Topic Development

357 questions

Question 121Question

During a freezing winter trip to New York City in 1903, Alabama native Mary Anderson noticed that streetcar drivers had to open their front windows or step outside to clear ice and sleet from their windshields, endangering themselves and their passengers. This hazardous situation inspired her to design a rubber squeegee blade operated by a hand lever inside the vehicle. Anderson was granted a patent for her window-cleaning device in 1903, yet manufacturing firms rejected her invention, believing it would distract drivers. Consequently, she never profited from her creation, and the patent eventually expired. [1]

The writer wants to add a sentence at the end of the passage (at point [1]) to conclude the discussion of Mary Anderson's invention. Which choice best accomplishes this goal by summarizing the main significance of her design while remaining consistent with the passage's tone and details?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although she never benefited financially, Anderson's design laid the foundation for the standard windshield wipers that would eventually become mandatory safety equipment on all motor vehicles.

Answer

The correct choice is the option that explains how Anderson's design laid the foundation for standard windshield wipers on all motor vehicles, despite her lack of financial benefit.
The correct choice successfully concludes the passage by highlighting the long-term impact and significance of Anderson's windshield wiper design while maintaining grammatical accuracy and consistency with the rest of the text.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the paragraph's main theme and determine the purpose of the concluding sentence.
The passage describes Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper, its initial rejection, and her lack of financial profit. The concluding sentence should tie these elements together and state the invention's ultimate significance.
Establishing the main point ensures the conclusion is relevant and comprehensive.
2
Evaluate the options for logical relevance and tone, ensuring no unsupported details are introduced.
The option mentioning the foundation of modern mandatory safety equipment summarizes the impact of her design. The options mentioning electric trolley power or automatic wipers introduce new, unsupported historical details.
A good conclusion summarizes existing ideas rather than introducing new subtopics.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option starting with 'Her design was simple' contains a comma splice. The option starting with 'Consequently, drivers had preferred' has an incorrect tense shift ('will fail'). Only the correct option is grammatically sound.
ACT English questions require the correct answer to be both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.

Key Concept

A successful concluding sentence must summarize the passage's main points and highlight the significance of the topic without introducing new, unsupported information or grammatical errors.
Question 122Question

[1] In 79 CE, the eruption of Mount Vesuvius buried the villa of Herculaneum, carbonizing hundreds of papyrus scrolls and rendering them too fragile to unroll. [2] For centuries, any attempt to physically open these scrolls resulted in their immediate destruction. [3] Recently, however, researchers have utilized high-resolution X-ray phase-contrast tomography to virtually unwrap the scrolls, revealing the faint density differences between the carbon-based ink and the carbonized papyrus. [4] Advanced machine learning algorithms are then trained to detect these subtle texture variations, translating them into legible Greek characters. [5] Computer scientists have also used similar machine learning models to identify fraudulent paintings in major art museums. [6] As this digital technology continues to advance, scholars hope to recover lost philosophical treatises that have remained unreadable for nearly two millennia.

The author is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it introduces a separate application of machine learning that digresses from the paragraph's focus on deciphering the scrolls.

Answer

Deleted, because it introduces a separate application of machine learning that digresses from the paragraph's focus on deciphering the scrolls.
The correct option is the one stating the sentence should be deleted because it digresses from the paragraph's focus on deciphering the scrolls. The paragraph centers on the technological process of virtually unwrapping and reading the carbonized scrolls of Herculaneum. Discussing fraudulent paintings in art museums shifts the topic away from this focus and disrupts the flow of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph details the specific scientific and computational methods used to read the carbonized Herculaneum scrolls.
Determining paragraph unity requires establishing its specific scope.
2
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 5 to that primary topic.
Sentence 5 discusses using machine learning to detect fraudulent paintings in art museums.
Analyzing the sentence in context reveals whether it contributes to the development of the main topic.
3
Decide whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
The sentence should be deleted because identifying fake paintings is a different subject that interrupts the development of the scroll-deciphering narrative.
Sentences that digress from the established focus of a paragraph must be removed.
4
Evaluate the options to find the correct decision and logical explanation.
The option recommending deletion because the sentence digresses from the focus on the scrolls is the only one with both a correct decision and an accurate rhetorical reason.
An ACT English add/delete option is only correct if both the yes/no decision and the rationale are sound.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content based on the paragraph's specific focus.
Question 123Question

The following is an excerpt from an essay about early Earth's climate.

[1]
In 19721972, astronomers Carl Sagan and George Mullen pointed out a puzzling contradiction that threatened our understanding of Earth's early history. According to standard astrophysical models, our sun was about 3030 percent dimmer during the Archean Eon, four billion years ago, than it is today. With so little solar energy reaching the planet, Earth should have been a frozen wasteland, completely locked in ice. Yet, geological evidence from that same period—such as water-worn pebbles and ancient sedimentary rocks—reveals that liquid water flowed abundantly across the surface, and primitive life was already thriving.

[2]
To resolve this paradox, researchers have proposed various atmospheric models. One prominent theory suggests that a dense greenhouse gas envelope, consisting of carbon dioxide and perhaps ammonia or methane, acted as a heavy blanket to trap what little heat the faint sun provided. Others argue that Earth's lower albedo, or reflectivity, allowed the surface to absorb more solar radiation than it does today. Understanding how Earth maintained its liquid oceans during this period is not just a historical curiosity; it also helps astronomers define the boundaries of habitable zones around distant stars.

Which choice provides the most effective transition from the first paragraph to the second paragraph and introduces the main topic of the second paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: To resolve this paradox, researchers have proposed various atmospheric models.

Answer

The phrasing that states 'To resolve this paradox, researchers have proposed various atmospheric models.' is correct because it provides a grammatically sound transition that links the paradox of the first paragraph to the scientific models described in the second paragraph.
The correct answer, which mentions proposing various atmospheric models to resolve the paradox, is grammatically correct and establishes a logical link between the paradox of the faint young sun (described in the first paragraph) and the specific atmospheric hypotheses (discussed in the second paragraph).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the first and second paragraphs to determine the transition needed.
The first paragraph describes the 'faint young sun paradox' (a dim early sun but liquid water on Earth), while the second paragraph discusses specific theories (greenhouse gases and albedo) to explain it.
An effective transition must connect this contradiction (the paradox) to the explanations (the models).
2
Evaluate the grammar of the transition options.
Identify that several options introduce grammatical errors such as sentence fragments, comma splices, or incorrect semicolon usage.
The correct option must not only be contextually appropriate but also grammatically correct.
3
Identify the correct choice based on grammar and context.
The correct choice connects the paragraphs logically without introducing any punctuation or structural errors.
This ensures the passage maintains flow, clarity, and grammatical precision.

Key Concept

Establishing transitions and paragraph-level topic sentences that logically connect and introduce paragraph topics.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 124Question

During a trolley ride in a freezing New York City winter, Mary Anderson observed the driver repeatedly opening the front window pane to brush away falling sleet, exposing passengers to the biting cold. Determined to find a solution, she sketched a device featuring a hand-operated lever inside the vehicle linked to a rubber blade on the outside. Although she secured a patent for her mechanical sweeper in 1903, manufacturing companies rejected her design, viewing it as a dangerous distraction for drivers.

The writer wants to add a sentence at the end of the paragraph that contrasts the initial commercial failure of Mary Anderson's invention with its eventual universal adoption. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: By the time her patent expired in 1920, windshield wipers had become standard equipment on most consumer vehicles, including the Ford Model T.

Answer

By the time her patent expired in 1920, windshield wipers had become standard equipment on most consumer vehicles, including the Ford Model T.
The correct option is the one stating that by the time her patent expired in 1920, windshield wipers had become standard equipment. This choice successfully contrasts the initial rejection of Mary Anderson's design in 1903 with its eventual integration as standard equipment on most consumer vehicles.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The prompt requires a sentence that contrasts the initial rejection and commercial failure of Mary Anderson's invention in 1903 with its eventual widespread and standard use.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the rhetorical goal.
The choice discussing the 1920 patent expiration and standard equipment on vehicles like the Ford Model T matches the goal. The options discussing Robert Kearns or the National Inventors Hall of Fame fail to address this specific contrast.
Eliminating choices that do not meet the rhetorical goal narrows down the candidates.
3
Check the remaining candidates for grammatical correctness.
The choice detailing the 1920 patent expiration is grammatically correct. The choice starting with 'She never profited from the invention herself' is incorrect because it contains a comma splice.
ACT English requires the correct option to be grammatically flawless.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 125Question

For decades after the Tudor warship *Mary Rose* was raised from the Solent in 1982, conservators kept the wooden hull constantly saturated with a chilled freshwater mist to prevent it from drying out and collapsing. Eventually, they began actively replacing the water in the wood cells with polyethylene glycol (PEG), a water-soluble polymer.

Given that all the choices are true, which choice most clearly highlights the transition from temporary preservation methods to a permanent, structural stabilization technique while emphasizing the scientific complexity of the process?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: By slowly increasing the concentration of the polymer over decades, conservators successfully infused the timber's cell walls to structurally reinforce the decaying wood, allowing the misting sprays to finally be turned off.

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that by slowly increasing the concentration of the polymer over decades, conservators infused the cell walls to structurally reinforce the decaying wood, allowing the misting sprays to be turned off.
The correct choice successfully establishes the transition from temporary preservation (misting sprays) to a permanent structural stabilization technique (infusing the cell walls to structurally reinforce the decaying wood) and highlights the scientific complexity (slowly increasing the polymer's concentration over decades).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goals required: transitioning from temporary preservation to permanent structural stabilization, and emphasizing scientific complexity.
The correct choice must show temporary preservation methods ending, permanent structural reinforcement beginning, and mention complex scientific details like concentration changes or cellular infusion.
Understanding the precise criteria is essential to evaluate the choices effectively.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The option starting with 'Conservators slowly increased the polymer's concentration' contains a comma splice and is eliminated.
ACT English choices must be grammatically correct first.
3
Evaluate the remaining options against the rhetorical goals.
The option about the museum facility ignores the preservation methods. The option comparing the chemical treatment to water sprays is too simple and lacks details of scientific complexity. The option describing the slow increase of polymer concentration and infusion of cell walls meets all criteria.
Only one option fulfills all elements of the rhetorical prompt.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 126Question

Reading Between the Lines

[1]
In 19481948, Norman Joseph Woodland, a graduate student at Drexel Institute of Technology, set out to solve a persistent problem for supermarkets: how to automate the tedious process of inventory checking and checkout. Standard methods relied on manual entry, which was slow and prone to human error. Woodland, along with his classmate Bernard Silver, began brainstorming solutions, but their initial ideas, which involved ultraviolet ink, proved impractical and expensive.

[2]
The breakthrough came in an unexpected setting. While visiting his grandfather in Miami, Woodland sat on the beach, pondering how to encode information visually. He idly ran his fingers through the sand, pulling four fingers toward him to draw parallel lines. Looking down at the patterns left behind, he had a sudden realization. He could adapt the concept of Morse code—a system he had learned in the Boy Scouts—by extending the dots and dashes vertically to create thin lines and thick lines. By reading these lines with a light source, a machine could instantly decode the information.

[3]
Woodland and Silver patented their "Classifying Apparatus and Method" in 19521952, but the technology required to read the code—including lasers and computers small enough to fit in a store—did not yet exist. It would take more than two decades, and the development of the microchip and helium-neon lasers, before the barcode would make its commercial debut. On June 2626, 19741974, a pack of chewing gum was scanned at a supermarket in Troy, Ohio, marking the birth of a technology that would revolutionize global commerce and logistics.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the collaborative efforts and equal division of technical labor between Norman Joseph Woodland and Bernard Silver in the commercialization of the barcode. Would this essay successfully fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because the essay focuses primarily on Woodland’s individual breakthrough and subsequent technological developments rather than detailing a collaborative division of labor in commercializing the invention.

Answer

No, because the essay focuses primarily on Woodland’s individual breakthrough and subsequent technological developments rather than detailing a collaborative division of labor in commercializing the invention.
The essay does not fulfill the stated goal. While it mentions Bernard Silver as Woodland's classmate and co-patent holder, it does not describe their collaborative efforts or any division of labor between them. Instead, it describes Woodland's solitary inspiration on the beach and attributes the final commercialization to broader technological advancements like microchips and lasers. Therefore, the option explaining that the essay focuses on Woodland's individual breakthrough and subsequent developments is correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the writer's goal stated in the prompt.
The goal is to write an essay that details the collaborative efforts and equal division of technical labor between Woodland and Silver in commercializing the barcode.
Understanding the precise requirements of the goal is essential to evaluating the essay's success.
2
Evaluate the passage content against the goal.
The passage mentions Silver briefly in the first and third paragraphs but focuses almost entirely on Woodland's solo realization on the beach and the independent development of lasers and microchips by others.
Comparing the text's actual focus to the hypothetical goal determines if the goal is met.
3
Select the correct direction (Yes or No) and evaluate the reasoning in the options.
The essay does not meet the goal, eliminating the 'Yes' options. Among the 'No' options, the one claiming they abandoned the project is factually incorrect. The correct option is the one explaining that the essay focuses on Woodland's individual breakthrough and subsequent technology.
This isolates the correct option by matching both the correct direction and factual support from the text.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 127Question

Architect Julia Morgan was renowned for her meticulous integration of classical aesthetics with modern engineering. At Hearst Castle, she spent decades translating the client's grandiose visions into physical reality. She designed the Neptune Pool to evoke an ancient Roman temple, incorporating detailed classical elements that framed the water. This harmonious blend of historic style and structural innovation made the pool one of the most celebrated designs of her career.

The writer wants to revise the underlined portion of the third sentence (reproduced below) to provide the most specific, concrete visual detail that supports the claim that the Neptune Pool evokes an ancient Roman temple.

She designed the Neptune Pool to evoke an ancient Roman temple, incorporating detailed classical elements that framed the water.

Which of the following versions of the underlined portion best achieves this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: placing fluted white marble colonnades and a sculpted temple facade around the shimmering blue water

Answer

The version that uses 'placing fluted white marble colonnades and a sculpted temple facade around the shimmering blue water' is correct because it provides the most specific and concrete visual details that illustrate how the pool evokes an ancient Roman temple.
The correct option is the one stating 'placing fluted white marble colonnades and a sculpted temple facade around the shimmering blue water' because it uses concrete visual details like 'fluted white marble colonnades' and 'sculpted temple facade' to show exactly how the pool evokes an ancient Roman temple. It is also grammatically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goal stated in the prompt
The prompt requires finding the option that provides the most specific, concrete visual detail supporting the claim that the pool evokes a Roman temple.
This establishes the main criteria for assessing the options.
2
Analyze each option for specificity and grammar
The original wording is vague. The option containing 'placing fluted white marble colonnades...' uses precise, descriptive visual terms. The options containing a semicolon and the phrase 'having designed...' introduce grammatical errors (a fragment and a dangling modifier, respectively).
To eliminate options that are grammatically incorrect or do not meet the rhetorical goal.
3
Select the option that meets both requirements
The option with 'placing fluted white marble colonnades...' is grammatically sound and highly descriptive.
To choose the best revision of the underlined text.

Key Concept

Selecting concrete, specific details to support a rhetorical claim while maintaining grammatical correctness.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 128Question

In 1895, Harvard University opened the Fogg Art Museum, but its lecture hall was a disaster; speakers' voices bounced off the semicircular plaster walls, creating a chaotic echo that rendered lectures completely unintelligible. The university turned to a young physics assistant professor, Wallace Sabine, to solve the problem. Sabine painstakingly tracked the sound decay in the room, using a pipe organ and a stopwatch to measure the time it took for sound to become inaudible. He discovered that the duration of the reverberation was directly proportional to the room's volume and inversely proportional to the sound-absorbing qualities of its surfaces. [X] Ultimately, this breakthrough allowed him to calculate the exact amount of felt padding needed to absorb the excess sound, founding the modern science of architectural acoustics.

Given that all the choices are true, which one transitions most effectively from the discovery of the mathematical relationship to the practical application of it, while emphasizing the arduous nature of Sabine's experimentation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: To test this formula, he spent countless late-night hours moving hundreds of hair-felt cushions from a nearby theater into the lecture hall to measure their absorption properties.

Answer

The correct choice is the option that begins with 'To test this formula,' as it is grammatically correct, provides a strong transition, and emphasizes the arduous effort involved in the experiment.
The correct choice transitions from the discovery of the formula in the previous sentence ('this formula') to the application of measuring absorption properties, while explicitly detailing the grueling nature of the task ('spent countless late-night hours moving hundreds of hair-felt cushions').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goals requested in the prompt.
The correct choice must transition from the mathematical relationship (the formula) to the practical application (the experiments with felt), and it must emphasize the arduous nature of the experimentation.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the rhetorical suitability of each option.
2
Evaluate the options for grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'He carried hundreds' contains a comma splice, and the option beginning with 'The hair-felt cushions' contains an incorrect comma placement before a restrictive relative clause ('that he carried').
Any option that introduces a grammatical error must be eliminated, regardless of its rhetorical content.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goals.
The option starting with 'His formula, which defined reverberation time' is grammatically correct but fails to mention the arduous nature of Sabine's physical experiments. The option starting with 'To test this formula' meets all criteria: it connects to 'this formula,' leads into the practical testing of felt padding, and emphasizes the arduous work ('countless late-night hours moving hundreds of hair-felt cushions').
This isolates the only choice that is both grammatically correct and rhetorically aligned with the prompt.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 129Question

[1]
In the 1840s, British botanist Anna Atkins sought a more accurate and efficient way to record the intricate structures of British algae than the traditional, painstaking method of hand-drawing specimens. Her search led her to the work of astronomer and chemist Sir John Herschel, who in 1842 had invented a simple photographic printing process known as the cyanotype. Utilizing paper treated with iron salts, Herschel’s process produced a Prussian blue image when exposed to sunlight and washed with water.

[2]
Recognizing the scientific utility of this new medium, Atkins realized she could place dried botanical specimens directly onto the sensitized paper, exposing them to light to create precise, detailed silhouettes. These "photogenic drawings," or cyanotypes, captured the delicate fronds and filaments of algae with a degree of accuracy and speed that no hand-illustration could match. Atkins was not merely experimenting; she was embarking on a systematic effort to document her extensive collection.

[3]
In 1843, Atkins began publishing her work in installments, titled Photographs of British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions. This landmark publication is widely recognized by historians as the first book ever illustrated with photographs. By using cyanotypes, Atkins successfully bridged the gap between botanical science and the emerging field of photography, establishing a permanent place for photographic illustration in scientific documentation.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay that explains the chemical process of Sir John Herschel's cyanotype invention and details its subsequent industrial applications. Is the statement that the essay successfully achieves this goal true or false?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The statement is false because the essay focuses almost exclusively on Anna Atkins's botanical cataloging and does not contain either an explanation of the chemistry behind the cyanotype or a discussion of industrial applications.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the proposed writing goal from the stem.
The goal is to explain the chemical process of Herschel's cyanotype invention and detail its subsequent industrial applications.
This establishes the criteria against which the entire essay must be evaluated.
2
Examine the passage for explanations of the chemical process.
The text only mentions that the process utilizes 'paper treated with iron salts' and produces an image when 'exposed to sunlight and washed with water.' It does not explain the actual chemical reactions.
Evaluating this portion of the goal shows that the essay lacks the necessary scientific depth to fulfill it.
3
Examine the passage for details on industrial applications.
The passage focuses entirely on Anna Atkins using the process for botanical scientific illustration (cataloging algae). It does not mention any industrial uses.
Evaluating the remaining portion of the goal confirms that the essay does not address industrial applications.
4
Determine the truth value of the statement.
Since the essay fails to meet both components of the proposed goal, the statement that it successfully achieves this goal is false.
This synthesizes the findings to produce the final correct answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 130Question

A writer is editing a draft of an essay about astronomer Maria Mitchell.

[1] In 1847, Mitchell spent her evenings scanning the night sky from the roof of her father's bank in Nantucket. [2] Using a modest two-inch telescope, she discovered a new comet, which established her reputation as a skilled observer. [3] Shortly after her discovery, Mitchell received prestigious honors that cemented her international reputation. [4] The success of her work ultimately paved the way for other women to pursue careers in professional astronomy.

The writer wants to revise sentence 3 to provide the most specific, concrete evidence of Mitchell's international recognition. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Shortly after her discovery, Mitchell was awarded a gold medal by King Christian VIII of Denmark and became the first woman elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Answer

The choice stating that Mitchell was awarded a gold medal by King Christian VIII of Denmark and became the first woman elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
The correct choice is the one that names the specific award ('gold medal by King Christian VIII of Denmark') and the specific academic honor ('first woman elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences'), which provides the most concrete evidence of Mitchell's international recognition.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to revise sentence 3 to provide the most specific, concrete evidence of Maria Mitchell's international recognition.
Understanding the precise criteria of the question ensures that the selected option directly supports the targeted claim rather than just being grammatically correct.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
One choice is a sentence fragment starting with a subordinating conjunction, and another introduces an illogical verb tense shift, leaving two grammatically correct choices.
ACT English questions require both grammatical correctness and rhetorical appropriateness; eliminating grammatically incorrect options narrows down the choices.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct choices to determine which provides the most specific and concrete details.
The choice detailing the gold medal from the King of Denmark and election to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences provides highly specific, concrete details, whereas the other choice relies on vague, general descriptions.
Specific details like names of organizations and awards provide stronger support for a claim of international recognition than generalized statements.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 131Question

[1] Fleming returned to his laboratory after a vacation to find that a mold called *Penicillium notatum* had contaminated one of his petri dishes. To his surprise, the bacteria immediately surrounding the mold had been destroyed. This chance discovery revolutionized modern medicine, leading to the development of antibiotics that have since saved millions of lives.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In 19281928, Alexander Fleming made a discovery that would change medicine forever.

Answer

In 19281928, Alexander Fleming made a discovery that would change medicine forever.
The correct option is a complete, grammatically sound sentence that effectively introduces the main focus of the paragraph: Alexander Fleming's discovery and its impact on medicine.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph by reading the sentences that follow the introduction.
The paragraph details Alexander Fleming's discovery of a mold that killed bacteria, which led to modern antibiotics.
An effective introduction must establish the subject of the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
One choice is a dependent clause fragment; another shifts verb tenses incorrectly; a third contains a comma splice.
An introductory sentence must adhere to the rules of standard written English grammar.
3
Select the choice that is both grammatically correct and introduces the passage's main focus.
The choice stating that Fleming made a discovery in 19281928 that would change medicine forever fits all criteria.
It acts as a complete, correct sentence that perfectly sets up the paragraph's subject.

Key Concept

Establishing paragraph introductions
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 132Question

A student is writing an essay about the unique adaptations of the glass frog. The student wants to organize the paragraph below to ensure that the claim regarding the frog's survival mechanism is followed by explanation and specific supporting evidence.

How should the student arrange these sentences to create the most logical progression of ideas?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order is to start with the sentence introducing translucency as a camouflage strategy, follow with the sentence detailing how light passes through the frog on a leaf, and conclude with the sentence explaining how this blurs the frog's silhouette to deter predators.
The paragraph is most logically organized when it begins with the broad claim about the frog's translucent camouflage, followed by the specific detail of how light passes through the skin, and ending with the final outcome of predator avoidance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main claim or introductory statement of the paragraph.
The statement introducing the glass frog's use of translucency as a survival mechanism is the starting point.
Paragraphs typically begin with a general claim before presenting supporting details.
2
Look for the sentence that describes the immediate mechanism or evidence of this claim.
The sentence explaining how light passes through the clear skin to match a leaf's hue follows the claim.
This provides the immediate physical explanation of how the general claim of translucency functions.
3
Locate the sentence explaining the result or ultimate effect of the mechanism.
The sentence describing how the blurred silhouette protects the frog from predators completes the sequence.
It offers the final supporting detail that links the physical mechanism back to the survival benefit.

Key Concept

Ordering sentences to ensure that supporting evidence and details logically follow a central claim.
Question 133Question

Beneath the forest floor, a complex web of fungal threads known as mycelium connects the roots of individual trees. This network, often called the "Wood Wide Web," allows trees to share resources, such as carbon, nitrogen, and water, with one another. Through these underground pathways, a mature tree can transfer nutrients to a struggling sapling of a different species, ensuring the survival of the forest community as a whole. Fungi are classified as a distinct kingdom separate from plants and animals. However, this cooperation is not entirely altruistic; the fungi extract a portion of the sugars produced by the trees' photosynthesis to fuel their own growth.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the cooperative resource-sharing network with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the cooperative resource-sharing network with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.
The correct option correctly identifies that the underlined sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's specific focus on the cooperative resource-sharing network between trees with an irrelevant taxonomic detail about the classification of fungi.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the mutualistic resource-sharing network (mycorrhizal network) between trees, facilitated by fungal mycelium.
Establishing the main topic allows you to evaluate whether any specific sentence contributes directly to that topic or disrupts the flow.
2
Analyze the content and function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence states that fungi are classified as a distinct kingdom separate from plants and animals, which is a broad taxonomic fact.
Understanding what information the sentence provides is necessary to determine if it is relevant to the paragraph's specific focus.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's focus.
The sentence is irrelevant because the taxonomic classification of fungi does not explain how the resource-sharing network operates, nor does it fit the transition between the mutualistic sharing of nutrients and the extraction of sugars.
Comparing the sentence's content to the paragraph's focus helps determine if it should be kept or deleted.
4
Select the option that correctly states the decision to delete the sentence and provides the accurate rhetorical reason.
The option stating the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus with an irrelevant taxonomic detail is selected.
Only one option contains both the correct decision (delete) and the correct justification (it interrupts the focus with irrelevant details).

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content based on paragraph focus.
Question 134Question

In 1783, Joseph-Michel and Jacques-Étienne Montgolfier launched the first manned hot air balloon in Paris. The balloon, constructed of paper and silk, rose over three thousand feet into the air and carried its passengers safely across the city. Today, hot air ballooning is a popular recreational activity and competitive sport worldwide. The success of this flight marked the beginning of human aviation, inspiring subsequent inventors to develop hydrogen balloons and gliders.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the historical event of the first balloon flight with an irrelevant detail about modern recreation.

Answer

The underlined sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the historical event of the first balloon flight with an irrelevant detail about modern recreation.
The sentence should be deleted because it disrupts the historical narrative of the 1783 flight by introducing modern, irrelevant details about hot air ballooning as a hobby or sport today.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focus is the historical event of the Montgolfier brothers' first hot air balloon flight in 1783 and its immediate impact on early human aviation.
Establishing a baseline focus allows the reader to determine if the underlined sentence contributes to or deviates from the main narrative.
2
Analyze the content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes modern hot air ballooning as a popular recreational activity and competitive sport today.
Determining what information the underlined sentence introduces is necessary to evaluate its relevance.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence should be kept or deleted based on paragraph relevance, and select the option with the correct reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because modern recreation is irrelevant to the 1783 historical event. The option recommending deletion due to interrupting the historical focus with modern details is correct.
Choosing the correct decision and logical justification leads to the correct answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:45s
Question 135Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about marine biology. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems rely on chemosynthesis, in what order should the sentences be placed?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with the general claim about chemosynthetic ecosystems, followed by the explanation of how specialized bacteria generate energy, then the specific example of giant tube worms, and concludes with the overall impact on the food web.
The paragraph flows logically from the general thesis about chemosynthesis at hydrothermal vents, to the biological explanation of specialized bacteria, then to a specific species example (giant tube worms), and finally to the broader ecological conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main claim of the paragraph.
The main claim is that hydrothermal vents support thriving ecosystems that depend on chemosynthesis rather than photosynthesis.
This establishes the topic and must be the opening sentence of the paragraph.
2
Find the explanation or evidence that defines the mechanism of chemosynthesis.
The sentence describing specialized bacteria oxidizing hydrogen sulfide to convert it into organic matter explains how chemosynthesis works in this environment.
This directly follows and supports the general claim by detailing the biological process.
3
Identify the concrete example that illustrates this relationship.
The sentence introducing giant tube worms (Riftia pachyptilaRiftia\ pachyptila) as relying on these bacteria inside a trophosome is a specific example.
An example must follow the general explanation of the concept it illustrates.
4
Find the sentence that summarizes the broader ecological impact.
The sentence beginning with 'Consequently' describes how the bacteria serve as the bedrock of the food web.
This serves as a logical conclusion, connecting the specific example of tube worms back to the wider community of crabs, shrimp, and fish.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 136Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about chemist Alice Ball. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that Ball's work solved a major clinical hurdle in treating Hansen's disease, in what order should the sentences be placed?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The sentences should be ordered: first the description of the insolubility of chaulmoogra oil, followed by Alice Ball's chemical isolation of ethyl esters to overcome the obstacle, then the clinical evidence of patients being successfully treated, and finally the summary of how this technique transformed the treatment into a viable cure.
The correct order establishes a clear problem-solution-evidence-conclusion structure. First, the paragraph introduces the medical obstacle of insoluble oil. Second, it explains how Alice Ball's chemical isolation of ethyl esters solved 'this obstacle'. Third, it provides concrete evidence of success by detailing how the new formulation successfully cured patients. Finally, it concludes by summarizing the broader historical significance of her technique.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial claim or baseline problem.
The sentence describing physicians struggling to use insoluble chaulmoogra oil to treat Hansen's disease sets up the obstacle.
A logical paragraph must define the problem before explaining how it was solved.
2
Link the solution to the identified problem.
The sentence detailing Alice Ball isolating active ethyl esters to overcome 'this obstacle' directly follows the problem description.
The pronoun phrase 'this obstacle' requires the preceding sentence to have introduced the specific problem.
3
Find the evidence supporting the success of the solution.
The sentence showing that the soluble medicine allowed circulation in the bloodstream and successfully cured patients follows the chemical discovery.
Evidence of clinical success must follow the description of the development ('this breakthrough development') that made it possible.
4
Determine the concluding sentence.
The sentence summarizing the transformation of the treatment into a viable cure wraps up the paragraph.
A concluding statement logically follows the presentation of all evidence and details.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 137Question

Consider the following passage:

Umbrellas have a long history, dating back to ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, where they were used primarily to shade royalty from the sun. In these early societies, umbrellas were symbols of power and status, made from palm leaves, feathers, or stretched papyrus. However, it was not until much later in ancient China that umbrellas were first waterproofed with wax and lacquer to provide protection against the rain.

[1] _________________________________________. For centuries, European men viewed them as a feminine accessory, associated almost exclusively with women of high social standing. It was not until the mid-eighteenth century, when an English traveler named Jonas Hanway began carrying an umbrella in public, that the device gained acceptance among men. Despite initial ridicule from carriage drivers who feared losing business, Hanway’s persistence eventually paid off, transforming the umbrella into a common and practical accessory for everyone.

Which of the following choices best introduces the main topic of the second paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although umbrellas were widely used in Asia, they did not immediately gain popularity in Europe.

Answer

Although umbrellas were widely used in Asia, they did not immediately gain popularity in Europe.
The correct option is grammatically correct and successfully introduces the focus of the second paragraph by transitioning from the history of umbrellas in Asia to their slow, gendered adoption in Europe.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the second paragraph to determine its primary topic and focus.
The paragraph discusses the history of umbrellas in Europe, specifically focusing on their initial association with women, the resistance to them, and how they eventually gained acceptance among men.
Understanding the content of the paragraph is necessary to identify which sentence best introduces and establishes this topic.
2
Evaluate the grammar of each option to eliminate choices with errors.
One option correctly uses a comma to join the clauses. The other options contain a semicolon fragment, a comma splice, or a subject-verb agreement error.
ACT English questions require the correct answer to be grammatically correct.
3
Select the grammatically correct option that best fits the paragraph's theme.
The grammatically correct option introducing European reception of umbrellas is chosen.
This establishes a clear transition and sets up the discussion of European acceptance.

Key Concept

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Question 138Question

Originating in Japan, *yakisugi* is a traditional method of wood preservation that involves charring the surface of cedar boards to make them resistant to fire, rot, and insects. The process begins by binding three boards into a triangular chimney, lighting the interior, and allowing the flames to rapidly carbonize the wood. This superficial burning creates a thick layer of carbonized cellulose, which acts as a natural barrier. Ultimately, the charred layer protects the underlying timber from environmental degradation, ensuring its longevity for decades.

The writer wants to revise the underlined portion of the sentence below to provide the most specific, concrete visual details that illustrate the physical appearance of the carbonized surface:

"This superficial burning creates a thick layer of carbonized cellulose, which acts as a natural barrier."

Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: a silvery-black, cracked texture resembling alligator hide that repels moisture and prevents insect infestations.

Answer

The choice that describes the surface as 'a silvery-black, cracked texture resembling alligator hide' is correct because it provides the most specific and concrete visual details while maintaining grammatical correctness.
The correct choice successfully answers the prompt by replacing general terms with specific, visually descriptive details ('silvery-black', 'cracked texture resembling alligator hide') that allow the reader to visualize the carbonized surface of the wood. It also maintains grammatical correctness and tense consistency with the rest of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the writer's goal from the prompt.
The goal is to find the option that provides the most specific, concrete visual details illustrating the physical appearance of the carbonized wood surface.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Analyze each option for grammatical correctness.
The option containing a semicolon before 'which' creates a fragment, and the option with the past-tense verb 'blocked' introduces an incorrect tense shift and a comma splice. The remaining options are grammatically correct.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options narrows the choices to valid sentences.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The original phrasing uses general, abstract concepts, whereas the correct option uses specific visual terms.
The correct answer must satisfy the specific demand for visual details.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 139Question

Mary Anning was a pioneering English paleontologist who made several groundbreaking fossil discoveries in the cliffs of Lyme Regis. However, her path to success was not easy.

[1] She had many hobbies that kept her busy throughout her adult years. As a woman in nineteenth-century Britain, she was not allowed to join the Geological Society of London, and she was often excluded from the scientific community. Furthermore, male scientists frequently published academic papers about the fossils she found without giving her any credit.

Which choice most effectively replaces the underlined portion to introduce the paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Despite her scientific achievements, Anning faced significant social and professional barriers.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that Anning faced significant social and professional barriers despite her scientific achievements.
The correct option effectively introduces the paragraph by establishing its main focus: the social and professional obstacles Anning faced. This sets up the following sentences, which describe her exclusion from the Geological Society and the lack of credit she received. It is also grammatically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the supporting sentences in the paragraph to identify the main topic.
The paragraph explains that Anning was barred from joining the Geological Society and did not receive credit for her fossil discoveries because of her gender.
An effective introduction must set up the specific details that follow in the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the choices for thematic relevance and grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'Despite her scientific achievements' is grammatically correct and directly introduces the topic of social and professional barriers. The other options contain grammar errors (subject-verb agreement, comma splice, and fragment) and are off-topic.
The correct choice must be both grammatically sound and rhetorically appropriate for introducing the paragraph.

Key Concept

A topic sentence must introduce the main idea of the paragraph, setting up the specific supporting details that follow.
Question 140Question

Consider the following paragraph from an essay about Mayan architecture:

[1] The ancient Mayan pyramid El Castillo at Chichen Itza is celebrated not only for its imposing structure but also for its sophisticated acoustic design. [2] When visitors clap their hands at the base of the pyramid's staircase, the steps bounce the sound waves back as an echo. [3] This echo closely mimics the distinctive, high-pitched chirp of the resplendent quetzal, a sacred bird in Mayan mythology. [4] Researchers believe that Mayan architects intentionally engineered the staircase's dimensions—specifically the height and depth of each step—to produce this precise auditory illusion.

The writer wants to add a sentence after Sentence 3 that provides the most specific, concrete visual detail supporting the claim that the quetzal was highly revered in Mayan society. Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Priests and royalty wore the bird's long, iridescent green tail feathers in towering ceremonial headdresses to display their connection to the gods.

Answer

Priests and royalty wore the bird's long, iridescent green tail feathers in towering ceremonial headdresses to display their connection to the gods.
The correct option successfully supports the claim that the quetzal was highly revered by showing that its plumage was reserved for the highest echelons of society (priests and royalty) for religious purposes. Furthermore, it meets the specific constraint of providing concrete visual details by using precise descriptors such as 'long, iridescent green tail feathers' and 'towering ceremonial headdresses' instead of vague generalizations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the target claim and the formatting constraint in the prompt.
The target claim is that the quetzal was highly revered in Mayan society, and the constraint is to provide the most specific, concrete visual details.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the options for their level of descriptive detail and alignment with the target claim.
One option provides vivid visual imagery ('long, iridescent green tail feathers', 'towering ceremonial headdresses') and shows high-status figures wearing them. Another option is too vague. Another option is off-topic, and another contains a grammatical error.
This allows for the elimination of incorrect choices based on quality of detail, relevance, and grammar.
3
Confirm the grammatical accuracy of the best option.
The sentence containing the detailed visual imagery is grammatically correct and smoothly connects to the surrounding context.
This ensures the final choice meets both the rhetorical and conventions-of-usage requirements of the exam.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 0s
PreviousPage 7 / 18Next