-FlightCorp route was not audited. For a Tier-1 route to avoid weekly audits, it must meet the exemption condition of serving exclusively international destinations.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Represent the premises as conditional logic statements.
1. Wide-Body -> Tier-1 Maintenance.
2. Tier-1 Maintenance AND NOT Exclusively International -> Weekly Audits.
3. Weekly Audits -> Operated by FlightCorp.
Establishing clear conditional rules allows logical synthesis.
2
Take the contrapositive of Premise 3.
NOT Operated by FlightCorp -> NOT Weekly Audits.
If a route was not operated by FlightCorp, it could not have been subjected to mandatory weekly safety audits.
3
Combine the premises for a route that uses wide-body aircraft but is not operated by FlightCorp.
The route has Tier-1 Maintenance (from Premise 1) and does NOT undergo Weekly Audits (from contrapositive of Premise 3).
Linking the conditions isolates the exception clause in Premise 2.
4
Apply Premise 2 to the combined state.
Premise 2 states that Tier-1 routes undergo weekly audits UNLESS they serve exclusively international destinations. Since this route has Tier-1 maintenance but does NOT undergo weekly audits, it MUST fall under the exception and serve exclusively international destinations.
The absence of the audit requirement for a Tier-1 route strictly necessitates that the exemption condition (exclusively international) holds true.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Deductions and Contrapositives
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 58Soru

In 2024, 40 percent of Company X's total workforce were software engineers. In 2025, software engineers made up 50 percent of the total workforce. If the total number of employees at Company X decreased by 30 percent between 2024 and 2025, which of the following must be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total number of software engineers employed at Company X was smaller in 2025 than in 2024.

Cevap

The total number of software engineers employed at Company X was smaller in 2025 than in 2024.
The correct answer is logically necessitated by combining the percentage of software engineers with the overall workforce reduction. An increase in proportion from 40 percent to 50 percent applied to a base that dropped by 30 percent results in fewer total software engineers.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Calculate the initial number of software engineers using a hypothetical base workforce
Assuming a total workforce of 100 employees in 2024, 40 percent corresponds to 40 software engineers.
Establishing a base number allows straightforward calculation of relative change.
2
Calculate the updated total workforce and number of software engineers in 2025
A 30 percent reduction reduces the workforce to 70 employees. In 2025, 50 percent of 70 equals 35 software engineers.
Applying the given percentage parameters to the reduced base size yields the new count.
3
Compare the total count of software engineers between the two years
The absolute count of engineers fell from 40 to 35.
Comparing absolute counts verifies which deduction logically must follow.

Anahtar Kavram

Numerical, Proportion, and Statistical Inferences
Soru 59Soru

A bio-pharmaceutical research consortium enforces the following regulatory guidelines for all clinical trials:

1. Every international multi-site trial conducted by the consortium requires central Ethics Board approval prior to the initiation of patient enrollment.
2. Any trial receiving central Ethics Board approval that includes pediatric participants must undergo an independent pediatric safety review.

During a recent compliance audit, investigators noted that Trial X was conducted as an international multi-site trial and enrolled pediatric participants, but never underwent an independent pediatric safety review.

Evaluate the validity of the following statement based on the information above: "Patient enrollment for Trial X was initiated without prior approval from the central Ethics Board."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. It logically follows from the premises that patient enrollment for Trial X began without approval from the central Ethics Board.
The deduction relies on formal contrapositive logic: Premise 2 states that receiving Ethics Board approval AND including pediatric participants guarantees a safety review. Trial X included pediatric participants but lacked the safety review. Therefore, Trial X could not have received Ethics Board approval. Since Trial X did enroll pediatric participants, patient enrollment was initiated without central Ethics Board approval.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the second regulatory guideline into conditional logic.
(Ethics Board Approval AND Pediatric Participants) → Independent Pediatric Safety Review.
This establishes the necessary condition for any trial that has both approval and pediatric participants.
2
Apply the facts of Trial X to the contrapositive of the second guideline.
Since Trial X had pediatric participants but NO Pediatric Safety Review, Trial X did NOT have Ethics Board Approval.
The contrapositive states: NOT(Pediatric Safety Review) → NOT(Ethics Board Approval AND Pediatric Participants). Given Pediatric Participants is true, Ethics Board Approval must be false.
3
Combine the deduction with the fact that patient enrollment occurred.
Trial X enrolled pediatric participants (enrollment initiated) without Ethics Board Approval.
Because enrollment was initiated for Trial X and Ethics Board Approval was proven to be absent, enrollment was initiated without approval.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Deductions and Contrapositive Chains
Soru 60Soru

Passage:
In an international pharmaceutical trial evaluating a new anti-inflammatory drug, every participant was categorized as exhibiting either full remission, moderate symptom reduction, or no measurable improvement. Every participant who achieved full remission had completed a six-week physical therapy regimen prior to the trial. However, less than forty percent of all participants who completed the physical therapy regimen achieved full remission. Additionally, no participant enrolled at the trial's European testing centers achieved full remission.

Statement:
Based solely on the passage above, the statement 'At least one participant enrolled at the trial's European testing centers completed the six-week physical therapy regimen prior to the trial' MUST BE TRUE.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is False because the premise only establishes physical therapy as a necessary condition for full remission, not a sufficient one, making it possible that zero European participants took physical therapy.
The claim is evaluated as False because the premises do not guarantee that any European participant completed the physical therapy regimen. The passage establishes that physical therapy was necessary for full remission (Full RemissionPhysical TherapyFull\ Remission \rightarrow Physical\ Therapy). Knowing that no European participant achieved full remission allows for the possibility that some European participants took physical therapy without achieving full remission, but it equally permits the possibility that zero European participants took physical therapy. Because the statement is not strictly required by the facts, classifying it as a 'must be true' statement is logically invalid.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the formal logic of the conditional premise
Full Remission \rightarrow Physical Therapy. This means completing physical therapy is a necessary condition for full remission, but not a sufficient condition.
Understanding the direction of conditional statements prevents confusing necessary conditions with sufficient outcomes.
2
Apply the evidence regarding European testing center participants
No European participant achieved full remission (¬Full Remission\neg Full\ Remission).
We must evaluate what can be deduced about European participants given their lack of full remission.
3
Test whether physical therapy completion is required for European participants
Denying the antecedent or negating the consequent of a necessary condition does not force the necessary condition to occur. European participants could have done physical therapy and achieved moderate/no improvement, OR they could have omitted physical therapy entirely.
Since the facts allow for zero European participants having taken physical therapy, asserting that at least one MUST have taken it is an unwarranted extrapolation.

Anahtar Kavram

Avoiding 'Could Be True' and Out-of-Scope Inference Traps in Conditional Premises
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 3 / 5Sonraki
Critical Reasoning: Inference and Conclusions Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 3 | Examkin