Tüm alıştırma soruları

Read the following two passages regarding the philosophy of science and the epistemic status of scientific theories.

Passage A
The remarkable predictive success of modern scientific theories cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. Scientific realism posits that our best, most mature scientific theories are at least approximately true descriptions of both the observable and unobservable aspects of the world. When a theory successfully predicts a novel phenomenon—such as the bending of starlight by massive objects or the existence of a new subatomic particle—it is highly improbable that the theory is fundamentally false yet miraculously produces such precise empirical predictions. Therefore, the theoretical entities posited by these theories, from electrons to spacetime curvature, must genuinely exist in the mind-independent world. To deny this is to render the overarching success of the scientific enterprise a completely inexplicable miracle. The realist framework insists that science fundamentally aims for absolute truth, and its progressive accumulation of predictively successful theories is compelling evidence that it is gradually uncovering the actual underlying structure of reality, rather than merely cataloging observable regularities.

Passage B
Constructive empiricism offers a more modest and epistemologically secure account of the scientific enterprise, avoiding the sweeping metaphysical commitments demanded by realism. According to this view, the objective of science is not to uncover the absolute truth about unobservable reality, but rather to develop theories that are "empirically adequate." A theory is empirically adequate if what it says about observable phenomena is true—that is, if it successfully "saves the phenomena." When a theory successfully predicts novel events, this success merely confirms its empirical adequacy, not the underlying literal truth of its postulated unobservable entities. The history of science is littered with predictively successful theories—such as the caloric theory of heat or the luminiferous aether—whose unobservable entities were later universally discarded. Thus, inferring the actual existence of unobservable entities solely from a theory's predictive success is a logically perilous leap unjustified by the available evidence. We can embrace a scientific theory as practically useful, structurally robust, and completely adequate for guiding empirical inquiry without committing to the dogmatic belief that its theoretical constructs map onto hidden, unobservable realities.

Based on the perspectives presented in the passages, match each assertion derived from Passage A (on the left) with the most likely response or evaluation from the author of Passage B (on the right).

Legal theorist: Some jurisprudence scholars advocate the "expectation-only" principle, which asserts that contractual damages should be awarded solely to put the non-breaching party in the financial position they would have occupied had the contract been fulfilled, without regard to foreseeable reliance costs incurred before execution. However, adopting this principle would systematically incentivize parties to conceal early preparatory expenses from one another to avoid uncompensable losses, thereby undermining the transparency necessary for reliable contracting in the first place. Therefore, the expectation-only principle is self-undermining as a general foundation for contract law.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed in the legal theorist's argument?

Read the two passages below regarding historical methodology.

Passage A
In contemporary historiography, the "Great Man" theory—which attributes historical causality primarily to the exceptional character of prominent leaders—has rightly been marginalized in favor of systemic analyses of economic and social forces. However, historians must be wary of overcorrecting. While broad economic conditions undoubtedly create the dry tinder of historical change, specific individuals often act as the spark. To completely write out individual idiosyncrasies and personal agency from historical narratives is to produce an overly deterministic account of the past. A leader's unique temperament can accelerate, delay, or subtly alter the trajectory of a social movement, even if the ultimate outcome was structurally inevitable.

Passage B
The methodological shift toward structuralist history provides a vastly superior framework for understanding historical change than the romanticized biographical focus of the past. By examining demographic trends and modes of production, we can identify the genuine engines of history. Some critics argue that this macro-level approach inappropriately diminishes human agency, pointing to "catalytic" historical figures. Yet this objection fundamentally misunderstands causality. So-called catalytic leaders are themselves entirely products of their socioeconomic environments. Their specific actions are merely the inevitable expression of underlying structural pressures; if one leader had not emerged to fulfill a structural mandate, another would have emerged to achieve the exact same historical outcome. Thus, assigning independent causal weight to a leader's unique temperament is an analytical illusion that distracts from actual historical causation.

Is the following statement true or false based on the texts provided?

The authors of Passage A and Passage B disagree over whether a historical leader's unique temperament can alter the trajectory of a structurally inevitable movement.

Match each of the following arguments with the supplementary finding that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Ecologist: Any temperate wetland that effectively mitigates regional flooding must support a dense population of peat-forming bryophytes. Most coastal wetlands in the northern basin support dense populations of peat-forming bryophytes. Thus, at least some coastal wetlands in the northern basin effectively mitigate regional flooding.

Which of the following arguments exhibits a flawed pattern of reasoning most similar to the flawed pattern of reasoning in the ecologist's argument?

Farah: Deep-sea mining for polymetallic nodules should be prohibited until comprehensive independent ecological surveys are completed. Disturbing the abyssal seabed risks causing irreversible biodiversity loss that far outweighs any commercial or industrial mineral yield.

Gideon: A moratorium on seabed extraction is fundamentally counterproductive. The nickel and cobalt deposits located on the ocean floor are vital for manufacturing the battery storage systems required to avert catastrophic global climate change.

Statement: Farah and Gideon disagree on whether the potential ecological harms of seabed mining are severe enough to outweigh the mineral benefits associated with mitigating global climate change.

Below are four complex arguments from varied fields. Match each argument to the foundational unstated premise that must be true for its conclusion to be properly drawn.

Ecologist: Wild populations of the desert shrub *Larrea* produce volatile terpenes in their root zones. Although researchers once hypothesized that these subterranean terpenes primarily suppress the germination of competing plant species, recent field assays show that natural soil concentrations of the compounds are far too low to inhibit seed germination. However, *Larrea* specimens growing in soils with elevated terpene concentrations exhibit significantly less foliar tissue desiccation during prolonged droughts than do specimens in terpene-deficient soils. Given that terpene molecules are known to chemically bond with and thicken waxy cuticular layers on plant surfaces, the subterranean terpene vapor must rise into the canopy and directly reduce foliar water loss by reinforcing the leaves' cuticular wax.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the ecologist's argument?

An analyst of formal logic categorizes arguments according to their deductive validity or specific fallacious pattern. Match each argument below to the structural representation that accurately characterizes its logical form.

Ecologist: Over the past decade, several metropolitan municipalities replaced standard high-pressure sodium streetlights with broad-spectrum white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Following this transition, researchers documented a 45 percent drop in local nocturnal moth populations. The researchers concluded that the transition to broad-spectrum LEDs caused this decline, reasoning that the higher proportion of blue wavelengths emitted by white LEDs disrupts nocturnal insect navigation.

Statement: The finding that adjacent rural nature reserves retaining high-pressure sodium streetlights experienced stable moth populations over the same ten-year period strengthens the ecologist's argument.

Economist: Proponents of the scarcity-rent model claim that the recent spike in commercial real estate lease rates across the central business district was caused by municipal height restrictions on new commercial towers. However, neighboring suburban business corridors that lack any building height limitations experienced an identical rate of lease increases during the exact same period. Furthermore, both the central district and the suburban corridors experienced an influx of venture capital investment targeting regional logistics firms. Thus, the lease spike is attributable to increased capital investment rather than municipal height restrictions.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning used in the economist's argument?

For centuries, Western astronomers operated under the Aristotelian assumption that celestial bodies must move in perfect circles at uniform speeds, as the circle was considered the only geometrically perfect shape worthy of the heavens. Even Nicolaus Copernicus, whose sixteenth-century heliocentric model correctly placed the Sun near the center of the solar system, retained circular orbits and relied on complex epicycles to account for observed discrepancies. It was not until the early seventeenth century that Johannes Kepler fundamentally broke with this classical doctrine. Utilizing the unprecedentedly precise observational records of Tycho Brahe regarding the orbit of Mars, Kepler discovered that no combination of circular paths could reconcile the mathematical models with observed reality. Rather than dismissing the small discrepancy as observational error, Kepler discarded the long-standing philosophical dogma of circular motion in favor of empirical fidelity, ultimately establishing that planets travel in elliptical orbits with the Sun at one focus. In doing so, Kepler shifted the foundational paradigm of astronomy from speculative geometric idealism to rigorous, data-driven physical law.

Which of the following most accurately expresses the main idea of the passage?

Passage A
Intellectual property (IP) regimes, contrary to the lofty rhetoric often employed by industry advocates, are fundamentally pragmatic instruments of economic policy rather than expressions of fundamental justice. The traditional rationale for copyright and patent laws rests on a well-documented market failure: information is non-rivalrous and non-excludable. Once a new medication or a digital artwork is released into the world, it can be freely utilized and replicated by others without depleting the original resource. This dynamic makes it exceedingly difficult for original creators to recoup their initial investment in research, time, and capital. To solve this public goods problem, the state artificially intervenes by granting a temporary, limited monopoly to the creator. However, it is crucial to recognize that this grant is a statutory privilege engineered for societal benefit, not an intrinsic moral entitlement. Because all monopolies impose deadweight losses on society by artificially restricting consumer access and raising prices, the scope, strength, and duration of IP protections must be strictly and mathematically calibrated. Any extension of IP rights beyond what is absolutely necessary to incentivize the optimal level of creative output represents an unjustifiable tax on the public domain, ultimately stifling the cumulative, sequential nature of innovation itself by withholding the raw materials future creators need.

Passage B
The prevailing economic analysis of intellectual property, which dominates contemporary legal discourse, frequently overlooks the profound moral foundation underlying a creator's claim to their work. According to the natural rights tradition, rooted primarily in Lockean property theory, individuals possess absolute ownership over their own minds and bodies and, by extension, the labor produced by them. When a creator exerts intensive intellectual labor to synthesize abstract ideas from the intellectual commons into a tangible, original expression, they acquire a natural right to the exclusive control and fruits of that labor. This entitlement does not depend on a utilitarian calculus of societal benefit, nor is it a mere statutory artifact granted conditionally by the state. Rather, the legal recognition of intellectual property is merely the formal codification of a pre-existing, transcendent moral reality. Just as it is inherently unjust to appropriate a farmer’s physical crop without fair compensation, it is intrinsically wrongful to reproduce an author's manuscript or appropriate an inventor's mechanical design without their explicit authorization. Consequently, robust copyright and patent laws are not merely policy levers to be adjusted to stimulate economic output; they are essential mechanisms for securing justice and protecting the fundamental autonomy of the creator.

Statement: The author of Passage A would likely agree with the assertion in Passage B that the legal prohibition against unauthorized copying is justified primarily because such copying constitutes an intrinsic violation of a creator's natural rights.

Analyze the following four discrete textual fragments, which are drawn from different academic disciplines. Match each excerpt to the abstract proposition that most accurately synthesizes its underlying, unstated thesis. (Note: Two propositions are incorrect distractors.)

Kendra: Proprietary probabilistic genotyping software used to analyze complex crime-scene DNA mixtures must be fully disclosed, including its underlying source code, to defense counsel in criminal trials. Due process requires that an accused individual have the means to inspect and challenge the algorithmic validity of software whose outputs serve as foundational prosecution evidence. Without source code access, meaningful cross-examination of the software's reliability is impossible.

Liam: Requiring commercial developers to surrender proprietary source code undermines trade secret protections and disincentivizes developers from investing in high-precision forensic tools. Defendants' rights to challenge evidence are adequately preserved if developers provide comprehensive validation study reports and make executable binaries available for independent defense testing. Complete code disclosure creates intellectual property theft risks without providing necessary testing benefits that cannot already be achieved through empirical validation tests.

Match each proposition regarding forensic software in criminal trials with the statement that accurately characterizes the commitments of both speakers.

Read the following two passages regarding the historical transition from the harpsichord to the piano in Western music.

Passage A
The transition to the piano in the late eighteenth century was fundamentally an aesthetic revolution. Composers demanded greater expressive capability—specifically, dynamic variation—to convey the emotional depth characteristic of the emerging Romantic style. The harpsichord, with its plucked strings and uniform volume, was simply incapable of meeting this artistic mandate. Thus, the piano's hammer mechanism was embraced primarily as a tool for realizing new aesthetic ideals.

Passage B
It is romantic but inaccurate to view the piano's triumph as a purely aesthetic victory driven by composers' demands. The shift was primarily socioeconomic. As musical performance moved from intimate aristocratic courts to large public concert halls, musicians required an instrument with greater sheer volume to project sound over long distances. Furthermore, the burgeoning bourgeois market demanded robust instruments requiring less frequent maintenance than the delicate harpsichord. The piano's dynamic capabilities were a welcomed byproduct, but its widespread adoption was dictated by the practicalities of a changing musical economy.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a point of disagreement between the authors of the two passages?

Consider the following argument:

Paleontologist: Many researchers assume that the evolution of feathers in theropod dinosaurs was primarily driven by thermal insulation. However, this assumption is problematic. Early proto-feathers lacked the branched structure necessary to trap air efficiently for heat retention. Furthermore, fossil evidence demonstrates that these early plumage structures were richly pigmented with distinct melanin patterns across their dorsal surfaces. Therefore, visual display and species recognition, rather than thermoregulation, were almost certainly the initial evolutionary drivers of plumage.

Match each excerpted claim from the passage with the precise argumentative role it plays in the paleontologist's reasoning.

The following passages were adapted from articles discussing the history of geological science.

Passage A
In the early twentieth century, the notion that Earth’s continents were fixed and immovable was a foundational tenet of geology, deeply embedded in the scientific consensus of the era. Thus, when meteorologist Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift in 1912, he was met with fierce, nearly universal resistance. To support his radical claim, Wegener marshaled an impressive array of empirical evidence: identical fossil distributions of the prehistoric reptile *Mesosaurus* found exclusively along the distinct coastlines of South America and Africa, as well as matching geological formations and glacial striations separated by the vast Atlantic Ocean. However, despite the elegance of his observational data, his hypothesis suffered from what was considered a fatal physical flaw. Wegener suggested that centrifugal force derived from Earth’s rotation caused the continents to literally plow through the rigid oceanic crust. Physicists and geologists quickly demonstrated mathematically that these rotational forces were vastly insufficient to move continents, leading the broader scientific community to dismiss his theory entirely. The prevailing consensus stubbornly remained that speculative sunken land bridges, rather than drifting landmasses, accounted for the peculiar transoceanic fossil similarities. For decades, continental drift was marginalized, treated by academia as a cautionary tale of unbridled speculation outpacing physical constraints. Prominent critics argued that allowing such a mechanically unsound theory to gain traction would undermine the rigorous, quantitative standards that geology was striving to establish as a modern science. Consequently, Wegener's meticulous cataloging of biological and geological correlations was largely ignored in favor of physically plausible, albeit ad hoc, explanations.

Passage B
The dramatic transition from the widespread rejection of continental drift to the universal acceptance of plate tectonics elegantly illustrates how new technological capabilities can override entrenched theoretical dogma. While early proponents of moving landmasses relied heavily on paleontological and climatological anomalies to build their case, it was ultimately the advent of advanced sonar mapping and sophisticated radiometric dating post-World War II that catalyzed a true scientific paradigm shift. By the 1960s, oceanographers discovering magnetic striping on the ocean floor provided the definitive physical mechanism that earlier theorists had conspicuously lacked: seafloor spreading driven by immense thermal convection currents within the Earth's mantle. Interestingly, while the original proponents of drift were routinely ridiculed by their contemporaries for lacking a viable physical mechanism to explain continental motion, their core observational data regarding matching fossil records across disparate oceans was remarkably accurate and forward-thinking. Today, modern plate tectonic theory not only vindicates the fundamental, once-heretical assertion that continents move, but it also provides a robust, comprehensive geophysical framework. By modeling rigid lithospheric plates gliding over a ductile asthenosphere, contemporary geology seamlessly integrates the historical biological evidence with continuously measurable tectonic forces, transforming an isolated hypothesis into a unifying scientific principle. Furthermore, modern satellite measurements can now track tectonic plate movements down to the millimeter per year, offering real-time confirmation of what early theorists could only deduce from ancient rocks. The vindication of continental movement serves as a powerful reminder that observational data should not be hastily discarded merely because the theoretical apparatus of the time cannot yet accommodate it.

Based on the passages, classify each of the following factual details according to whether it is explicitly affirmed in Passage A only, Passage B only, both passages, or neither passage.

An astrobiologist constructs a formal deductive argument to establish the habitability potential of a planetary body. Complete the argument by identifying the missing premise that logically and deductively guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Economist: To encourage retirement savings, several mid-sized firms replaced their opt-in retirement plans with an automatic enrollment system featuring a default employee contribution rate of 3 percent of gross salary. Five years after implementation, overall employee participation rose from 42 percent to 88 percent. Nonetheless, financial analysts argue that this policy change reduced the overall median retirement wealth accumulated by participating employees by retirement age. They reason that under the opt-in system, the self-selected participants chose an average contribution rate of 7 percent, whereas the vast majority of employees enrolled under the automatic system never actively adjusted their contribution rate above the 3 percent default.

Statement: The finding that workers enrolled under the automatic system are significantly less likely to open or contribute to supplementary individual retirement accounts than were workers under the opt-in system provides logical support for the financial analysts' conclusion.