Indian Polity and Governance

316 soru

Soru 141Soru

Which of the following statements regarding the legal status, amendability, and historical adoption of the Preamble to the Constitution of India are correct?

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Supreme Court of India ruled in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution, departing from its earlier view in the Berubari Union case (1960).; The Preamble can be amended under Article 368 of the Constitution, provided that such an amendment does not alter or destroy its basic structural features.

Cevap

The correct statements are that the Supreme Court affirmed the Preamble as an integral part of the Constitution in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), and that the Preamble can be amended under Article 368 without altering its basic structure.
The correct statements accurately reflect Indian constitutional jurisprudence: the Supreme Court established in Kesavananda Bharati (1973) that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution (overruling the 1960 Berubari opinion), and that while it can be amended under Article 368, such amendments cannot alter its basic structure.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate the statement regarding judicial precedent on the legal status of the Preamble.
In the Berubari Union case (1960), the Supreme Court viewed the Preamble as a key to the minds of the framers but not a part of the Constitution. In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), this was overruled, declaring the Preamble an integral part of the Constitution. This statement is correct.
Tracking judicial evolution is necessary to determine the legal standing of the Preamble.
2
Assess the justiciability and enforceability of the Preamble.
The Preamble is neither a source of power to the legislature nor a prohibition upon the powers of the legislature. It is non-justiciable, meaning its provisions are not enforceable in courts of law. This statement is incorrect.
Constitutional law explicitly distinguishes between justiciable rights and non-justiciable constitutional declarations.
3
Examine the amendability of the Preamble under Article 368.
The Supreme Court held that the Preamble can be amended under Article 368, subject to the condition that the 'basic structure' reflected in the Preamble (such as sovereign, democratic, republic nature) is not destroyed. This statement is correct.
Article 368 power is bounded by the Basic Structure doctrine established in 1973.
4
Verify the historical sequence of the adoption of the Preamble by the Constituent Assembly.
Although founded on the Objectives Resolution introduced in December 1946, the Preamble itself was passed by the Constituent Assembly after the rest of the Constitution was finalized to ensure harmony. This statement is incorrect.
Chronological order in the Constituent Assembly proceedings is vital for historical accuracy.

Anahtar Kavram

Legal status, justiciability, amendability, and historical adoption of the Preamble to the Indian Constitution.
Soru 142Soru

With reference to the legislative procedure in a bicameral Indian state, for what maximum duration can the Legislative Council delay an Ordinary Bill passed by the Legislative Assembly when the bill is presented to it for the first time?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 3 months

Cevap

The maximum period for which the Legislative Council can delay an Ordinary Bill on its first presentation is 3 months.
According to Article 197 of the Constitution of India, the Legislative Assembly holds overarching authority over Ordinary Bills. When an Ordinary Bill passed by the Legislative Assembly is sent to the Legislative Council for the first time, the Council has four choices: pass it, reject it, suggest amendments, or take no action. In cases of rejection, amendment conflict, or inaction, the Council can delay the bill for a maximum period of 3 months. If the Assembly passes the bill again and sends it to the Council a second time, the Council can only delay it for 1 additional month, making the maximum total delay 4 months.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision for state legislative procedure regarding ordinary bills.
Article 197 of the Constitution of India specifies the restriction on powers of the Legislative Council as to bills other than Money Bills.
Different rules apply to Money Bills (Article 198) and Ordinary Bills (Article 197).
2
Examine the timeline limits imposed on the Legislative Council for the first instance of bill transmission.
When an Ordinary Bill is passed by the Legislative Assembly and transmitted to the Legislative Council, the Council can keep the bill for up to 3 months without passing it.
Article 197(1) mandates that if 3 months elapse from the date on which the bill is laid before the Council without being passed, the Assembly may pass it a second time.
3
Distinguish between the first instance delay and the total cumulative delay possible.
The initial delay limit is 3 months. If re-passed by the Assembly, the Council can delay it for 1 additional month (total 4 months maximum cumulative delay).
The question specifically asks about the first time the bill is presented to the Council.

Anahtar Kavram

Powers of State Legislative Council regarding Ordinary Bills under Article 197
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 143Soru

Match the statutory acts and bodies related to governance in List-I with their respective specific administrative provisions or structural amendments in List-II:

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003
Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019
Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019
Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 pairs with the whistle-blower disclosure agency designation; the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019 pairs with reducing the NHRC members' tenure to 3 years with re-appointment eligibility; the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019 pairs with removing fixed 5-year terms in favor of terms prescribed by the Central Government; and the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 pairs with the specific five-member Selection Committee composition.
Each legislation is correctly matched with its specific legal and administrative amendment: CVC Act (2003) empowered the CVC under PIDPI whistle-blower protection; PHRA (2019) reduced NHRC tenure from 5 to 3 years; RTI Amendment Act (2019) allowed executive regulation of commissioner tenure; and the Lokpal Act (2013) established the statutory 5-member appointment panel.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003
Identified statutory role under PIDPI resolution
The CVC Act, 2003 established CVC as a statutory body oversight mechanism for corruption investigations and whistle-blower complaint handling.
2
Analyze Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019
Identified tenure reduction from 5 to 3 years for NHRC members
The 2019 amendment specifically lowered the tenure limit to 3 years while allowing re-appointment.
3
Analyze Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019
Identified federal rulemaking authority over tenure and salaries of Information Commissioners
The 2019 RTI amendment removed fixed statutory tenure (5 years) and tied salaries to central government rules instead of Election Commission parity.
4
Analyze Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
Identified statutory appointment committee structure
Section 4 lays down the multi-member panel including the PM, Speaker, Leader of Opposition, CJI/nominee, and eminent jurist.

Anahtar Kavram

Statutory Bodies, Tenure Rules, Selection Committees, and Public Governance Amendments
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 144Soru

Consider the following statements regarding the nature and enforceability of Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) under the Constitution of India:

1. Fundamental Rights primarily operate as negative obligations restricting State action, whereas Directive Principles serve as positive obligations directing State action toward welfare goals.
2. Any law enacted by Parliament to implement any Directive Principle automatically overrides all Fundamental Rights contained in Part III.
3. A law cannot be declared unconstitutional by courts solely on the ground that it violates or fails to implement a Directive Principle of State Policy.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 1 and 3 only

Cevap

Statements 1 and 3 are correct, while Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 1 accurately reflects the functional distinction: Fundamental Rights limit State authority to protect individual freedoms (negative obligations), whereas Directive Principles instruct the State to act positively toward socio-economic welfare. Statement 3 correctly identifies that because Directive Principles are non-justiciable (Article 37), courts cannot invalidate legislation solely for contravening Part IV provisions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement 1 on the constitutional nature of Part III and Part IV provisions.
Statement 1 is correct.
Fundamental Rights mostly act as negative injunctions against arbitrary State actions (e.g., Article 14, 15, 21), whereas Directive Principles (Part IV) lay down affirmative, positive guidelines for creating a social and economic democracy.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the hierarchy and overriding capacity of DPSPs over Part III rights.
Statement 2 is incorrect.
Laws implementing DPSPs do not enjoy blanket immunity or automatic precedence over all Fundamental Rights. Under Article 31C, only laws giving effect to Article 39(b) and 39(c) are protected against Articles 14 and 19, provided they do not destroy the basic structure of the Constitution.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding judicial review and enforceability of non-justiciable principles.
Statement 3 is correct.
According to Article 37, Directive Principles are non-justiciable and non-enforceable by any court. Thus, courts cannot invalidate an Act of Parliament purely because it fails to fulfill a DPSP.

Anahtar Kavram

Harmony and Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy
Soru 145Soru

The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 laid down both compulsory (mandatory) provisions that all state governments must incorporate into their local laws, and voluntary provisions left to the discretion of state legislatures. Which of the following are compulsory provisions under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act? Select all correct provisions.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Indirect election to the post of Chairperson of Panchayats at the intermediate and district levels; Constitution of a State Finance Commission every five years to review the financial position of Panchayats

Cevap

The compulsory provisions under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act are the indirect election of the chairperson at intermediate and district Panchayat levels, and the establishment of a State Finance Commission every five years.
The compulsory provisions under the 73rd Amendment Act include: (1) Indirect election of Panchayat chairpersons at intermediate and district levels (Article 243C), and (2) Periodic constitution of a State Finance Commission every 5 years (Article 243I). Both are mandatory constitutional obligations for state governments.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Categorize each option into compulsory versus voluntary provisions of Part IX of the Indian Constitution.
Identify constitutional mandates under Articles 243C, 243D, 243G, and 243I.
The 73rd Amendment created a dual framework where certain structural/electoral rules are binding while functional devolution and OBC reservations remain state options.
2
Evaluate the provision regarding indirect election of chairpersons at intermediate and district levels.
Confirmed as a compulsory provision under Article 243C(5)(b).
While village-level chairperson election method is left to states, intermediate and district chairperson elections are strictly indirect by constitutional mandate.
3
Evaluate the provision regarding State Finance Commission constitution.
Confirmed as a compulsory provision under Article 243I.
The 5-year periodic constitution of the State Finance Commission by the Governor is a non-negotiable constitutional requirement.
4
Evaluate the remaining options regarding OBC reservations and Eleventh Schedule devolution.
Both are identified as voluntary provisions under Articles 243D(6) and 243G respectively.
State legislatures hold discretionary authority over whether and how much power or specific reservations for backward classes to grant.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinction between Compulsory and Voluntary Provisions of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992
Soru 146Soru

Under Article 312 of the Constitution of India, which body holds the exclusive power to pass a resolution enabling the Parliament to create one or more All-India Services common to both the Union and the States?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Rajya Sabha

Cevap

Rajya Sabha is the correct answer because Article 312 of the Constitution uniquely empowers the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) to initiate a resolution for creating new All-India Services.
The Rajya Sabha represents the States in the federal structure. Under Article 312, if the Rajya Sabha declares by resolution supported by not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting that it is necessary or expedient in the national interest, Parliament may by law provide for the creation of one or more All-India Services.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision regarding All-India Services
Article 312 deals with the creation of All-India Services.
The Constitution specifies distinct federal provisions for services common to the Union and States.
2
Determine which house of Parliament holds the exclusive initiating power
Rajya Sabha represents the interests of the States and is granted the special power to pass a resolution by a two-thirds majority authorizing Parliament to legislate on All-India Services.
Creating an All-India Service impacts State administration, making the consent of the State-representing house mandatory.

Anahtar Kavram

Exclusive Federal Powers of Rajya Sabha under Article 312
Soru 147Soru

With reference to the lawmaking procedure for financial bills in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements:

1. A Financial Bill (Category I) under Article 117(1) can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and requires the prior recommendation of the President.
2. A Financial Bill (Category II) under Article 117(3) can be introduced in either House of Parliament without the prior recommendation of the President for its introduction.
3. Unlike a Financial Bill (Category I), a Financial Bill (Category II) cannot be rejected or amended by the Rajya Sabha once passed by the Lok Sabha.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 1 and 2 only

Cevap

Statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect.
The correct combination includes the first and second statements only. Under Article 117(1), Category I Financial Bills share two characteristics with Money Bills: they must originate in the Lok Sabha and require the recommendation of the President. Under Article 117(3), Category II Financial Bills can originate in either House without prior presidential recommendation at introduction. Category II bills are ordinary in all legislative aspects, meaning the Rajya Sabha holds full powers of amendment and rejection.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding Financial Bill (Category I) under Article 117(1)
Statement 1 is correct. Article 117(1) specifies that a Financial Bill (I), which contains matters listed in Article 110 along with general legislative provisions, can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and requires the prior recommendation of the President.
Establishing the constitutional prerequisites for introducing a Category I financial bill.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding Financial Bill (Category II) under Article 117(3)
Statement 2 is correct. A Financial Bill (II) contains provisions involving expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India but no Article 110 matters. It can originate in either House and does not require the President's prior recommendation for introduction (though recommendation is needed before consideration/passing).
Evaluating the introduction procedure for Category II financial bills.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding Rajya Sabha's powers over Financial Bill (Category II)
Statement 3 is incorrect. A Financial Bill (Category II) is governed by the ordinary bill procedure in all respects. The Rajya Sabha possesses equal powers to amend or reject it, and deadlocks can be resolved via a joint sitting under Article 108.
Distinguishing the powers of the Rajya Sabha over money bills versus ordinary/financial bills.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinction between Money Bills, Financial Bills (Category I under Article 117(1)), and Financial Bills (Category II under Article 117(3))
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 148Soru

Under the Constitution of India, when the Vice-President acts as President or discharges the functions of the President during a casual vacancy in the office of the President, which of the following constitutional provisions correctly applies to the Vice-President during this period?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Vice-President ceases to perform the duties of the Chairman of the Council of States and is entitled to the emoluments, privileges, and powers of the President of India.

Cevap

The Vice-President ceases to perform the duties of the Chairman of the Council of States and is entitled to the emoluments, privileges, and powers of the President of India.
Under Article 64 and Article 65(3) of the Constitution of India, whenever the Vice-President acts as President or discharges the functions of the President, they cease to perform the duties of the ex-officio Chairman of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha). During this period, the Vice-President is entitled to all powers, immunities, privileges, and emoluments associated with the office of the President of India.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the constitutional provisions of Article 64 and Article 65 regarding the Vice-President acting as President.
Article 65(1) states that during a casual vacancy due to death, resignation, or removal of the President, the Vice-President acts as President until a new President takes office.
To determine the structural shift in the Vice-President's role.
2
Examine the status of the Vice-President's ex-officio role as Chairman of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha).
Article 64 (proviso) specifies that during any period when the Vice-President acts as President, the Vice-President shall not perform the duties of the office of Chairman of the Council of States.
To verify whether legislative duties continue during executive discharge.
3
Evaluate the financial entitlements, immunities, and powers of the Vice-President during this interim period under Article 65(3).
The Vice-President has all powers and immunities of the President and is entitled to emoluments, allowances, and privileges specified in the Second Schedule or determined by Parliament.
To confirm complete assumption of presidential authority and remuneration.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional provisions governing the Vice-President acting as President under Articles 64 and 65
Soru 149Soru

Match each Constitutional Body in List-I with its corresponding Article of the Constitution of India in List-II:

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Election Commission of India
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Union Public Service Commission
Finance Commission of India

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches are: Election Commission of India matches with Article 324; Comptroller and Auditor General of India matches with Article 148; Union Public Service Commission matches with Article 315; and Finance Commission of India matches with Article 280.
Each constitutional body in India is established by a specific article of the Constitution. The Election Commission is anchored in Article 324, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in Article 148, the Union Public Service Commission in Article 315, and the Finance Commission in Article 280.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the constitutional article for the Election Commission of India
Part XV, Article 324 governs the Election Commission of India.
Article 324 establishes the body responsible for conducting free and fair elections.
2
Identify the constitutional article for the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)
Part V, Article 148 governs the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
Article 148 creates the CAG as the guardian of the public purse.
3
Identify the constitutional article for the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
Part XIV, Article 315 governs the Union and State Public Service Commissions.
Article 315 mandates the establishment of Public Service Commissions for recruitment to civil services.
4
Identify the constitutional article for the Finance Commission of India
Part XII, Article 280 governs the Finance Commission.
Article 280 provides for a quasi-judicial body to recommend tax distribution between the Union and States.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional Articles Governing Key Bodies in India
Soru 150Soru

Under the Constitution of India, which article explicitly grants every High Court the power of superintendence over all subordinate courts and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Article 227

Cevap

Article 227 grants every High Court the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction.
Article 227 of the Constitution of India explicitly provides that every High Court shall have superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction. This encompasses both administrative supervision and judicial oversight.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the targeted judicial power in the stem
The requirement is to identify the constitutional provision for a High Court's superintendence over subordinate courts and tribunals.
The Indian Constitution specifies separate articles for writ powers, appellate provisions, and supervisory administrative control.
2
Evaluate the constitutional articles
Article 227 specifically deals with the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals by the High Court.
This power extends both judicially and administratively over bodies operating within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court.

Anahtar Kavram

High Court Supervisory Jurisdiction under Article 227
Soru 151Soru

Match the given Constitutional Articles concerning the Supreme Court of India with their corresponding structural mandates:

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Article 137
Article 141
Article 142
Article 144

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Article 137 matches with the power of review; Article 141 matches with binding precedent across all courts; Article 142 matches with the mandate to pass decrees for doing complete justice; and Article 144 matches with the constitutional directive that civil and judicial authorities act in aid of the Supreme Court.
The pairing accurately reflects the specific constitutional mandates: Article 137 grants review powers over Supreme Court judgments; Article 141 codifies the binding nature of Supreme Court law across all Indian courts; Article 142 supplies plenary power to achieve complete justice; and Article 144 obligates all civil and judicial authorities to support and enforce Supreme Court rulings.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Article 137
Identified as the constitutional provision authorizing the Supreme Court to review its own judgments and orders.
This establishes a specific exception to the general doctrine of finality of judicial decisions.
2
Analyze Article 141
Identified as the provision declaring Supreme Court decisions as binding precedent on all courts in India.
This serves as the core foundation of judicial consistency and judicial federalism in India.
3
Analyze Article 142
Identified as conferring inherent powers to do 'complete justice'.
This article provides plenary equitable jurisdiction that can transcend technical statutory limitations when fundamental rights or constitutional values are at stake.
4
Analyze Article 144
Identified as the mandatory instruction to civil and judicial authorities to act in aid of the court.
This ensures executive and judicial machinery across all state and central departments enforce Supreme Court judgments.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional Powers and Jurisdictional Mandates of the Supreme Court of India
Soru 152Soru

Consider the following statements regarding statutory accountability bodies and governance frameworks in India:

1. The Selection Committee for the appointment of the Lokpal includes the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha as an ex-officio member alongside the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
2. Under the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, the term of office and conditions of service of the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners are prescribed by the Central Government rather than being fixed by statute at 5 years.
3. The Central Vigilance Commissioner holds office for a term of 4 years from the date of entering office or until attaining the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 2 and 3 only

Cevap

Statements 2 and 3 are correct.
The option selecting 2 and 3 only is correct because the RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019 replaced the fixed five-year tenure with terms prescribed by the Central Government, and the CVC Act, 2003 explicitly lays down a tenure of 4 years or up to 65 years of age. Statement 1 is incorrect because the Lokpal Selection Committee includes the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding the composition of the Lokpal Selection Committee under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
Statement 1 is incorrect. According to Section 4(1) of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, the Selection Committee consists of the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, the Chief Justice of India (or a Supreme Court judge nominated by CJI), and an eminent jurist. It does NOT include the Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha.
Verify statutory membership provisions of the Lokpal appointment committee.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019.
Statement 2 is correct. The 2019 amendment modified Sections 13 and 16 of the RTI Act, 2005, removing the statutory 5-year fixed tenure and linking the term of office, salaries, and allowances of Information Commissioners to rules notified by the Central Government.
Confirm legislative changes introduced by statutory amendments to the RTI framework.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding the tenure of the Central Vigilance Commissioner under the CVC Act, 2003.
Statement 3 is correct. Under Section 4 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, the Central Vigilance Commissioner holds office for a term of 4 years or until reaching 65 years of age, whichever occurs first.
Verify tenure specifications for the Central Vigilance Commission.

Anahtar Kavram

Statutory provisions, appointment committee compositions, and tenure rules governing Indian public policy and anti-corruption bodies (Lokpal, CVC, and CIC).
Soru 153Soru

Match the Constitutional Provisions listed under List-I with their corresponding descriptions or scope listed under List-II:

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Article 39A
Article 43B
Article 51A(h)
Article 31C

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings are: Article 39A matches with Equal justice and free legal aid to the poor; Article 43B matches with Promotion of voluntary formation and autonomous functioning of co-operative societies; Article 51A(h) matches with Duty to develop the scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform; and Article 31C matches with Saving of laws giving effect to certain directive principles.
Article 39A relates to equal justice and free legal aid; Article 43B directs the promotion of co-operative societies; Article 51A(h) outlines the duty regarding scientific temper and humanism; and Article 31C shields laws implementing certain Directive Principles.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the provision under Article 39A.
Article 39A mandates equal justice and free legal aid to underprivileged citizens.
It was incorporated into Part IV (DPSP) via the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976.
2
Identify the provision under Article 43B.
Article 43B promotes the voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, and professional management of co-operative societies.
It was introduced into Part IV (DPSP) by the 97th Amendment Act of 2011.
3
Examine the scope of Article 51A(h).
Article 51A(h) explicitly defines the duty of citizens to foster scientific temper, humanism, and inquiry.
Part IVA enumerates Fundamental Duties added upon the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee.
4
Determine the constitutional function of Article 31C.
Article 31C saves legislation giving effect to socialistic directive principles in Article 39(b) and (c) from being invalidated by Articles 14 and 19.
It creates an exception to Fundamental Rights to uphold key Directive Principles.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional provisions and amendment history of Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, and Fundamental Duties
Soru 154Soru

Match List-I (Articles governing Centre-State Relations and Emergency Mechanisms) with List-II (Constitutional Scope and Operational Provisions):

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Article 250
Article 252
Article 253
Article 365

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches pair Article 250 with parliamentary legislation during National Emergency, Article 252 with legislative authorization by consent of two or more States, Article 253 with parliamentary legislation implementing international treaties, and Article 365 with the constitutional presumption of breakdown of state machinery due to non-compliance with Union directions.
Article 250 activates parliamentary power over State List subjects during National Emergency; Article 252 requires consent resolutions from two or more state legislatures; Article 253 allows international treaty implementation across State List subjects without state consent; and Article 365 defines failure of constitutional machinery when a state ignores Union executive directions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the operational scope of Article 250
Article 250 automatically expands Parliament's legislative jurisdiction to cover the State List whenever a Proclamation of National Emergency (under Article 352) is active.
During National Emergency, the federal system adopts a unitary operational bias, superseding ordinary state legislative exclusivity.
2
Analyze the procedure established under Article 252
Article 252 allows two or more State Assemblies to pass resolutions requesting Parliament to enact laws on a State List subject, applying exclusively to consenting States and any other State adopting it subsequently.
It represents a cooperative federal mechanism of voluntary jurisdiction surrender by States.
3
Analyze treaty-enforcement powers under Article 253
Article 253 confers exclusive power on Parliament to legislate for implementing international treaties, agreements, or decisions of international conferences, even if the legislation impinges upon State List topics.
Foreign affairs and treaty implementation require unitary legislative authority across the national territory.
4
Analyze sanction mechanisms under Article 365
Article 365 provides that if a State fails to satisfy or follow lawful directions issued by the Union executive (such as under Articles 256 or 257), it shall be lawful for the President to deem that state government cannot be conducted under constitutional provisions, enabling President's Rule under Article 356.
It connects administrative non-cooperation directly to constitutional breakdown.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional provisions governing Centre-State legislative jurisdiction and emergency sanctions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 155Soru

With reference to the constitutional safeguards and operational framework of the State Public Service Commission (SPSC) and Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), which of the following statements are correct?

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Although the Chairman and members of a State Public Service Commission are appointed by the Governor of the state, they can be removed from office only by the President of India.; The conditions of service of a member of UPSC or SPSC cannot be varied to their disadvantage after their appointment.

Cevap

The correct statements are that the Chairman and members of an SPSC are appointed by the Governor but removed only by the President, and that their conditions of service cannot be varied to their disadvantage after appointment.
The Constitution assigns appointment of SPSC members to the Governor, but reserves removal strictly to the President of India under Article 317 to shield members from local political influence. Additionally, service conditions are protected from adverse changes during the tenure to ensure impartiality.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate the appointment and removal provisions of SPSC members (Article 317).
The Governor makes the appointment, but removal authority rests solely with the President following a Supreme Court reference.
This dual-authority design provides constitutional protection against state political interference.
2
Examine service condition protection under constitutional provisions.
Service conditions determined at the time of appointment cannot be altered to the officer's disadvantage during tenure.
This guarantees independence in official functioning.
3
Assess post-retirement eligibility rules under Article 319.
The SPSC Chairman can transition to UPSC (as Chairman or member) or another SPSC as Chairman.
Claims restricting transition to UPSC misinterpret the constitutional post-retirement bar.
4
Check the financial charging status of SPSC expenses under Article 322.
Expenses are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of the State.
Charged expenses are not subject to annual voting in the state assembly to prevent executive financial control.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional Independence Safeguards of Public Service Commissions (Articles 315 to 323)
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 156Soru

Under the Indian Councils Act of 1892, which of the following legislative and financial powers was granted to the non-official members of the Legislative Councils for the first time?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The power to discuss the annual financial statement (budget) and address questions to the executive

Cevap

The Indian Councils Act of 1892 granted non-official members the power to discuss the annual financial statement (budget) and address questions to the executive.
The Indian Councils Act of 1892 enlarged the functions of the Legislative Councils. It gave non-official members the power to discuss the financial statement (budget) and ask questions to the executive on public interest matters. However, this power was limited: members could neither vote on the budget nor ask supplementary questions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the legislative evolution under the Indian Councils Act of 1892.
The 1892 Act increased the number of non-official members in the Imperial and Provincial Legislative Councils and expanded their functions.
To identify the specific financial and legislative powers granted in 1892 compared to 1861 and 1909.
2
Differentiate the budgetary rights granted in 1892 from those introduced in 1909.
The 1892 Act allowed members to discuss the budget and ask questions to the executive, but forbade them from voting on the budget or asking supplementary questions.
Supplementary questions and moving resolutions on the budget were only permitted under the Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909.
3
Match the identified provision to the correct option.
The option stating the power to discuss the budget and address questions to the executive accurately reflects the 1892 provision.
This single choice directly matches the historical statutory provisions of the 1892 Act.

Anahtar Kavram

Indian Councils Act of 1892 - Budgetary and Legislative Powers of Non-Official Members
Soru 157Soru

Regarding the constitutional framework governing the appointment, tenure, and removal of the Governor of an Indian State under Articles 155 and 156 of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements are correct?

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Governor of a State is appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal and holds office during the pleasure of the President.; The Supreme Court has ruled that the pleasure of the President in removing a Governor is not non-justiciable, and removal cannot be based on arbitrary, whimsical, or unfair grounds.

Cevap

The statements confirming that the Governor is appointed by the President and holds office during Presidential pleasure, and that the Supreme Court ruled Presidential pleasure regarding removal is subject to judicial review against arbitrary dismissal, are correct.
The Constitution specifies under Article 155 that the Governor is appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal and holds office during Presidential pleasure under Article 156(1). Additionally, as laid down by the Supreme Court in B.P. Singhal (2010), while the President does not need to show cause for removal, the decision remains open to judicial review if challenged on grounds of arbitrariness or bad faith.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Examine Article 155 and Article 156(1) regarding executive appointment and tenure.
The Governor is executive-appointed by the President by warrant under hand and seal and serves during the pleasure of the President.
This establishes the constitutional mechanism of appointment and primary tenure rule.
2
Verify the constitutional authority for receiving a Governor's resignation under Article 156(2).
Resignation must be submitted in writing to the President of India.
Because the President is the appointing authority, resignation is tendered directly to the President, not to state-level executive heads such as the Chief Minister.
3
Analyze judicial interpretations regarding Presidential pleasure under Article 156(1).
In B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010), the Supreme Court affirmed that Presidential pleasure is not absolute or immune from judicial review against arbitrary removal.
Withdrawal of pleasure must not be based on political prejudice or arbitrary grounds.
4
Check for state legislative removal or impeachment procedures.
No impeachment or removal mechanism exists within the State Legislature for the Governor.
The Governor is an constitutional appointee of the Union executive and is not answerable to or removable by the State Legislative Assembly.

Anahtar Kavram

Constitutional Provisions and Judicial Rulings on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of State Governors
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 158Soru

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions governing Panchayati Raj institutions under Part IX of the Constitution of India:

1. A person who has attained the age of 21 years is constitutionally eligible to be chosen as a member of a Panchayat.
2. Any question regarding the disqualification of a Panchayat member is automatically referred to the State Election Commission for a final binding decision.
3. The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act mandates a minimum five-year tenure for Panchayats, and if dissolved prematurely, elections must be held within six months.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 1 and 3 only

Cevap

Statements 1 and 3 are correct.
The option selecting statements 1 and 3 only is correct. Statement 1 is accurate because Article 243F stipulates 21 years as the minimum age for contesting Panchayat elections. Statement 3 is accurate because Article 243E specifies a 5-year tenure for Panchayats and obligates fresh elections within 6 months if dissolved early. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Constitution vests the power to decide disqualification disputes in an authority prescribed by State legislative law, rather than directly specifying the State Election Commission.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding minimum age requirements under Article 243F.
Under Article 243F(1)(a), a person cannot be disqualified for being under 25 years of age if they have reached 21 years of age. Thus, Statement 1 is correct.
The Constitution specifically relaxed the age requirement from 25 years (applicable to State Legislative Assemblies) to 21 years for local body elections.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the authority for deciding disqualifications under Article 243F(2).
According to Article 243F(2), questions of disqualification are referred to such authority as the State Legislature may by law determine, not necessarily the State Election Commission. Thus, Statement 2 is incorrect.
The Constitution leaves the decision-making authority for disqualifications to state legislation.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding the duration and re-election timeline under Article 243E.
Article 243E mandates a five-year term from the date of the first meeting and requires elections to be completed within six months in case of premature dissolution. Thus, Statement 3 is correct.
This guarantees constitutional continuity and timely elections for local self-government institutions.

Anahtar Kavram

Disqualification provisions (Article 243F) and Duration of Panchayats (Article 243E) under Part IX of the Indian Constitution
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 159Soru

Arrange the following sequential stages involved in the passage of an Ordinary Bill within a House of the Indian Parliament in their correct chronological order:

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct procedural order for an Ordinary Bill within a House of Parliament is: First Reading (Introduction), followed by Second Reading (General Discussion), Committee Stage, Consideration Stage, and finally Third Reading.
The lawmaking process for an Ordinary Bill in a House of the Indian Parliament progresses logically from initial presentation to final approval. It begins with First Reading (Introduction), moves into Second Reading's General Discussion, undergoes detailed scrutiny during the Committee Stage, undergoes clause-by-clause voting in the Consideration Stage, and culminates in the Third Reading where the bill is voted upon as a whole.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the initial step of lawmaking in Parliament
First Reading (Introduction of the Bill in the House) takes place when a member moves for leave to introduce the bill.
No debate occurs at this stage; it formally places the bill before the House.
2
Determine the broad evaluation phase after introduction
Second Reading - Stage of General Discussion occurs next.
The House discusses the general provisions and principles of the bill without clause-by-clause voting.
3
Identify the detailed scrutiny phase
Committee Stage follows the general discussion.
The bill is scrutinized in depth by a committee before being reported back to the House.
4
Determine the clause-level voting phase in the House
Consideration Stage takes place after the committee submits its report.
The House considers each clause and proposed amendment individually.
5
Identify the final voting phase within the House
Third Reading concludes the process in that House.
Members vote on whether the bill as a whole should pass without proposing new amendments.

Anahtar Kavram

Legislative Procedure for Ordinary Bills in Indian Parliament
Soru 160Soru

Under Article 151 of the Constitution of India, to whom does the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) submit audit reports relating to the accounts of a State?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The Governor of the State

Cevap

The Governor of the State
According to Article 151(2) of the Constitution of India, the reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India relating to the accounts of a State shall be submitted to the Governor of the State, who shall cause them to be laid before the Legislature of the State.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision for CAG report submissions
Article 151 of the Indian Constitution governs audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General.
Article 151 clearly demarcates the submission procedure for both Union and State accounts.
2
Distinguish between Union accounts and State accounts reporting channels
Article 151(1) mandates reporting Union accounts to the President, while Article 151(2) mandates reporting State accounts to the Governor.
The Governor acts as the constitutional head of the State to lay the report before the State Legislature.

Anahtar Kavram

Submission of audit reports by the CAG under Article 151
ÖncekiSayfa 8 / 16Sonraki
Indian Polity and Governance Alıştırma Soruları — State PSC Exam — Sayfa 8 | Examkin