Logical Reasoning

666 soru

Soru 401Soru →

Under regional airspace management guidelines, any aerial survey platform operating in the coastal estuary that is equipped with lidar bathymetry is subject to automated transponder logging. No aerial survey platform subject to automated transponder logging is certified for low-altitude wildlife sanctuary flyovers. Every survey platform operated by the state marine research unit is equipped with lidar bathymetry, and at least some survey platforms operated by the state marine research unit are certified for low-altitude wildlife sanctuary flyovers.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some survey platforms operated by the state marine research unit do not operate in the coastal estuary.

Cevap

At least some survey platforms operated by the state marine research unit do not operate in the coastal estuary.
The deduction is logically airtight: platforms operated by the state marine research unit that possess flyover certification cannot be subject to transponder logging. Because operating in the coastal estuary with lidar triggers mandatory logging, and all state platforms possess lidar, any certified state platform must not be operating in the coastal estuary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the overlap among state marine research unit platforms
There exists at least one state marine research unit platform that is both equipped with lidar bathymetry and certified for low-altitude wildlife sanctuary flyovers.
The stimulus states that all state unit platforms have lidar bathymetry, and some are certified for low-altitude sanctuary flyovers.
2
Apply the rule regarding sanctuary flyovers and transponder logging
These certified state unit platforms are not subject to automated transponder logging.
The rule states that no platform subject to automated transponder logging is certified for low-altitude flyovers, so having the certification guarantees that the platform is not subject to logging.
3
Apply the contrapositive of the coastal estuary operating condition
Because these platforms have lidar bathymetry but are not subject to transponder logging, they cannot be operating in the coastal estuary.
Operating in the estuary while having lidar requires transponder logging; therefore, lacking transponder logging while possessing lidar guarantees not operating in the coastal estuary.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Chaining and Quantifier Deductions
Soru 402Soru →

Match each short argument with the description of its underlying logical structure or flaw.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Every employee who meets their sales quota receives an annual bonus. Marcus received an annual bonus; therefore, Marcus must have met his sales quota.
If the council approves the new transit line, commuter travel times will decrease. The council rejected the transit line; therefore, commuter travel times will not decrease.
All licensed architects in the firm are certified in green building standards, and several licensed architects lead project teams. Therefore, several team leaders in the firm are certified in green building standards.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The argument regarding the sales bonus matches the flaw of treating a sufficient condition as necessary; the transit line argument matches the flaw of assuming the absence of a sufficient condition prevents the outcome; and the architect argument matches the valid deduction of a universal property applied to an intersecting subset.
The correct pairings accurately map each stimulus to its exact logical architecture: Marcus's scenario exemplifies affirming the consequent, the transit scenario exemplifies denying the antecedent, and the architectural team scenario demonstrates a valid universal-to-subset deduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional structure of the sales bonus argument.
Identified the structure as: If Quota, then Bonus. Bonus occurred, therefore Quota occurred. This is the fallacy of affirming the consequent (necessary vs. sufficient confusion).
Determining the conditional relationship reveals whether the inference moves validly or commits a reversal flaw.
2
Analyze the conditional structure of the transit line argument.
Identified the structure as: If Approved, then Decreased Times. Not Approved, therefore Not Decreased Times. This is the fallacy of denying the antecedent.
Checking the truth conditions confirms that rejecting the sufficient condition does not rule out other causes of the outcome.
3
Analyze the quantifier and subset logic of the architect argument.
Identified the structure as: All Architects have Certification; Some Architects are Team Leaders; therefore, Some Team Leaders have Certification. This is a valid syllogistic deduction.
Evaluating set intersections demonstrates that every member of the subset shares the universal property of the whole set.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying isomorphic argument structures, conditional reasoning flaws, and valid subset deductions.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 403Soru →

Marine Biologist: Over the past decade, populations of native ribbon kelp in the North Sound estuary declined by sixty percent. During the same period, water salinity in the estuary dropped significantly due to increased agricultural runoff from nearby farms. Because laboratory experiments confirm that juvenile ribbon kelp tissue suffers cellular degradation when exposed to reduced salinity, the decline in North Sound's ribbon kelp must be primarily caused by this agricultural runoff.

Which of the following statements, if true, undermine the marine biologist's argument? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: An invasive species of herbivorous sea urchin that feeds voraciously on mature ribbon kelp was introduced to the North Sound estuary ten years ago and has since multiplied substantially.; The agricultural runoff entering the estuary contains dissolved nutrients that neutralize cellular stress in juvenile ribbon kelp, keeping juvenile survival rates in North Sound consistent with historical averages.

Cevap

The argument is undermined by the statements identifying an alternative cause (the proliferation of an invasive kelp predator) and showing that local runoff conditions prevent the juvenile mortality observed in laboratory settings.
The argument concludes that agricultural runoff caused the kelp decline based on a concurrent drop in salinity and laboratory tests on juvenile kelp. The statement regarding the invasive sea urchin undermines the conclusion by introducing a plausible alternative cause that occurred over the same timeframe. The statement regarding dissolved nutrients neutralizing cellular stress in the wild weakens the argument by showing that the laboratory findings do not apply to the actual conditions in the estuary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and supporting premises in the stimulus.
Conclusion: The decline in North Sound's ribbon kelp was primarily caused by agricultural runoff. Premises: Salinity dropped due to runoff over the past decade, and laboratory tests show juvenile kelp tissue degrades in low salinity.
Isolating the core causal claim is essential for evaluating potential counterevidence.
2
Identify the logical assumptions connecting the premises to the conclusion.
The author assumes no other major confounding factor caused the decline, and that laboratory observations directly translate to wild estuary conditions.
Weakeners target unstated assumptions or provide alternative explanations for observed phenomena.
3
Evaluate each option against the causal chain.
The option introducing an invasive grazing sea urchin provides an alternate cause, while the option showing nutrient buffering in the estuary breaks the link between laboratory data and wild outcomes.
Both findings directly reduce the likelihood that agricultural runoff was the primary driver of the population decline.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening causal arguments by introducing alternative explanations or invalidating the application of experimental data to wild conditions
Soru 404Soru →

For each logical argument presented below, identify the unstated assumption upon which the argument's conclusion strictly depends. Apply the Negation Test: if the logical opposite of the assumption destroys the argument's conclusion, it is the correct necessary assumption.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Purists within the field of historical preservation insist that architectural restoration should seamlessly replicate original materials and construction techniques. Yet, employing seamless replication obscures the chronological evolution of a building, effectively hiding its true history from researchers. Because preserving historical truth is paramount, ethically responsible restoration demands that any modern interventions be made structurally and visually distinct from the original edifice.
The abyssal crustacean known as C. caecus lacks ocular structures entirely, yet it features extraordinarily complex chemosensory antennae. Because this particular species resides strictly in aphotic ocean depths—environments where light is entirely absent and vision is consequently useless—biologists conclude that these specialized chemosensory antennae must have evolved as a direct compensatory mechanism for navigating and hunting without vision in their deep-sea habitat.
The city's new zoning ordinance restricts high-density residential housing exclusively to designated transit corridors. The mayor implemented this policy with the explicit goal of reducing overall traffic congestion across the metropolitan area. However, high-density housing always yields a massive net increase in the local population density of the area where it is built. Therefore, the new ordinance will inevitably exacerbate the city's traffic congestion rather than alleviate it.
Recently, several enterprise software firms transitioned to 'flat' management hierarchies, allowing developers to self-select their engineering projects rather than receiving assignments from superiors. A comprehensive study revealed that short-term software output at these firms dropped by 20 percent following the transition. Consequently, to ensure the maximum possible software output over time, it is imperative that enterprise software firms maintain traditional top-down project assignment systems.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The architectural preservation argument pairs with the assumption regarding auxiliary archival documentation. The biological evolution argument pairs with the assumption regarding evolutionary predecessors. The public policy argument pairs with the assumption regarding per capita vehicular usage. The economic management argument pairs with the assumption regarding developer morale and output reduction.
Each correct match successfully passes the Negation Test. When the logically negated version of the assumption is introduced into the corresponding argument, it severs the connection between the premises and the conclusion, thereby rendering the argument invalid.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the architectural preservation argument to identify its logical gap.
The argument jumps from 'seamless replication obscures physical evolution' to 'restoration demands visually distinct physical interventions'. It assumes no non-physical way to record history exists.
Applying the Negation Test to the archival documentation assumption destroys the requirement for physical distinctness, proving it is a necessary assumption.
2
Analyze the biological evolution argument to identify its logical gap.
The argument concludes a causal evolutionary origin (compensating for darkness) based on current utility.
Applying the Negation Test to the evolutionary predecessor assumption shows that if the trait existed before the dark environment, it could not have evolved as a response to it (a Defender assumption).
3
Analyze the public policy argument to identify its logical gap.
The argument equates an absolute increase in population density with a net increase in traffic congestion, ignoring the rate of driving.
Applying the Negation Test to the vehicular usage assumption reveals that if per capita driving drops significantly enough, traffic won't increase, breaking the link between population and congestion.
4
Analyze the economic management argument to identify its logical gap.
The argument concludes that because alternative A (flat hierarchy) causes a 20 percent drop, alternative B (top-down) must be maintained to maximize output.
Applying the Negation Test to the developer morale assumption demonstrates that if alternative B causes an equal or worse drop, maintaining it does not ensure maximum output (a Defender assumption).

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying implicit premises required for an argument's conclusion to remain logically valid, specifically utilizing the Negation Test to verify necessity.
Soru 405Soru →

Organic chemists studying pharmaceutical manufacturing protocols have documented the following facts regarding the synthesis of Compound X-9:

• Any synthesis protocol for Compound X-9 that utilizes an immobilized lipase enzyme requires a substrate solution with a pH below 6.5.
• Every synthesis protocol requiring a substrate solution with a pH below 6.5 necessitates subsequent chiral flash chromatography to isolate the active enantiomer, unless the reaction vessel is maintained under supercritical carbon dioxide conditions.
• No synthesis protocol that necessitates chiral flash chromatography can yield an enantiomeric purity exceeding 98%.
• During Laboratory Beta's recent production run of Compound X-9, the reaction vessel was not maintained under supercritical carbon dioxide conditions, and the synthesis yielded an enantiomeric purity of 99.4%.

Based on the facts above, evaluate the truth value of the following statement:

"Laboratory Beta's production run of Compound X-9 did not utilize an immobilized lipase enzyme."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True: The deduction is logically necessary based on the chained contrapositives of the provided premises.
The statement is logically guaranteed to be true by a direct chain of contrapositives: 99.4% purity proves chiral flash chromatography was not required; the absence of both chromatography and supercritical carbon dioxide proves a substrate pH below 6.5 was not required; and the absence of a sub-6.5 pH requirement strictly rules out the use of an immobilized lipase enzyme.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the purity constraint and infer whether chiral flash chromatography was necessitated.
Laboratory Beta's protocol did not necessitate chiral flash chromatography.
The stimulus states that any protocol necessitating chiral flash chromatography cannot exceed 98% purity. Because Laboratory Beta achieved 99.4% purity, the contrapositive dictates that chiral flash chromatography was not necessitated.
2
Apply the chromatography rule under non-supercritical conditions to evaluate the pH requirement.
The synthesis protocol did not require a substrate solution with a pH below 6.5.
The rule states: (pH < 6.5 AND NOT supercritical CO2) implies chiral chromatography. Given that supercritical CO2 was NOT used, but chiral chromatography was NOT necessitated, the condition (pH < 6.5) must be false.
3
Apply the initial enzyme requirement premise to conclude whether an immobilized lipase enzyme was used.
An immobilized lipase enzyme was not utilized in the production run.
The first premise establishes: (utilized immobilized lipase) implies (requires pH < 6.5). By contrapositive, because the protocol did not require a pH below 6.5, it could not have utilized an immobilized lipase enzyme.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-step deductive chaining via conditional contrapositives and compound logical operators
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 406Soru →

Each of the following arguments contains a distinct vulnerability in its logical reasoning. Match each flawed argument with the abstract description that most accurately identifies its reasoning error.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Maritime Insurer: A commercial vessel cannot secure an international seaworthiness certificate unless it has installed dual-redundant bilge pumps. Because the freighter Aegis has newly installed dual-redundant bilge pumps, it is guaranteed to receive the seaworthiness certificate.
Urban Planner: The municipal council must either approve the complete pedestrianization of the central commercial district or reconcile itself to the total economic collapse of downtown retailers. Since a majority of council members oppose full pedestrianization, downtown retail commerce will inevitably fail.
Venture Capitalist: Every software engineer recruited to the new autonomous driving startup has published award-winning machine-learning research. Therefore, the newly assembled engineering team as a whole is certain to operate with unprecedented organizational synergy and collaborative efficiency.
Legal Theorist: Natural physical laws cannot be repealed, suspended, or amended by human legislative assemblies. Because copyright statutes and patent codes are laws, it follows that legislative bodies lack the power to amend or eliminate them.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings match the maritime argument with the confusion of necessary and sufficient conditions, the urban planning argument with the false dilemma fallacy, the venture capitalist argument with the part-to-whole composition fallacy, and the legal theorist argument with the equivocation on statutory versus natural law.
Each argument maps directly to its defining logical fallacy: the maritime vessel argument confuses a necessary condition for a sufficient one; the municipal transit argument posits a false dichotomy between two extreme outcomes; the engineering team argument erroneously infers a whole-group attribute from individual-member attributes; and the legal theorist argument commits equivocation by shifting the meaning of the word 'law.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional structure in the maritime argument.
Identified that installing dual-redundant pumps is necessary for certification, but the argument improperly concludes that fulfilling this condition guarantees certification.
This is a textbook confusion of necessary and sufficient conditions.
2
Examine the alternatives presented in the urban planning argument.
Identified that the argument artificially restricts the scenario to two extreme outcomes (full pedestrianization vs. total economic collapse).
This represents a false dichotomy / false dilemma fallacy.
3
Evaluate the relationship between the individual engineers and the engineering team.
Identified an invalid inference from properties of individual parts (individual publication records) to a property of the collective unit (organizational synergy).
This is a classic fallacy of composition (part-to-whole error).
4
Assess the usage of the term 'law' in the legal theorist argument.
Identified that 'law' is used in two incompatible senses: descriptive natural physical regularities versus prescriptive statutory codes.
This is a semantic shift / equivocation flaw.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Structural Flaw Identification
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 407Soru →

Every member of the astronomy club attended the guest lecture. Jordan attended the guest lecture, so Jordan must be a member of the astronomy club.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: All certified lifeguards at the community pool know CPR. Marcus knows CPR, so Marcus must be a certified lifeguard at the community pool.

Cevap

The argument concluding that Marcus must be a certified lifeguard because all certified lifeguards know CPR and Marcus knows CPR.
The correct argument exhibits the identical Mistaken Reversal flaw: it starts from a universal rule ('All certified lifeguards know CPR'), confirms the presence of the necessary condition ('Marcus knows CPR'), and illicitly concludes that the sufficient condition must hold ('Marcus must be a certified lifeguard').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical structure and validity of the stimulus.
Premise 1: Astronomy Club Member -> Attended Lecture. Premise 2: Jordan attended lecture. Conclusion: Jordan is an astronomy club member.
Deconstructing the argument reveals a classic Mistaken Reversal (Affirming the Consequent) where having a necessary condition is incorrectly treated as guaranteeing the sufficient condition.
2
Abstract the core flaw into a structural template.
All X are Y; Individual Z is Y; Therefore, Individual Z must be X.
A parallel flaw question requires matching the exact structural defect, including the certainty of the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the exact structural match.
The argument regarding certified lifeguards matches the template: All Lifeguards (X) know CPR (Y); Marcus (Z) knows CPR (Y); Therefore, Marcus (Z) is a Lifeguard (X).
Only this option replicates the exact invalid conditional reversal from an absolute universal premise.

Anahtar Kavram

Parallel Flaw - Mistaken Reversal (Affirming the Consequent)
Soru 408Soru →

The following arguments each contain a distinctive reasoning vulnerability. Match each flawed argument on the left with the statement on the right that most accurately describes the flaw in its reasoning.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Anthropologist: Every ancient language that remained in active use for over two millennia produced a formalized grammatical treatise. Because archaeologists discovered a formalized grammatical treatise for the ancient dialect of Oritan, Oritan must have remained an active spoken language for more than two millennia.
Urban Sociologist: Surveys show that neighborhoods with dedicated public chess tables experience lower rates of minor property vandalism than neighborhoods without them. Therefore, installing public chess tables in a neighborhood will directly prevent residents from committing acts of vandalism.
Management Consultant: Sterling Fleet operates with the lowest administrative overhead cost ratio of any logistics firm in the freight shipping sector. It follows that every regional branch office managed by Sterling Fleet must also operate with an exceptionally low administrative cost ratio.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The argument about the ancient language matches with treating a necessary condition as sufficient; the argument about neighborhood chess tables matches with inferring causation from correlation; and the argument about Sterling Fleet matches with presuming an attribute of an organization applies to each of its parts.
Each flawed argument corresponds directly to its abstract fallacy description: the first exhibits conditional reversal (treating a necessary condition as sufficient), the second commits a correlation-to-causation error, and the third commits the fallacy of division (attributing a collective property to each component part).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the formal logic structure of the first argument regarding ancient language treatises.
The premise states that survival requires a treatise (Survival -> Treatise). The conclusion assumes that having a treatise guarantees survival (Treatise -> Survival), which is a classic conditional reversal.
Isolating conditional indicators reveals that a necessary condition has been mistaken for a sufficient condition.
2
Analyze the causal inference in the second argument regarding public chess tables.
The premise provides a comparative correlation between chess tables and vandalism rates, while the conclusion claims a direct causal prevention mechanism.
Recognizing that correlation does not establish causation identifies the causal error.
3
Analyze the compositional relationship in the third argument regarding shipping branches.
The consultant transfers an overall firm-wide financial ratio to every single constituent subdivision.
Distinguishing between properties of a collective whole versus individual parts identifies the fallacy of division.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying formal and informal flaws in reasoning: confusing necessary and sufficient conditions, inferring causation from correlation, and the fallacy of division.
Soru 409Soru →

Archaeometallurgical investigations of Bronze Age metal artifacts recovered from the Cilician Plain established the following facts:

• Every artifact cast from an arsenic-bronze alloy originated in a high-altitude highland furnace.
• Any artifact originating in a high-altitude highland furnace contains distinct nickel trace impurities only if it was smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores.
• No artifact smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores exhibits lead-isotope ratios characteristic of lowland alluvial deposits.
• Some excavated spearheads from the Cilician Plain are arsenic-bronze artifacts containing distinct nickel trace impurities.

If the statements above are true, which of the following statements must also be true? (Select all that apply)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some excavated spearheads from the Cilician Plain were smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores.; At least some artifacts originating in highland furnaces do not exhibit lead-isotope ratios characteristic of lowland alluvial deposits.

Cevap

The statements asserting that at least some excavated spearheads were smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores, and that at least some artifacts originating in highland furnaces do not exhibit lowland alluvial lead-isotope ratios, must both be true.
The premises state that some excavated spearheads are arsenic-bronze artifacts with nickel impurities. Because all arsenic-bronze artifacts originate in highland furnaces, these spearheads are highland furnace artifacts containing nickel impurities. The stimulus states that highland furnace artifacts contain nickel impurities only if smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores, which proves that these spearheads were smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores. Furthermore, because no artifact smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores exhibits lowland alluvial lead-isotope ratios, these highland-produced spearheads cannot exhibit those ratios, proving that at least some highland artifacts do not exhibit lowland lead-isotope ratios.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Chain the universal conditional premises.
Arsenic-bronze guarantees highland furnace origin. A highland furnace origin combined with nickel impurities guarantees polymetallic sulfide smelting. Polymetallic sulfide smelting guarantees the absence of lowland alluvial lead-isotope ratios.
Establishing the formal logical sequence allows valid deductions to be transferred across the premises.
2
Apply the existential premise regarding spearheads to the conditional chain.
There exist spearheads that are arsenic-bronze and contain nickel impurities. Because they are arsenic-bronze, they are highland artifacts. Because they are highland artifacts with nickel, they were smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores. Because they were smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores, they do not have lowland lead-isotope ratios.
Connecting the specific group of spearheads to the conditional rules proves their metallurgical properties deductively.
3
Evaluate the options against these derived conclusions.
The statement regarding some spearheads being smelted using polymetallic sulfide ores is directly verified. The statement that some highland artifacts lack lowland lead ratios is also verified by the existence of these same spearheads.
Isolating only the statements that are strictly guaranteed by the formal chain.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Quantifier and Conditional Logic Chaining
Soru 410Soru →

Urban Planner: Commuters who switch from driving personal vehicles to taking public transit experience a significant reduction in daily commute stress only if their transit trip requires no transfers between routes. A municipal transit authority plans to reduce commuter stress by introducing express bus lines that provide direct, transfer-free service between residential suburbs and the city center. Therefore, suburban commuters who switch from driving to these new express bus lines will experience a significant reduction in their daily commute stress.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the urban planner's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The new express bus lines will not introduce commute-related stressors that counteract the stress reduction gained from avoiding transfers.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that the new express bus lines will not introduce commute-related stressors that counteract the stress reduction gained from avoiding transfers.
The conclusion claims that suburban car commuters who switch to the new direct express buses will experience a significant reduction in commute stress. The premise only establishes that eliminating transfers is a necessary condition ('only if') for reducing stress when switching from driving. For the conclusion to follow, the author must assume that the new express bus lines will not introduce other countervailing stressors (such as severe delays, extreme noise, or overcrowding) that equal or outweigh the benefit of avoiding transfers. Negating this statement means the stress reduction would be offset, causing the conclusion to fail completely.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion in the stimulus.
Premise: Switching from driving to transit reduces commute stress only if the trip requires no transfers (a necessary condition). Premise: The transit authority is launching direct, transfer-free express bus routes. Conclusion: Suburban commuters who switch from driving to these express bus lines will experience a significant reduction in commute stress.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the logical relationship between the evidence provided and the claim being made.
2
Locate the logical gap between the necessary condition and the predicted outcome.
The author assumes that satisfying the necessary condition (no transfers) is sufficient to guarantee the reduction in stress, ignoring the possibility that other factors associated with the new buses might negate this benefit.
Necessary assumptions often function as defenders that rule out potential confounding factors that would invalidate the conclusion.
3
Apply the Negation Test to confirm necessity.
Negating the statement yields: 'The new express bus lines will introduce commute-related stressors that counteract the stress reduction gained from avoiding transfers.' If true, switching will not reduce stress, and the argument collapses.
A required assumption must fatally undermine the conclusion when logically negated.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Assumption and the Negation Test)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 411Soru →

Pair each of the following short deductive arguments with the statement that most accurately characterizes its logical form or reasoning defect.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Every homeowner who installs solar panels lowers their monthly utility bill. David did not lower his monthly utility bill; therefore, David did not install solar panels.
A theatrical production will be profitable only if it receives positive opening reviews. The new musical received glowing opening reviews; therefore, the musical will be profitable.
The municipal museum must either raise general admission prices or reduce public operating hours. The board of directors voted against raising admission prices; therefore, the museum must reduce operating hours.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The solar panel argument pairs with the statement describing valid deduction from the absence of a necessary result; the theatrical production argument pairs with the statement describing the error of treating a required condition as a guarantee; and the museum argument pairs with the statement describing an unjustified assumption of only two exclusive alternatives.
Each argument corresponds to its exact structural form: the solar panel argument validly concludes the absence of an initial condition because its necessary result did not happen; the theatrical production argument commits a conditional reversal error by treating a requirement as a guarantee; and the museum argument commits a false dilemma by arbitrarily restricting all possibilities to two choices.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Examine the formal conditional logic of the solar panel argument
The argument establishes that installing solar panels guarantees lower utility bills (P→QP \rightarrow Q), observes that the bill was not lowered (¬Q\neg Q), and validly concludes no solar panels were installed (¬P\neg P).
Maps the first argument to valid contrapositive deduction (modus tollens).
2
Examine the conditional indicator words in the theatrical production argument
The phrase 'only if' introduces a necessary condition (Profitable →\rightarrow Positive Reviews). Concluding profitability from positive reviews treats a necessary condition as sufficient.
Maps the second argument to the fallacy of affirming the consequent / mistaking a necessary condition for a sufficient condition.
3
Examine the disjunctive structure of the municipal museum argument
The argument asserts an 'either/or' premise without demonstrating that other budgetary actions are impossible, then eliminates one option to force the other.
Maps the third argument to the false dilemma fallacy.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying and differentiating valid conditional structures (modus tollens) from canonical reasoning flaws including necessary-versus-sufficient confusion and false dilemma.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 412Soru →

Marine biologists investigating benthic ecosystems in deep oceanic trenches have established the following facts:

• Any abyssal organism that derives energy primarily from sulfur-oxidizing endosymbionts produces specialized hemoglobin variants.
• Every benthic species that produces specialized hemoglobin variants can survive prolonged periods of severe hypoxia.
• No organism capable of surviving prolonged periods of severe hypoxia can inhabit shallow reef zones with high dissolved oxygen fluctuations.
• Several newly cataloged gastropod species in the trench derive energy primarily from sulfur-oxidizing endosymbionts.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some of the newly cataloged gastropod species cannot inhabit shallow reef zones with high dissolved oxygen fluctuations.

Cevap

At least some of the newly cataloged gastropod species cannot inhabit shallow reef zones with high dissolved oxygen fluctuations.
The conclusion that at least some newly cataloged gastropods cannot inhabit shallow reef zones is logically guaranteed. The stimulus establishes that several newly cataloged gastropods rely on sulfur-oxidizing endosymbionts. By following the valid conditional chain (Sulfur-Oxidizing -> Specialized Hemoglobin -> Hypoxia Tolerance -> Inability to Inhabit Shallow Reefs), those particular gastropods must have all downstream characteristics.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Symbolize the formal conditional relationships and quantifier statements from the stimulus.
1. Sulfur-Oxidizing -> Hemoglobin Variants
2. Hemoglobin Variants -> Survives Severe Hypoxia
3. Survives Severe Hypoxia -> Cannot Inhabit Shallow Reefs
4. Some Newly Cataloged Gastropods are Sulfur-Oxidizing.
Clarifies the exact logical structure and rules governing the facts provided.
2
Chain the universal conditional premises together.
Sulfur-Oxidizing -> Hemoglobin Variants -> Survives Severe Hypoxia -> Cannot Inhabit Shallow Reefs.
Allows direct deduction from any sufficient condition to all downstream necessary conditions.
3
Apply the existential quantifier statement to the conditional chain.
Since some newly cataloged gastropods possess the initial sufficient property (Sulfur-Oxidizing), those specific gastropods must possess all subsequent properties in the chain, concluding that at least some newly cataloged gastropods cannot inhabit shallow reef zones.
Determines the single logically necessary inference that must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Quantifier Intersection
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
Soru 413Soru →

Agricultural Scientist: In an effort to reduce synthetic pesticide applications, orchard managers introduced a predatory mite species into twenty commercial apple orchards to suppress herbivorous red spider mite populations. Over the subsequent three seasons, red spider mite damage to apple crops in these orchards fell by forty-five percent. Because synthetic pesticide applications remained constant across all twenty orchards throughout this period, the introduction of the predatory mites was clearly the primary cause of the reduction in crop damage.

Statement: If regional meteorological records confirm that unusually heavy rainfall during those three seasons fostered the widespread proliferation of a native fungal pathogen lethal to red spider mites, the agricultural scientist's conclusion is significantly weakened.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The conclusion asserts a specific causal relationship: predatory mites caused the reduction in red spider mite damage. Providing evidence that a fungal pathogen flourished during the exact same period and attacked the pest population introduces an alternative cause, which directly weakens the author's causal claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and main conclusion
Premise: Predatory mites were introduced; red spider mite damage dropped by 45%; chemical pesticide use remained unchanged. Conclusion: The introduction of predatory mites was the primary cause of the reduction in damage.
Isolating the core causal claim is essential for evaluating any potential weakener.
2
Identify the central assumption underlying the causal inference
The author assumes that no other unmeasured confounding factor or environmental variable caused the reduction in red spider mite populations during the three-year period.
Causal conclusions on the LSAT assume the absence of alternative explanations for the observed correlation or change.
3
Evaluate the impact of the statement on the causal claim
The proliferation of a lethal fungal pathogen during the trial provides a viable competing explanation for the pest decline, weakening the claim that predatory mites were responsible.
Demonstrating an alternate cause directly undermines the validity of the scientist's primary conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Alternative Explanations in Causal Arguments
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 414Soru →

Biologist: Cuttlefish rapidly alter their skin patterning to produce disruptive coloration when resting near heterogeneous coral rubble, but switch to uniform background matching when traversing open sand flats. Researchers originally hypothesized that this behavioral switching is driven by energetic efficiency, assuming that maintaining complex disruptive patterns demands substantially more neural computation and muscular tension in chromatophores than uniform matching. However, recent physiological assays demonstrate that maintaining uniform coloration requires just as much metabolic energy and muscular activation as maintaining disruptive patterning. Therefore, the hypothesis that energetic efficiency drives this behavioral switching must be false.

Which of the following are assumptions on which the biologist's argument strictly depends? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The overall energetic cost of transitioning between coloration states does not create an energetic savings that would make switching advantageous despite identical maintenance costs.; The laboratory assays did not substantially underestimate the wild energetic expenditure required to maintain disruptive patterning relative to uniform coloration.

Cevap

The argument depends on assuming that pattern transition costs do not create a net energetic advantage and that laboratory assays accurately reflect relative maintenance costs in the wild.
The correct options represent unstated assumptions required by the argument. One functions as a Supporter assumption by ruling out the possibility that transition costs yield net energy savings despite equal maintenance costs. The other functions as a Defender assumption by ensuring that the empirical baseline measured in the laboratory holds true under natural ecological conditions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the conclusion and supporting premises of the argument.
Premise: Maintenance of uniform and disruptive coloration uses equal energy. Conclusion: Energetic efficiency cannot be the driver of pattern switching.
Identifying the exact gap between equal maintenance costs and overall energetic efficiency is necessary to find required unstated assumptions.
2
Identify potential unstated gaps linking maintenance energy to total energetic efficiency.
The argument equates equal static maintenance costs with a lack of overall energetic benefit, overlooking transition dynamics and ecological validity of the lab assays.
Necessary assumptions must bridge these conceptual leaps or defend the premise validity against outside distortions.
3
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions.
Negating the statement about transition costs reveals that switching could still save energy; negating the assay fidelity shows maintenance costs might differ in the wild. Both negations shatter the conclusion.
A statement is strictly necessary if and only if its logical negation fatalizes the author's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption identification via Supporter and Defender gap analysis and the Negation Test.
Soru 415Soru →

Under municipal traffic regulations, any urban intersection equipped with adaptive signal timing must also possess automated pedestrian sensors. Furthermore, no intersection that possesses automated pedestrian sensors is permitted to operate in fixed-time flash mode during peak transit hours. Intersection K is located in the municipality and is equipped with adaptive signal timing.

Statement: Intersection K is not permitted to operate in fixed-time flash mode during peak transit hours.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is logically guaranteed by combining the two universal premises: having adaptive signal timing guarantees the presence of automated pedestrian sensors, and the presence of automated pedestrian sensors forbids fixed-time flash mode during peak transit hours. Because Intersection K has adaptive signal timing, it cannot operate in fixed-time flash mode during peak hours.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional premises from the stimulus
Adaptive Signal Timing →\rightarrow Automated Pedestrian Sensors; Automated Pedestrian Sensors →\rightarrow No Fixed-Time Flash Mode (during peak transit hours).
Translating the stimulus into formal logical relationships allows for precise deduction.
2
Chain the conditional statements using the transitive rule
Adaptive Signal Timing →\rightarrow No Fixed-Time Flash Mode (during peak transit hours).
The shared term 'Automated Pedestrian Sensors' links the sufficient condition directly to the ultimate requirement.
3
Apply the factual premise regarding Intersection K to the derived conditional rule
Because Intersection K satisfies the sufficient condition (adaptive signal timing), it necessarily satisfies the prohibition against fixed-time flash mode during peak transit hours.
Applying Modus Ponens guarantees that the statement must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Chaining and Transitive Deduction
Soru 416Soru →

Linguists agree that any dialect experiencing a rapid phonological shift within a single generation must either have extensive contact with neighboring language communities or be subject to rigorous educational standardization. Rigorous educational standardization, however, inevitably leads to the eradication of historical morphological irregularities. Recent field studies have documented several isolated mountain dialects that recently experienced rapid phonological shifts while thoroughly retaining their historical morphological irregularities. Furthermore, it is well established that no language community with extensive contact with neighboring communities can maintain an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary.

Which one of the following statements follows logically from the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some mountain dialects do not maintain an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary.

Cevap

At least some mountain dialects do not maintain an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary.
The correct answer correctly traces the logical chain of events. Because the several mountain dialects retained their irregularities, they avoided educational standardization. Since they experienced a rapid phonological shift without standardization, they must have had extensive contact with neighbors. Finally, any community with extensive contact cannot keep an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary. Therefore, it is definitively true that at least some mountain dialects do not maintain an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditions for the documented mountain dialects.
They experienced rapid phonological shift (RPS) AND retained historical morphological irregularities (no eradication).
This is explicitly stated in the stimulus as findings from recent field studies.
2
Determine the impact of retaining irregularities.
The dialects could not have been subject to rigorous educational standardization.
The stimulus establishes that rigorous standardization inevitably leads to eradication of irregularities. Taking the contrapositive, if there is no eradication, there was no rigorous standardization.
3
Apply the rule regarding rapid phonological shifts.
The mountain dialects must have had extensive contact with neighboring language communities.
RPS requires EITHER extensive contact OR rigorous standardization. Since step 2 ruled out standardization, extensive contact is the only remaining possibility for these dialects.
4
Determine the consequence of extensive contact.
These mountain dialects cannot maintain an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary.
The final premise dictates that no community with extensive contact can maintain an exclusively internally-derived vocabulary. Therefore, there are some mountain dialects that do not maintain one.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal Logic, Conditional Chains, and Intersecting Quantifiers
Soru 417Soru →

The four argumentative excerpts below each commit a distinct logical fallacy. Match each flawed argument with the abstract description that most accurately characterizes its primary inferential vulnerability.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Astrophysicist: In scientific inquiry, an 'observation' is strictly defined as an empirical measurement recorded by a physical sensing apparatus. However, theoretical cosmologists routinely assert that their mathematical models generate novel 'observations' concerning the topology of early spacetime. Therefore, these theorists must be directly manipulating physical laboratory instruments.
Paleoclimatologist: Marine geological records confirm that whenever extensive continental glaciation has taken place, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations have invariably fallen below 200 parts per million. Consequently, if international climate protocols successfully reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide below 200 parts per million, a period of extensive continental glaciation will be triggered.
Ergonomist: Every individual component in our redesigned modular assembly station—including the pneumatic lift, the articulated arm, and the anti-fatigue matting—has been independently verified to reduce worker musculoskeletal strain by at least ten percent. It follows that implementing the entire integrated assembly station will reduce total worker musculoskeletal strain by at least ten percent.
Cartographer: The regional transit authority must either develop an expensive proprietary smartphone navigation application or continue subsidizing the mass printing of multi-fold paper route maps at a recurring loss. Because current fiscal constraints make subsidizing printed paper maps impossible, the authority must immediately commission the proprietary smartphone application.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The astrophysicist's argument matches the description of illicitly shifting between two distinct meanings of a key term; the paleoclimatologist's argument matches the description of treating a necessary condition as a sufficient condition; the ergonomist's argument matches the description of erroneously inferring that a property of individual parts applies to the whole; and the cartographer's argument matches the description of assuming an unjustified binary choice.
Each flawed argument exhibits a classic structural vulnerability: the astrophysicist relies on a semantic shift (equivocation); the paleoclimatologist mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient trigger (conditional reversal); the ergonomist assumes that features of individual components aggregate uniformly to the whole system (fallacy of composition); and the cartographer artificially limits the decision space to two extreme options (false dilemma).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural gap in the astrophysicist argument
Identified equivocation on the word 'observation' between empirical data collection and theoretical output.
Matching structural vulnerabilities requires isolating the shift between premise definitions and conclusion claims.
2
Analyze the conditional logic in the paleoclimatologist argument
Identified necessary-versus-sufficient confusion (Glaciation -> Low CO2 does not imply Low CO2 -> Glaciation).
Evaluating conditional relationships clarifies whether the author has performed an illegal conditional reversal.
3
Analyze the aggregation logic in the ergonomist argument
Identified an error of composition (part-to-whole fallacy).
Determining whether individual part performance guarantees emergent system performance isolates composition flaws.
4
Analyze the scope of alternatives in the cartographer argument
Identified a false dilemma / exclusivity flaw.
Exclusivity flaws present an artificial either/or scenario while ignoring viable third alternatives.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Formal and Informal Logical Flaws in Deductive Reasoning
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 418Soru →

Architectural Historian: A historical preservation initiative is eligible to receive a municipal heritage grant only if the project concurrently stimulates local economic growth and rigorously preserves the original architectural integrity of the site. The newly proposed restoration of the Beaumont Foundry will definitively stimulate economic growth by creating three hundred permanent jobs. Furthermore, despite interior modernizations, the developers' binding agreement ensures the rigorous preservation of the foundry's original exterior architectural integrity. It follows inexorably that the Beaumont restoration will be awarded a municipal heritage grant.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning of the architectural historian's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The argument infers that a particular result will occur solely on the grounds that the stated prerequisites for that result have been satisfied.

Cevap

The correct answer identifies that the argument infers a result will occur solely because its prerequisites have been satisfied.
The argument states that a project is eligible for a grant 'only if' it meets two conditions: stimulating economic growth and preserving architectural integrity. In formal logic, these are necessary conditions. The historian then demonstrates that the Beaumont Foundry meets both of these conditions and concludes that it will 'inexorably' (definitely) be awarded the grant. This reasoning is flawed because it treats the satisfaction of necessary conditions (prerequisites) as sufficient to guarantee the outcome.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional logic in the argument's first sentence.
The phrase 'only if' introduces necessary conditions. To be eligible for a grant, a project must stimulate economic growth AND preserve architectural integrity.
Identifying the formal logical structure (Sufficient -> Necessary) is critical for diagnosing the flaw.
2
Evaluate how the premises apply this conditional logic to the Beaumont Foundry.
The premises establish that the Beaumont Foundry successfully meets both necessary conditions: it stimulates growth (by creating jobs) and preserves integrity (via binding agreement).
We must track whether the argument fulfills the necessary or sufficient conditions of the established rule.
3
Analyze the conclusion and identify the logical gap.
The author concludes the project 'will be awarded' the grant. This treats the fulfillment of necessary conditions as sufficient to guarantee the outcome (Affirming the Consequent).
Locating the exact disconnect between the premises and the absolute conclusion reveals the primary vulnerability of the reasoning.
4
Select the option that accurately describes this logical gap in abstract terms.
The correct option states that the argument infers a result will occur solely because its prerequisites (necessary conditions) have been satisfied.
This precisely maps the abstract description of Necessary/Sufficient confusion to the structural error made by the architectural historian.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Soru 419Soru →

Presented below are several flawed arguments and a series of reasoning criticisms. Which logical flaw description correctly matches each specific argument?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Ethnomusicologist: An examination of eighteenth-century wooden lutes preserved in aristocratic European estate collections reveals that every specimen was constructed from high-density alpine spruce. Therefore, eighteenth-century instrument makers exclusively utilized high-density alpine spruce when crafting wooden lutes for the general populace.
Agronomist: Agricultural test fields with high population densities of subterranean earthworms consistently exhibit significantly lower incidences of fungal root blight than adjacent fields. Hence, the presence of earthworms directly suppresses the germination of fungal root pathogens.
Archivist: The municipal gallery cannot afford the specialized hermetically sealed display vitrines required to exhibit the medieval illuminated charter safely. Consequently, the charter must remain permanently locked away in off-site storage vaults.
Macroeconomist: Each individual commercial firm in the manufacturing district reduces its annual operating expenses when it downsizes its on-site inventory storage. Therefore, if every firm in the district downsizes inventory simultaneously, the aggregate operating expenses of the regional manufacturing sector will necessarily decline.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The ethnomusicology argument matches the description of unrepresentative sampling; the agronomy argument matches the description of confusing correlation with causation; the archivist argument matches the description of a false dilemma; and the macroeconomics argument matches the description of a part-to-whole composition error.
Each argument corresponds precisely to its structural logical vulnerability: the lute argument generalizes from an unrepresentative aristocratic sample; the earthworm argument illicitly derives direct causation from an observed correlation; the charter argument creates a false dilemma between expensive display vitrines and permanent vault storage; and the manufacturing argument commits the fallacy of composition by transferring an individual firm attribute to the entire economic sector.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the ethnomusicologist's argument regarding antique lutes.
The premises rely solely on surviving aristocratic specimens, but the conclusion makes a broad claim about all lutes made for the general populace.
This reflects unrepresentative sampling / survivorship bias, matching the description concerning unrepresentative historical samples.
2
Analyze the agronomist's argument regarding earthworm populations and fungal blight.
The premise establishes a correlation (high earthworms, low blight), while the conclusion claims direct causal suppression.
This confuses correlation with causation without ruling out common causes (such as soil aeration or moisture), matching the causal flaw description.
3
Analyze the archivist's argument regarding illuminated charter display.
The premise rules out one expensive preservation method, and the conclusion immediately deduces permanent vault storage.
This is a false dilemma that treats two extreme options as exhaustive, matching the description of overlooking intermediate possibilities.
4
Analyze the macroeconomist's argument regarding inventory downsizing.
The premise describes cost savings for single firms acting individually, while the conclusion claims aggregate sector-wide expenses must drop.
This commits the fallacy of composition, matching the description of assuming what is true of individual parts is true of the collective whole.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 420Soru →

Biogeneticists have established the following regulatory parameters for synthetic genomes: All Class 3 synthetic genomes contain the zeta-promoter. Any genome containing the zeta-promoter requires continuous telomerase expression unless it lacks the chi-repressor. Furthermore, any genome that requires continuous telomerase expression exhibits rapid senescence when deprived of nutrient Q. However, no genome that lacks the chi-repressor is capable of synthesizing nutrient Q autonomously. Lastly, all Class 3 synthetic genomes developed at the Apex Institute are capable of synthesizing nutrient Q autonomously.

Evaluate the logical validity of the following statement: Any Class 3 synthetic genome developed at the Apex Institute exhibits rapid senescence when deprived of nutrient Q.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement evaluates to True because it is a logically guaranteed deduction from the provided conditional premises.
The conclusion rigorously follows from the premises. A Class 3 genome developed at Apex is capable of synthesizing nutrient Q. According to the fourth premise, lacking the chi-repressor prevents synthesizing nutrient Q. Thus, an Apex genome cannot lack the chi-repressor. Since all Class 3 genomes contain the zeta-promoter (premise 1), the Apex genome has the zeta-promoter. Because it has the zeta-promoter and does not lack the chi-repressor, the 'unless' exception fails, forcing it to require continuous telomerase expression (premise 2). Finally, requiring continuous telomerase expression guarantees rapid senescence when deprived of nutrient Q (premise 3).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the foundational premises about genome properties.
1. Class 3 → zeta-promoter. 2. (zeta-promoter AND NOT lacking chi-repressor) → requires telomerase. 3. requires telomerase → rapid senescence without Q.
Mapping conditional relationships accurately is necessary to track the cascading constraints. 'Unless' introduces a necessary condition for avoiding the outcome.
2
Formalize the premises concerning the Apex Institute.
4. lacks chi-repressor → CANNOT synthesize Q. 5. Class 3 at Apex → CAN synthesize Q.
Isolating the characteristics of the specific subject (Class 3 at Apex) allows us to test the target statement.
3
Combine the premises to deduce the properties of Apex genomes.
A Class 3 genome at Apex CAN synthesize Q. Taking the contrapositive of premise 4 (CAN synthesize Q → DOES NOT lack chi-repressor), we deduce the genome does not lack the chi-repressor.
Applying contrapositives is required to connect the capabilities of the Apex genome back to the main regulatory parameters.
4
Complete the conditional chain to reach the final outcome.
The Apex genome is Class 3 (has zeta-promoter) and does NOT lack the chi-repressor. Therefore, it requires continuous telomerase expression, meaning it will exhibit rapid senescence without Q.
This confirms the statement perfectly matches the logical outcome of the premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal Logic: Conditional Chains, Contrapositives, and the 'Unless' Operator
ÖncekiSayfa 21 / 34Sonraki
Logical Reasoning Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 21 | Examkin