All practice questions

4581 questions

Question 1981Question

Arrange the following key historical milestones associated with economic planning and institutional evolution in India in correct chronological sequence from earliest to latest:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence from earliest to latest is: Visvesvaraya Plan publication (1934), National Planning Committee constitution (1938), National Development Council establishment (1952), and NITI Aayog creation (2015).
The correct order follows the historical timeline: the Visvesvaraya Plan (1934), followed by the National Planning Committee (1938), the National Development Council (1952), and finally NITI Aayog (2015).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the year of Sir M. Visvesvaraya's economic planning proposal
Sir M. Visvesvaraya published 'Planned Economy for India' in 1934.
Establishes the earliest historical landmark for formal economic planning proposals in British India.
2
Determine the formation year of the National Planning Committee
The National Planning Committee was set up under Jawaharlal Nehru's chairmanship in 1938.
Ranks second as a major pre-independence planning initiative organized by the Indian National Congress.
3
Identify the creation year of the National Development Council (NDC)
The NDC was set up by an executive resolution on August 6, 1952.
Follows post-independence institutional developments after the 1950 creation of the Planning Commission.
4
Identify the establishment date of NITI Aayog
NITI Aayog was instituted via a Union Cabinet Resolution on January 1, 2015.
Marks the most recent structural shift in Indian economic governance and think-tank advisory mechanisms.

Key Concept

Historical progression of economic planning proposals and institutional mechanisms in India
Question 1982Question

Regarding Financial Emergency under Article 360 of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A proclamation of Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months from the date of its issue.; During the operation of a Financial Emergency, the President can issue directions to reduce the salaries and allowances of Supreme Court and High Court judges.

Answer

The correct statements are that a proclamation of Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months, and that the President can issue directions to reduce the salaries and allowances of Supreme Court and High Court judges during its operation.
The correct provisions are that a Financial Emergency proclamation must be approved within two months by both Houses of Parliament and that the President holds constitutional authority to direct salary reductions for judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts during its operation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the parliamentary approval timeframe for Financial Emergency under Article 360.
Article 360 stipulates a two-month timeframe for approval by both Houses of Parliament after proclamation by the President.
Establishing the constitutional requirement for legislative concurrence.
2
Examine executive powers regarding salary reductions during Financial Emergency.
The executive authority extends to reducing salaries of constitutional positions, including Supreme Court and High Court judges.
Verifying the economic control mechanisms authorized under Article 360.
3
Evaluate duration/extension rules and historical application of Article 360.
No periodic six-month re-approval is needed once passed, and Article 360 has never been invoked in Indian history.
Distinguishing Financial Emergency rules from National Emergency rules and confirming historical facts.

Key Concept

Financial Emergency provisions under Article 360 of the Constitution of India
Question 1983Question

Arrange the following mountain ranges of northern India in the correct sequence from North to South:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order from North to South is Karakoram Range, Ladakh Range, Zaskar Range, and Shiwalik Range.
The correct arrangement from North to South begins with the Karakoram Range (northernmost Trans-Himalayan zone), followed by the Ladakh Range (between Shyok and Indus rivers), the Zaskar Range (south of the Indus River), and finishes with the Shiwalik Range (southernmost outer Himalayan foothills).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the northernmost mountain range in the northern arc of India.
The Karakoram Range occupies the extreme northern section in the Trans-Himalayas.
Geographically, Karakoram lies at the highest latitude above the Shyok River.
2
Sequence the intermediate Trans-Himalayan ranges between the Shyok and Indus Rivers.
The Ladakh Range lies immediately south of Karakoram, followed by the Zaskar Range south of the Indus River.
The Indus River flows between the parallel Ladakh Range to its north and the Zaskar Range to its south.
3
Locate the southernmost Himalayan range adjoining the Northern Plains.
The Shiwalik Range forms the outer, southernmost foothills of the Himalayan system.
Shiwaliks mark the southern geographical boundary of the Himalayas facing the Indo-Gangetic Plains.

Key Concept

Latitudinal (North-to-South) spatial arrangement of Trans-Himalayan and Himalayan relief features in India.
Question 1984Question

Match the parliamentary terms related to the functioning of the Indian Parliament in Column-I with their correct procedural descriptions in Column-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Prorogation
Adjournment sine die
Quorum
Dissolution

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Prorogation matches with ending a session of the House by the President; Adjournment sine die matches with terminating a sitting for an indefinite period; Quorum matches with the minimum membership requirement of one-tenth to conduct business; and Dissolution matches with bringing an end to the life of the Lok Sabha.
Each parliamentary procedural term is correctly paired with its constitutionally specified definition: Prorogation terminates a session via Presidential order, Adjournment sine die suspends a sitting without a specified reassembly date via the Presiding Officer, Quorum establishes the 10% minimum attendance requirement under Article 100(3), and Dissolution terminates the tenure of the Lok Sabha.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze 'Prorogation'
Matches with terminating a session of the House by the President.
Prorogation ends an entire session, unlike an adjournment which only suspends a sitting.
2
Analyze 'Adjournment sine die'
Matches with terminating a sitting for an indefinite period.
'Sine die' literally means without fixing a day; it is exercised by the Speaker/Chairman.
3
Analyze 'Quorum'
Matches with one-tenth of total membership required to conduct proceedings.
Under Article 100(3), a sitting cannot officially take place without this minimum attendance.
4
Analyze 'Dissolution'
Matches with ending the life of the Lok Sabha.
Rajya Sabha is a permanent body not subject to dissolution, whereas Lok Sabha dissolves after its term or on presidential order.

Key Concept

Parliamentary Sittings, Sessions, and Procedural Terminology
Estimated Time:45s
Question 1985Question

With reference to the Indian national income accounting framework and price deflators under the revised CSO/NSO methodology, consider the following statements:

1. Gross Value Added (GVA) at basic prices is obtained by adding product taxes and deducting product subsidies from GVA at factor cost.
2. The GDP Deflator accounts for price changes in all domestically produced final goods and services, whereas the Consumer Price Index (CPI) also reflects price variations of imported consumer goods.
3. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at market prices is derived by adding net product taxes (product taxes minus product subsidies) to GVA at basic prices.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 2 and 3 only

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that statements 2 and 3 only are correct.
Statement 2 is correct because the GDP Deflator excludes imported goods (only measuring domestic output), while CPI includes imported consumer goods in its basket. Statement 3 is correct because GDP at market prices is explicitly calculated by adding net product taxes to GVA at basic prices. Statement 1 is incorrect because GVA at basic prices is derived by adjusting GVA at factor cost with net PRODUCTION taxes (not net PRODUCT taxes).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding GVA at basic prices
Statement 1 is incorrect.
GVA at basic prices includes PRODUCTION taxes (e.g., land revenue, stamp duty) and excludes PRODUCTION subsidies (e.g., subsidies to railways, farm subsidies). PRODUCT taxes (e.g., GST, excise duty) and PRODUCT subsidies (e.g., food/fertilizer subsidies) are per-unit charges added/subtracted later to obtain GDP at market prices.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding GDP Deflator vs CPI coverage
Statement 2 is correct.
The GDP Deflator measures the overall price level of all final goods and services produced domestically within an economy's borders. In contrast, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reflects the cost of a fixed basket of goods consumed by households, which includes imported consumer items.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding GDP at market prices formula
Statement 3 is correct.
By national accounting convention: GDP at Market Prices = GVA at Basic Prices + Net Product Taxes (Product Taxes - Product Subsidies).

Key Concept

GVA at Basic Prices vs GDP at Market Prices and GDP Deflator vs CPI
Question 1986Question

Arrange the following administrative institutional developments and milestone events of Medieval India in correct chronological order, from the earliest to the latest:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence from earliest to latest is: Introduction of Silver Tanka and Copper Jital (c. 1220s CE) → Establishment of Vijayanagara Kingdom (1336 CE) → Division of Bahmani Kingdom into eight Tarafs by Mahmud Gawan (c. 1470s CE) → Compilation of Fatawa-i-Alamgiri under Aurangzeb (1667–1675 CE).
The items are arranged correctly in chronological sequence: 1. Introduction of Silver Tanka and Copper Jital by Sultan Iltutmish (early 13th century, c. 1220s CE), 2. Establishment of the Vijayanagara Kingdom (1336 CE), 3. Division of the Bahmani Kingdom into eight Tarafs by Mahmud Gawan (c. 1470s CE), and 4. Compilation of Fatawa-i-Alamgiri under Emperor Aurangzeb (1667–1675 CE).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the historical period for the introduction of Sultanate coinage
Sultan Iltutmish introduced the Silver Tanka and Copper Jital in the early 13th century (c. 1211–1236 CE).
This event belongs to the Mamluk dynasty phase of the Delhi Sultanate.
2
Identify the foundation date of the Vijayanagara Kingdom
Harihara I and Bukka I established the Vijayanagara Empire in 1336 CE.
This occurred during the 14th century, coinciding with the reign of Muhammad bin Tughlaq in Delhi.
3
Locate the administrative reforms of Mahmud Gawan in the Bahmani Sultanate
Mahmud Gawan reorganized Bahmani provincial governance around 1470–1481 CE.
He split the existing four large provinces into eight smaller tarafs to tighten administrative control.
4
Identify the compilation timeframe of Fatawa-i-Alamgiri
Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb commissioned Fatawa-i-Alamgiri between 1667 and 1675 CE.
This represents late 17th-century Mughal legal and administrative consolidation.

Key Concept

Chronology of Medieval Indian Dynastic Developments and Administrative Systems
Question 1987Question

Match List-I (Soil Types and Natural Vegetation in India) with List-II (Key Pedological and Ecological Characteristics) to establish the correct relationships.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest
Saline Soil (Usar Soil)
Black Soil (Regur Soil)
Littoral and Swamp Forest

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest matches with the transitional leaf-shedding forest zone; Saline Soil matches with salt accumulation via capillary action; Black Soil matches with basaltic origin, moisture retention, and self-ploughing; Littoral and Swamp Forest matches with estuarine habitats, pneumatophores, and viviparous germination.
Each item is matched to its authoritative geographic classification in India. Tropical Dry Deciduous forests drop leaves during dry seasons to conserve water; Saline soils form when capillary action brings sodium and magnesium salts to the surface in poorly drained dry areas; Black soils arise from Deccan basalt weathering and display self-ploughing clay characteristics; and Littoral/Swamp forests utilize pneumatophores to survive in submerged coastal marshlands.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the defining physical and biological properties of each entity listed in List-I.
Tropical Dry Deciduous forest is characterized by seasonal leaf shedding; Saline soil features surface salt crusts via capillary action; Black soil exhibits high clay content and basaltic origin; Swamp forest features respiratory roots.
Establishing the core ecological or pedological signature of each term enables accurate matching.
2
Pair each entity from List-I with its matching description in List-II.
Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest corresponds to the description mentioning Teak and summer leaf drop; Saline Soil corresponds to salt accumulation via capillary forces; Black Soil corresponds to basaltic origin and self-ploughing; Littoral/Swamp Forest corresponds to tidal breathing roots.
Verifying all pairs ensures full alignment across the soil and vegetation classifications.

Key Concept

Soil formation mechanisms and natural vegetation adaptations in India
Question 1988Question

Under normal circumstances, what is the maximum time limit mandated by Section 7(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, for a Public Information Officer (PIO) to provide requested information to an applicant?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 30 days

Answer

The statutory time limit for providing requested information under normal circumstances is 30 days.
Under Section 7(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, the Public Information Officer is required to either provide the requested information or reject the application with reasons within 30 days of receiving the request.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the statutory provision defining response timelines for Public Information Officers under the RTI Act, 2005.
Section 7(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 governs the timeline for disposing of information requests.
Clear timeframes ensure administrative responsiveness and public accountability.
2
Determine the exact duration prescribed by Section 7(1) for standard requests.
The statute specifies that information must be provided or the request rejected within 30 days of receipt of the application.
30 days is the standard legal window for ordinary information requests.

Key Concept

Statutory response timelines under the Right to Information Act, 2005
Question 1989Question

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional position, immunities, and structural limits of the Union Executive in India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No criminal proceedings whatsoever can be instituted or continued against the President of India in any court during the term of office.; Unlike the British system, there is no constitutional provision in India establishing the legal responsibility of a Minister for an official act of the President.

Answer

The statements establishing that no criminal proceedings can be instituted against the President during office and that Indian ministers carry no legal responsibility for official presidential acts are correct.
The Constitution of India provides full criminal immunity to the President while in office under Article 361(2). Additionally, India follows executive responsibility to Parliament politically rather than legally; presidential acts do not require ministerial countersignature, meaning ministers cannot be sued in court for official executive acts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Constitutional immunities of the President under Article 361.
Article 361(2) provides absolute immunity from criminal proceedings during the President's term. However, Article 361(4) requires a two-month advance written notice before initiating civil proceedings for personal acts.
To verify the rules governing criminal and civil immunity for the Head of State.
2
Examine the doctrine of legal responsibility of Ministers under Indian parliamentary democracy.
Unlike the United Kingdom, where executive orders require ministerial countersignature making ministers legally answerable in courts ('the King can do no wrong'), the Indian Constitution does not require ministerial countersignature, leaving no system of legal responsibility of ministers for presidential acts.
To contrast British cabinet conventions with Indian constitutional provisions.
3
Evaluate the statutory ceiling on the size of the Union Council of Ministers under Article 75(1A).
The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act (2003) added Article 75(1A), stipulating that the total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, shall not exceed 15% of the total number of members of the House of the People (Lok Sabha), not both Houses of Parliament.
To verify the specific parliamentary house used for computing the maximum size of the council.

Key Concept

Constitutional Immunities of the President, System of Ministerial Responsibility, and Size Ceiling of Union Council of Ministers under Articles 75 and 361.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 1990Question

During the 1945 Indian National Army (INA) trials held at the Red Fort in Delhi, three officers—Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Sahgal, and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon—were court-martialed by the British colonial government. Which of the following statements correctly describes the legal defense organized for these officers?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Indian National Congress constituted an INA Defence Committee led by Bhulabhai Desai, joined by legal luminaries including Tej Bahadur Sapru, Kailash Nath Katju, and Jawaharlal Nehru.

Answer

The Indian National Congress constituted an INA Defence Committee led by Bhulabhai Desai, joined by legal luminaries including Tej Bahadur Sapru, Kailash Nath Katju, and Jawaharlal Nehru.
When the British authorities decided to hold public courts-martial of INA soldiers at the Red Fort in late 1945, the Indian National Congress organized a legal defense committee. Bhulabhai Desai led the defense team and delivered a masterful legal argument on international law and the right of an enslaved people to fight for freedom. Jawaharlal Nehru donned his lawyer's robe after 25 years to join the defense alongside Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru and Kailash Nath Katju.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the historical context of the INA Red Fort trials of November 1945.
Recognize that three INA officers (Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Sahgal, and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon) were tried jointly at the Red Fort, generating widespread public sympathy across India.
Establishing the core event helps isolate the political and legal measures undertaken in response.
2
Evaluate the details of the legal defense committee organized to represent the accused officers.
Confirm that the Indian National Congress formed the INA Defence Committee, where senior advocate Bhulabhai Desai served as the chief defense counsel, supported by Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru, Dr. Kailash Nath Katju, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Asaf Ali.
Verification of historical leadership and members confirms the accuracy of the defense panel composition.

Key Concept

INA Red Fort Trials (1945) and the INA Defence Committee
Question 1991Question

With reference to the structural reforms and committee recommendations introduced during the 1991 Economic Reforms (LPG) in India, consider the following statements:

1. The Narasimham Committee (1991) on the Financial System recommended a phased reduction of both the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) to augment liquidity for commercial bank credit.
2. The Raja Chelliah Committee was constituted to lay down the roadmap for comprehensive reforms in direct and indirect taxation.
3. The Rangarajan Committee (1993) on Disinvestment of Shares in Public Sector Enterprises recommended that equity disinvestment in non-reserved/non-core sectors should be strictly capped at 20%20\% to retain dominant state equity control.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 2 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect.
The option selecting statements 1 and 2 only is correct. The Narasimham Committee (1991) advocated reducing reserve requirements (SLR/CRR) to leave banks with adequate loanable funds, while the Raja Chelliah Committee formulated comprehensive tax structure reforms. Statement 3 is false because the 1993 Rangarajan Committee recommended disinvesting up to 49%49\% equity in reserved sectors and up to 100%100\% in non-reserved enterprises.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding the Narasimham Committee (1991).
The Narasimham Committee recommended lowering high statutory reserve ratios (CRR and SLR) to unlock commercial bank funds for private sector credit expansion. Thus, Statement 1 is correct.
Prior to 1991, high SLR and CRR locked up over 50%50\% of bank deposits into government pre-emptions.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the Raja Chelliah Committee.
The Tax Reforms Committee headed by Raja J. Chelliah (1991-1993) provided the foundational blueprint for reforming direct tax rates (lowering income/corporate tax rates) and simplifying indirect taxes (modvat/excise). Thus, Statement 2 is correct.
Chelliah committee recommendations formed the pillar of fiscal structural reforms under the 1991 LPG policy.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding the Rangarajan Committee (1993) on Disinvestment.
The Rangarajan Committee recommended that disinvestment could go up to 49%49\% for industries reserved for the public sector, and up to 100%100\% in non-reserved/non-core industries. The 20%20\% limit was only an initial ad-hoc cap applied in 1991–92 before the committee's report. Thus, Statement 3 is incorrect.
The Rangarajan Committee advocated significantly higher equity dilution than the initial ad-hoc 20%20\% target.

Key Concept

Structural Reforms and High-Level Reform Committees of 1991 (LPG Era)
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 1992Question

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions governing Money Bills and the legislative powers of the Governor in a State Legislature:

1. A Money Bill can be introduced in either House of a bicameral State Legislature with the prior recommendation of the Governor.
2. If any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly thereon shall be final.
3. The Governor cannot return a Money Bill passed by the State Legislature for its reconsideration.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 2 and 3 only

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that statements 2 and 3 only are correct.
Statement 2 is correct as Article 199(3) vests exclusive and final authority in the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly to decide whether a Bill is a Money Bill. Statement 3 is correct as Article 200 precludes the Governor from returning a Money Bill for legislative reconsideration because it was introduced with the Governor's prior recommendation. Statement 1 is incorrect because Article 198 states that a Money Bill cannot be introduced in the Legislative Council.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding introduction of Money Bills
Under Article 198 of the Indian Constitution, a Money Bill shall not be introduced in a Legislative Council. It can only originate in the Legislative Assembly. Thus, Statement 1 is incorrect.
Constitutional restriction on upper houses in financial matters.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding certification of a Money Bill
Under Article 199(3), if any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly is final. Thus, Statement 2 is correct.
Assembly Speaker holds sole authority over bill classification.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding Governor's options for Money Bills
Under Article 200, when a Money Bill is presented to the Governor, the Governor may give assent, withhold assent, or reserve it for the President, but CANNOT return it to the House for reconsideration. Thus, Statement 3 is correct.
Money Bills are introduced with the Governor's prior recommendation, removing the rationale for returning them.

Key Concept

Procedure for Money Bills and Governor's Assent in State Legislature (Articles 198, 199, and 200)
Question 1993Question

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional jurisdiction and scope of writs under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution of India:

1. The Supreme Court cannot refuse to entertain an application under Article 32 on the ground that an alternative legal remedy is available, because the right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 is itself a guaranteed Fundamental Right.
2. The High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is wider in subject-matter scope than that of the Supreme Court under Article 32.
3. The judicial review power of High Courts to issue writs under Article 226 forms an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be excluded even by a constitutional amendment.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Answer

Statements 1, 2, and 3 are all correct.
All three statements are constitutionally sound. Statement 1 is correct because Article 32 is itself a guaranteed fundamental right, meaning the Supreme Court cannot deny relief on the grounds of alternative remedies. Statement 2 is correct because High Courts can issue writs for both fundamental rights and legal rights ('for any other purpose'). Statement 3 is correct as the 7-judge bench in L. Chandra Kumar (1997) declared judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 to be part of the unamendable basic structure of the Constitution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding Article 32 status
Statement 1 is correct. Article 32 is enshrined in Part III of the Constitution as a Fundamental Right. Therefore, accessing the Supreme Court under Article 32 is a constitutional duty of the court, and an alternative remedy cannot be a bar to entertaining the petition.
Article 32 provides a guaranteed remedy, whereas High Court writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is discretionary.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding subject-matter scope of Articles 32 and 226
Statement 2 is correct. Article 32 can be invoked exclusively for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, whereas Article 226 can be invoked for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights as well as 'for any other purpose' (ordinary legal rights). Thus, the subject-matter scope of High Courts is wider.
The phrase 'for any other purpose' expands Article 226 beyond Fundamental Rights.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding basic structure doctrine and Article 226
Statement 3 is correct. In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), a 7-judge Constitution Bench held that the power of judicial review over legislative actions vested in High Courts under Article 226 (and Supreme Court under Article 32) forms an essential feature of the basic structure of the Constitution.
Constitutional amendments excluding judicial review under Article 226 are unconstitutional.

Key Concept

Writ Jurisdiction and Basic Structure Doctrine (Articles 32 & 226)
Question 1994Question

Match the 19th-century anti-colonial movements and uprisings in List I with their prominent leaders or organizers in List II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Ahom Revolt (1828)
Kuka Movement (1872)
Farazi Movement (1838)
Gadkari Uprising (1844)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings are: Ahom Revolt (1828) matches Gomdhar Konwar; Kuka Movement (1872) matches Baba Ram Singh; Farazi Movement (1838) matches Dadu Mian; and Gadkari Uprising (1844) matches Daji Krishna Pandit.
Each uprising matches its historical leader: Gomdhar Konwar headed the Ahom rebellion in Assam (1828); Baba Ram Singh led the Kuka movement in Punjab; Dadu Mian spearheaded the agrarian Farazi struggle in Bengal; and Daji Krishna Pandit was associated with the Gadkari revolt in Kolhapur.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the geographical context and key leader for the Ahom Revolt.
The Ahom Revolt occurred in Assam (1828) led by prince Gomdhar Konwar.
It was triggered by the British East India Company attempting to annex Ahom territories after the First Anglo-Burmese War.
2
Associate the Kuka Movement with its primary leader in Punjab.
The Kuka Movement is associated with Baba Ram Singh.
Although initiated by Bhagat Jawahar Mal, Baba Ram Singh organized the Kukas into an active political movement against British dominance in Punjab.
3
Determine the leader of the Farazi Movement in Bengal.
The Farazi Movement is associated with Dadu Mian.
Dadu Mian organized the Farazis into a militant socio-religious and agrarian movement against oppressive local landlords.
4
Match the Gadkari Uprising with its leadership in Maharashtra.
The Gadkari Uprising matches Daji Krishna Pandit.
The Gadkaris, a garrison class of Maratha forts in Kolhapur, revolted when subjected to retrenchment and administrative restructuring.

Key Concept

Leadership and Regional Centers of 19th-Century Peasant, Tribal, and Anti-Colonial Uprisings
Question 1995Question

Regarding the constitutional safeguards ensuring the independence of key constitutional authorities in India, which of the following provisions correctly applies to BOTH the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: They become completely ineligible for any further employment under the Government of India or the Government of any State after ceasing to hold their respective offices.

Answer

Both the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) are completely ineligible for any further employment under the Government of India or any State Government after demitting office.
To maintain absolute independence from executive influence, both Article 148(4) (for the CAG) and Article 319(a) (for the Chairman of the UPSC) stipulate that upon relinquishing their respective positions, these officials are entirely disqualified from holding any subsequent office or employment under the Union or State governments.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze post-retirement restrictions for CAG and UPSC Chairman.
Under Article 148(4), the CAG is barred from further office under the GoI or State Governments. Under Article 319(a), the Chairman of the UPSC is similarly barred from further employment under the GoI or State Governments.
This guarantees independence from executive influence or future political inducements.
2
Evaluate removal procedures for both authorities.
The CAG is removed via Parliamentary address identical to a Supreme Court Judge (Article 148(1)). The UPSC Chairman is removed by the President following a Supreme Court inquiry under Article 317(1).
The removal grounds and parliamentary mechanics differ between the two positions.
3
Verify financial autonomy and voting mechanisms.
Salaries and administrative expenses for both offices are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India (Articles 148(6) and 322), which means they are non-votable.
Charged expenditures do not require annual parliamentary votes.

Key Concept

Independence guarantees and post-tenure restrictions of Indian Constitutional Bodies
Question 1996Question

With reference to the Union Legislature in India, which Article of the Constitution of India explicitly provides the legal definition of a 'Money Bill'?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 110

Answer

Article 110
Article 110 of the Constitution of India provides the precise definition of a Money Bill, stating that a bill is deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with taxation, custody or withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India, or regulation of borrowing money by the Union Government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Recall the constitutional article that contains the definition of a Money Bill.
Article 110 of the Indian Constitution defines a Money Bill as one dealing exclusively with taxation, government borrowing, or expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India.
It is essential to distinguish between the article containing the definition (Article 110) and the article prescribing the legislative procedure (Article 109).

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions defining a Money Bill (Article 110)
Question 1997Question

With reference to the institutional machinery of NITI Aayog and the post-1991 structural reform architecture in India, consider the following statements:

I. The Governing Council of NITI Aayog comprises the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers of all States and Union Territories with Assemblies, and Lieutenant Governors of other Union Territories.
II. NITI Aayog possesses direct constitutional authority to allocate plan revenue and capital expenditure grants to state governments for Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).
III. The Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO) functions as an attached office under NITI Aayog to conduct independent evaluations of central government initiatives.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Statements I and III only

Answer

Statements I and III are correct.
The correct answer highlights that NITI Aayog serves primarily as a policy think-tank promoting cooperative federalism through its Governing Council (comprising the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and Lieutenant Governors) and monitors program implementation via the Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO). Crucially, fund allocation powers formerly held by the Planning Commission were transferred entirely to the Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement I regarding NITI Aayog Governing Council composition
Statement I is correct
The Governing Council is the premier body of NITI Aayog, chaired by the Prime Minister and comprising Chief Ministers of all States and UTs with legislatures, alongside Lieutenant Governors of other UTs.
2
Evaluate Statement II regarding fund allocation powers
Statement II is incorrect
Unlike the former Planning Commission, NITI Aayog is strictly an advisory think tank and does not have the power to allocate central funds or financial grants to state governments. Fund allocations are handled by the Department of Expenditure under the Ministry of Finance based on Finance Commission recommendations.
3
Evaluate Statement III regarding DMEO
Statement III is correct
The Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO) was established in September 2015 as an attached office under NITI Aayog by merging the erstwhile Program Evaluation Organisation and Independent Evaluation Office to monitor program outcomes.

Key Concept

Organizational Structure of NITI Aayog and Division of Financial Powers Post-Planning Commission
Question 1998Question

Consider the following statements regarding the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002, which created a tripartite constitutional framework for education across Part III, Part IV, and Part IVA:

1. It inserted Article 21A in Part III, declaring free and compulsory education for children between the ages of 6 and 14 years as a Fundamental Right.
2. It modified the scope of Article 45 in Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) to focus on early childhood care and education for children below the age of six years.
3. It added clause (k) to Article 51A under Part IVA, making it a Fundamental Duty of a parent or guardian to provide educational opportunities to their child aged 6 to 14 years.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1, 2 and 3

Answer

Statements 1, 2, and 3 are all correct.
The correct answer includes all three statements because the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 enacted a coordinated change across Part III, Part IV, and Part IVA. It introduced Article 21A (Fundamental Right for ages 6–14), modified Article 45 (Directive Principle for children up to 6 years), and added Article 51A(k) (Fundamental Duty of parents/guardians for children aged 6–14).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the impact of the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 on Part III (Fundamental Rights).
It inserted Article 21A, guaranteeing free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6 to 14 years as a Fundamental Right.
This elevated primary education to an enforceable right of every child in India.
2
Examine the modification made to Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy).
Article 45 was substituted to read that the State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.
Since 6–14 years moved to Article 21A, Article 45 was repurposed to cover early childhood care below 6 years.
3
Examine the addition to Part IVA (Fundamental Duties).
Clause (k) was appended to Article 51A, making it the fundamental duty of a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to their child or ward aged 6 to 14 years.
This expanded the total number of Fundamental Duties from 10 to 11.

Key Concept

Tripartite Constitutional Alignment on Education via the 86th Amendment
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 1999Question

Consider the following statements regarding the methodology recommended by the Suresh Tendulkar Committee for poverty estimation in India:

1. The committee recommended moving away from poverty lines anchored purely to calorie consumption.
2. The committee introduced a uniform Poverty Line Basket (PLB) based on urban consumption specifications across both rural and urban areas.
3. The committee advocated returning exclusively to the 30-day Uniform Reference Period (URP) for data collection.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The committee recommended moving away from poverty lines anchored purely to calorie consumption.; The committee introduced a uniform Poverty Line Basket (PLB) based on urban consumption specifications across both rural and urban areas.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Suresh Tendulkar Committee recommended moving away from calorie-consumption anchors and introduced a uniform Poverty Line Basket across both rural and urban areas.
The statements highlighting that the Suresh Tendulkar Committee moved away from calorie-based anchoring and introduced a uniform Poverty Line Basket across rural and urban sectors are correct because the committee sought to modernize poverty measurement by explicitly accounting for health and education expenses while ensuring spatial parity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding calorie consumption anchoring.
Statement 1 is correct. The Suresh Tendulkar Committee (2009) criticized the old calorie-based norm (2400 kcal rural / 2100 kcal urban) and decoupled poverty estimation from calorie intake.
Calorie intake alone did not correlate reliably with nutritional outcomes or health status.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the Poverty Line Basket (PLB).
Statement 2 is correct. The committee used the urban consumption basket as the uniform baseline for both rural and urban India.
Using a uniform basket allowed price differentials to reflect spatial variations in living costs accurately.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding reference periods.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The committee recommended using the Mixed Reference Period (MRP) instead of the 30-day Uniform Reference Period (URP).
MRP captures low-frequency consumption (e.g., clothing, footwear, durables, education, institutional medical care) over a 365-day recall period.

Key Concept

Suresh Tendulkar Committee Methodology on Poverty Estimation
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 2000Question

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional bodies created for local self-government under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor of the State and can be removed from office only in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of a High Court.; The State Finance Commission constituted under Article 243-I is tasked with reviewing the financial position of Panchayats and making recommendations for distribution of net tax proceeds.

Answer

The statements confirming that the State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor with removal procedures identical to a High Court Judge, and that the State Finance Commission is constituted under Article 243-I to review Panchayat finances, are correct.
Under Articles 243K and 243-I of the Constitution of India, the State Election Commissioner has security of tenure equal to a High Court Judge to ensure independent elections, while the State Finance Commission is constituted by the Governor every five years to advise on local body revenue sharing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Article 243K regarding the State Election Commission.
Article 243K(2) specifies that the Governor appoints the State Election Commissioner and guarantees constitutional protection by allowing removal only in like manner and on like grounds as a High Court Judge.
To verify the appointment authority, tenure protection, and removal procedure for rural and urban election authorities.
2
Examine Article 243-I and Article 243Y regarding the State Finance Commission.
The Governor constitutes a State Finance Commission every 5 years under Article 243-I (and Article 243Y for municipalities) to recommend measures for improving local government finances and distributing revenue.
To confirm the mandate, constitution interval, and financial scope of the commission.
3
Verify state-level legislative powers and laying requirements for constitutional commission reports.
The Governor determines conditions of service subject to state legislative laws (not UPSC), and commission reports must be laid before the State Legislature with an action-taken memorandum.
To identify incorrect statements regarding regulatory control and report submission procedures.

Key Concept

Constitutional Provisions for State Election Commission and State Finance Commission (Articles 243I and 243K)
PreviousPage 100 / 230Next
All practice questions — State PSC Exam | Examkin